Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Human Rights Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University

Discipline
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 211 - 218 of 218

Full-Text Articles in Human Rights Law

Human Rights In Canadian Society: Mechanisms For Raising The Issues And Providing Redress, A. Wayne Mackay May 1978

Human Rights In Canadian Society: Mechanisms For Raising The Issues And Providing Redress, A. Wayne Mackay

Dalhousie Law Journal

To the great body of the people, the whole mass of right is without remedy. Selling justice to the favoured few, denying it to the many, the system gives the rights in outward show; takes them away in effect; gives rights by what it says, takes them away by what it does. 1 Society has changed since Jeremy Bentham made the above observation. However, the problem he identified has not been eliminated. The gap between what governments say about human rights and what they do about violations of human rights is wide. In spite of occasional verbal protests from other …


The Credibility Gap In Human Rights, Niall Macdermot May 1976

The Credibility Gap In Human Rights, Niall Macdermot

Dalhousie Law Journal

The credibility gap in human rights is a term coined by my predecessor, Mr. Sean MacBride. He used it to refer to the gap between the standards with governments proclaim, or accept, or at least pay lip-service to, and the reality of their practice in enforcing or suppressing these rights. The questions I would like to consider with you are the extent of this gap, the reasons for it, and what, if anything, ordinary citizens who care about human rights can do about it.


A Progress Report On The Canadian Bill Of Rights, J. N. Lyon May 1976

A Progress Report On The Canadian Bill Of Rights, J. N. Lyon

Dalhousie Law Journal

When the Parliament of Canada enacted the Canadian Bill of Rights' in 1960 it injected fresh authority into the judicial power of interpretation of federal laws. The process of interpretation of the Bill ofRights itself has been difficult for a judiciary trained to accept law as given and to take for granted the great creative periods and personalities of English law without regard to the fact that much if not most of the civil liberties tradition in English (and therefore Canadian) law was triggered by declaratory statutes like Magna Carta and the English Bill ofRights. The decade and a half …


The Credibility Gap In Human Rights, Niall Macdermot May 1976

The Credibility Gap In Human Rights, Niall Macdermot

Dalhousie Law Journal

The credibility gap in human rights is a term coined by my predecessor, Mr. Sean MacBride. He used it to refer to the gap between the standards with governments proclaim, or accept, or at least pay lip-service to, and the reality of their practice in enforcing or suppressing these rights. The questions I would like to consider with you are the extent of this gap, the reasons for it, and what, if anything, ordinary citizens who care about human rights can do about it.


The Credibility Gap In Human Rights, Niall Macdermot May 1976

The Credibility Gap In Human Rights, Niall Macdermot

Dalhousie Law Journal

The credibility gap in human rights is a term coined by my predecessor, Mr. Sean MacBride. He used it to refer to the gap between the standards with governments proclaim, or accept, or at least pay lip-service to, and the reality of their practice in enforcing or suppressing these rights. The questions I would like to consider with you are the extent of this gap, the reasons for it, and what, if anything, ordinary citizens who care about human rights can do about it.


The Credibility Gap In Human Rights, Niall Macdermot May 1976

The Credibility Gap In Human Rights, Niall Macdermot

Dalhousie Law Journal

The credibility gap in human rights is a term coined by my predecessor, Mr. Sean MacBride. He used it to refer to the gap between the standards with governments proclaim, or accept, or at least pay lip-service to, and the reality of their practice in enforcing or suppressing these rights. The questions I would like to consider with you are the extent of this gap, the reasons for it, and what, if anything, ordinary citizens who care about human rights can do about it.


The Credibility Gap In Human Rights, Niall Macdermot May 1976

The Credibility Gap In Human Rights, Niall Macdermot

Dalhousie Law Journal

The credibility gap in human rights is a term coined by my predecessor, Mr. Sean MacBride. He used it to refer to the gap between the standards with governments proclaim, or accept, or at least pay lip-service to, and the reality of their practice in enforcing or suppressing these rights. The questions I would like to consider with you are the extent of this gap, the reasons for it, and what, if anything, ordinary citizens who care about human rights can do about it.


A Progress Report On The Canadian Bill Of Rights, J. N. Lyon May 1976

A Progress Report On The Canadian Bill Of Rights, J. N. Lyon

Dalhousie Law Journal

When the Parliament of Canada enacted the Canadian Bill of Rights' in 1960 it injected fresh authority into the judicial power of interpretation of federal laws. The process of interpretation of the Bill ofRights itself has been difficult for a judiciary trained to accept law as given and to take for granted the great creative periods and personalities of English law without regard to the fact that much if not most of the civil liberties tradition in English (and therefore Canadian) law was triggered by declaratory statutes like Magna Carta and the English Bill ofRights. The decade and a half …