Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Medicine and Health Sciences (157)
- Dentistry (109)
- Law and Society (109)
- Business (108)
- Business Administration, Management, and Operations (102)
-
- Constitutional Law (101)
- Law and Gender (101)
- Dental Public Health and Education (100)
- Human Resources Management (99)
- Leadership (98)
- Human Rights Law (96)
- Medical Jurisprudence (91)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (90)
- Food and Drug Law (86)
- Supreme Court of the United States (82)
- State and Local Government Law (79)
- Law and Politics (78)
- Administrative Law (77)
- Law and Race (77)
- Science and Technology Law (77)
- Environmental Law (75)
- International Law (73)
- Legislation (73)
- Disability Law (72)
- Intellectual Property Law (72)
- Social Welfare Law (72)
- Criminal Law (71)
- Courts (70)
- Institution
-
- American Dental Association (111)
- Seattle University School of Law (56)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (30)
- Cleveland State University (23)
- University of Michigan Law School (18)
-
- Georgetown University Law Center (16)
- Boston University School of Law (14)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (13)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (13)
- American University Washington College of Law (10)
- Pace University (9)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (8)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (8)
- University of Washington School of Law (8)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (8)
- St. Mary's University (7)
- Brooklyn Law School (6)
- DePaul University (6)
- Fordham Law School (6)
- University of Miami Law School (6)
- Emory University School of Law (5)
- Notre Dame Law School (5)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (5)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (5)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (5)
- Marquette University Law School (4)
- Marshall University (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- Mississippi Christian University School of Law (4)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (4)
- Keyword
-
- Abortion (35)
- Health law (25)
- Dobbs (20)
- COVID-19 (16)
- Law (16)
-
- Public health (15)
- Healthcare (12)
- Mental health (11)
- Medicaid (10)
- Reproductive rights (9)
- Supreme Court (9)
- Advocacy (8)
- Health equity (8)
- Continuing education (7)
- Dental education (7)
- Dental practice management (7)
- Medical-legal partnership (7)
- Regulation (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Access to care (6)
- Access to dental care (6)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- Dental advocacy (6)
- Discrimination (6)
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (6)
- Environmental law (6)
- FDA (6)
- Federalism (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- Fourteenth Amendment (6)
- Publication
-
- The Journal of the Michigan Dental Association (106)
- Seattle University Law Review (56)
- Faculty Scholarship (26)
- Saint Louis University Journal of Health Law & Policy (26)
- Journal of Law and Health (18)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (11)
- Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences (10)
- Articles (8)
- Utah Law Review (8)
- DePaul Journal of Health Care Law (6)
- Fordham Law Review (6)
- Pace Law Review (6)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice (5)
- Scholarly Works (5)
- The New York State Dental Journal (5)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (5)
- Utah Law Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (5)
- Adultspan Journal (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Faculty Articles (4)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- MC Law Review (4)
- Michigan Journal of Gender & Law (4)
- Oklahoma Law Review (4)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (4)
- Touro Law Review (4)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (4)
- BYU Law Review (3)
- Cleveland State Law Review (3)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 541 - 545 of 545
Full-Text Articles in Health Law and Policy
Prejudice Standards In Washington’S Appellate Courts, Andrew B. Van Winkle
Prejudice Standards In Washington’S Appellate Courts, Andrew B. Van Winkle
Seattle University Law Review
When an appellate court finds an error to have occurred during a proceeding, the error is not yet subject to correction. In order to merit a remedy, the error must have been sufficiently prejudicial to the aggrieved party’s case. Drawing the line between correctable and non-correctable errors is not an easy task, for it often requires guessing at what was in the minds of jurors and trial judges. To cope with this task, courts have devised various rules and tests for deciding whether an error was likely prejudicial or not. These standards often go by names such as “harmless error,” …
Real-World Consequences For Online Actions: The Case For Expanding Employee Harassment Protection Via Employers’ Rights Of Action, Alexander Barnes
Real-World Consequences For Online Actions: The Case For Expanding Employee Harassment Protection Via Employers’ Rights Of Action, Alexander Barnes
Seattle University Law Review
This Note argues for expanding employers’ access to legal remedies that allow them to recoup the costs of protecting their employees from swatting, doxing, and other online harassment arising from their employees’ professional activity. Part I provides a brief description and history of the online harassment problem and its potentially deadly dangers. Part II describes employers’ legal responsibility to take action to protect their employees from harassment aimed at their employees within the scope of their employment. Part III explores common legal remedies that are currently available to employers, using the state of Washington as an example. Part III also …
Foreseeability And Duty In Washington Negligence Law: Leaving The Road Less Traveled By, Leo Linder
Foreseeability And Duty In Washington Negligence Law: Leaving The Road Less Traveled By, Leo Linder
Seattle University Law Review
Washington negligence law is a confusing labyrinth of foreseeability that not even Ariadne’s string could guide plaintiffs out of. Foreseeability is implicated in four distinct analyses, several of which overlap considerably. Doctrines that were once questions of law are now questions of fact, and vice versa. Something needs to change.
Washington has taken the novel approach of bifurcating the duty element into two parts—duty’s mere existence, which is a question of law for the court to determine; and duty’s scope, which is a question of fact handed off to the jury to determine. Foreseeability impacts both of these assessments, but …
Rethinking Foundations And Analyzing New Conflicts: Teaching Law After Dobbs, Nicole Huberfeld, Linda C. Mcclain, Aziza Ahmed
Rethinking Foundations And Analyzing New Conflicts: Teaching Law After Dobbs, Nicole Huberfeld, Linda C. Mcclain, Aziza Ahmed
Faculty Scholarship
This Article draws on our diverse and complementary areas of scholarly expertise and teaching experiences across law school and public health curricula to offer a multidisciplinary model for teaching in a variety of courses after Dobbs. Teaching reproductive rights and justice poses extensive challenges in the wake of Dobbs' overruling Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, upending a half century of precedents protecting a constitutional right to abortion, and returning the issue to "the people" and the states. This Article offers theoretical and pedagogical perspectives on teaching courses in Reproductive Rights and Justice, as well …
Human Rights In Hospitals: An End To Routine Shackling, Neil Singh Bedi, Nisha Mathur, Judy D. Wang, Avital Rech, Nancy Gaden, George J. Annas, Sondra S. Crosby
Human Rights In Hospitals: An End To Routine Shackling, Neil Singh Bedi, Nisha Mathur, Judy D. Wang, Avital Rech, Nancy Gaden, George J. Annas, Sondra S. Crosby
Faculty Scholarship
Medical students (NSB, NM, JDW) spearheaded revision of the policy and clinical practice for shackling incarcerated patients at Boston Medical Center (BMC), the largest safety net hospital in New England. In American hospitals, routine shackling of incarcerated patients with metal restraints is widespread—except for perinatal patients—regardless of consciousness, mobility, illness severity, or age. The modified policy includes individualized assessments and allows incarcerated patients to be unshackled if they meet defined criteria. The students also formed the Stop Shackling Patients Coalition (SSP Coalition) of clinicians, public health practitioners, human rights advocates, and community members determined to humanize the inpatient treatment of …