Health Law and Policy Commons^™

Virginia V. Sebelius - Virginia's Petition For Writ Of Certiorari, Commonwealth Of Virginia

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.

Baldwin V. Sebelius - Appellants' Petition For En Banc Review, Steve Baldwin

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.

Virginia V. Sebelius - American Association Of People With Disabilities Amicus Brief, American Association Of People With Disabilities

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.

Federal Health Care Reform: What’S Happening And Where Are We Going?, Anthony H. Szczygiel

Other Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Bad News About Bad News: The Disclosure Of Risks To Insurability In Research Consent Processes, Victoria Smith Apold, Jocelyn Downie

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

One of the phenomena associated with research is “incidental findings,” that is, unexpected findings made during the research, and outside the scope of the research, which have potential health importance. One underappreciated risk of incidental findings is the potential loss of the research subject's insurability; or if a research subject fails to disclose incidental findings when applying for insurance, the insurance contract may be voidable by the insurer. In this article, we seek to explain the insurability risks associated with incidental findings and to make recommendations for how researchers and research ethics committees should address the issue of disclosure of …

Virginia V. Sebelius - Scheduling Order, United States Court Of Appeals For The Fourth Circuit

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.

New Jersey Physicians V. President Of The United States - Appellants' Brief, New Jersey Physicians

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.

Oklahoma V. Sebelius - Original Complaint, State Of Oklahoma

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.

Can Congress Make You Buy Broccoli? And Why That's A Hard Question, Wendy K. Mariner, George J. Annas, Leonard H. Glantz

Faculty Scholarship

The continuing uncertainty over the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), illustrated by conflicting trial court rulings and scholarly commentaries, raises the question of why this constitutional question is so hard to answer. There are at least four reasons.

Liberty University V. Geithner - Brief For Appellants, Liberty University

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.

Pruitt V. Sebelius - U.S. Reply In Support Of Motion To Dismiss, United States Department Of Health And Human Services

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.

Pruitt V. Sebelius - Plaintiffs' Memorandum In Opposition To Motion To Dismiss, E. Scott Pruitt

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.

Goudy-Bachman V. Hhs - Plaintiffs' Supplemental Brief In Opposition To Motion To Dismiss, Barbara Goudy-Bachman

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.

The Schizophrenia Of Physician Extender Utilization, Thomas R. Mclean

Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 provides incentives for healthcare to be delivered by Affordable Care Organizations (ACOs). The public face of many, if not most, ACOs is likely to be the Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMHs), a business structure that evolved from Retail Medical Clinics, which made greater use of physician extenders (PAs). Accordingly, this paper examines the evolution and structure of PCMHs as well as how the PCMH is regulated. As neither legal or market regulatory mechanisms are ideal for policing business structures that employ PAs, this paper concludes that the tort reform most appropriate …

Goudy-Bachman V. Hhs - Plaintiffs' Brief In Opposition To Dismiss, Barbara Goudy-Bachman

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.

Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter, Winter 2011

Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter

No abstract provided.

Governance And Biosecurity: Strengthening Security And Oversight Of The Nation's Biological Agent Laboratories, Michael Greenberger, Talley Kovacs, Marita Mike

Faculty Scholarship

Since the advent of the Anthrax attacks in the fall of 2001, the United States has been confronted with a serious policy conundrum. On the one hand, we have strengthened programs that encourage the use of our best scientific resources to develop countermeasures to the weaponization of highly dangerous biopathogens. On the other hand, research on those countermeasures requires the use of the very biopathogens we seek to defeat. There have been many mishaps in the handling of those pathogens, which raises the frightening prospect that the research may be as (or more) dangerous than bioterrorist acts themselves. Indeed, the …

Legal Impediments To The Diffusion Of Telemedicine, Diane E. Hoffmann, Virginia Rowthorn

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Restoring Transparency To Automated Authority, Frank Pasquale

Faculty Scholarship

Leading finance, health care, and internet firms shroud key operations in secrecy. Our markets, research, and life online are increasingly mediated by institutions that suffer serious transparency deficits. When a private entity grows important enough, it should be subject to transparency requirements that reflect its centrality. The increasing intertwining of governmental, business, and academic entities should provide some leverage for public-spirited appropriators and policymakers to insist on more general openness.

However well an "invisible hand" coordinates economic activity generally, markets depend on reliable information about the practices of core firms that finance, rank, and rate entities in the rest of …

William H. Sorrell, Attorney General Of Vermont, Et Al. V. Ims Health Inc., Et Al. - Amicus Brief In Support Of Petitioners, Kevin Outterson, David Orentlicher, Christopher T. Robertson, Frank A. Pasquale

Faculty Scholarship

On April 26, 2011, the US Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the Vermont data mining case, Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. Respondents claim this is the most important commercial speech case in a decade. Petitioner (the State of Vermont) argues this is the most important medical privacy case since Whalen v. Roe.

The is an amicus brief supporting Vermont, written by law professors and submitted on behalf of the New England Journal of Medicine

Law & Health Care Newsletter, V. 18, No. 2, Spring 2011

Law & Health Care Newsletter

No abstract provided.

Law & Health Care Newsletter, V. 19, No. 1, Fall 2011

Law & Health Care Newsletter

No abstract provided.

Using Law To Fight A Silent Epidemic: The Role Of Healthy Literacy In Health Care Access, Quality & Cost, Brietta Clark

Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences

The dominant rhetoric in the health care policy debate about cost has assumed an inherent tension between access and quality on the one hand, and cost effectiveness on the other; but an emerging discourse has challenged this narrative by presenting a more nuanced relationship between access, quality, and cost. This is reflected in the discourse surrounding health literacy, which is viewed as an important tool for achieving all three goals. Health literacy refers to one's ability to obtain, understand and use health information to make appropriate health decisions. Research shows that improving patients' health literacy can help overcome access barriers …

The Real Constitutional Problem With The Affordable Care Act, Timothy Stoltzfus Jost

Scholarly Articles

Not available.

Loopholes In The Affordable Care Act: Regulatory Gaps And Border Crossing Techniques And How To Address Them, Timothy Stoltzfus Jost

Scholarly Articles

Not available.

Lebron V. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital: Capping Medical Practice Reform In Illinois, Leonard Nelson, Amanda Swanson, Marianne Buckley

Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences

On February 4, 2010 the Illinois Supreme Court struck down Illinois' medical practice reform bill, P.A. 94-677, when it decided Lebron v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital. Although the court only considered the unconstitutionality of the cap on non-economic damages contained in that bill, an inseverability provision resulted in the invalidation of all of its provisions. The end result of the Lebron decision extends much further than the striking of the cap on non-economic damages. It affects such areas as medical liability insurance law, physician discipline, public disclosure of information, the admissibility of physician statements into evidence, and expert witness standards. …

It’S An Art Not A Science: State-Mandated Insurance Coverage Of Assisted Reproductive Technologies And Legal Implications For Gay And Unmarried Persons, Valarie K. Blake

Scholarly Works

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has made it possible for a wealth of individuals, who would otherwise be unable, to create families and become parents. Traditionally, most people think of infertile couples as the beneficiaries of such technology, but ART has special and important implications for gay and/or unmarried persons as well. Dubbed the “structurally infertile,” this latter group is highly dependent on ART for their family planning needs. Despite the growth in popularity of ART for both the medically and structurally infertile, ART continues to be a mainly private-payer enterprise, reserved for those individuals who have the expendable income to …

Bad News For Mail Robbers: The Obvious Constitutionality Of Health Care Reform, Andrew Koppelman

Faculty Working Papers

Two federal district judges have invalidated the so-called "individual mandate" in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. Their reasoning is bizarre and mischievous. The novel approach to constitutional law that they propose would misread the Constitution, betray the intentions of the framers, and cripple the nation's ability to address one of its most pressing problems.

The correct legal analysis is simple. Congress has the authority to solve problems that the states cannot separately solve. It can choose any reasonable means to do that.

An Essay On Torts: States Of Argument, Marshall S. Shapo

Faculty Working Papers

This essay summarizes high points in torts scholarship and case law over a period of two generations, highlighting the "states of argument" that have characterized tort law over that period. It intertwines doctrine and policy. Its doctrinal features include the tradtional spectrum of tort liability, the duty question, problems of proof, and the relative incoherency of damages rules. Noting the cross-doctrinal role of tort as a solver of functional problems, it focuses on major issues in products liability and medical malpractice. The essay discusses such elements of policy as the role of power in tort law, the tension between communitarianism …

Legally Ill: Is The Federal Health Insurance Mandate Constitutional?, Josh Bolus

Barry Law Review

This article explores the constitutionality of the individual mandate of the health care reform bill known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as well as the economic penalty that is assessed to those who do not meet the mandate. A brief history of prior health reform initiatives in the United States will be examined to provide a historical context for the current political debate regarding the currently instituted reforms. The legal justifications of the proponents for the mandate will be analyzed regarding their constitutionality, and the legal fate of the mandate will be examined. Lastly, this article will …