Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law and Society (43)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (43)
- Environmental Law (42)
- State and Local Government Law (41)
- Jurisprudence (35)
-
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (33)
- Medical Jurisprudence (31)
- Immigration Law (28)
- Food and Drug Law (27)
- Military, War, and Peace (27)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (27)
- Legislation (23)
- International Law (21)
- Public Health (19)
- Human Rights Law (18)
- Torts (18)
- Community Health and Preventive Medicine (16)
- Health Services Administration (16)
- Health Services Research (16)
- Health and Medical Administration (16)
- Science and Technology Law (16)
- Constitutional Law (14)
- Criminal Law (13)
- Bioethics and Medical Ethics (12)
- Insurance Law (12)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (10)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (10)
- Family Law (9)
- Institution
-
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (33)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (28)
- St. Mary's University (27)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (25)
- BLR (19)
-
- Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library, The George Washington University (18)
- American University Washington College of Law (15)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (11)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (9)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (9)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (8)
- Boston University School of Law (7)
- UIC School of Law (7)
- Duke Law (6)
- Georgetown University Law Center (6)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (6)
- Cleveland State University (5)
- University of Michigan Law School (5)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (5)
- Wayne State University (5)
- Columbia Law School (4)
- Notre Dame Law School (4)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (3)
- University of Baltimore Law (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- University of South Florida (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (3)
- University of Denver (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Health Law and Policy (24)
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (20)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (20)
- Health care (10)
- Bioethics (9)
-
- Medical Jurisprudence (9)
- Medicine (9)
- Health (8)
- Ethics (7)
- Food and Drug Law (7)
- Inc. (7)
- Public health (7)
- Law and Economics (6)
- Race (6)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (5)
- Health & Biotechnology (5)
- Health insurance (5)
- Human rights (5)
- Law (5)
- Student comment (5)
- Torts (5)
- Vaccines (5)
- Biodefense (4)
- Consent (4)
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Corporations (4)
- Environmental Law (4)
- Fifth Amendment (4)
- Health law (4)
- Law and Society (4)
- Publication
-
- St. Mary's Law Journal (26)
- Health Matrix: The Journal of Law-Medicine (22)
- Faculty Scholarship (21)
- Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences (17)
- National Health Policy Forum (16)
-
- ExpressO (15)
- Journal of Health Care Law and Policy (15)
- All Faculty Scholarship (11)
- Scholarly Works (11)
- William Mitchell Law Review (11)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (10)
- Buffalo Law Review (8)
- UIC Law Review (7)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (6)
- Articles (5)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (5)
- Faculty Publications & Other Works (5)
- Journal of Law and Health (5)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (5)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (5)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Journal Articles (4)
- Loyola Consumer Law Review (4)
- George Mason University School of Law Working Papers Series (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- Mental Health Law & Policy Faculty Publications (3)
- Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter (3)
- Scholarly Articles (3)
- American University International Law Review (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 211 - 240 of 307
Full-Text Articles in Health Law and Policy
Inoculation Inventions: The Interplay Of Infringement And Immunity In The Development Of Biodefense Vaccines, Cynthia M. Ho
Inoculation Inventions: The Interplay Of Infringement And Immunity In The Development Of Biodefense Vaccines, Cynthia M. Ho
Faculty Publications & Other Works
No abstract provided.
How Necessity May Preclude State Responsibility For Compulsory Licensing Under The Trips Agreement, James T. Gathii
How Necessity May Preclude State Responsibility For Compulsory Licensing Under The Trips Agreement, James T. Gathii
Faculty Publications & Other Works
No abstract provided.
Beyond The Bylaws: Hospital-Physician Relationships, Economics, And Conflicting Agendas, John D. Blum
Beyond The Bylaws: Hospital-Physician Relationships, Economics, And Conflicting Agendas, John D. Blum
Faculty Publications & Other Works
No abstract provided.
Gloria Jean Ate Catfood Tonight: Justice And The Social Compact For Health Care In America, Lawrence E. Singer
Gloria Jean Ate Catfood Tonight: Justice And The Social Compact For Health Care In America, Lawrence E. Singer
Faculty Publications & Other Works
No abstract provided.
No Safe Harbor And No Experimental Use: Is It Time For Compulsory Licensing Of Biotech Tools, Ruth E. Freeburg
No Safe Harbor And No Experimental Use: Is It Time For Compulsory Licensing Of Biotech Tools, Ruth E. Freeburg
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mind The Gap: Expansion Of Texas Governmental Immunity Between Takings And Tort., Jadd F. Masso
Mind The Gap: Expansion Of Texas Governmental Immunity Between Takings And Tort., Jadd F. Masso
St. Mary's Law Journal
In Jennings v. City of Dallas, the city’s wastewater collection division was dispatched to unstop a clogged sewer main but instead caused sewage to spew into the Jennings’ home with dramatic force, causing extensive damage. The Jennings subsequently filed suit against the city, alleging its actions constituted an unconstitutional taking, damaging, or destruction of their property for public use without adequate compensation in violation of Article I, § 17 of the Texas Constitution. The issue presented from the case was whether an individual citizen should be liable for such losses when the damage—as an incident to governmental action—in effect benefits …
Much Ado About Nothing - Why Desert Palace Neither Murdered Mcdonnell Douglas Nor Transformed All Employment Discrimination Cases To Mixed-Motive Essay., Matthew R. Scott, Russell D. Chapman
Much Ado About Nothing - Why Desert Palace Neither Murdered Mcdonnell Douglas Nor Transformed All Employment Discrimination Cases To Mixed-Motive Essay., Matthew R. Scott, Russell D. Chapman
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Unintentional Franchising., Mark H. Miller
Unintentional Franchising., Mark H. Miller
St. Mary's Law Journal
The focus of this Article is on honest businesses that do not realize they may be legally regulated as "franchisors" or "business opportunity sellers" and subject to potentially awful consequences due to noncompliance. This Article first discusses federal and other states' laws, then the Texas Business Opportunity Act (BOA), and finally, practical and litigation consequences.
Good Cause In The Texas Rules Of Civil Procedure., Naomi Mccuistion
Good Cause In The Texas Rules Of Civil Procedure., Naomi Mccuistion
St. Mary's Law Journal
The Texas judiciary should give “good cause” a single meaning. Ambiguity exists concerning the phrase “good cause” amongst Texas courts. Three different standards of “good cause” currently exist in Texas including: the Stelly/Craddock standard, the Alvarado standard, and the Remington Arms standard. Under the Stelly/Craddock standard—if withdrawal of deemed admissions is requested—“good cause” is required showing the failure was unintentional as a result of an accident or mistake. Under the Alvarado standard—if the request is to offer testimony of a witness who was not timely identified—the court requires a more strict showing of “good cause” not satisfied by an attorney’s …
Superseding Attorney's Fees And Pre-Judgment Interest After House Bill 4., Jonathan Yedor, Regina M. Uhl
Superseding Attorney's Fees And Pre-Judgment Interest After House Bill 4., Jonathan Yedor, Regina M. Uhl
St. Mary's Law Journal
Supersedeas is a rule of procedure allowing a judgment debtor to suspend enforcement of a judgment “by posting security set by the trial court” during the pendency of an appeal. The purpose of it is to “protect[ ] the [prevailing] party [following trial and entry of judgment] from the risk of a later uncollectible judgment and [to] compensate[]’” the prevailing party “for delay in the entry of final judgment.” This means the changes are meant to ensure a judgment debtor does not lose the right to appeal simply because the bond on judgment is too expensive so as to be …
Kelo V. City Of New London, Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District V. United States, And Washoe County V. United States: A Fifth Amendment Takings Primer., Christopher L. Harris, Daniel J. Lowenberg
Kelo V. City Of New London, Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District V. United States, And Washoe County V. United States: A Fifth Amendment Takings Primer., Christopher L. Harris, Daniel J. Lowenberg
St. Mary's Law Journal
The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment is a remedy available to citizens for the government's undue interference with private property rights. It operates similarly to an affirmative defense as it entitles citizens to “just compensation” when the government “takes” private property for “public use.” The Takings Clause thus embodies the idea that society values the protection of private property. The Supreme Court of the United States stated the purpose of the Takings Clause is “to bar Government from forcing citizens from bearing public burdens which, in all fairness, should be borne by the public as a whole.” Kelo v. …
Questionable Summary Judgments, Appearances Of Judicial Bias, And Insurance Defense In Texas Declaratory-Judgment Trials: A Proposal And Arguments For Revising Texas Rules Of Civil Procedure 166a(A), 166a(B), And 166a(L)., Willy E. Rice
St. Mary's Law Journal
Economic necessity, expanding dockets, and judicial bias and unfairness are reasons for removing summary judgement practice from declaratory judgment trials in Texas. The Texas Supreme Court adopted the summary judgment rule primarily to prevent juries from considering arguably groundless causes, to reduce costs, and to increase "the efficient administration of justice." The Texas Supreme Court could prevent summary judgment practice in declaratory judgment cases. Texas's judges have the power to decide questions of fact and law when considering whether to award declaratory relief, negating the perceived need to entertain motions for summary relief. Trial judges must employ those doctrines to …
Utter Excitement About Nothing: Why Domestic Violence Evidence-Based Prosecution Will Survive Crawford V. Washington., Donna D. Bloom
Utter Excitement About Nothing: Why Domestic Violence Evidence-Based Prosecution Will Survive Crawford V. Washington., Donna D. Bloom
St. Mary's Law Journal
In response to domestic violence involving victims who do not wish to cooperate in the prosecution of their abuser, prosecutors endeavor to frame cases around other evidence establishing a defendant’s guilt regardless of the victim’s testimony. Domestic violence cases set for trial are being thrown out of Texas courts because of the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that reasserts a defendant’s right to confront his accuser in court. Prosecutors believe that strong legal arguments exist to continue successfully prosecuting abusers without the cooperation of the victim at trial. This is through the continued admission of certain hearsay statements, despite Crawford …
Even Judges Don't Know Everything: A Call For A Presumption Of Admissibility For Expert Witness Testimony In Lawyer Disciplinary Proceedings The Fourth Annual Symposium On Legal Malpractice And Professional Responsibility., Timothy P. Chinaris
St. Mary's Law Journal
Today's practice environment is full of potential ethical pitfalls for even the most conscientious lawyer. The consequences of being found guilty of misconduct can include suspension or disbarment from practicing as a lawyer. Added to these concerns is the fact that the judge or hearing panel before whom the case is tried may not be intimately familiar with the particular ethics rules or how they are interpreted in different areas of practice. In order to mount an effective defense against the disciplinary charges, an accused lawyer may want to introduce expert testimony on his or her behalf. Unfortunately for the …
Leveling The Legal Malpractice Playing Field: Reverse Bifurcation Of Trials The Fourth Annual Symposium On Legal Malpractice And Professional Responsibility., Dwayne J. Hermes, Jeffrey W. Kemp, Paul B. Moore
Leveling The Legal Malpractice Playing Field: Reverse Bifurcation Of Trials The Fourth Annual Symposium On Legal Malpractice And Professional Responsibility., Dwayne J. Hermes, Jeffrey W. Kemp, Paul B. Moore
St. Mary's Law Journal
The growing public demand for perfect results is shifting the time-tested obligation of lawyers to meet the standard of care. The general public no longer deems the advice and performance of professionals as beyond reproach. While this is probably a positive development, it appears that a number of clients (and patients) are raising the bar too high by expecting and demanding a perfect result. The legal malpractice suit is in vogue, and juries are increasingly holding attorneys to be guarantors of a favorable outcome for their clients. A significant portion of legal malpractice suits are merely thinly veiled claims for …
The Business Of Law And Tortious Interference The Fourth Annual Symposium On Legal Malpractice And Professional Responsibility., Alex B. Long
St. Mary's Law Journal
While few in the legal profession would refer to clients as “property”, it is difficult to think some lawyers do not believe they possess something similar to property rights in their retainer agreements with clients. Not surprisingly, a tortious interference claim is a viable option for an attorney who feels that another attorney has wrongfully “stolen” a client or otherwise interfered with the attorney’s “property.” Courts have traditionally been reluctant to hold attorneys liable for litigation conduct that results in harm to adversaries or their attorneys. Plaintiff-attorneys generally have a better chance of succeeding when they complain that another attorney—while …
Unresolved Problems In Texas Legal Malpractice Law The Fourth Annual Symposium On Legal Malpractice And Professional Responsibility., Stephen E. Mcconnico, Jennifer Knauth, Robyn Bigelow
Unresolved Problems In Texas Legal Malpractice Law The Fourth Annual Symposium On Legal Malpractice And Professional Responsibility., Stephen E. Mcconnico, Jennifer Knauth, Robyn Bigelow
St. Mary's Law Journal
Legal malpractice jurisprudence is a dynamic and evolving area of Texas law. In its evolution, many issues have arisen regarding potential areas for attorney liability and discipline. The Texas Supreme Court opinion in Alexander v. Turtur & Associates, Inc. discusses the “suit within the suit” requirement for causation in litigation malpractice cases. The case also raised an important question—whether and in what circumstances causation should be treated as a question of law for the trial judge in the malpractice case, rather than as a question of fact for the jury. The Alexander opinion suggests that both the jury submission issues …
The Emperor's New Clothes: Cloaking Client Protection Under The New Model Court Rule On Insurance Disclosure The Fourth Annual Symposium On Legal Malpractice And Professional Responsibility: Comment., Nicole D. Mignone
St. Mary's Law Journal
Traditionally, the legal profession prides itself on its ability to self-regulate and prefers to “take care of its own” in the disciplinary realm. The Model Court Rule on Insurance Disclosure (the Rule) invites an initial effort toward the legal profession’s self-regulating ideals and client protection. The Rule requires private practice attorneys to report to their state whether they plan to maintain liability insurance, which is then disclosed to the public. Unfortunately, the Rule’s ambiguous language and requirements create worrisome issues for both the attorney and client. Attorneys without malpractice insurance may be indirectly forced to obtain it. This expense could …
Legal Ethics In Capital Cases: Looking For Virtue In Roberts V. Dretke And Assessing The Ethical Implications Of The Death Row Volunteer The Fourth Annual Symposium On Legal Malpractice And Professional Responsibility: Comment., J. Caleb Rackley
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Reeves V. Sanderson Plumbing Products: The Emperor Has No Clothes - Pretext Plus Is Alive And Kicking., Matthew R. Scott, Russell D. Chapman
Reeves V. Sanderson Plumbing Products: The Emperor Has No Clothes - Pretext Plus Is Alive And Kicking., Matthew R. Scott, Russell D. Chapman
St. Mary's Law Journal
Before the Supreme Court’s decision in Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., the Fifth Circuit’s en banc decision in Rhodes v. Guiberson Oil Tools established the proper standard of causation in employment discrimination cases. The plaintiff must prove his or her protected trait was the “determinative reason” for the challenged employment action. Following Reeves, which appeared to overrule Rhodes and the doctrine of pretext plus, the Fifth Circuit struggled with the causation question. Despite the apparent confusion, the Fifth Circuit has largely reaffirmed not only its commitment to the Rhodes pretext-plus analysis, but also the determinative-reason standard for pretext cases. …
The Impact Of Federal Tax Exemption Standards On Health Care Policy And Delivery, Douglas M. Mancino
The Impact Of Federal Tax Exemption Standards On Health Care Policy And Delivery, Douglas M. Mancino
Health Matrix: The Journal of Law-Medicine
No abstract provided.
Health Care Joint Ventures Between Tax-Exempt Organizations And For-Profit Entities, Michael I. Sanders
Health Care Joint Ventures Between Tax-Exempt Organizations And For-Profit Entities, Michael I. Sanders
Health Matrix: The Journal of Law-Medicine
No abstract provided.
Do Fiduciary Duties Contained In Federal Tax Laws Effectively Promote National Health Care Policies And Practices ?, Nina J. Crimm
Do Fiduciary Duties Contained In Federal Tax Laws Effectively Promote National Health Care Policies And Practices ?, Nina J. Crimm
Health Matrix: The Journal of Law-Medicine
No abstract provided.
Why So Glum ? Toward A Fair Balance Of Competitive Interests In Direct-To-Consumer Advertising And The Well-Being Of The Mentally Ill Consumers It Targets, Erin Lenhardt
Health Matrix: The Journal of Law-Medicine
No abstract provided.
Masthead, Volume 15 Issue 2 (2005)
Masthead, Volume 15 Issue 2 (2005)
Health Matrix: The Journal of Law-Medicine
No abstract provided.
Volume 15 Issue 2 (2005), Case Western Reserve Health Matrix: Journal Of Law-Medicine
Volume 15 Issue 2 (2005), Case Western Reserve Health Matrix: Journal Of Law-Medicine
Health Matrix: The Journal of Law-Medicine
No abstract provided.
Ethical Concerns Related To Treating Gender Nonconformity In Childhood And Adolescence: Lessons From The Familyl Court Of Australia, Hazel Beh, Milton Diamond
Ethical Concerns Related To Treating Gender Nonconformity In Childhood And Adolescence: Lessons From The Familyl Court Of Australia, Hazel Beh, Milton Diamond
Health Matrix: The Journal of Law-Medicine
No abstract provided.
Dealing With Dying: How Insurers Can Help Patients Seeking Last-Chance Therapies (Even When The Answer Is "No"), Kathy L. Cerminara
Dealing With Dying: How Insurers Can Help Patients Seeking Last-Chance Therapies (Even When The Answer Is "No"), Kathy L. Cerminara
Health Matrix: The Journal of Law-Medicine
No abstract provided.
Refusal To Undergo A Cesarean Section: A Woman's Right Or A Criminal Act ?, Monica K. Miller
Refusal To Undergo A Cesarean Section: A Woman's Right Or A Criminal Act ?, Monica K. Miller
Health Matrix: The Journal of Law-Medicine
No abstract provided.
Lessons To Be Learned From The 407 Process, Lainie Friedman Ross
Lessons To Be Learned From The 407 Process, Lainie Friedman Ross
Health Matrix: The Journal of Law-Medicine
No abstract provided.