Health Law and Policy Commons^™

Binding Arbitration: A Preferred Alternative For Resolving Commercial Disputes Between Mexican And U.S. Businessmen., Hope H. Camp Jr.

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Salinastroika: Recent Developments In Technology Transfer Law In Mexico., Mark O'C. O'Brien, Carlos R.V. Muggenburg

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Why The United States Should Adopt The First-To-File System For Patents., Bernarr R. Pravel

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Recent Developments In Civil Rights Law (As Presented At The Common Cause 20th Anniversary Celebration At St. Mary's School Of Law On November 3, 1990) Address., Archibald Cox

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Alamo Lumber And Texas Usury Law: Playing With Fire In The Usury Forest., Terry W. Wright, W. Alan Wright, Scott G. Night

St. Mary's Law Journal

The effect of Alamo Lumber Co. v. Gold, and later cases interpreting third party assumption of debt as interest can be perilous to lenders. Lenders are in the business of offering loans to make money. Lenders achieve profit maximization by charging as much interest as possible in the market. Although economic and market factors are always considerations in a lender’s business, in Texas, lenders must also consider harsh usury laws that restrain the maximum amount of chargeable loan interest. Texas defines interest broadly. Statutes define interest as the receipt of compensation for the detention, forbearance or use of money. The …

The Empire Strikes Back., E. Joshua Rosenkranz

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Review Of Honorable Justice: The Life Of Oliver Wendell Holmes By Sheldon Novick., Michael S. Ariens

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Erisa Preempts All Texas Causes Of Action That Relate To An Employee Benefit Plan Including The Insurance Code, The Deceptive Trade Practices Act And Common Law., Brent Biggs

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Incurable, Reversible Error Occurs Whenever The Jury Feels Animus Toward Or Solidarity With Witnesses Or Litigants Because Of Ethnicity Or Race Due To An Attorney's Suggestions Made During Closing Argument, No Matter How Open Or Subtle And With Finesse Those Suggestions May Be., Glenn D. Levy

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Preserving Error On Appeal In Texas Civil Cases: A Practical Guide For Civil Appeals In Texas Article Foreword., John Cornyn Iii

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Preserving Error On Appeal In Texas Civil Cases: A Practical Guide For Civil Appeals In Texas., John Hill Cayce Jr.

St. Mary's Law Journal

Fatal procedural errors can prevent appellees from preserving judgements and appellants from seeking review of court decisions on appeal. This article is a practical guide identifying critical concepts necessary to preserve the various rights of appeal. By examining the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the author identifies procedural pitfalls attorneys may face when attempting to preserve appeals to the Texas Supreme Court or the appellate courts of Texas. Although the Texas Supreme Court has endeavored to eliminate procedural traps from civil appeals, a significant number of requests for appeal fail because lawyers do not follow the requirements necessary to preserve …

The Texas Tax Relief Act After Twelve Years: Adoption, Implementation &(And) Enforcement., Michael Weiss

St. Mary's Law Journal

The Texas Tax Reform Act, an amendment to the Texas constitution, undertook to create and enforce spending limits. The Texas Government first followed the spending limits in the 1982-1983 biennium. The threat of veto from Governor Clemments forced the legislature to adopt a budget below the limit. Unfortunately, Texas taxpayers did not see the savings of 1982 repeated in subsequent years. Meaning, the amendment, which passed by an eighty-four percent majority, failed in its purpose for limiting the government growth and spending. The noncompliance of the LBB is in contravention of the people’s will and the laws established to set …

Postscript: In Budget Disputes Between Elected State Officials, Will The Rule Of Law Prevail., Gregory E. Maggs

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Life And Death Decisions: A Reply To Judge Peccarelli, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 569 (1990), Irwin R. Kramer

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

New York V. Sullivan: Shhh .... Don't Say The A Word - Another Outcome-Oriented Abortion Decision, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 753 (1990), Christopher C. Kendall

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Applying Edgewood V. Kirby To Analysis Of Fundamental Rights Under The Texas Constitution., Albert H. Kauffman, Carmen Maria Rumbaut

St. Mary's Law Journal

State constitutions are affirmative grants of power under which both stated and implied fundamental rights can be sought. A proposed test for fundamental rights under the Texas Constitution looks at three factors: the history of the topic within the Texas Constitution and case law; the actual language used in the controlling provision; and the importance of that value to the people of Texas. The declaration of a constitutional right as fundamental certainly has implications for future relationships between the people and the government.

The Edgewood v. Kirby case has the potential to change much in Texas. The case stands for …

Dedication., Orville C. Walker

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Dedication., Editorial Board St. Mary's School Of Law

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Protecting The Fetus From Maternal Drug And Alcohol Abuse: A Proposal For Texas., Tom Rickhoff, Curtis L. Cukjati

St. Mary's Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Prenatal V. Parental Rights: What A Difference An A Makes., Ali Gallagher

St. Mary's Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Government Regulations Authorizing M.Andatory Alcohol And Drug Testing Of Private Railroad Employees On Less Than Individualized Suspicion To Enhance Safety Are Constitutional, Keith Dorsett

St. Mary's Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Benign Classification Based On Race Must Be Narrowly Tailored To Achieve A Compelling Governmental Interest., Martha J. Hess

St. Mary's Law Journal

In City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., the Supreme Court held a minority business utilization plan (Richmond Plan) was violative of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. The Richmond Plan required all builders awarded city construction contracts to subcontract, at minimum, 30% of the contract value to Minority Business Enterprises. A state government enacting legislation that burdens one class of persons and benefits a similarly-situated class must provide sufficient justification for its action to survive equal protection analysis. When distinction is based on race or national origin—classes considered inherently suspect—a reviewing court subjects the governmental legislation to strict scrutiny, …

42 U.S.C. 1981 Does Not Provide A Remedy For Racial Harassment During Employment., Jeffrey A. Lacy

St. Mary's Law Journal

In Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, the United States Supreme Court held 42 U.S.C. § 1981 does not provide a remedy for racial harassment during employment. In 1976, in Runyon v. McCrary, the Court expanded the scope of § 1981 to cover private discrimination in contractual settings, including racial discrimination in private schools, when previously unavailable. More than a decade after the Runyon decision, the Supreme Court in Patterson, established that there were limits to § 1981’s applicability in private racial discrimination claims. Specifically, the Court held while § 1981 prohibits discriminatory conduct while entering into or enforcing a contract, …

Dtpa In The Courts: Two Empirical Studies And A Proposal For Change., Nancy Friedman Atlas, Scott J. Atlas, Raymond T. Nimmer

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Personal Injury Actions Under The Dtpa., Paul N. Gold, George (Tex) Quesada

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Texas Disciplinary Rules Of Professional Conduct: Additional Liability For Texas Lawyers., Xavier G. Medina, Virginia Coyle

St. Mary's Law Journal

As a result of the enactment of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct (“Rules”), Texas lawyer no longer practice under guidelines which include aspirational goals and discretionary moral choices. The Rules are mandatory in nature and depict a minimum standard of professional conduct which, if violated, could subject the offending lawyer to disciplinary action. Although the Rules provide a disclaimer stating that they “do not undertake to define standards of civil liability of lawyers for professional conduct,” Texas lawyers fear the Rules will be utilized as an independent basis for liability, or a standard of care for malpractice. The …

In Memoriam.

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Dedication., Ernest A. Raba

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Dedication., Jack Pope

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Dedication., James P. White

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.