Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- President/Executive Department (4)
- Agency (3)
- Law and Politics (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Legislation (3)
-
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Courts (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Election Law (1)
- Food and Drug Law (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- International Humanitarian Law (1)
- Internet Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Keyword
-
- AKS; FCA; Anti-Kickback Statute; False Claims Act; healthcare; health care; statutory interpretation; causation; causal language (1)
- Admissions (1)
- Agency cost theory (1)
- Agency costs (1)
- Cooperation (1)
-
- Executive orders; big law; separation of powers; authoritarianism; first amendment; fifth amendment; sixth amendment; legal ethics; professional responsibility; dual state; Ernst Fraenkel; Prerogative state; Normative State; collective action problem; Donald J. Trump; retaliation; chilling effect; pro bono; legal risk; corporate governance (1)
- Executive power; rule of law; authoritarianism; democracy; separation of powers; Congress; the Supreme Court; political polarization; racial resentment; Christian nationalism; neoliberalism; Trump administration; civil rights; executive orders; media; immigration enforcement; checks and balances (1)
- FCA (1)
- False claims act (1)
- Frivolous claims (1)
- Oligarch; oligarchy; technology; technology oligarchs; night watchman; venture; venture capitalist; decentralized finance; DeFi; crypto; cryptocurrencies; compute; rinse cycle; utopia; libertarian; wealth offense; wealth defense; DOGE; neoliberalism; sultanistic; AI; artificial intelligence; AGI; tech platform; space colonization; government contracting; separatist colonies; transhumanism; longtermism; Silicon Valley; futurist projects; dual-class system; Google; Amazon; Facebook; Microsoft; Oracle; Apple; SpaceX; Palantir; Elon Musk; Sam Altman; Jeff Bezos; Mark Zuckerberg; Peter Thiel; Marc Andressen (1)
- Procurement; artificial intelligence; management-based regulation; performance-based regulation; regulation; documentation; government contracts (1)
- Publicly-filed (1)
- Qui tam (1)
- Settlements (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Government Contracts
How Did We Get Here?, Michael J. Klarman
How Did We Get Here?, Michael J. Klarman
Fordham Law Review
President Donald J. Trump’s second administration has transgressed basic rules and norms of democracy and the rule of law in myriad ways. Below, I have laid out my own top ten list of transgressions, though others could surely have made out a good case for their own “favorites.” It would not be difficult to come up with a longer list, yet the purpose of my Levine Lecture is less to describe where we are than to explain how we got here. Following an enumeration of Trump administration transgressions, my lecture turns to two questions. First, why have traditional checks on …
All The King’S Lawyers, Rebecca Aviel
Ai Procurement As Regulatory Reconnaissance, Sam Adler
Ai Procurement As Regulatory Reconnaissance, Sam Adler
Fordham Law Review
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a black box technology in a black box industry. Some view AI as a life-changing technology capable of advancing society and perhaps even saving the world, while others fear its capacity to harm. Like Dr. Frankenstein, developers fear the unpredictability of their own creations; deployers fear the unknown risks of third-party AI tools that market pressures drive them to assume; members of civil society fear AI’s capacity to oppress the already oppressed and degrade trust in institutions; and everyday users fear the undisclosed potential of AI to cause harm by means they cannot readily comprehend. These …
Oligarchy, State, And Cryptopia, Julie E. Cohen
Oligarchy, State, And Cryptopia, Julie E. Cohen
Fordham Law Review
Theoretical accounts of power in networked digital environments typically do not give systematic attention to the phenomenon of oligarchy—to extreme concentrations of material wealth deployed to obtain and protect durable personal advantage. The biggest technology platform companies are dominated to a singular extent by a small group of very powerful and extremely wealthy men who have played uniquely influential roles in structuring technological development in particular ways that align with their personal beliefs and who now wield unprecedented informational, sociotechnical, and political power. Developing an account of oligarchy and, more specifically, of tech oligarchy within contemporary political economy therefore has …
Bridging The False Certification Gap: Why “Resulting From” In The 2010 Aks Amendment Requires But-For Causation, Alexandra Wildman
Bridging The False Certification Gap: Why “Resulting From” In The 2010 Aks Amendment Requires But-For Causation, Alexandra Wildman
Fordham Law Review
Before 2010, violators of the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) could avoid False Claims Act (FCA) liability if claims for items or services borne of their kickback scheme were submitted to federal healthcare programs by a third party. In 2010, as part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Congress attempted to close this loophole in the FCA by amending the AKS. Under the amendment’s terms, claims submitted to federal healthcare programs for items or services “resulting from” an AKS scheme are false for the purposes of establishing FCA liability, regardless of who submitted the claims.
Although the amendment widened the FCA liability …
Agency Costs And The False Claims Act, David Farber
Agency Costs And The False Claims Act, David Farber
Fordham Law Review
The False Claims Act represents the U.S. Justice Department’s most effective tool in detecting, punishing, and deterring fraud against the government. The effectiveness of the False Claims Act is due in large part to the law’s qui tam provisions, which provide a private right of action to whistleblowers who may sue fraudsters on behalf of the government in exchange for a percentage of the recovery. The resulting relationship between the government and whistleblowers has led to increased detection and recoveries from corporate defendants who defraud and abuse government programs.
However, these whistleblower provisions also come with social costs where profit-motivated …