Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (184)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- DePaul University (28)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (3)
- UIC School of Law (2)
-
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
- University of Montana (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- University of Dar es Salaam (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Law (14)
- Copyright (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- ESG (6)
-
- Investment (6)
- Diversity (5)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Technology (5)
- Addiction (4)
- Artificial intelligence (4)
- Corporation (4)
- First Amendment (4)
- Privacy (4)
- Public health (4)
- Regulation (4)
- SEC (4)
- Securities (4)
- Supreme Court (4)
- Agreement (3)
- Banking (3)
- Business Competition (3)
- Constitution (3)
- Corporate (3)
- Corporate Governance (3)
- Credit (3)
- Data (3)
- Debt (3)
- Deposit Insurance Corporation (3)
- Discrimination (3)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (184)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (28)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (3)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (2)
-
- UIC Law Review (2)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (1)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Fordham Law Review (1)
- Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (1)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (1)
- Supreme Court Case Files (1)
- Texas A&M Law Review (1)
- Washington Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 331 - 352 of 352
Full-Text Articles in Government Contracts
Economic Structural Transformation And Litigation: Evidence From Chinese Provinces, To Economic Change And Restructuring, Doug Bujakowski, Joan Schmit
Economic Structural Transformation And Litigation: Evidence From Chinese Provinces, To Economic Change And Restructuring, Doug Bujakowski, Joan Schmit
DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The "Business Interruption" Insurance Coverage Conundrum: Covid-19 Presents A Challenge, Paul E. Traynor
The "Business Interruption" Insurance Coverage Conundrum: Covid-19 Presents A Challenge, Paul E. Traynor
DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Misalighned Incentives In Markets: Envisioning Finance That Benefits All Of Society, Dr. Ryan Clements
Misalighned Incentives In Markets: Envisioning Finance That Benefits All Of Society, Dr. Ryan Clements
DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Monsanto: Creator Of Cancer Liability
Monsanto: Creator Of Cancer Liability
DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Impact Of Corporate Response To Controversial Presidential Statements Or Policies
Impact Of Corporate Response To Controversial Presidential Statements Or Policies
DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal
No abstract provided.
With Actual Knowledge Comes Lack Of Materiality: Offering A Reasonable Bright-Line Rule For The Escobar Materiality Standard, Nicholas B. Goddard
With Actual Knowledge Comes Lack Of Materiality: Offering A Reasonable Bright-Line Rule For The Escobar Materiality Standard, Nicholas B. Goddard
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract forthcoming.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Enough Is As Good As A Feast, Noah C. Chauvin
Enough Is As Good As A Feast, Noah C. Chauvin
Seattle University Law Review
Ipse Dixit, the podcast on legal scholarship, provides a valuable service to the legal community and particularly to the legal academy. The podcast’s hosts skillfully interview guests about their legal and law-related scholarship, helping those guests communicate their ideas clearly and concisely. In this review essay, I argue that Ipse Dixit has made a major contribution to legal scholarship by demonstrating in its interview episodes that law review articles are neither the only nor the best way of communicating scholarly ideas. This contribution should be considered “scholarship,” because one of the primary goals of scholarship is to communicate new ideas.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Fmc Corp. V. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Seth T. Bonilla
Fmc Corp. V. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Seth T. Bonilla
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In 1998, FMC Corporation agreed to submit to the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes’ permitting processes, including the payment of fees, for clean-up work required as part of consent decree negotiations with the Environmental Protection Agency. Then, in 2002, FMC refused to pay the Tribes under a permitting agreement entered into by both parties, even though the company continued to store hazardous waste on land within the Shoshone-Bannock Fort Hall Reservation in Idaho. FMC challenged the Tribes’ authority to enforce the $1.5 million permitting fees first in tribal court and later challenged the Tribes’ authority to exercise civil regulatory and adjudicatory jurisdiction over …
In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth
In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth
Seattle University Law Review
Janet Ainsworth, Professor of Law at Seattle University School of Law: In Memory of Professor James E. Bond.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Strategic Institutional Positioning: How We Have Come To Generate Environmental Law Without Congress, Donald J. Kochan
Strategic Institutional Positioning: How We Have Come To Generate Environmental Law Without Congress, Donald J. Kochan
Texas A&M Law Review
The administrative state has emerged as a pervasive machine that has become the dominate generator of legal rules—despite the fact that the U.S. Constitution commits the legislative power to Congress alone. When examining legislation authorizing administrative agencies to promulgate rules, we are often left asking whether Congress “dele- gates” away its lawmaking authority by giving agencies too much power and discretion to decide what rules should be promulgated and to determine how rich to make their content. If the agencies get broad authority, it is not too hard to understand why they would fulsomely embrace the grant to its fullest. …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Pit River Tribe V. Bureau Of Land Management, 793 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir. 2015), Kathryn S. Ore
Pit River Tribe V. Bureau Of Land Management, 793 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir. 2015), Kathryn S. Ore
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land Management, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit explained the correct application of the zone of interests test and further solidified the importance of proper NEPA and NHPA analysis in geothermal leasing. The court reaffirmed that the BLM and the Forest Service must conduct additional cultural and environmental analysis when granting lease extensions under the Geothermal Steam Act. Furthermore, it rejected the BLM’s decision to grant forty-year lease continuations to unproven geothermal leases by treating them as a unit rather than individually.
The Real Issue Behind Stanford V. Roche: Faulty Conceptions Of University Assignment Policies Stemming From The 1947 Biddle Report, Sean M. O'Connor
The Real Issue Behind Stanford V. Roche: Faulty Conceptions Of University Assignment Policies Stemming From The 1947 Biddle Report, Sean M. O'Connor
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
The recent Supreme Court decision in Stanford v. Roche laid bare a faulty assumption of the federal research funding system. Government patent policy for federally funded research relies on "contractors"--the recipients of federal funding--to secure patent assignments from their employees. While this practice was routine for private firms and nonprofit research institutions, it was not for universities. This was in part based on the relationship of faculty and other researchers to universities that differed from industry employment relationships. The roots of this faulty assumption can be traced to the seminal 1947 Biddle Report. Detailed monographs drafted as appendices to the …
In The Service Of Secrets: The U.S. Supreme Court Revisits Totten, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 475 (2006), Douglas Kash, Matthew Indrisano
In The Service Of Secrets: The U.S. Supreme Court Revisits Totten, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 475 (2006), Douglas Kash, Matthew Indrisano
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Privatization And Political Accountability, Jack M. Beermann
Privatization And Political Accountability, Jack M. Beermann
Faculty Scholarship
This article is an attempt to draw some general connections between privatization and political accountability. Political accountability is to be understood as the amenability of a government policy or activity to monitoring through the political process. Although the main focus of the article is to examine different types of privatization, specifically exploring the ramifications for political accountability of each type, I also engage in some speculation as to whether there are there situations in which privatization might raise constitutional concerns related to the degree to which the particular privatization reduces political accountability for the actions or decisions of the newly …
United States V. Johnson: The Supreme Court Extends The Feres Doctrine Bar To Ftca Recovery Against Non-Military Tortfeasors, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 199 (1988), Susan Beaupre Lindholm
United States V. Johnson: The Supreme Court Extends The Feres Doctrine Bar To Ftca Recovery Against Non-Military Tortfeasors, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 199 (1988), Susan Beaupre Lindholm
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Webster V. Doe, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Note And Comment, Michigan Law Review
Note And Comment, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A National Incorporation Law; The Northern Securities Case; Controversies Between States; Liability of Members of Congress for Bribery; Exempting of Lawyers from Service of Civil Process While Attending Court; Law Governing the Validity of a Note Executed and Delivered in One State, But Payable in Another