Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (3)
- Eleventh Amendment (2)
- Johnson Act (2)
- Altheimer & Gray v. Sioux Manufacturing Corp. (1)
- Buzzard v. Oklahoma Tax Commission (1)
-
- Cheyenne River Act (1)
- Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma (1)
- Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe v. Green (1)
- Congress (1)
- Criminal jurisdiction (1)
- Definition of Indian Country (1)
- Devils Lake Sioux Tribe (1)
- Economic developments (1)
- Eleventh Amendment immunity (1)
- Federal power (1)
- Flood Control Plan of 1944 (1)
- Fort Laramie Treaty (1)
- Gaming (1)
- Gaming activities (1)
- Gaming compact (1)
- Great Sioux Reservation (1)
- IRC (1)
- IRD (1)
- Indian Major Crimes Act (1)
- Installment Sales Revision Act (1)
- Internal Revenue Code (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Kansas Act (1)
- Kansas Supreme Court (1)
- Land use regulation (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Gaming Law
Who Gets A Dead Man's Gold? The Dilemma Of Lottery Winnings Payable To A Decedent's Estate, M. Eldridge Blanton
Who Gets A Dead Man's Gold? The Dilemma Of Lottery Winnings Payable To A Decedent's Estate, M. Eldridge Blanton
University of Richmond Law Review
This article addresses the federal estate tax and federal income tax consequences of lottery winnings which flow to the estate of a decedent or, alternatively, directly to the decedent's beneficiaries. State income tax and state death tax considerations must also be taken into account. With respect to these secondary implications, this article draws largely upon the Code of Virginia and the relevant sections of Virginia's income tax and estate tax statutes. Some references will be made to the possibility of contrary statutory treatment in other states, but primary reliance will be upon Virginia law.
The Igra And The Eleventh Amendment: Indian Tribes Are Gambling When They Try To Sue A State, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 193 (1993), Peter T. Glimco
The Igra And The Eleventh Amendment: Indian Tribes Are Gambling When They Try To Sue A State, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 193 (1993), Peter T. Glimco
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Winning Appelate Brief In The First Annual Native American Law Student Association Moot Court Competition, Carol S. Yeatman
Winning Appelate Brief In The First Annual Native American Law Student Association Moot Court Competition, Carol S. Yeatman
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Potawatomi/Oklahoma Gaming Compact Of 1992: Have Two Sovereigns Achieved A Meeting Of The Minds?, Michael W. Ridgeway
The Potawatomi/Oklahoma Gaming Compact Of 1992: Have Two Sovereigns Achieved A Meeting Of The Minds?, Michael W. Ridgeway
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.