Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (222)
- Administrative Law (221)
- Environmental Law (221)
- Criminal Law (219)
- Intellectual Property Law (219)
-
- Land Use Law (219)
- Water Law (219)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (218)
- Energy and Utilities Law (218)
- Transnational Law (217)
- Law and Gender (214)
- Constitutional Law (196)
- Tax Law (196)
- Natural Resources Law (195)
- Civil Law (194)
- Contracts (194)
- Human Rights Law (194)
- Education Law (193)
- Civil Procedure (192)
- Communications Law (192)
- Criminal Procedure (192)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (192)
- First Amendment (192)
- Fourteenth Amendment (192)
- Agency (191)
- Animal Law (191)
- Bankruptcy Law (191)
- Jurisdiction (188)
- Keyword
-
- Law (13)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- ESG (6)
- Diversity (5)
-
- Regulation (5)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Supreme Court (5)
- Addiction (4)
- Artificial intelligence (4)
- Data (4)
- Native American (4)
- Public health (4)
- SEC (4)
- Technology (4)
- Constitution (3)
- Corporate (3)
- Corporate Governance (3)
- Discrimination (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Privacy (3)
- Reform (3)
- Sec (3)
- Securities (3)
- Shareholder (3)
- Washington (3)
- American Indian (2)
- Antitrust (2)
- Case law (2)
- Censorship (2)
- Publication Year
Articles 211 - 225 of 225
Full-Text Articles in Gaming Law
In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth
In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth
Seattle University Law Review
Janet Ainsworth, Professor of Law at Seattle University School of Law: In Memory of Professor James E. Bond.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Case Law On American Indians August 2018-2019, Thomas P. Schlosser
Case Law On American Indians August 2018-2019, Thomas P. Schlosser
American Indian Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
A View From American Courts: The Year In Indian Law 2017, Grant Christensen
A View From American Courts: The Year In Indian Law 2017, Grant Christensen
Seattle University Law Review
This Article provides a comprehensive review of Indian law for 2017. It does not include a citation to every case related to Indian law issued by the courts but tries to incorporate the majority of opinions into its catalog to provide a robust discussion of the changes in Indian law over the course of 2017. Part I of this Article provides some general statistics about Indian law in 2017. Part II focuses on activity at the U.S. Supreme Court, which is the most watched forum for Indian law cases for obvious reasons. Part III groups cases by subject area and …
Case Law On American Indians: August 2015—August 2016, Thomas P. Schlosser
Case Law On American Indians: August 2015—August 2016, Thomas P. Schlosser
American Indian Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Sovereignty, Economic Development, And Human Security In Native American Nations, W. Gregory Guedel
Sovereignty, Economic Development, And Human Security In Native American Nations, W. Gregory Guedel
American Indian Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Costing A Pretty Penny: Online Penny Auctions Revive The Pestilence Of Unregulated Lotteries, David R. Konkel
Costing A Pretty Penny: Online Penny Auctions Revive The Pestilence Of Unregulated Lotteries, David R. Konkel
Seattle University Law Review
Penny auctions, an online phenomenon imported from Europe, operate by the hundreds in the United States without meaningful oversight from consumer protection agencies. In a penny auction, consumers compete for items one penny at a time. To date, no significant inquiry, either academic or practical, into the legitimacy of the penny auction has occurred. Although marketed as auctions, online penny auctions may actually qualify as lotteries. Unlike the multifarious and confusing definitions of gambling, the long-accepted definition of a lottery consists of three elements: prize, consideration, and chance. If a penny auction satisfies this definition then, under well-established case law …
Of Justice Sotomayor And The Jicarilla Apache Nation: Slouching Toward Intellectual Honesty And The Canons Of Construction, Jeremy Stevens
Of Justice Sotomayor And The Jicarilla Apache Nation: Slouching Toward Intellectual Honesty And The Canons Of Construction, Jeremy Stevens
American Indian Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Public Nature Of Indian Reservation Roads, M. Brent Leonard
The Public Nature Of Indian Reservation Roads, M. Brent Leonard
American Indian Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Enhancing Tribal Sovereignty By Protecting Indian Civil Rights: A Win-Win For Indian Tribes And Tribal Members, Rob Roy Smith
Enhancing Tribal Sovereignty By Protecting Indian Civil Rights: A Win-Win For Indian Tribes And Tribal Members, Rob Roy Smith
American Indian Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Gas Tax Agreements In Indian Country, Jonathan White
Gas Tax Agreements In Indian Country, Jonathan White
American Indian Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Justice Rehnquist’S Theory Of Indian Law: The Evolution From Mazurie To Atkinson – Where Did He Leave The Court?, Brenna Willott
Justice Rehnquist’S Theory Of Indian Law: The Evolution From Mazurie To Atkinson – Where Did He Leave The Court?, Brenna Willott
American Indian Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Must The House Always Win?: A Critique Of Rousso V. State, Rachel J. Schaefer
Must The House Always Win?: A Critique Of Rousso V. State, Rachel J. Schaefer
Seattle University Law Review
Gambling enthusiasts in Washington may be dismayed to learn that while it is legal to place a wager at one of the numerous brick-and-mortar casinos located in the state, placing the same wager over the Internet is a crime. This result arises from a 2006 amendment to Washington Revised Code 9.46.240 (the Gambling Act), which effectively bans individuals from placing bets or wagers over the Internet from Washington. In addition to prohibiting bets made by individuals, the law also prohibits Internet gambling businesses from receiving bets placed by individuals in Washington—even if those gambling businesses operate far from the state’s …