Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Fourth Amendment Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Search

Discipline
Institution
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 91 - 96 of 96

Full-Text Articles in Fourth Amendment

Fourth Amendment, William E. Hellerstein Jan 1989

Fourth Amendment, William E. Hellerstein

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Is The Fourth Amendment Obsolete?–Restating The Fourth Amendment In Functional Terms, John M.A. Dipippa Jan 1987

Is The Fourth Amendment Obsolete?–Restating The Fourth Amendment In Functional Terms, John M.A. Dipippa

Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Criminal Procedure—Exclusionary Rule—No Good Faith Exception To The Arkansas Rules Of Criminal Procedure, Dale Scroggins Jul 1985

Criminal Procedure—Exclusionary Rule—No Good Faith Exception To The Arkansas Rules Of Criminal Procedure, Dale Scroggins

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


Searching For The Fourth Amendment, John M.A. Dipippa Jul 1984

Searching For The Fourth Amendment, John M.A. Dipippa

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


In Defense Of The Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule—A Reply To Attorney General Smith, John Wesley Hall Jr. Apr 1983

In Defense Of The Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule—A Reply To Attorney General Smith, John Wesley Hall Jr.

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Burger Court And The Fourth Amendment, Larry Yackle Jan 1978

The Burger Court And The Fourth Amendment, Larry Yackle

Faculty Scholarship

In his 1974 Holmes Lectures, Anthony Amsterdam likened the Supreme Court in search and seizure cases to a committee "attempting to draft a horse by placing very short lines on a very large drawing board at irregular intervals during which the membership of the committee constantly changes." On that perception of the matter he cautioned against precipitous criticism when the completed draft resembles a camel. That advice, in my judgment, is reliable only in part. On the one hand, only the most arrogant of armchair critics would not concede that the Court's work is as difficult as it is important. …