Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (70)
- Criminal Procedure (65)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (41)
- Criminal Law (34)
- Supreme Court of the United States (33)
-
- State and Local Government Law (27)
- Courts (18)
- Evidence (14)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (13)
- Judges (12)
- Privacy Law (12)
- Jurisprudence (10)
- Fourteenth Amendment (7)
- Science and Technology Law (7)
- Law and Society (4)
- Law and Race (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Civil Law (2)
- Computer Law (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Internet Law (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Legal Remedies (2)
- National Security Law (2)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (47)
- University of Michigan Law School (22)
- Cleveland State University (4)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
-
- The University of Akron (3)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Emory University School of Law (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (2)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (2)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (2)
- University of Maine School of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (47)
- Michigan Law Review (12)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (4)
-
- Akron Law Review (3)
- Articles (3)
- Cleveland State Law Review (3)
- Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Oklahoma Law Review (3)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (3)
- Book Chapters (2)
- Emory Law Journal (2)
- Florida State University Law Review (2)
- Maine Law Review (2)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (2)
- St. Thomas Law Review (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Faculty Publications & Other Works (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- Marquette Law Review (1)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (1)
- Nebraska College of Law: Faculty Publications (1)
- Nevada Law Journal (1)
- Notre Dame Law Review (1)
- Publications (1)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (1)
- San Diego Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 121 - 125 of 125
Full-Text Articles in Fourth Amendment
Searches Without Warrants, Jerold H. Israel
Searches Without Warrants, Jerold H. Israel
Book Chapters
My primary area of concentration today is the search made without a warrant. Studies indicate that 95 percent or more of all searches are without warrants. It is quite understandable, then, that most of the search-and-seizure litigation concerns the validity of searches without warrants.
An Analysis Of Terry V. Ohio And Its Implications Upon The California Law Of Stop And Frisk, Judith N. Keep
An Analysis Of Terry V. Ohio And Its Implications Upon The California Law Of Stop And Frisk, Judith N. Keep
San Diego Law Review
The controversy surrounding the legality of police "stop and frisk" practices at last has been partially resolved by the Supreme Court. In the case of Terry v. Ohio, which is further illuminated by its companion case Sibron v. New York, the Court established a constitutional standard for the frisk under the search and seizure clause of the fourth amendment. Additionally, it strongly suggested that the same standard would be applied to the stop. Thus, not only did the Court resolve the debate in favor of this often employed police practice, but under the doctrine of Mapp v. Ohio, the standard …
Betts V. Brady Twenty Years Later: The Right To Counself And Due Process Values, Yale Kamisar
Betts V. Brady Twenty Years Later: The Right To Counself And Due Process Values, Yale Kamisar
Michigan Law Review
I am quite distressed by talk that the landmark case of Mapp v. Ohio "suggests by analogy" that the Court may now overrule Betts v. Brady. For whether one talks about the fourth or the sixth amendment, there is much to be said for Justice Harlan's dissenting views in Mapp. "[W]hatever configurations ... have been developed in the particularizing federal precedents" should not be "deemed a part of 'ordered liberty,' and as such ... enforceable against the States .... [W]e would not be true to the Fourteenth Amendment were we merely to stretch the general principle [ of …
Constitutional Law- Search And Seizure- Search Incidental To An Administrative Arrest, James J. White
Constitutional Law- Search And Seizure- Search Incidental To An Administrative Arrest, James J. White
Michigan Law Review
As a preliminary to deportation proceedings, defendant, Rudolf I. Abel, was arrested in his hotel room by Immigration and Naturalization Service agents who acted pursuant to a valid administrative arrest warrant. After the arrest, but without a search warrant, the INS searched Abel's room and seized evidence later used in his trial for espionage. In the district court Abel moved to suppress this evidence on the theory that the search violated the fourth amendment. The district court's denial of the motion was affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. On certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, …
Search And Seizure - Suppression Of Evidence - Judicial Attitude Toward Enforcement, John B. Waite
Search And Seizure - Suppression Of Evidence - Judicial Attitude Toward Enforcement, John B. Waite
Michigan Law Review
The "numbers game" is today the most profitable of the wide-spread gambling rackets. And like all organized gambling it is a focal source and the financial support of far more serious crimes. At the same time it is one of the most difficult forms of crime for the police to control. It needs no costly installations which the police can confiscate or destroy. Unlike "house" gambling it cannot practically be harassed out of business. It can be operated by one man alone, if he survives failure to pay off for lack of capital; or by a syndicate with capital enough …