Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (31)
- Constitutional Law (30)
- Criminal Procedure (22)
- Criminal Law (18)
- Courts (11)
-
- Law and Race (11)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (10)
- Supreme Court of the United States (9)
- Jurisprudence (7)
- Evidence (6)
- Privacy Law (6)
- State and Local Government Law (6)
- Judges (5)
- Law and Society (5)
- Fourteenth Amendment (4)
- Litigation (3)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (3)
- Civil Law (2)
- Computer Law (2)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (2)
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Legal Remedies (2)
- Legal Studies (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- African American Studies (1)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (12)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (6)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (3)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- University of Maine School of Law (3)
-
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (2)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- College of the Holy Cross (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- The University of Akron (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- University of Tulsa College of Law (1)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (10)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (5)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (3)
- Maine Law Review (3)
-
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (2)
- Oklahoma Law Review (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (2)
- Akron Law Review (1)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works (1)
- Brooklyn Law Review (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- College Honors Program (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- IUSTITIA (1)
- Journal of Law and Policy (1)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (1)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (1)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice (1)
- Northwestern University Law Review (1)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (1)
- Scholarly Publications (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 58 of 58
Full-Text Articles in Fourth Amendment
County Court, Westchester County, People V. Gant, Albert V. Messina Jr.
County Court, Westchester County, People V. Gant, Albert V. Messina Jr.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, New York County, People V. Smith, Jessica Miller
Supreme Court, New York County, People V. Smith, Jessica Miller
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments In The Use Of Excessive Force By Law Enforcement, Karen M. Blum, Jack Ryan
Recent Developments In The Use Of Excessive Force By Law Enforcement, Karen M. Blum, Jack Ryan
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
California And Uncle Sam's Tug-Of-War Over Mary Jane Is Really Harshing The Mellow, Daniel Mortensen
California And Uncle Sam's Tug-Of-War Over Mary Jane Is Really Harshing The Mellow, Daniel Mortensen
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court Fortifies Qualified Immunity For Law Enforcement Officers In Warrant Cases, Martin Schwartz
Supreme Court Fortifies Qualified Immunity For Law Enforcement Officers In Warrant Cases, Martin Schwartz
Scholarly Works
This article analyzes the significance of the United States Supreme Court decision in Messerschmidt v. Millender, 132 S.Ct. 1652 (2012), upon §1983 Fourth Amendment claims asserted against state and local law enforcement officers who apply for and enforce warrants. Millender held that police officers who sought and executed a very broad warrant authorizing them to search a residence for guns and gang related material were protected by qualified immunity. The author asserts that §1983 plaintiffs, who seek to recover damages based upon either the application or execution of an allegedly unconstitutional warrant, will now have to overcome various layers of …
Rehnquist And Panvasive Searches, Christopher Slobogin
Rehnquist And Panvasive Searches, Christopher Slobogin
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
In the history of the Supreme Court, William Rehnquist may have been the least friendly justice toward the view that the Fourth Amendment should be read expansively. Even he, however, might have interpreted the amendment to place more restrictions on modern law enforcement techniques than current caselaw does. Relying on a 1974 article authored by Rehnquist, this essay, written for a symposium on Rehnquist and the Fourth Amendment, describes his views on the types of requirements the Fourth Amendment imposes on the police, how decriminalization can protect privacy, and most importantly, why Rehnquist might have been willing to regulate surveillance …
The Shocking Truth: Law Enforcement's Use And Abuse Of Tasers And The Need For Reform, Michelle E. Mcstravick
The Shocking Truth: Law Enforcement's Use And Abuse Of Tasers And The Need For Reform, Michelle E. Mcstravick
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Cloudy Privacy Protections: Why The Stored Communications Act Fails To Protect The Privacy Of Communications Stored In The Cloud, Ilana R. Kattan
Cloudy Privacy Protections: Why The Stored Communications Act Fails To Protect The Privacy Of Communications Stored In The Cloud, Ilana R. Kattan
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
The advent of new communications technologies has generated debate over the applicability of the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement to communications sent through, and stored in, technologies not anticipated by the Framers. In 1986, Congress responded to perceived gaps in the protections of the warrant requirement as applied to newer technologies, such as email, by passing the Stored Communications Act (SCA). As originally enacted, the SCA attempted to balance the interests of law enforcement against individual privacy rights by dictating the mechanisms by which the government could compel a particular service provider to disclose communications stored on behalf of its customers. …
Fourth Amendment Federalism And The Silencing Of The American Poor, Andrew E. Taslitz
Fourth Amendment Federalism And The Silencing Of The American Poor, Andrew E. Taslitz
Chicago-Kent Law Review
In Virginia v. Moore, police officers searched Moore incident to an arrest for a minor traffic infraction for which Virginia statutory law in fact prohibited arrest. The officers found cocaine on Moore's person, arresting him for that crime too. The United States Supreme Court ultimately found that the arrest for the traffic infraction and the subsequent search were valid under the federal Constitution's Fourth Amendment. Central to the Court's reasoning was its insistence that the state statute was irrelevant. Any contrary conclusion, explained the Court, would wrongly make the Fourth Amendment's meaning vary from place to place. Professor Taslitz …
Replacing The Exclusionary Rule: Fourth Amendment Violations As Direct Criminal Contempt, Ronald J. Rychlak
Replacing The Exclusionary Rule: Fourth Amendment Violations As Direct Criminal Contempt, Ronald J. Rychlak
Chicago-Kent Law Review
The exclusionary rule, which bars from admission evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment's prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures, is a bedrock of American law. It is highly controversial, but there seems to be no equally effective way to protect citizens' rights. This paper proposes that an admissibility standard be adopted that is in keeping with virtually every jurisdiction around the world other than the United States. Thus, before ruling evidence inadmissible, the court would consider the level of the constitutional violation, the seriousness of the crime, whether the violation casts substantial doubt on the reliability of the …
Government Data Mining And The Fourth Amendment, Christopher Slobogin
Government Data Mining And The Fourth Amendment, Christopher Slobogin
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
The government's ability to obtain and analyze recorded information about its citizens through the process known as data mining has expanded enormously over the past decade. Although the best-known government data mining operation (Total Information Awareness, more recently dubbed Terrorism Information Awareness) supposedly no longer exists, large-scale data mining by federal agencies devoted to enforcing criminal and counter-terrorism laws has continued unabated. This paper addresses three puzzles about data mining. First, when data mining is undertaken by the government, does it implicate the Fourth Amendment? Second, does the analysis change when data mining is undertaken by private entities which then …
The Liberal Assault On The Fourth Amendment, Christopher Slobogin
The Liberal Assault On The Fourth Amendment, Christopher Slobogin
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
As construed by the Supreme Court, the Fourth Amendment's reasonableness requirement regulates overt, non-regulatory government searches of homes, cars, and personal effects-and virtually nothing else. This essay is primarily about how we got to this point. It is fashionable to place much of the blame for today's law on the Warren Court's adoption of the malleable expectation of privacy concept as the core value protected by the Fourth Amendment. But this diagnosis fails to explain why even the more liberal justices have often gone along with many of the privacy-diminishing holdings of the Court. This essay argues that three other …
The Reasonable Policeman: Police Intent In Criminal Procedure, Craig M. Bradley
The Reasonable Policeman: Police Intent In Criminal Procedure, Craig M. Bradley
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Cultural Context Matters: Terry's "Seesaw Effect", Frank Rudy Cooper
Cultural Context Matters: Terry's "Seesaw Effect", Frank Rudy Cooper
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Deadly Cure: The Supreme Court's Dangerous Medicine In Ferguson V. City Of Charleston, George M. Dery Iii
A Deadly Cure: The Supreme Court's Dangerous Medicine In Ferguson V. City Of Charleston, George M. Dery Iii
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Racial Profiling And Whren: Searching For Objective Evidence Of The Fourth Amendment On The Nation's Roads, Alberto B. Lopez
Racial Profiling And Whren: Searching For Objective Evidence Of The Fourth Amendment On The Nation's Roads, Alberto B. Lopez
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Case Notes: State V. Jackson: Warning - Roadblock Ahead! Louisiana Creates Log Jam Of Search And Seizure Analysis, Marc L. Roark
Case Notes: State V. Jackson: Warning - Roadblock Ahead! Louisiana Creates Log Jam Of Search And Seizure Analysis, Marc L. Roark
Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Transparent Adjudication And Social Science Research In Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Tracey L. Meares, Bernard Harcourt
Transparent Adjudication And Social Science Research In Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Tracey L. Meares, Bernard Harcourt
Faculty Scholarship
The October 1999 Term was a year of consolidation in the law of police investigations in constitutional criminal procedure. In four short and compact opinions – three supported by sizeable majorities and three written by the Chief Justice – the Supreme Court synthesized and consolidated its criminal procedure jurisprudence, and offered clear guidance to law enforcement officers and private citizens alike. Miranda warnings are required by the Fifth Amendment, and the police must continue to "Mirandize" citizens before conducting any custodial interrogations. Reasonable suspicion under the Fourth Amendment calls for a totality-of-the-circumstances test, and a citizen's flight from the police …
It Was A Very Good Year - For The Government: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Rulings Of The 1995-1996 Term, William E. Hellerstein
It Was A Very Good Year - For The Government: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Rulings Of The 1995-1996 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Race, Cops, And Traffic Stops, Angela J. Davis
Race, Cops, And Traffic Stops, Angela J. Davis
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
This article discusses the Supreme Court's failure to provide a clear and effective remedy for discriminatory pretextual traffic stops. The first part explores the discretionary nature of pretextual stops and their discriminatory effect on African-Americans and Latinos. Then, the article examines Whren v. United States, a Supreme Court case in which the petitioners claimed that these “pretextual stops” violate the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution and are racially discriminatory. The Supreme Court rejected the claim, upholding the constitutionality of pretextual stops based on probable cause and noting that claims of racial discrimination must be challenged under the Equal Protection Clause. …
Of Myths And Mapp: A Response To Professor Magee, Sheri Johnson
Of Myths And Mapp: A Response To Professor Magee, Sheri Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fourth Amendment, William E. Hellerstein
Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz, Honorable George C. Pratt, Leon Friedman
Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz, Honorable George C. Pratt, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Warrantless Investigative Seizures Of Real And Tangible Personal Property By Law Enforcement Officers, Steven A.G. Davison
Warrantless Investigative Seizures Of Real And Tangible Personal Property By Law Enforcement Officers, Steven A.G. Davison
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Street Perspective: A Conversation With The Police, Patrick L. Baude
The Street Perspective: A Conversation With The Police, Patrick L. Baude
IUSTITIA
Professor Baude's purpose in this discussion is to elicit police officers' comments on what members of the legal profession ought to know about the influence of the "street perspective" in shaping those officers' attitudes towards the criminal justice system and the role they play in it. It is police insistence on the broad validity of insights which only "the street" can provide that accounts for the considerable gulf between "front-line" enforcement officers and other functionaries in (and students of) that system. Law students (and no doubt lawyers) seem uncomfortable with the notion that our system cannot adequately be understood without …
Fourth Amendment Limitations On Eavesdropping And Wire-Tapping, David H. Hines
Fourth Amendment Limitations On Eavesdropping And Wire-Tapping, David H. Hines
Cleveland State Law Review
The subject of eavesdropping, wiretapping, and electronic surveillance has induced many legal writers to comment on the law and urge legislative changes.This paper will analyze the constitutional aspects of eavesdropping as well as the common law concerning eavesdropping as it exists today.