Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (95)
- Criminal Procedure (85)
- Criminal Law (80)
- Law and Society (75)
- Law and Race (74)
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (73)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (72)
- Privacy Law (72)
- First Amendment (71)
- Courts (70)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (69)
- Disability Law (68)
- Law and Gender (68)
- Other Law (68)
- State and Local Government Law (67)
- Science and Technology Law (66)
- Evidence (65)
- Supreme Court of the United States (65)
- Jurisprudence (64)
- Civil Law (63)
- Computer Law (63)
- Judges (63)
- Legal History (62)
- Civil Procedure (61)
- Environmental Law (61)
- Health Law and Policy (61)
- Human Rights Law (61)
- Internet Law (61)
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (58)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (9)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- St. John's University School of Law (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Roger Williams University (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- University of Maine School of Law (2)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- California State University, Monterey Bay (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Mississippi Christian University School of Law (1)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- The University of Akron (1)
- The University of San Francisco (1)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (1)
- University of Central Florida (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Dar es Salaam (1)
- Keyword
-
- Fourth Amendment (17)
- Fourth amendment (8)
- Privacy (7)
- Addiction (5)
- Artificial intelligence (5)
-
- Police (5)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Surveillance (5)
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Constitutional law (4)
- ESG (4)
- First Amendment (4)
- Governance (4)
- Public health (4)
- Regulation (4)
- Technology (4)
- Constitution (3)
- Corporate (3)
- Discrimination (3)
- Environmental (3)
- Exclusionary rule (3)
- Judges (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Progress (3)
- Sec (3)
- Shareholder (3)
- Social (3)
- Warrant (3)
- AAPI (2)
- Achievement (2)
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (58)
- Nebraska Journal on Advancing Justice (9)
- Articles (3)
- Northwestern University Law Review (3)
- Faculty Articles (2)
-
- Maine Law Review (2)
- St. John's Law Review (2)
- Touro Law Review (2)
- Akron Law Review (1)
- Arkansas Law Review (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law Review (1)
- Capstone Projects and Master's Theses (1)
- Cardozo Law Review de•novo (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- FIU Law Review (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Honors Undergraduate Theses (1)
- Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (1)
- MC Law Review (1)
- Marquette Sports Law Review (1)
- McNair Summer Research Program (1)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (1)
- Michigan Technology Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 118 of 118
Full-Text Articles in Fourth Amendment
Loopholes Of Liberty: The Supreme Court’S Evisceration Of The Fourth Amendment, David J. Looney
Loopholes Of Liberty: The Supreme Court’S Evisceration Of The Fourth Amendment, David J. Looney
Touro Law Review
The Fourth Amendment’s protections against unwarranted government intrusion are currently undermined by the Supreme Court’s third party and open fields doctrines, which permit warrantless access to shared data and private land beyond a home’s curtilage, clashing with the Amendment’s aim to safeguard privacy and property in an era of advanced surveillance. These doctrines enable arbitrary governmental overreach, necessitating urgent review to restore constitutional protections. Rooted in Enlightenment principles, the Fourth Amendment historically protected “papers” and “effects” from physical trespass, as seen in Boyd v. United States. Katz v. United States introduced a “reasonable expectation of privacy” test, but its subjective …
The Reality Of The Good Faith Exception, Matthew Tokson, Michael Gentithes
The Reality Of The Good Faith Exception, Matthew Tokson, Michael Gentithes
Utah Law Faculty Scholarship
The Fourth Amendment’s primary remedy is the exclusion of unlawfully obtained evidence at trial. But not every defendant whose rights are violated gets a remedy. The most substantial obstacle for defendants is the good faith exception, which directs courts to admit unlawfully collected evidence if the police can show they relied in good faith on existing authority. If the police rely on a statute that turns out to be unconstitutional, or a warrant or precedent that turns out to be invalid, the evidence they obtain will nonetheless be admitted under the good faith exception. The Supreme Court has justified this …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Corporate Governance Speech, Sarah C. Haan
Corporate Governance Speech, Sarah C. Haan
Seattle University Law Review
The State has always regulated the intra-firm communications that make corporate governance possible, most commonly by mandating disclosures of information by a corporation to its shareholders. Some such laws are labeled “securities regulation,” but securities regulation is a broad category that extends to speech by actors who are outside the corporate enterprise as well. Also, the conventional securities regulation category does not capture all such laws; other examples, including informationforcing mandates, can be found in state corporate law. This Article uses the term “corporate governance speech” to describe the communications among shareholders, directors, and officers through which corporate governance is …
Green Dividends: A Case Study In Green Dividends And The Conditions For Private Ordering Solutions, Anne M. Tucker
Green Dividends: A Case Study In Green Dividends And The Conditions For Private Ordering Solutions, Anne M. Tucker
Seattle University Law Review
This Essay introduces a novel private ordering solution to facilitate corporate investments in pro-social and environmental initiatives: Green dividends. Green dividends are an optional increase in shareholder dividends that are returned to the company to be reinvested in environmental initiatives or kept by a shareholder.
Green dividends pose an alternative to the current gridlocked debate that corporations can’t, won’t, shouldn’t, and shouldn’t even try to act in pro-social or environmental ways. Turning the common refrains on their head converts each narrative into an element for a successful private ordering solution: authority, accountability, shareholder buy-in, and government- backed enforcement. With Green …
Does Climate Disclosure Work To Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Emerging Evidence Suggests Cautious Optimism, Cynthia A. Williams
Does Climate Disclosure Work To Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Emerging Evidence Suggests Cautious Optimism, Cynthia A. Williams
Seattle University Law Review
Significant regulatory resources have been spent developing global, voluntary climate and sustainability disclosure standards, such as the TCFD, TNRD, and ISSB’s Sustainability and Climate Disclosure standards, or domestically required disclosures, such as in the EU and in the U.S. Thus, it is important to evaluate whether this disclosure, particularly voluntary, qualitative disclosure, will have the power to shift the allocation of capital, will have a significant effect on the management of climate risk within firms, and ultimately will reduce climate change risk and biodiversity loss.
In this Article, several interrelated questions will be discussed. First, what does the empirical evidence …
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead
Facial Recognition Technology And The First Amendment, Joseph A. Tomain
Facial Recognition Technology And The First Amendment, Joseph A. Tomain
Articles by Maurer Faculty
The growing ubiquity of facial recognition technology (FRT) is a problem. While much has been written on harmful government use of FRT, little has been written regarding harmful private actor use. This Article helps fill a gap in the literature by providing a detailed analysis of the First Amendment interests at stake when private actors use FRT. Specifically, this Article analyzes whether laws that limit the use of publicly available photographs to create faceprints for inclusion in FRT databases violate the First Amendment rights of private actors.
In May 2025, a multidistrict litigation against Clearview AI, an FRT company, offered …
Constitutional Law Application In The Sport Industry, Barbara Osborne
Constitutional Law Application In The Sport Industry, Barbara Osborne
Marquette Sports Law Review
No abstract provided.
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead
Corporate Scenarios: Drawing Lessons From History, Madison Condon
Corporate Scenarios: Drawing Lessons From History, Madison Condon
Seattle University Law Review
As corporations are increasingly pressed to reveal information about their exposure to climate-related risks, they are often asked to undertake and disclose the outcome of “scenario analysis.” In this exercise, corporations, including financial institutions, examine how their business would fare under different pathways the future may take. One oft-used scenario, for example, is the International Energy Agency’s “Net-Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Energy Sector.” This Essay presents a history of the use of scenarios as a corporate planning tool, particularly in the oil industry, arguing that it is key for understanding our present moment and the role of …
Dark Accounting Matter, Colleen Honigsberg
Dark Accounting Matter, Colleen Honigsberg
Seattle University Law Review
Physicists calculate that approximately 85% of the matter in the universe is composed of “dark matter” that “does not absorb, reflect, or emit electromagnetic radiation and is therefore difficult to detect.” The S&P 500 currently trades at a price-to-book value of 4.2, suggesting that book value accounts for less than 20% of the S&P 500’s market value. The remaining 80% appears nowhere in these firms’ balance sheets—it is invisible to contemporary accounting techniques and constitutes “dark accounting matter.”
Some “dark accounting matter” is composed of factors commonly described as components of “ESG.” Human capital, for example, is an intangible asset …
Facial Recognition Technology And The First Amendment, Joseph A. Tomain
Facial Recognition Technology And The First Amendment, Joseph A. Tomain
Michigan Technology Law Review
The growing ubiquity of facial recognition technology (FRT) is a problem. While much has been written on harmful government use of FRT, little has been written about harmful use by private actors. This Article helps fill that gap in the literature by providing a detailed analysis of the First Amendment interests at stake when private actors use FRT. Specifically, this Article analyzes whether laws that limit the use of publicly available photographs to create “faceprints” for inclusion in FRT databases violate the First Amendment rights of the private actors creating these databases.
In May 2025, a multidistrict litigation against Clearview …
The Warrant Exception That Isn't: Fisa Section 702, "Defensive" Searches, And The Fourth Amendment, Noah C. Chauvin
The Warrant Exception That Isn't: Fisa Section 702, "Defensive" Searches, And The Fourth Amendment, Noah C. Chauvin
Faculty Articles
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act allows the government to conduct warrantless electronic surveillance of non-Americans who are located overseas. Although the surveillance targets foreigners, Americans' communications are "incidentally" collected, too. Once the government has acquired Americans' communications, court-approved rules allow it to conduct warrantless searches for and through them in its Section 702 databases. Intelligence agencies have used these rules to turn this foreign intelligence program into a domestic spying tool, conducting tens of thousands of warrantless "backdoor" searches for Americans' private communications obtained under Section 702 every year.
Section 702 periodically sunsets; Congress most recently reauthorized …
Katz'S Imperfect Circle: An Empirical Study Of Reasonable Expectations Of Privacy, Tonja Jacobi, Christopher Brett Jaeger
Katz'S Imperfect Circle: An Empirical Study Of Reasonable Expectations Of Privacy, Tonja Jacobi, Christopher Brett Jaeger
Faculty Articles
Under Katz v. United States, the Fourth Amendment restricts government actions that infringe upon expectations of privacy that society recognizes as reasonable. This foundational test has long been criticized as circular, both because courts can shape the very expectations they seek to identify through their decisions and because governments can manipulate those expectations to expand the reach of their own power. But how do members of society decide what expectations are reasonable, and how do judges ascertain those expectations? And are expectations of privacy malleable even without deliberate manipulation?
This Article shows that the circularity critique is both understated …
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead
Office Intent And Excessive Force, John F. Preis
Office Intent And Excessive Force, John F. Preis
Law Faculty Publications
In the mayhem that often accompanies a police officer’s use of force, all manner of mistakes and miscalculations can occur. Suspects are accidentally shot, innocent bystanders are bitten by police dogs, and hostages are killed instead of their kidnappers. To what degree may persons harmed by police mistakes obtain relief through excessive force claims?
At present, the answer to this question is surprisingly uncertain. It is clear that an excessive force claim requires that an officer intend to seize the suspect, but it is far less clear whether the officer must also intend the nature and extent of force used …
The Evolution Of Surveillance And The Decline Of Privacy, Alan J. Geyer
The Evolution Of Surveillance And The Decline Of Privacy, Alan J. Geyer
Honors Undergraduate Theses
This study directly examines how surveillance law and technology have evolved in the United States and how privacy rights have declined correspondingly. The study specifically focuses on how advancements in surveillance technology have overstepped the boundaries of Fourth Amendment protections and analyzes whether these provisions are adequate for protecting citizens in the modern technological era. The study explores newly employed methods of technological surveillance, such as facial recognition, data collection, and automated license plate readers. It focuses on how government surveillance programs have reshaped legal and ethical understandings of privacy. The changes in surveillance and technology have been analyzed by …
Decentering Property In Fourth Amendment Law, Michael C. Pollack, Matthew Tokson
Decentering Property In Fourth Amendment Law, Michael C. Pollack, Matthew Tokson
Articles
For the past several decades, privacy has been the primary conceptual foundation for Fourth Amendment search law. The canonical test for Fourth Amendment searches accordingly looks to whether the government has violated a person’s reasonable expectation of privacy. Yet privacy is no longer the sole determinant of Fourth Amendment protection, as the Supreme Court has recently added a property-based test to address cases involving physical intrusions on land or chattel. Further, given the ambiguity of the reasonable expectation of privacy test, a variety of influential judges and scholars have proposed relying primarily, or even exclusively, on property in determining the …
Byte By Byte: Breaking Down The Third-Party Doctrine And Reproductive Health Apps After Dobbs, Travis Handler
Byte By Byte: Breaking Down The Third-Party Doctrine And Reproductive Health Apps After Dobbs, Travis Handler
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Free Movement Rights And The American City, Ryan Stoa
Free Movement Rights And The American City, Ryan Stoa
FIU Law Review
American cities are facing an inflection point. Widespread dissatisfaction with urban planning outcomes is making land use and transportation policies (such as congestion pricing) a mainstream topic of debate. Suburban sprawl and housing shortages are moving urban populations into the periphery, commuting times (and associated mental health problems) are increasing, and pedestrian and cyclist deaths caused by vehicles are at all-time highs. American cities that were largely planned and built in the twentieth century based on assumptions that we now know are flawed are not meeting the needs of their residents, and urban planners are making changes to reshape urban …
Consensus And Conflict Over Context: Select Criminal Law And Procedure Cases From The Supreme Court's 2024-25 Term, Eve Brensike Primus, Elena Schultz
Consensus And Conflict Over Context: Select Criminal Law And Procedure Cases From The Supreme Court's 2024-25 Term, Eve Brensike Primus, Elena Schultz
Articles
In its 2024-2025 Term, the Supreme Court emphasized the utility—and necessity—of context-based, fact-sensitive analyses throughout its criminal law and procedure cases. Though the Justices sparred over how to derive meaning from factual, structural, legal, and historical contexts, they tended to agree that courts should not be artificially restricted from considering the breadth of the record before them.
Caught In The Crosshairs: Predictive Policing And The Use Of Force, Matthew D. Zampa
Caught In The Crosshairs: Predictive Policing And The Use Of Force, Matthew D. Zampa
University of San Francisco Law Review
No abstract provided.
Family Regulation's Consent Problem, Anna Arons
Family Regulation's Consent Problem, Anna Arons
Faculty Publications
The home is the most protected space in constitutional law. But family regulation investigators conduct millions of home searches a year. Under pressure, parents nearly always consent to these state agents’ entry into the most private areas of their lives.
This Article identifies the coercive forces—not least the threat of family separation—that drive parents to consent to home searches. Drawing on primary sources and case law examining consent in criminal cases, it shows that common family regulation investigation tactics render consent involuntary and the ensuing searches unconstitutional. And yet, it argues, the Constitution is not enough. Though constitutional litigation could …
The Employees’ Dilemma: Balancing Internal Reporting, Whistleblowing, And Insider Trading Risks, Geeyoung Min
The Employees’ Dilemma: Balancing Internal Reporting, Whistleblowing, And Insider Trading Risks, Geeyoung Min
Seattle University Law Review
The Essay examines how recent developments in insider trading regulations and whistleblower reward programs can lead to unintended and counterproductive results of discouraging employees from using internal reporting channels within corporate compliance programs. While the presence of a robust and well-functioning corporate compliance program is a critical factor both in mitigating the level of public enforcement actions against companies and in protecting corporate managers from liability in private litigation, these programs often provide little incentive for employees to report potential misconduct internally.
Corporate compliance programs are designed to promote the upward information flow within the company, which is essential for …
Understanding The Big Three’S Wavering Support Of Environmental And Social Shareholder Proposals, Jeff Schwartz, Jefferson Jensen
Understanding The Big Three’S Wavering Support Of Environmental And Social Shareholder Proposals, Jeff Schwartz, Jefferson Jensen
Seattle University Law Review
Because of their substantial equity portfolios, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street (the Big 3) are central players in corporate governance. It is, therefore, critical to understand how they vote. One puzzle is that their support for shareholder proposals on environmental and social matters appears to waiver. In 2020, for instance, BlackRock supported 11.1% of environmental proposals at S&P 500 firms. In 2021, it seemingly reversed course, supporting 55.2%. It then flipped again, supporting 32.1% in 2022. Such statistics suggest that the Big 3 are constantly changing their views on these topics. This Article seeks to better understand whether this is …
How The Antidiscrimination Law Of Commercial Transactions Really Works, Helen Norton
How The Antidiscrimination Law Of Commercial Transactions Really Works, Helen Norton
Seattle University Law Review
A variety of businesses now cite 303 Creative when seeking First Amendment protection for their refusal to serve certain customers based on those customers’ protected class status. How this litigation will play out remains to be seen. But future courts need not, and should not, repeat the 303 Creative Court’s misunderstanding of how the antidiscrimination law of commercial transactions actually works.
Part I of this Essay explains the Court’s longstanding understanding of the antidiscrimination law of commercial transactions, and then describes the Court’s failure to engage with this precedent in 303 Creative. Part II then identifies the 303 Creative decision’s …
Remedying Unconstitutional Immigration Enforcement, Guha Krishnamurthi
Remedying Unconstitutional Immigration Enforcement, Guha Krishnamurthi
Cardozo Law Review de•novo
Fearmongering about “illegal immigration” has reached a fever pitch. There is a nearing bipartisan consensus among politicians that “stopping illegal immigration and securing the border” is a paramount priority. The fact that many politicians and institutional actors have displayed animus in discussing immigration enforcement portends that many perils lie ahead. It is precisely during this time that constitutional rights must serve as a bulwark against government overreach. This Essay contends that our constitutional rights framework, specifically its principal remedies for rights violations, are inadequate to protect against government malfeasance. In particular, I demonstrate that there are plausible scenarios where the …