Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Procedure (21)
- Constitutional Law (20)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (14)
- Fourteenth Amendment (12)
- Supreme Court of the United States (11)
-
- Jurisprudence (8)
- Criminal Law (7)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- Evidence (2)
- Law and Race (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Sociology (2)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Education Law (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Race and Ethnicity (1)
- Transportation Law (1)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (14)
- William & Mary Law School (5)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (2)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
-
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- UIdaho Law (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Miranda v. Arizona (10)
- Dickerson v. United States (9)
- Fifth Amendment (8)
- Fourth Amendment (6)
- Custodial interrogation (5)
-
- Due Process Clause (5)
- Search and seizure (5)
- Searches and Seizures (5)
- Racial profiling (4)
- Confession (3)
- Discrimination (3)
- Exclusionary rule (3)
- Kamisar (Yale) (3)
- Mapp v. Ohio (3)
- Michigan v. Tucker (3)
- New York v. Quarles (3)
- Police (3)
- Police interrogation (3)
- Searches (3)
- Self-Incrimination Clause (3)
- Voluntariness (3)
- African Americans (2)
- Arrest (2)
- Bill of Rights (2)
- City of Boerne v. Flores (2)
- Compulsion (2)
- Confrontation Clause (2)
- Consent (2)
- Due process (2)
- Edwards v. Arizona (2)
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (11)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (2)
- Popular Media (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
-
- Articles (1)
- Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (1)
- Cardozo Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (1)
- Oklahoma Law Review (1)
- Scholarly Publications (1)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (1)
- University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (1)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 35 of 35
Full-Text Articles in Fourth Amendment
Usual Suspects Beware: "Walk, Don't Run" Through Dangerous Neighborhoods, Margaret Anne Hoehl
Usual Suspects Beware: "Walk, Don't Run" Through Dangerous Neighborhoods, Margaret Anne Hoehl
University of Richmond Law Review
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution is "designed 'to prevent arbitrary and oppressive interference by enforcement officials with the privacy and personal security of individuals." The Amendment is currently interpreted as consisting of two separate clauses, the first generally prohibiting unreasonable searches and seizures, and the second requiring the establishment of probable cause prior to the issuance of a warrant. Hence, only those government searches and seizures requiring a warrant necessitate the establishment of probable cause, and all other searches and seizures simply need to be "reasonable."
An Empirically Based Comparison Of American And European Regulatory Approaches To Police Investigation, Christopher Slobogin
An Empirically Based Comparison Of American And European Regulatory Approaches To Police Investigation, Christopher Slobogin
Michigan Journal of International Law
This article takes a comparative and empirical look at two of the most significant methods of police investigation: searches for and seizures of tangible evidence and interrogation of suspects. It first compares American doctrine regulating these investigative tools with the analogous rules predominant in Europe. It then discusses research on the American system that sheds light on the relative advantages and disadvantages of the two regulatory regimes.
Racial Profiling And Whren: Searching For Objective Evidence Of The Fourth Amendment On The Nation's Roads, Alberto B. Lopez
Racial Profiling And Whren: Searching For Objective Evidence Of The Fourth Amendment On The Nation's Roads, Alberto B. Lopez
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure: Tenth Circuit Erroneously Allows Officers' Intentions To Define Reasonable Searches: United States V. Carey, Jim Dowell
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Keeping The Government's Hands Off Our Bodies: Mapping A Feminist Legal Theory Approach To Privacy In Cross-Gender Prison Searches, Teresa A. Miller
Keeping The Government's Hands Off Our Bodies: Mapping A Feminist Legal Theory Approach To Privacy In Cross-Gender Prison Searches, Teresa A. Miller
Journal Articles
The power of privacy is diminishing in the prison setting, and yet privacy is the legal theory prisoners rely upon most to resist searches by correctional officers. Incarcerated women in particular rely upon privacy to shield them from the kind of physical contact that male guards have been known to abuse. The kind of privacy that protects prisoners from searches by guards of the opposite sex derives from several sources, depending on the factual circumstances. Although some form of bodily privacy is embodied in the First, Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments, prisoners challenging the constitutionality of cross-gender searches most commonly …