Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (191)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (68)
- UIC School of Law (15)
- Roger Williams University (7)
- University of Michigan Law School (5)
-
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4)
- University of Washington School of Law (4)
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Florida International University College of Law (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (2)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Liberty University (1)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (1)
- Mississippi Christian University School of Law (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Search and Seizure (40)
- Fourth Amendment (37)
- Article I section 12 (33)
- New york constitution (33)
- United states constitution (33)
-
- Fourth amendment (28)
- Supreme Court (28)
- Constitution (27)
- Probable cause (27)
- Amendment IV (25)
- Police (24)
- Reasonable suspicion (23)
- Federal (20)
- Privacy (16)
- Defendant (15)
- Evidence (15)
- § 12 (15)
- Appellate Division (14)
- Search and seizure (14)
- Law (13)
- Warrant (13)
- Court of Appeals (12)
- Court of appeals (12)
- State (11)
- Searches (10)
- Criminal possession of controlled substance (9)
- Exclusionary rule (9)
- New York State (9)
- Search & seizure (9)
- 1992) (8)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (191)
- Touro Law Review (68)
- UIC Law Review (14)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (5)
- Northwestern University Law Review (4)
-
- Washington Law Review (4)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Publications (3)
- University of Richmond Law Review (3)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (2)
- FIU Law Review (2)
- Georgia Law Review (2)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (2)
- University of Baltimore Law Forum (2)
- Articles (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Books (1)
- Brooklyn Law Review (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Et Cetera (1)
- Florida State University Law Review (1)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (1)
- Georgia State University Law Review (1)
- Helm's School of Government Conference - 2021-2024 (1)
- Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (1)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 241 - 270 of 339
Full-Text Articles in Fourth Amendment
Survey Of Washington Search And Seizure Law: 2013 Update, Justice Charles W. Johnson, Justice Debra L. Stephens
Survey Of Washington Search And Seizure Law: 2013 Update, Justice Charles W. Johnson, Justice Debra L. Stephens
Seattle University Law Review
This survey is intended to serve as a resource to which Washington lawyers, judges, law enforcement officers, and others can turn as an authoritative starting point for researching Washington search and seizure law. In order to be useful as a research tool, this Survey requires periodic updates to address new cases interpreting the Washington constitution and the U.S. Constitution and to reflect the current state of the law. Many of these cases involve the Washington State Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Washington constitution. Also, as the U.S. Supreme Court has continued to examine Fourth Amendment search and seizure jurisprudence, its …
Clever Contraband: Why Illinois’ Lockstep With The U.S. Supreme Court Gives Police Authority To Search The Bowels Of Your Vehicle, 47 J. Marshall L. Rev. 425 (2013), Jason Cooper
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Pledge Your Body For Your Bread: Welfare, Drug Testing, And The Inferior Fourth Amendment, Jordan C. Budd
Pledge Your Body For Your Bread: Welfare, Drug Testing, And The Inferior Fourth Amendment, Jordan C. Budd
Law Faculty Scholarship
Proposals to subject welfare recipients to periodic drug testing have emerged over the last three years as a significant legislative trend across the United States. Since 2007, over half of the states have considered bills requiring aid recipients to submit to invasive extraction procedures as an ongoing condition of public assistance. The vast majority of the legislation imposes testing without regard to suspected drug use, reflecting the implicit assumption that the poor are inherently predisposed to culpable conduct and thus may be subject to class-based intrusions that would be inarguably impermissible if inflicted on the less destitute. These proposals are …
Photo Enforcement Programs: Are They Permissible Under The United States Constitution?, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 463 (2010), Paul Mcnaughton
Photo Enforcement Programs: Are They Permissible Under The United States Constitution?, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 463 (2010), Paul Mcnaughton
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Gps Monitoring May Cause Orwell To Turn In His Grave, But Will It Escape Constitutional Challenges? A Look At Gps Monitoring Of Domestic Violence Offenders In Illinois, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 845 (2010), Mary Ann Scholl
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fourth Amendment Federalism And The Silencing Of The American Poor, Andrew E. Taslitz
Fourth Amendment Federalism And The Silencing Of The American Poor, Andrew E. Taslitz
Chicago-Kent Law Review
In Virginia v. Moore, police officers searched Moore incident to an arrest for a minor traffic infraction for which Virginia statutory law in fact prohibited arrest. The officers found cocaine on Moore's person, arresting him for that crime too. The United States Supreme Court ultimately found that the arrest for the traffic infraction and the subsequent search were valid under the federal Constitution's Fourth Amendment. Central to the Court's reasoning was its insistence that the state statute was irrelevant. Any contrary conclusion, explained the Court, would wrongly make the Fourth Amendment's meaning vary from place to place. Professor Taslitz …
Contingent Constitutionalism: State And Local Criminal Laws And The Applicability Of Federal Constitutional Rights, Wayne A. Logan
Contingent Constitutionalism: State And Local Criminal Laws And The Applicability Of Federal Constitutional Rights, Wayne A. Logan
Scholarly Publications
Americans have long been bound by a shared sense of constitutional commonality, and the Supreme Court has repeatedly condemned the notion that federal constitutional rights should be allowed to depend on distinct state and local legal norms. In reality, however, federal rights do indeed vary, and they do so as a result of their contingent relationship to the diversity of state and local laws on which they rely. Focusing on criminal procedure rights in particular, this Article examines the benefits and detriments of constitutional contingency, and casts in new light many enduring understandings of American constitutionalism, including the effects of …
Vagrants In Volvos: Ending Pretextual Traffic Stops And Consent Searches Of Vehicles In Illinois, 40 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 745 (2009), Timothy P. O'Neill
Vagrants In Volvos: Ending Pretextual Traffic Stops And Consent Searches Of Vehicles In Illinois, 40 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 745 (2009), Timothy P. O'Neill
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Hitching A Ride: Every Time You Take A Drive, The Government Is Riding With You, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1499 (2006), Benjamin Burnham
Hitching A Ride: Every Time You Take A Drive, The Government Is Riding With You, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1499 (2006), Benjamin Burnham
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Snoop Dogs: An Analysis Of Narcotics Canine Sniffs Of Storage Units Under The Fourth Amendment, Eugene D. Bryant
Snoop Dogs: An Analysis Of Narcotics Canine Sniffs Of Storage Units Under The Fourth Amendment, Eugene D. Bryant
Georgia Law Review
A recent development in the nation's war on drugs is the increased use of narcotics canines to indiscriminately search storage facilities. Although the Fourth Amendment protects persons from unreasonable searches and seizures, the Supreme Court of the United States in U.S. v. Place deemed a canine sniff to be sui generis and not a "search"subject to analysis under the Fourth Amendment. With its decision in Illinois v. Caballes, the Court extended this analysis to canine sniffs outside of vehicles. Various state courts, in order to better protect the rights of state citizens, have rejected the Supreme Court's sui generis analysis …
American Courts Are Drowning In The "Gene Pool": Excavating The Slippery Slope Mechanisms Behind Judicial Endorsement Of Dna Databases, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 115 (2005), Meghan Riley
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Anthony V. City Of New York, Roy G. Locke Jr.
Criminal Law, Marla Graff Decker, Stephen R. Mccullough
Criminal Law, Marla Graff Decker, Stephen R. Mccullough
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law And Procedure, Julie E. Mcconnell, Gregory Franklin, Craig Winston Stallard
Criminal Law And Procedure, Julie E. Mcconnell, Gregory Franklin, Craig Winston Stallard
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Claims For Damages For Violations Of State Constitutional Rights - Analysis Of The Recent Court Of Appeals Decision In Brown V. New York; The Resolved And Unresolved Issues, Martin A. Schwartz
Claims For Damages For Violations Of State Constitutional Rights - Analysis Of The Recent Court Of Appeals Decision In Brown V. New York; The Resolved And Unresolved Issues, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Court Of Appeals: People V. Turriago
Search And Seizure, Court Of Appeals: People V. Turriago
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department: People V. Lafontaine
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department: People V. Lafontaine
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: People V. King
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: People V. King
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Bronx County: People V. Johnson
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Bronx County: People V. Johnson
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Queens County: People V. Brewer
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Queens County: People V. Brewer
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
New York Vs. "The Rest Of The Country": State Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Barry Latzer
New York Vs. "The Rest Of The Country": State Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Barry Latzer
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Court Of Appeals: People V. Funches
Search And Seizure, Court Of Appeals: People V. Funches
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: People V. Hichez
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: People V. Hichez
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, New York County: People V. Rodgers
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, New York County: People V. Rodgers
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department: People V. Smith
Search And Seizure, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department: People V. Smith
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Execution Of Search Warrants, H. Patrick Furman
The Execution Of Search Warrants, H. Patrick Furman
Publications
No abstract provided.
Intruders At The Death House: Limiting Third-Party Intervention In Executive Clemency, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 567 (1997), Daryl M. Schumacher
Intruders At The Death House: Limiting Third-Party Intervention In Executive Clemency, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 567 (1997), Daryl M. Schumacher
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Buck Stops Here: Illinois Criminalizes Support For International Terrorism, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 871 (1997), Victoria Meyerov
The Buck Stops Here: Illinois Criminalizes Support For International Terrorism, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 871 (1997), Victoria Meyerov
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Race, Cops, And Traffic Stops, Angela J. Davis
Race, Cops, And Traffic Stops, Angela J. Davis
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
This article discusses the Supreme Court's failure to provide a clear and effective remedy for discriminatory pretextual traffic stops. The first part explores the discretionary nature of pretextual stops and their discriminatory effect on African-Americans and Latinos. Then, the article examines Whren v. United States, a Supreme Court case in which the petitioners claimed that these “pretextual stops” violate the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution and are racially discriminatory. The Supreme Court rejected the claim, upholding the constitutionality of pretextual stops based on probable cause and noting that claims of racial discrimination must be challenged under the Equal Protection Clause. …
Mandatory Non-Anonymous Testing Of Newborns For Hiv: Should It Ever Be Allowed, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 373 (1994), Jean R. Sternlight
Mandatory Non-Anonymous Testing Of Newborns For Hiv: Should It Ever Be Allowed, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 373 (1994), Jean R. Sternlight
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.