Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (185)
- University of Michigan Law School (22)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (20)
- American University Washington College of Law (17)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (14)
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (13)
- UIC School of Law (10)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (7)
- University of Miami Law School (6)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (5)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (5)
- Georgetown University Law Center (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- Pepperdine University (4)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- Emory University School of Law (2)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Pace University (2)
- The University of Akron (2)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- West Virginia University (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- Bemidji State University (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Bridgewater College (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Fourth Amendment (59)
- Privacy (57)
- Technology (39)
- Fourth amendment (32)
- Surveillance (30)
-
- Search (29)
- Police (19)
- Law (16)
- Searches (16)
- Third party doctrine (13)
- Search and seizure (11)
- Seizure (11)
- Big data (8)
- DNA (8)
- Data (8)
- Expectation of privacy (8)
- Katz (8)
- United States Supreme Court (8)
- Criminal procedure (7)
- Katz v. United States (7)
- Probable cause (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Supreme Court (7)
- Warrant (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- ESG (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- GPS (6)
- Policing (6)
- Reasonable expectation of privacy (6)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (185)
- Faculty Articles (16)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (14)
- Faculty Scholarship (13)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (12)
-
- Michigan Law Review (9)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (6)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (5)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (5)
- UIC Law Review (5)
- Articles (4)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
- Other Faculty Publications (4)
- Scholarly Articles (4)
- Cleveland State Law Review (3)
- Pepperdine Law Review (3)
- Publications (3)
- University of Miami Law Review (3)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (3)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Caveat (3)
- Washington and Lee Law Review Online (3)
- Akron Law Review (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Journal of Business & Technology Law (2)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (2)
- Pace Law Review (2)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (2)
- University of Miami Business Law Review (2)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 361 - 367 of 367
Full-Text Articles in Fourth Amendment
The Bill Of Rights And The Constitution: Facing The Challenge Of The Future, Stephen Wermiel
The Bill Of Rights And The Constitution: Facing The Challenge Of The Future, Stephen Wermiel
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Thermal Imaging And The Fourth Amendment: Pushing The Katz Test Towards Terminal Velocity, 13 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 453 (1995), Daniel J. Polatsek
Thermal Imaging And The Fourth Amendment: Pushing The Katz Test Towards Terminal Velocity, 13 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 453 (1995), Daniel J. Polatsek
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
Thermal imaging technology allows police to ascertain if a suspect is growing marijuana in his home by monitoring the escaping heat from the home. Conflicts between the lower courts on whether thermal imaging is sophisticated technology that is intrusive has not been resolved. Most courts rely on Katz v. United States in developing a reasonable inquiry into whether one's privacy has been invaded. The Katz test fails in part because of the second prong of the court's analysis. The second prong of the test states that an impermissible search occurs when a reasonable expectation of privacy is invaded. Consequently, prosecutors …
Search And Seizure: It's Time The Court Shed Some Light On The Use Of Ultraviolet Lamps, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 877 (1989), M. Jeffrey Tucker
Search And Seizure: It's Time The Court Shed Some Light On The Use Of Ultraviolet Lamps, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 877 (1989), M. Jeffrey Tucker
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Electronic Tracking Devices And The Fourth Amendment: Knotts, Karo, And The Questions Still Unanswered, Clifford S. Fishman
Electronic Tracking Devices And The Fourth Amendment: Knotts, Karo, And The Questions Still Unanswered, Clifford S. Fishman
Scholarly Articles
This article will examine the Knotts and Karo decisions, analyze the unanswered questions relating to the use of electronic tracking devices, and outline legislation that might best resolve those questions and strike a proper balance between the often conflicting values of individual privacy and effective law enforcement.
Police Use Of Cctv Surveillance: Constitutional Implications And Proposed Regulations, Gary C. Robb
Police Use Of Cctv Surveillance: Constitutional Implications And Proposed Regulations, Gary C. Robb
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This article evaluates the constitutionality of CCTV "searches." Part I discusses the present uses being made of closed circuit technology and evaluates the merits of the CCTV surveillance system. The critical policy trade-off is the system's effectiveness in combatting crime against the resulting loss of privacy to individual citizens.
Part II considers the constitutional implications of CCTV use in terms of three major doctrines: the Fourth Amendment prohibition against "unreasonable searches and seizures"; the constitutional right of privacy; and the First Amendment guarantees of free speech and association. This part briefly summarizes the state of the law concerning these constitutional …
Pen Registers And Privacy: Risks, Expectations, And The Nullification Of Congressional Intent, Clifford S. Fishman
Pen Registers And Privacy: Risks, Expectations, And The Nullification Of Congressional Intent, Clifford S. Fishman
Scholarly Articles
In United States v. New York Telephone Co. the Supreme Court first ruled that an ordinary search warrant sufficed to authorize law enforcement use of a pen register. Additionally, the Court ruled that a federal district judge possessed the authority to include within the search warrant an order compelling a telephone company to assist the government by installing a pen register on the targeted telephone.
In Smith v. Maryland, the Court considered the legality of pen register surveillance conducted by a telephone company pursuant to an informal police request, that is, without a warrant or other court order. In holding …
The Legitimation Of Electronic Eavesdropping: The Politics Of "Law And Order", Herman Schwartz
The Legitimation Of Electronic Eavesdropping: The Politics Of "Law And Order", Herman Schwartz
Michigan Law Review
This Article will examine some constitutional considerations raised by wiretapping and eavesdropping in light of recent Supreme Court decisions, the probable extent of such activity, the limitations imposed upon it by title III and the ABA Standards, and the arguments for the "necessity" of electronic surveillance. Finally, a few jaundiced comments will be offered about legislative and judicial lawmaking in the field of criminal justice, particularly in a time of crisis.