Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (186)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (14)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (3)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (3)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
-
- The University of Akron (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (1)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (1)
- University of Dar es Salaam (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Law (13)
- Fourth Amendment (11)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- ESG (6)
-
- Supreme Court (6)
- Discrimination (5)
- Diversity (5)
- Privacy (5)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Addiction (4)
- Artificial intelligence (4)
- Public health (4)
- Regulation (4)
- SEC (4)
- Technology (4)
- Constitution (3)
- Corporate (3)
- Corporate Governance (3)
- Data (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Justice (3)
- Katz (3)
- Police misconduct (3)
- Reform (3)
- Sec (3)
- Securities (3)
- Shareholder (3)
- Surveillance (3)
- Washington (3)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (186)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (14)
- University of the District of Columbia Law Review (3)
- Akron Law Review (2)
- Cardozo Law Review (2)
-
- Touro Law Review (2)
- UIC Law Review (2)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (1)
- Arkansas Law Review (1)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law Review (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (1)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (1)
- Intercultural Human Rights Law Review (1)
- Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - ) (1)
- Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (1)
- Law Student Publications (1)
- Utah Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Washington Law Review Online (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 211 - 225 of 225
Full-Text Articles in Fourth Amendment
Birchfield V. North Dakota:Why The United States Supreme Court Should Rely On Riley V. California To Hold That Criminalizing A Suspect’S Refusal To Consent To A Warrantless Blood Test Violates The Fourth Amendment, Adam Lamparello, Cynthia Swann
Birchfield V. North Dakota:Why The United States Supreme Court Should Rely On Riley V. California To Hold That Criminalizing A Suspect’S Refusal To Consent To A Warrantless Blood Test Violates The Fourth Amendment, Adam Lamparello, Cynthia Swann
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Policing In The Era Of Permissiveness: Mitigating Misconduct Through Third-Party Standing, Julian A. Cook Iii
Policing In The Era Of Permissiveness: Mitigating Misconduct Through Third-Party Standing, Julian A. Cook Iii
Brooklyn Law Review
On April 4, 2015, Walter L. Scott was driving his vehicle when he was stopped by Officer Michael T. Slager of the North Charleston, South Carolina, police department for a broken taillight. A dash cam video from the officer’s vehicle showed the two men engaged in what appeared to be a rather routine verbal exchange. Sometime after Slager returned to his vehicle, Scott exited his car and ran away from Slager, prompting the officer to pursue him on foot. After he caught up with Scott in a grassy field near a muffler establishment, a scuffle between the men ensued, purportedly …
Corporate Rights And Individual Interests: The Corporate Right To Privacy As A Bulwark Against Warrantless Government Surveillance, Kayla Robinson
Corporate Rights And Individual Interests: The Corporate Right To Privacy As A Bulwark Against Warrantless Government Surveillance, Kayla Robinson
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Another Casualty Of The War . . . Vagrancy Laws Target The Fourth Amendment, T. Leigh Anenson
Another Casualty Of The War . . . Vagrancy Laws Target The Fourth Amendment, T. Leigh Anenson
Akron Law Review
This Comment will review the origins of the vagrancy law and its traditional abuses. It will then examine decisions discussing the vagrancy law's constitutionality under the Due Process clause void-for-vagueness doctrine and the courts' attempted remedy of explicit standards as to place, scope, or purpose. The remainder of this Comment will discuss the constitutionality of these revised vagrancy laws under the Fourth Amendment's prohibition of unreasonable seizures.
The Devil Is In The Details: The Supreme Court Erodes The Fourth Amendment In Applying Reasonable Suspicion In Navarette V. California, George M. Dery Iii, Kevin Meehan
The Devil Is In The Details: The Supreme Court Erodes The Fourth Amendment In Applying Reasonable Suspicion In Navarette V. California, George M. Dery Iii, Kevin Meehan
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Letting Innocence Suffer: The Need For Defense Access To The Law Enforcement Dna Database, Jason Kreag
Letting Innocence Suffer: The Need For Defense Access To The Law Enforcement Dna Database, Jason Kreag
Cardozo Law Review
Law enforcement has gradually amassed a sizable DNA database that holds considerable promise for solving cold cases and identifying suspects. The Supreme Court has blessed this effort, allowing investigators to include profiles of arrestees as well as convicted persons in the database. At present, though, law enforcement has a near monopoly on use of the DNA database, leaving defendants at the whim of the law enforcement officials who control access to this tool. Legal scholars have alternatively praised and decried the database, but none has examined its prospects for proving defendants' innocence post-conviction. This Article fills that void by identifying …
Redefining The Right To Be Let Alone: Privacy Rights And The Constitutionality Of Technical Surveillance Measures In Germany And The United States, Nicole Jacoby
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Putting The Brakes On Driver Privacy: Black Boxes, Data Collection, And The Fourth Amendment, Thayer Case
Putting The Brakes On Driver Privacy: Black Boxes, Data Collection, And The Fourth Amendment, Thayer Case
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure Decisions From The October 2006 Term, Susan N. Herman
Criminal Procedure Decisions From The October 2006 Term, Susan N. Herman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Proposition 8 Is Unconstitutional, But Not Because The Ninth Circuit Said So: The Equal Protection Clause Does Not Support A Legal Distinction Between Denying The Right To Same-Sex Marriage And Not Providing It In The First Place, Nathan Rouse
Seattle University Law Review
In Perry v. Brown, the Ninth Circuit held that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional. But in doing so, the court stepped back from the breadth of the district court’s decision. The Ninth Circuit did not address whether same-sex marriage is a fundamental constitutional right. Nor did the Ninth Circuit address whether the Equal Protection Clause categorically prevents states from limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples. Instead, the Ninth Circuit reached the narrow conclusion that Proposition 8 violates the Equal Protection Clause because it withdrew a preexisting legal right from a marginalized group without any legitimate purpose. The Ninth Circuit should have held …
Can Social Science Defeat A Legal Fiction? Challenging Unlawful Stops Under The Fourth Amendment, Josephine Ross
Can Social Science Defeat A Legal Fiction? Challenging Unlawful Stops Under The Fourth Amendment, Josephine Ross
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Due Process In American Military Tribunals After September 11, 2001, Gary Shaw
Due Process In American Military Tribunals After September 11, 2001, Gary Shaw
Touro Law Review
The Authorization for Use of Military Force ("AUMF") provides broad powers for a president after September 11, 2001. President Bush, under the AUMF, claimed he had the power to hold "enemy combatants" without due process. This gave rise to two questions that the article addresses: "Could they be held indefinitely without charges or proceedings being initiated? If proceedings had to be initiated, what process was due to the defendants?"
A Brave New World Of Stop And Frisk, Ron Bacigal
A Brave New World Of Stop And Frisk, Ron Bacigal
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
American Courts Are Drowning In The "Gene Pool": Excavating The Slippery Slope Mechanisms Behind Judicial Endorsement Of Dna Databases, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 115 (2005), Meghan Riley
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Intruders At The Death House: Limiting Third-Party Intervention In Executive Clemency, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 567 (1997), Daryl M. Schumacher
Intruders At The Death House: Limiting Third-Party Intervention In Executive Clemency, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 567 (1997), Daryl M. Schumacher
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.