Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (18)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (13)
- Law and Race (6)
- Law and Gender (5)
- Supreme Court of the United States (5)
-
- Criminal Procedure (3)
- Family Law (3)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Sexuality and the Law (3)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (2)
- Courts (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Education Law (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Fourth Amendment (2)
- Immigration Law (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Election Law (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Housing Law (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (1)
- Insurance Law (1)
- International Law (1)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1)
- Institution
-
- William & Mary Law School (5)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (5)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (3)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (3)
-
- UIC School of Law (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- UC Law SF (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Equal Protection Clause (5)
- United States Constitution 14th Amendment (5)
- Equal protection (4)
- Fourteenth Amendment (4)
- Brown v. Board of Education (2)
-
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (2)
- Desegregation (2)
- Due Process of Law (2)
- Due process (2)
- Fifteenth Amendment (2)
- Fundamental rights (2)
- Race Discrimination (2)
- Race and law (2)
- Ricci v. DeStefano (2)
- State Government (2)
- Title VII (2)
- United States Constitution (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- 14th Amendment (1)
- Acquired sex (1)
- Aesthetic zoning (1)
- Affirmative action (1)
- And Fifteenth Amendments (1)
- Anti-immigrant ordinances (1)
- Article IV (1)
- Article VII (1)
- Assisted reproductive technology (1)
- Bias (1)
- Birth certificate (1)
- Burman v. Parker (1)
- Publication
-
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (4)
- Faculty Articles (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (3)
- Articles (2)
-
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (2)
- Cardozo Law Review (2)
- UIC Law Review (2)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (2)
- American Indian Law Review (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Inquiry Journal 2010 (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Oklahoma Law Review (1)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (1)
- William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 36 of 36
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
The Origins Of The Privileges Or Immunities Clause, Part I: “Privileges And Immunities” As An Antebellum Term Of Art, Kurt T. Lash
The Origins Of The Privileges Or Immunities Clause, Part I: “Privileges And Immunities” As An Antebellum Term Of Art, Kurt T. Lash
Law Faculty Publications
Historical accounts of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of Section One of the Fourteenth Amendment generally assume that John Bingham based the text on Article IV of the original Constitution and that Bingham, like other Reconstruction Republicans, viewed Justice Washington’s opinion in Corfield v. Coryell as the definitive statement of the meaning of Article IV. According to this view, Justice Miller in the Slaughterhouse Cases failed to follow both framers’ intent and obvious textual meaning when he distinguished Section One’s privileges or immunities from Article IV’s privileges and immunities.
A close analysis of antebellum law, however, suggests that Justice Miller’s …
Native Hawaiians And The Ceded Lands Trust: Applying Self-Determination As An Alternative To The Equal Protection Analysis, R. Hōkūlei Lindsey
Native Hawaiians And The Ceded Lands Trust: Applying Self-Determination As An Alternative To The Equal Protection Analysis, R. Hōkūlei Lindsey
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
Justice Stevens And The Seattle Schools Case: A Case Study On The Role Of Righteous Anger In Constitutional Discourse, Andrew Siegel
Justice Stevens And The Seattle Schools Case: A Case Study On The Role Of Righteous Anger In Constitutional Discourse, Andrew Siegel
Faculty Articles
No abstract provided.
Barriers To Financing: Is European Union Indirect Discrimination Law The Answer For Female Entrepreneurs?, Adam G. Panopoulos
Barriers To Financing: Is European Union Indirect Discrimination Law The Answer For Female Entrepreneurs?, Adam G. Panopoulos
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The note explores whether European Union indirect discrimination law, particularly Directive 2004/113/EC, can address the barriers female entrepreneurs face in accessing financing. It examines the application of indirect discrimination principles to financial services, analyzing ECJ case law and advocating for the integration of gender mainstreaming to enhance gender equality in entrepreneurship.
Drawing Bisexuality Back Into The Picture: How Bisexuality Fits Into Lgbt Legal Strategy Ten Years After Bisexual Erasure, Heron Greenesmith
Drawing Bisexuality Back Into The Picture: How Bisexuality Fits Into Lgbt Legal Strategy Ten Years After Bisexual Erasure, Heron Greenesmith
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article argues that bisexuality remains legally invisible, both in legal culture and jurisprudence, due to its inherent complexity and the reliance of legal arguments on a binary understanding of sexual orientation. It extends Kenji Yoshino's theory of bisexual erasure into the legal context, proposing that bisexuality is not just socially invisible but also legally inconspicuous. The analysis focuses on two main hypotheses: first, that bisexuality is inherently invisible to the law beyond deliberate erasure, and second, that where bisexuality is legally relevant, it complicates legal arguments that depend on the binary of sexuality. The article concludes by advocating for …
Penalizing Punitive Damages: Why The Supreme Court Needs A Lesson In Law And Economics, Steve P. Calandrillo
Penalizing Punitive Damages: Why The Supreme Court Needs A Lesson In Law And Economics, Steve P. Calandrillo
Articles
The recent landmark Supreme Court decision addressing punitive damages in the infamous Exxon Valdez oil spill case has brought the issue of punitive awards back into the legal limelight. Modern Supreme Court jurisprudence, most notably BMW of North America, Inc. [517 U.S. 559 (1996)], State Farm [538 U.S. 408 (2003)], Philip Morris [549 U.S. 346 (2007)], and now Exxon Shipping Co. [128 S.Ct. 2605 (2008)] in 2008, has concluded that such judgments are justified to punish morally reprehensible behavior and to send a message to evildoers. The Court, however, has increasingly emphasized that the U.S. Constitution's Due Process Clause presumptively …