Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (20)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (17)
- Law and Race (15)
- Supreme Court of the United States (14)
- Legislation (11)
-
- Law and Politics (10)
- Election Law (9)
- State and Local Government Law (9)
- Legal History (7)
- Courts (6)
- Education Law (5)
- Litigation (5)
- Criminal Procedure (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Civil Law (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Law and Gender (2)
- Property Law and Real Estate (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Bankruptcy Law (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Disability Law (1)
- Elder Law (1)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (1)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (14)
- UIC School of Law (6)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (4)
- New York Law School (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
-
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Equal Protection Clause (14)
- Race and law (13)
- United States Supreme Court (13)
- Discrimination (8)
- Congress (7)
-
- Redistricting (7)
- Affirmative action (6)
- Congressional districts (6)
- Elections (6)
- Equal protection (6)
- Gerrymandering (6)
- LULAC v. Perry (6)
- Latinos (6)
- Michigan (6)
- Texas (6)
- Voting Rights Act (6)
- Civil Rights Act (5)
- Fourteenth Amendment (5)
- Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (5)
- Grutter v. Bollinger (4)
- Slavery (3)
- Citizenship (2)
- Constitutional law (2)
- Equal Protection (2)
- Gratz v. Bollinger (2)
- Race (2)
- Reconstruction (2)
- ADA (1)
- Admissions (1)
- African Americans (1)
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (11)
- UIC Law Review (6)
- Articles (3)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (2)
- NYLS Law Review (2)
-
- Nevada Law Journal (2)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- American Indian Law Review (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Florida A & M University Law Review (1)
- Maryland Law Review (1)
- Mercer Law Review (1)
- Popular Media (1)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (1)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- Washington Law Review (1)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 45 of 45
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Limiting The Presidency To Natural Born Citizens Violates Due Process, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1343 (2006), Paul A. Clark
Limiting The Presidency To Natural Born Citizens Violates Due Process, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1343 (2006), Paul A. Clark
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Disparate Impact And The Adea: So, Who Is Going To Be In The Comparison Group?, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1475 (2006), Timothy Tommaso
Disparate Impact And The Adea: So, Who Is Going To Be In The Comparison Group?, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1475 (2006), Timothy Tommaso
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Johnson V. California: Setting A Constitutional Trap For Prison Officials, Rachel C. Grumberger
Johnson V. California: Setting A Constitutional Trap For Prison Officials, Rachel C. Grumberger
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Gideon As A Human Right: Is The U.S. Going To Join Step With The Rest Of The Developed World?, Raven Lidman
Civil Gideon As A Human Right: Is The U.S. Going To Join Step With The Rest Of The Developed World?, Raven Lidman
Faculty Articles
This article will discuss the scope of services and rationale for the right to a free lawyer in civil matters as is the case in criminal cases. This right is currently provided in the 49 European member countries in the Council of Europe (COE), Australia, Canada, India, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Japan, Zambia, South Africa, and Brazil. Frequent reference will be made to a chart in the appendix, which condenses extensive information about programs in each of these countries. The article’s general conclusion regarding the foreign programs is that the right to a free lawyer in civil matters is a …
Incarcerated Men And Women, The Equal Protection Clause, And The Requirement Of “Similarly Situated”, Natasha L. Carroll-Ferrary
Incarcerated Men And Women, The Equal Protection Clause, And The Requirement Of “Similarly Situated”, Natasha L. Carroll-Ferrary
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Slippery Slope: The Vitality Of Reynolds V. Us After Romer And Lawrence, James Askew
The Slippery Slope: The Vitality Of Reynolds V. Us After Romer And Lawrence, James Askew
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The note argues that the legal prohibition of polygamy, upheld by the landmark case Reynolds v. United States, is increasingly vulnerable in light of recent Supreme Court decisions, particularly *Romer v. Evans* and Lawrence v. Texas. These decisions have expanded individual rights and challenged the constitutionality of laws targeting specific groups, suggesting that the legal framework against polygamy may no longer hold. The author posits that just as same-sex marriage is gaining legal recognition, polygamous marriages should also be reconsidered under these evolving legal standards.
Recent Appellate Court Decisions On Eyewitness Identification, Jerry E. Norton
Recent Appellate Court Decisions On Eyewitness Identification, Jerry E. Norton
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Headscarves In German Public Schools: Religious Minorities Are Welcome In Germany, Unless — God Forbid — They Are Religious, Ruben Seth Fogel
Headscarves In German Public Schools: Religious Minorities Are Welcome In Germany, Unless — God Forbid — They Are Religious, Ruben Seth Fogel
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Riddle Of Hiram Revels, Richard A. Primus
The Riddle Of Hiram Revels, Richard A. Primus
Articles
In 1870, a black man named Hiram Revels was named to represent Mississippi in the Senate. Senate Democrats objected to seating him and pointed out that the Constitution specifies that no person may be a senator who has not been a citizen of the United States for at least nine years. Before the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868, the Democrats argued, Revels had not been a citizen on account of the Supreme Court's 1857 decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford. Thus, even if Revels were a citizen in 1870, he had held that status for only two years. …
The Original Intent Of The Fourteenth Amendment: A Conversation With Eric Foner, Eric Foner
The Original Intent Of The Fourteenth Amendment: A Conversation With Eric Foner, Eric Foner
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Fourteenth Amendment—The Path Leads To Nowhere: The Supreme Court Re-Examines The Trek Through The Political Thicket. Vieth V. Jubelirer, 541 U.S. 267 (2004)., Vanessa L. Kinney
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Citizenship Theories, Immigration And Nationality Act Section 309 & Nguyen V. Ins: How The Supreme Court Got It Wrong, Rachel Baskin
Citizenship Theories, Immigration And Nationality Act Section 309 & Nguyen V. Ins: How The Supreme Court Got It Wrong, Rachel Baskin
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The note critiques the Supreme Court's decision in *Tuan Anh Nguyen v. INS*, which upheld the constitutionality of Section 309 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). This provision imposes additional requirements for U.S. citizen fathers, unlike mothers, to transmit citizenship to children born abroad. The author argues that the Court's ruling perpetuates gender discrimination and undermines the deeper meaning of citizenship, which should encompass membership, belonging, and substantive ties to the nation rather than mere legal formalities. The analysis draws on republican, communitarian, and liberal theories of citizenship to advocate for a more inclusive and gender-neutral approach to citizenship …
Winner, Best Appellate Brief In The 2005 Native American Law Student Association Moot Court Competition, Brian Mcclatchey, Paul Porter
Winner, Best Appellate Brief In The 2005 Native American Law Student Association Moot Court Competition, Brian Mcclatchey, Paul Porter
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lecture: Second Founding: The Story Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Garrett Epps
Lecture: Second Founding: The Story Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Garrett Epps
All Faculty Scholarship
The story of the Framing of the Fourteenth Amendment is a lost story of American history, covered over by Southern inspiring myth making and an unwillingness to grapple with the central role of slavery in American history. Americans can take new inspiration from that story and use it as an example of how our popular democracy can be perfected. Even today, nearly a century and a half after the Second Founders did their work, their words and example move before us as a people, a cloud by day, a pillar of fire by night.
A Reply To Professor Johnson, Marci A. Hamilton