Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (13)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (10)
- Criminal Law (5)
- Election Law (5)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (5)
-
- Science and Technology Law (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Administrative Law (3)
- Criminal Procedure (3)
- Human Rights Law (3)
- Legal Remedies (3)
- Disability Law (2)
- Education Law (2)
- Internet Law (2)
- Law and Race (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Property Law and Real Estate (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (1)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (1)
- Evidence (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Keyword
-
- Due process (3)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- Fourth Amendment (2)
- 2020 election (1)
- Administrative (1)
-
- Affirmative Action (1)
- Anti-caste jurisprudence (1)
- Artificial intelligence (AI) (1)
- Artificial intelligence law (1)
- Artificial intelligence legal personhood (1)
- Artificial rights (1)
- Asset (1)
- Autonomous business (1)
- Autonomous businesses (1)
- Biometric data (1)
- Black and Brown voters (1)
- Business organizations (1)
- Business organizations law (1)
- Business organizations model law (1)
- CONGRESS (1)
- Civic participation (1)
- Civil (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional (1)
- Copyright (1)
- Copyright constitution (1)
- Copyright infringement (1)
- Copyright infringement remedy (1)
- Copyright remedy (1)
- Copyright remedy constitution (1)
Articles 31 - 33 of 33
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Double Jeopardy And Dual Sovereignty, James M. Feeley
Double Jeopardy And Dual Sovereignty, James M. Feeley
Washington Law Review
This Comment has been prompted by two recent United States Supreme Court decisions, Bartkus v. Illinois, and Abbate v. United States. In the former decision Bartkus, the defendant, was tried in the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on December 18, 1953, for the robbery of a federally insured savings and loan association of Cicero, Illinois, in violation of a federal statute. There was a jury trial and Bartkus was acquitted. Then on January 8, 1954, Bartkus was indicted by an Illinois grand jury charging a violation of a state robbery statute. This time Bartkus was convicted, …
Constitutional Law—Fourteenth Amendment—Religious Education—Validity Of Released Time Programs, Raymond H. Siderius
Constitutional Law—Fourteenth Amendment—Religious Education—Validity Of Released Time Programs, Raymond H. Siderius
Washington Law Review
In 1948 the Supreme Court (8-1) held invalid under the 14th Amendment a system adopted by the Illinois Board of Education which permitted students, on written request of their parents, to be released during regular school hours for religious instruction or devotion in the public school buildings. McCollum v. Board of Education 333 U.S. 203, 2 A.L.R. 2d 1338 (1948). Under these so-called "released time" plans, non-participating children remain in the classroom and continue some form of secular study. Since the majority opinion in the McCollum case relied in part upon the metaphorical "wall of separation between Church and State," …
Privileges And Immunities Under The Fourteenth Amendment, Lucile Lomen
Privileges And Immunities Under The Fourteenth Amendment, Lucile Lomen
Washington Law Review
At the close of the Civil War, the federal government was faced with the serious problem of protecting the newly freed negro from restrictions which the state governments might see fit to impose upon him. The War had been won and the negro freed, but there was no power in the federal government which could insure his civil liberties against state action. The Bill of Rights formed a bulwark against invasion of personal rights by the federal government, but it had no application to other jurisdictions. It was to remedy this situation that the Fourteenth Amendment was proposed and adopted. …