Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (17)
- Supreme Court of the United States (10)
- State and Local Government Law (8)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (7)
- Courts (7)
-
- Criminal Law (5)
- First Amendment (4)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (4)
- Health Law and Policy (3)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Law and Gender (3)
- Torts (3)
- Civil Law (2)
- Education Law (2)
- Military, War, and Peace (2)
- Second Amendment (2)
- Sexuality and the Law (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Election Law (1)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Juvenile Law (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Due process (14)
- Fourteenth Amendment (13)
- Constitution (4)
- Ohio (4)
- Abortion (3)
-
- Affirmative action (3)
- Dobbs (3)
- Fourteenth amendment (3)
- Liberty (3)
- Abortion rights (2)
- Bill of Rights (2)
- Citizenship (2)
- Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment (2)
- Due process rights (2)
- Equal Protection Clause (2)
- Equal protection (2)
- Fetal rights (2)
- Indigent defendants (2)
- Monroe v. Pape (2)
- Parratt v. Taylor (2)
- Posterity (2)
- Roe (2)
- Roe v. Wade (2)
- Section 1983 (2)
- Sixth Amendment (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- The Parratt Doctrine (2)
- Title IX (2)
- U.S. Constitution (2)
- Women (2)
Articles 31 - 39 of 39
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Section 1983 And The Parratt Doctrine After Zinermon V. Burch: Ensuring Due Process Rights Or Turning The Fourteenth Amendment Into A Font Of Tort Law, Paul F. Wingenfeld
Section 1983 And The Parratt Doctrine After Zinermon V. Burch: Ensuring Due Process Rights Or Turning The Fourteenth Amendment Into A Font Of Tort Law, Paul F. Wingenfeld
Cleveland State Law Review
Over the last thirty years, the Court has decided a number of cases which illustrate an on-going struggle to find the proper place for section 1983 in the federal court system and, consequently, what ultimately qualifies as adequate procedural due process within the context of the statute. This note will examine the history of Court decisions involving section 1983 in order to provide the proper background for examining the Court's most recent decision in Zinermon v. Burch, a case which itself has added to an already confusing field of legal study. Within this historical background, however, the Court has actually …
Section 1983 And The Parratt Doctrine After Zinermon V. Burch: Ensuring Due Process Rights Or Turning The Fourteenth Amendment Into A Font Of Tort Law, Paul F. Wingenfeld
Section 1983 And The Parratt Doctrine After Zinermon V. Burch: Ensuring Due Process Rights Or Turning The Fourteenth Amendment Into A Font Of Tort Law, Paul F. Wingenfeld
Cleveland State Law Review
Over the last thirty years, the Court has decided a number of cases which illustrate an on-going struggle to find the proper place for section 1983 in the federal court system and, consequently, what ultimately qualifies as adequate procedural due process within the context of the statute. This note will examine the history of Court decisions involving section 1983 in order to provide the proper background for examining the Court's most recent decision in Zinermon v. Burch, a case which itself has added to an already confusing field of legal study. Within this historical background, however, the Court has actually …
Reconstructing Section Five Of The Fourteenth Amendment To Assist Impoverished Children, James Wilson
Reconstructing Section Five Of The Fourteenth Amendment To Assist Impoverished Children, James Wilson
Cleveland State Law Review
This article maintains that the Supreme Court's most recent affirmative action decisions, City of Richmond v. JA. Croson, Co. and Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. F.C.C. provide a surprising opportunity for the Court to offer constitutional protection to many Americans who are currently under protected, particularly to poor children. This Article will argue that the Richmond/Metro double standard is acceptable in such difficult areas as affirmative action, particularly if the Court also adopts this Article's primary proposal that the Court should sometimes permit Congress to "dilute" Supreme Court decisions. This Article shall explore this proposed doctrine of limited dilution by applying …
The Future Of Minority Set-Aside Programs After City Of Richmond, Judy Kerczewski Kranjc
The Future Of Minority Set-Aside Programs After City Of Richmond, Judy Kerczewski Kranjc
Cleveland State Law Review
One type of controversial affirmative action plan is the minority set-aside program. This Note will focus on the future of these plans in the wake of the recent Supreme Court decision, City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co. First, an examination of the background of affirmative action leading up to set-asides is in order. Second, this Note will analyze City of Richmond and the constitutional and social issues at stake, balancing whether minority set-asides are needed with the recognition that discrimination and lack of economic opportunity for minorities still exists in our society. Finally, the Note will examine several lower …
Due Process As A Management Tool In Schools And Prisons, Elisabeth T. Dreyfuss, Jane C. Knapp
Due Process As A Management Tool In Schools And Prisons, Elisabeth T. Dreyfuss, Jane C. Knapp
Cleveland State Law Review
This article will explore due process as an effective tool for the management of schools and prisons through a close scrutiny of the fourteenth amendment. The authors will attempt to identify emerging trends in case law and give special attention to Bell v. Wolfish, which may point to a new direction in due process analysis under the Burger Court. The purpose of this article is to propose radical reform of schools and prisons through the involvement of their populations and staffs in the rule-making process. Spawned by a firm belief that only through such democratic processes can the violence and …
Pretrial Detention And The Eighth And Fourteenth Amendments, James Lowe
Pretrial Detention And The Eighth And Fourteenth Amendments, James Lowe
Cleveland State Law Review
It is in the intent of the writer of this paper to examine the conditions endured by indigent defendants through their pretrial detention in Cuyahoga County Jail with respect to the Constitutional prohibitions of "cruel and unusual" punishment and a denial of "equal protection of the laws." Cuyahoga County is better known as Cleveland, Ohio. Expediency requires that the important concept of the rights of indigent inmates as they relate to civil rights statutes, and particularly Title 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, not be considered here. It may be hoped, however, that the propositions and legal considerations put forth in this …
Right To Counsel In Criminal Cases, Edward T. Haggins
Right To Counsel In Criminal Cases, Edward T. Haggins
Cleveland State Law Review
"The right to be heard would be, in many cases, of little avail if it did not comprehend the right to be heard by counsel. Even the intelligent and educated layman has small and sometimes no skill in the science of law... He requires the guiding hand of counsel at every step of the proceedings against him." These words, written in 1932 by Mr. Justice Sutherland for the majority in the famous case of Powell v. Alabama underline the fundamental right of a defendant in American criminal proceeding to have the assistance of counsel.
Freedom Of Association, William J. Hotes, Catherine H. Hotes
Freedom Of Association, William J. Hotes, Catherine H. Hotes
Cleveland State Law Review
To determine whether a limitation upon freedom of association by a state is constitutionally justified, the Court must balance the interests of those individuals whose rights have been restricted against the interests of the state involved. Constitutional freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment may be restricted only when the state has a compelling interest. A state may take action in the interest of public safety, health, or welfare to prevent abuse of the exercise of these freedoms, but it may not curtail the rights themselves. Only the public interest or a clear and present danger would justify restriction of First …
Ex Parte Deprivation Of Telephone Service To Alleged Gamblers - Police Power Vs. Constitution, Jules L. Kaufman
Ex Parte Deprivation Of Telephone Service To Alleged Gamblers - Police Power Vs. Constitution, Jules L. Kaufman
Cleveland State Law Review
The question is still much in a state of flux as to whether or not such regulations as Ohio Public Utilities Commission, Order No. 22,305,and actions taken thereunder, constitute an unconstitutional denial of due process. The large majority of cases, many of which have been decided by public utilities commissions, however, uphold the right of the telephone company to discontinue service summarily at the request of a law enforcement agency without the necessity of any further proof of illegal use of the equipment. With respect to the burden of proof as regards the legality or illegality of use and the …