Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (190)
- University of Michigan Law School (75)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (72)
- UIC School of Law (22)
- Cleveland State University (11)
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (11)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (10)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (9)
- University of Colorado Law School (8)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (6)
- Brooklyn Law School (5)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (5)
- Fordham Law School (4)
- Roger Williams University (4)
- St. Mary's University (4)
- University of Georgia School of Law (4)
- University of Washington School of Law (4)
- Georgia State University College of Law (3)
- Pepperdine University (3)
- The University of Akron (3)
- The University of San Francisco (3)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (3)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- Mississippi Christian University School of Law (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- University of Kentucky (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Due process (50)
- Fourteenth Amendment (42)
- Constitution (39)
- Fourteenth amendment (38)
- Equal protection (35)
-
- Federal (34)
- New York (31)
- State (31)
- Due Process (27)
- Supreme Court (27)
- United states constitution (25)
- Equal Protection Clause (24)
- 1990) (23)
- § 1 (22)
- Discrimination (18)
- N.Y. Cont. Art. I (18)
- New york constitution (18)
- U.S. Cont. Amend. XIV (17)
- Constitutional law (16)
- Court of Appeals (16)
- United States Supreme Court (16)
- Appellate Division (12)
- Due Process Clause (12)
- Fifth Amendment (12)
- Fifth amendment (12)
- Law (12)
- Michigan (12)
- § 11 (12)
- § 6 (12)
- Abortion (11)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (190)
- Touro Law Review (72)
- Michigan Law Review (61)
- UIC Law Review (20)
- Articles (9)
-
- Cleveland State Law Review (8)
- Publications (8)
- Northwestern University Law Review (7)
- Supreme Court Case Files (7)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (6)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (5)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (5)
- Cardozo Law Review (4)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (4)
- Washington Law Review (4)
- Akron Law Review (3)
- Brooklyn Law Review (3)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Georgia State University Law Review (3)
- Journal of Law and Health (3)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (3)
- Pepperdine Law Review (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- University of San Francisco Law Review (3)
- Washington and Lee Law Review Online (3)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (2)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (2)
- Kentucky Law Journal (2)
- MC Law Review (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 331 - 360 of 507
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Uniform Laws Or State Immunity? The Constitutionality Of Section 106(A) After Seminole, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 969 (2006), John F. Hiltz
Uniform Laws Or State Immunity? The Constitutionality Of Section 106(A) After Seminole, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 969 (2006), John F. Hiltz
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Preventing "You've Got Mail"™ From Meaning "You've Been Served": How Service Of Process By E-Mail Does Not Meet Constitutional Procedure Due Process Requirements, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1121 (2005), Matthew R. Schreck
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
How The Border Crossed Us: Filling The Gap Between Plume V. Seward And The Dispossession Of Mexican Landowners In California After 1848, 52 Clev. St. L. Rev. 297 (2005), Kim D. Chanbonpin
How The Border Crossed Us: Filling The Gap Between Plume V. Seward And The Dispossession Of Mexican Landowners In California After 1848, 52 Clev. St. L. Rev. 297 (2005), Kim D. Chanbonpin
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Identifying State Actors In Constitutional Litigation: Reviving The Role Of Substantive Context, Michael L. Wells
Identifying State Actors In Constitutional Litigation: Reviving The Role Of Substantive Context, Michael L. Wells
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Family Leave Policies Trump States Rights: Nevada Department Of Human Resources V. Hibbs And Its Impact Of Sovereign Immunity Jurisprudence, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 599 (2004), Jana L. Tibben
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Permitted But Not Intended: Boub V. Township Of Wayne, Municipal Tort Immunity In Illinois, And The Right To Local Travel, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 545 (2004), Bruce Epperson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Five Critical Issues In New York’S Grandparent Visitation Law After Troxel V. Granville, Stephen A. Newman
Five Critical Issues In New York’S Grandparent Visitation Law After Troxel V. Granville, Stephen A. Newman
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
May Congress Grant The States The Power To Violate The Equal Protection Clause? Aliessa V. Novello And Title Iv Of The Personal Responsibility And Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act Of 1996, Karin H. Berg
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Discrimination?:The Conflict Between Public Accommodations' Freedom Association And State Anti-Discrimination Laws, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 125 (2003), Gregory J. Wartman
Freedom Of Discrimination?:The Conflict Between Public Accommodations' Freedom Association And State Anti-Discrimination Laws, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 125 (2003), Gregory J. Wartman
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Parent's Rights Under The Fourteenth Amendment: Does Kentucky's De Facto Custodian Statute Violate Due Process?, Elizabeth Ashley Bruce
A Parent's Rights Under The Fourteenth Amendment: Does Kentucky's De Facto Custodian Statute Violate Due Process?, Elizabeth Ashley Bruce
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Due Process And Kentucky's Non-Claim Statutes: A Call For Legislative Revision, Mark A. Noel
Due Process And Kentucky's Non-Claim Statutes: A Call For Legislative Revision, Mark A. Noel
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
How To Apply The Religious Freedom Restoration Act To Federal Law Without Violating The Constitution, Gregory P. Magarian
How To Apply The Religious Freedom Restoration Act To Federal Law Without Violating The Constitution, Gregory P. Magarian
Michigan Law Review
Learned commentators have called the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 ("RFRA" or "the Act") "perhaps the most unconstitutional statute in the history of the nation" and "the most egregious violation of the separation of powers doctrine in American constitutional history." In the 1997 case of City of Boerne v. Flores, the Supreme Court struck down the Act in its applications to state and local governments, declaring that "RFRA contradicts vital principles necessary to maintain separation of powers and the federal balance." The Act's applications to federal law, however, survived Boerne, which means that plaintiffs with religious freedom claims against …
Trying To Make Peace With Bush V. Gore (Symposium: Bush V. Gore Issue 2001), Richard D. Friedman
Trying To Make Peace With Bush V. Gore (Symposium: Bush V. Gore Issue 2001), Richard D. Friedman
Articles
The Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore, shutting down the recounts of Florida's vote in the 2000 presidential election and effectively awarding the election to George W. Bush, has struck many observers, including myself, as outrageous.' Decisions of the Supreme Court should be more than mere reflections of ideological or partisan preference thinly camouflaged behind legalistic language. It would therefore be pleasant to be able to believe that they are more than that. Accordingly, Judge Richard Posner's analysis,2 in which he defends the result reached by the Court-though not the path by which it got there-is particularly welcome. Though …
Why Federalism Must Be Enforced: A Response To Professor Kramer, Marci A. Hamilton
Why Federalism Must Be Enforced: A Response To Professor Kramer, Marci A. Hamilton
Articles
The United States Supreme Court has issued a series of opinions that turn on the Constitution's inherent principles of federalism, decisions that have alarmed many a legal scholar. Some scholars have attacked the Court for overstepping its bounds, and others have criticized the Court on the ground that the federal/state balance should be maintained through the political process rather than judicial review. The most recent advocate of this position, Professor Larry Kramer, recently argued in the Columbia Law Review that the political party structure ensures that state interests are taken into account at the federal level, and therefore the Supreme …
Practicing Medicine Without A License: Legislative Attempts To Mandate Chemical Castration For Repeat Sex Offenders, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 381 (1999), Lisa Keesling
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
What Spending Clause? - (Or The President's Paramour): An Examination Of The Views Of Hamilton, Madison, And Story On Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Of The United States Constitution, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 81 (1999), Jeffrey T. Renz
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The New Federalism And The Ada: State Sovereign Immunity From Private Damage Suits After Boerne, Roger C. Hartley
The New Federalism And The Ada: State Sovereign Immunity From Private Damage Suits After Boerne, Roger C. Hartley
Scholarly Articles
State sanctioned disability-based discrimination comes in two basic flavors: prejudice and thoughtlessness. The former takes disability into consideration, while the latter ignores it. The Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause prohibits the prejudice but not the thoughtlessness, at least when the latter is unassociated with irrational assumptions based on myths, fears and stereotypes. Unlike most other civil rights statutes, the Americans With Disabilities Act (hereinafter "ADA" or "Act") prohibits both prejudice and thoughtlessness and aptly has been characterized as a "second-generation civil rights statute."
Unfortunately, the ADA's claim to innovation might yet prove to be its constitutional Achilles heel. Across the …
State Laws Criminalizing Female Circumcision: A Violation Of The Equal Protection Clause Of The Fourteenth Amendment, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 353 (1999), Shea Lita Bond
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Oregon V. Elstad Revisited: Urging State Court Judges To Depart From The U.S. Supreme Court's Narrowing Of Miranda, Claudia R. Barbieri
Oregon V. Elstad Revisited: Urging State Court Judges To Depart From The U.S. Supreme Court's Narrowing Of Miranda, Claudia R. Barbieri
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
Imagine an average young man on the threshold of adulthood, living in a medium-sized town in a middle-class family. Still in his early years, he gets into a little local trouble and one day finds the police at his door. They ask him questions about a burglary. He panics, and as he racks his brain for some scrap of legal knowledge that might get him out of this frightening situation, he admits that he knows about the crime, stating he was there. The police become more persistent, telling him they know about his involvement, asking him if he wants to …
Due Process, Court Of Appeals: People V. Thompson
Due Process, Court Of Appeals: People V. Thompson
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Equal Protection, Court Of Appeals: Trustees Of Union College V. Schenectady City Council
Equal Protection, Court Of Appeals: Trustees Of Union College V. Schenectady City Council
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process, Court Of Appeals: Chaya S. V. Frederick L.
Due Process, Court Of Appeals: Chaya S. V. Frederick L.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process, Supreme Court New York County: Ramanadhan V. Wing
Due Process, Supreme Court New York County: Ramanadhan V. Wing
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Equal Protection, Supreme Court, New York County: Walter V. City Of New York Police Department
Equal Protection, Supreme Court, New York County: Walter V. City Of New York Police Department
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Determining Ripeness Of Substantive Due Process Claims Brought By Landowners Against Local Governments, David S. Mendel
Determining Ripeness Of Substantive Due Process Claims Brought By Landowners Against Local Governments, David S. Mendel
Michigan Law Review
Landowners who sustain economic harm from arbitrary and capricious applications of land use regulations may sue the local government entities responsible for applying those regulations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the local government entities deprived them of substantive due process in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. A landowner who brings this claim - an "as-applied arbitrary and capricious substantive due process" claim - may in appropriate cases seek declaratory and injunctive relief, damages, and attorney's fees. Despite controversy among courts and commentators over both the definition of property interests protected by the Due Process Clause and the standard …
To Accomplish Fairness And Justice: Substantive Due Process, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 95 (1996), James W. Hilliard
To Accomplish Fairness And Justice: Substantive Due Process, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 95 (1996), James W. Hilliard
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
California’S Proposition 187--Does It Mean What It Says? Does It Say What It Means? A Textual And Constitutional Analysis, Lolita K. Buckner Inniss
California’S Proposition 187--Does It Mean What It Says? Does It Say What It Means? A Textual And Constitutional Analysis, Lolita K. Buckner Inniss
Publications
No abstract provided.
Section 1983 Litigation, Martin A. Schwartz