Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (214)
- University of Michigan Law School (39)
- UIC School of Law (13)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (12)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (11)
-
- Fordham Law School (9)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (9)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (9)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (8)
- New York Law School (7)
- Columbia Law School (5)
- University of Colorado Law School (5)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (4)
- Claremont Colleges (3)
- Florida State University College of Law (3)
- Pepperdine University (3)
- St. Mary's University (3)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Duquesne University (2)
- Florida International University College of Law (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- Keyword
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (37)
- Constitution (24)
- Law (21)
- Brown v. Board of Education (18)
- Due process (18)
-
- Supreme Court (18)
- Constitutional law (16)
- Equal protection (16)
- Equal Protection Clause (15)
- Slavery (15)
- Originalism (12)
- History (11)
- Legal history (11)
- Race (11)
- Reconstruction (11)
- Segregation (11)
- Equality (10)
- First Amendment (10)
- Fourteenth amendment (10)
- Separate but equal (10)
- United States Supreme Court (10)
- Affirmative Action (9)
- Civil rights in education (9)
- Discrimination (9)
- Due Process (9)
- Due Process Clause (9)
- Federalism (9)
- Legal History (9)
- Bill of Rights (8)
- Fifth Amendment (8)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (188)
- Michigan Law Review (28)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (26)
- Faculty Scholarship (17)
- UIC Law Review (11)
-
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (10)
- Cardozo Law Review (9)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (9)
- Northwestern University Law Review (8)
- NYLS Law Review (7)
- Articles (6)
- Touro Law Review (6)
- Publications (5)
- Scholarly Works (5)
- Arkansas Law Review (3)
- CMC Senior Theses (3)
- Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (3)
- BYU Law Review (2)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (2)
- FIU Law Review (2)
- Fordham Law Review (2)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (2)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- Scholarly Publications (2)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (2)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (2)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 331 - 360 of 425
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
A Convenient Constitution? Extraterritoriality After Boumediene, Christina Duffy Ponsa-Kraus
A Convenient Constitution? Extraterritoriality After Boumediene, Christina Duffy Ponsa-Kraus
Faculty Scholarship
Questions concerning the extraterritorial applicability of the Constitution have come to the fore during the "war on terror." In Boumediene v. Bush, the Supreme Court held that noncitizens detained in Guantánamo have the right to challenge their detention in federal court. To reach this conclusion, the Court used the "impracticable and anomalous" test, also known as the 'functional" approach because of its reliance on pragmatic or consequentialist considerations. The test first appeared in a concurring opinion over fifty years ago; in Boumediene, it garnered the votes of a majority.
This Article argues that the Boumediene Court was right …
Commentary: Was The Bill Of Rights Irrelevant To Nineteenth-Century State Criminal Procedure?, Carolyn B. Ramsey
Commentary: Was The Bill Of Rights Irrelevant To Nineteenth-Century State Criminal Procedure?, Carolyn B. Ramsey
Publications
No abstract provided.
Justice Kennedy's Short-Lived Libertarian Revolution: A Brief History Of Supreme Court Libertarian Ideology, Stephen O'Hanlon
Justice Kennedy's Short-Lived Libertarian Revolution: A Brief History Of Supreme Court Libertarian Ideology, Stephen O'Hanlon
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
This paper contends that Justice Anthony Kennedy did not initiate a libertarian jurisprudential revolution following Lawrence v. Texas. The article begins with an overview of constitutional fundamental rights jurisprudence and examines similarities with libertarian theory.
The paper then assesses the legal decisions of Justice Kennedy but concludes that Justice Kennedy is not a libertarian. This provides the basis for critiquing Professor Randy Barnett's assertion that Justice Kennedy was the instigator of a libertarian revolution in U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence. The fact that Justice Kennedy is not a libertarian is apparent from his reasoning in the recent partial birth abortion …
Public Rights, Social Equality, And The Conceptual Roots Of The Plessy Challenge, Rebecca J. Scott
Public Rights, Social Equality, And The Conceptual Roots Of The Plessy Challenge, Rebecca J. Scott
Articles
This Article argues that the test case that gave rise to the 1896 decision in Plessy v. Ferguson is best understood as part of a wellestablished, cosmopolitan tradition of anticaste activism in Louisiana rather than as a quixotic effort that contradicted nineteenth-century ideas of the boundaries of citizens' rights. By drawing a dividing line between civil and political rights, on the one hand, and social rights, on the other, the Supreme Court construed challenges to segregation as claims to a "social equality" that was beyond the scope of judicially cognizable rights. The Louisiana constitutional convention of 1867-68, however, had defined …
Roth At Fifty: Reconsidering The Common Law Antecedents Of American Obscenity Doctrine, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 393 (2008), James R. Alexander
Roth At Fifty: Reconsidering The Common Law Antecedents Of American Obscenity Doctrine, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 393 (2008), James R. Alexander
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Brain, Gender, Law: A Cautionary Tale, Carlin Meyer
Brain, Gender, Law: A Cautionary Tale, Carlin Meyer
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Equal Protection Of Free Exercise: Two Approaches And Their History, Bernadette Meyler
The Equal Protection Of Free Exercise: Two Approaches And Their History, Bernadette Meyler
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Contrary to critics of the Supreme Court's current equal protection approach to religious liberty, this Article contends that, from the very first federal free exercise cases, the Equal Protection and Free Exercise Clauses have been mutually intertwined. The seeds of an equal protection analysis of free exercise were, indeed, planted even before the Fourteenth Amendment within the constitutional jurisprudence of the several states. Furthermore, this Article argues, equal protection approaches should not be uniformly disparaged. Rather, the drawbacks that commentators have observed result largely from the Supreme Court's application of an inadequate version of equal protection. By ignoring the lessons …
The History Of Slave Marriage In The United States, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 299 (2006), Darlene C. Goring
The History Of Slave Marriage In The United States, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 299 (2006), Darlene C. Goring
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Limiting The Presidency To Natural Born Citizens Violates Due Process, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1343 (2006), Paul A. Clark
Limiting The Presidency To Natural Born Citizens Violates Due Process, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1343 (2006), Paul A. Clark
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Incarcerated Men And Women, The Equal Protection Clause, And The Requirement Of “Similarly Situated”, Natasha L. Carroll-Ferrary
Incarcerated Men And Women, The Equal Protection Clause, And The Requirement Of “Similarly Situated”, Natasha L. Carroll-Ferrary
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Headscarves In German Public Schools: Religious Minorities Are Welcome In Germany, Unless — God Forbid — They Are Religious, Ruben Seth Fogel
Headscarves In German Public Schools: Religious Minorities Are Welcome In Germany, Unless — God Forbid — They Are Religious, Ruben Seth Fogel
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Riddle Of Hiram Revels, Richard A. Primus
The Riddle Of Hiram Revels, Richard A. Primus
Articles
In 1870, a black man named Hiram Revels was named to represent Mississippi in the Senate. Senate Democrats objected to seating him and pointed out that the Constitution specifies that no person may be a senator who has not been a citizen of the United States for at least nine years. Before the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868, the Democrats argued, Revels had not been a citizen on account of the Supreme Court's 1857 decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford. Thus, even if Revels were a citizen in 1870, he had held that status for only two years. …
The Original Intent Of The Fourteenth Amendment: A Conversation With Eric Foner, Eric Foner
The Original Intent Of The Fourteenth Amendment: A Conversation With Eric Foner, Eric Foner
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Taking The Stand: The Lessons Of The Three Men Who Took The Japanese American Internment To Court, Lorraine K. Bannai
Taking The Stand: The Lessons Of The Three Men Who Took The Japanese American Internment To Court, Lorraine K. Bannai
Seattle Journal for Social Justice
No abstract provided.
In The Wake Of Gratz V. Bollinger: Standing On Thin Ice, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1037 (2005), Zubaida Qazi
In The Wake Of Gratz V. Bollinger: Standing On Thin Ice, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1037 (2005), Zubaida Qazi
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
How The Border Crossed Us: Filling The Gap Between Plume V. Seward And The Dispossession Of Mexican Landowners In California After 1848, 52 Clev. St. L. Rev. 297 (2005), Kim D. Chanbonpin
How The Border Crossed Us: Filling The Gap Between Plume V. Seward And The Dispossession Of Mexican Landowners In California After 1848, 52 Clev. St. L. Rev. 297 (2005), Kim D. Chanbonpin
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Time Out Of Mind: Our Collective Amnesia About The History Of The Privileges Or Immunities Clause, Michael P. O'Connor
Time Out Of Mind: Our Collective Amnesia About The History Of The Privileges Or Immunities Clause, Michael P. O'Connor
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Rule Of Law And The Achievement Of Unanimity In Brown, Stephen Ellmann
The Rule Of Law And The Achievement Of Unanimity In Brown, Stephen Ellmann
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Congress's Power To Enforce Fourteenth Amendment Rights: Lessons From Federal Remedies The Framers Enacted , Robert J. Kaczorowski
Congress's Power To Enforce Fourteenth Amendment Rights: Lessons From Federal Remedies The Framers Enacted , Robert J. Kaczorowski
Faculty Scholarship
Professor Robert Kaczorowski argues for an expansive originalist interpretation of Congressional power under the Fourteenth Amendment. Before the Civil War Congress actually exercised, and the Supreme Court repeatedly upheld plenary Congressional power to enforce the constitutional rights of slaveholders. After the Civil War, the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment copied the antebellum statutes and exercised plenary power to enforce the constitutional rights of all American citizens when they enacted the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and then incorporated the Act into the Fourteenth Amendment. The framers of the Fourteenth Amendment thereby exercised the plenary power the Rehnquist Court claims the …
Enforcing Brown In The Little Rock Crisis, Tony A. Freyer
Enforcing Brown In The Little Rock Crisis, Tony A. Freyer
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Symposium Discussion
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Speech On Brown V. Board Of Education, May 1, 1981, Paul E. Wilson
Speech On Brown V. Board Of Education, May 1, 1981, Paul E. Wilson
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
A Time To Lose, D. P. Marshall Jr.
A Time To Lose, D. P. Marshall Jr.
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Introduction: Brown In The Supreme Court, Dennis J. Hutchinson
Introduction: Brown In The Supreme Court, Dennis J. Hutchinson
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Voices Of The Brown Generation: Description Of A Project, Mildred Wigfall Robinson
Voices Of The Brown Generation: Description Of A Project, Mildred Wigfall Robinson
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Litigation Campaigns And The Search For Constitutional Rules, Mark V. Tushnet
Litigation Campaigns And The Search For Constitutional Rules, Mark V. Tushnet
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Back To Basics: Returning To The Matter Of Black Inferiority And White Supremacy In The Post-Brown Era, Regina Austin
Back To Basics: Returning To The Matter Of Black Inferiority And White Supremacy In The Post-Brown Era, Regina Austin
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Reflections On Brown, Paul D. Carrington
Reflections On Brown, Paul D. Carrington
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
The Journey From Brown V. Board Of Education To Grutter V. Bollinger: From Racial Assimilation To Diversity, Harry T. Edwards
The Journey From Brown V. Board Of Education To Grutter V. Bollinger: From Racial Assimilation To Diversity, Harry T. Edwards
Michigan Law Review
Fifty years ago, in Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court confronted a precise and straightforward question: "Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other 'tangible' factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities?" The Court's answer was precise and straightforward: "We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of "separate but equal" has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs ... are, by reason of the segregation complained of, …
Lochner'S Feminist Legacy, David E. Bernstein
Lochner'S Feminist Legacy, David E. Bernstein
Michigan Law Review
Professor Julie Novkov's Constituting Workers, Protecting Women examines the so-called Lochner era of American constitutional jurisprudence through the lens of the struggle over the constitutionality of "protective" labor legislation, such as maximum hours and minimum wage laws. Many of these laws applied only to women, and Novkov argues that the debate over the constitutionality of protective laws for women - laws that some women's rights advocates saw as discriminatory legislation against women - ultimately had more important implications for the constitutionality of protective labor legislation more generally. Liberally defined, the Lochner era lasted from the Slaughter-House Cases in 1873 - …