Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (185)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (143)
- University of Michigan Law School (22)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (17)
- UIC School of Law (5)
-
- University of Washington School of Law (5)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (5)
- Cleveland State University (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (3)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (3)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Georgia State University College of Law (2)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- Chapman University (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- Seton Hall University (1)
- Stephen F. Austin State University (1)
- University at Albany, State University of New York (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Dar es Salaam (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Mississippi (1)
- Keyword
-
- Capital punishment sentencing (102)
- Capital punishment (27)
- Due process (19)
- Fourteenth Amendment (16)
- Police (14)
-
- Constitution (12)
- Fifth Amendment (12)
- Law (12)
- Miranda v. Arizona (12)
- Supreme Court (11)
- Dickerson v. United States (9)
- Due Process Clause (8)
- Incarceration (8)
- Capital punishment of offenders with mental disabilities (7)
- Equal protection (7)
- Evidence (7)
- Fourth Amendment (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- Discrimination (6)
- ESG (6)
- Eighth Amendment (6)
- Exclusionary rule (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- Law enforcement (6)
- Privacy (6)
- Race (6)
- Racism (6)
- United States Supreme Court (6)
- Capital punishment sentencing (5)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (185)
- Capital Defense Journal (137)
- Michigan Law Review (14)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (11)
- Touro Law Review (6)
-
- UIC Law Review (5)
- Washington Law Review (5)
- Cleveland State Law Review (4)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (4)
- Cardozo Law Review (3)
- Faculty Works (3)
- Publications (3)
- Articles (2)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Georgia State University Law Review (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (2)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2)
- University of the District of Columbia Law Review (2)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (2)
- American Indian Law Review (1)
- Appellate Briefs (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Buffalo Law Review (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (1)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (1)
- Electronic Theses and Dissertations (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 391 - 420 of 426
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Bassette V. Thompson 915 F.2d 932 (1990)
Bassette V. Thompson 915 F.2d 932 (1990)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Getting The Most And Giving The Least From Virginia's "Mental Mitigation Expert" Statute, Helen L. Konrad
Getting The Most And Giving The Least From Virginia's "Mental Mitigation Expert" Statute, Helen L. Konrad
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Status Of Supreme Court Case Law Helpful To Capital Defendants, Steven K. Herndon, Ginger M. Jonas
Status Of Supreme Court Case Law Helpful To Capital Defendants, Steven K. Herndon, Ginger M. Jonas
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Gaskins V. Mckellar 916 F.2d 941 (1990)
Clozza V. Murray 913 F.2d 1092 (1990)
How To Look The Virginia Gift Horse In The Mouth: Federal Due Process And Virginia's Arbitrary Abrogation Of Capital Defendant's State-Created Rights, Otto W. Konrad
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Walton V. Arizona 110 S. Ct. 3047, 111 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990)
Walton V. Arizona 110 S. Ct. 3047, 111 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Boggs V. Bair 892 F.2d 1193 (4th Cir. 1989)
Boggs V. Bair 892 F.2d 1193 (4th Cir. 1989)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Addressing The Needs Of Attorneys For The Damned, Sean O'Brien
Addressing The Needs Of Attorneys For The Damned, Sean O'Brien
Faculty Works
This article is an introduction to the UMKC Law Review symposium issue dedicated to exploring the topic of capital punishment. UMKC Professor of Law Sean O’Brien shares how the growing importance of capital litigation makes this a timely and appropriate subject for consideration and shares how the university and the Law Review's attention to the death penalty debate contributes to more than just academic discussion.
Capital Punishment In Missouri: Recent Developments In The Interpretation And Administration Of The Death Penalty, Ellen Y. Suni
Capital Punishment In Missouri: Recent Developments In The Interpretation And Administration Of The Death Penalty, Ellen Y. Suni
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
A Step Towards Fairness In Capital Litigation: Missouri Resource Center, Sean O'Brien
A Step Towards Fairness In Capital Litigation: Missouri Resource Center, Sean O'Brien
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
South Carolina V. Gathers 109 S. Ct. 2207,104 L. Ed. 2d 876 (1989) United States Supreme Court
South Carolina V. Gathers 109 S. Ct. 2207,104 L. Ed. 2d 876 (1989) United States Supreme Court
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Penry V. Lynaugh 109 S. Ct. 2934,106 L. Ed. 2d 256 (1989) United States Supreme Court
Penry V. Lynaugh 109 S. Ct. 2934,106 L. Ed. 2d 256 (1989) United States Supreme Court
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Waye V. Townley 871 F.2d 18 (4th Cir. 1989) United States Court Of Appeals For The Fourth Circuit
Waye V. Townley 871 F.2d 18 (4th Cir. 1989) United States Court Of Appeals For The Fourth Circuit
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Restrictions On The State's Use Of Mental Health Experts In Capital Trials, W. Lawrence Fitch
Restrictions On The State's Use Of Mental Health Experts In Capital Trials, W. Lawrence Fitch
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Arizona V. Youngblood: Does The Criminal Defendant Lose His Right To Due Process When The State Loses Exculpatory Evidence?, Willis C. Moore
Arizona V. Youngblood: Does The Criminal Defendant Lose His Right To Due Process When The State Loses Exculpatory Evidence?, Willis C. Moore
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ross V. Oklahoma 108 S.Ct. 2273 (1988)
Yates V. Aiken 108 S.Ct. 534 (1988)
Thompson V. Oklahoma 486 U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2687, 100 L.Ed.2d -, (1988)
Thompson V. Oklahoma 486 U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2687, 100 L.Ed.2d -, (1988)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Mccleskey V. Kemp: The Supreme Court Pulls The Switch On Future Judicial Challenges To The Death Penalty, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1988), William H. Jones
Mccleskey V. Kemp: The Supreme Court Pulls The Switch On Future Judicial Challenges To The Death Penalty, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1988), William H. Jones
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Colorado V. Connelly: The Gratuitous Union Of Voluntariness And State Coercion, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 199 (1987), James P. Byrne Jr.
Colorado V. Connelly: The Gratuitous Union Of Voluntariness And State Coercion, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 199 (1987), James P. Byrne Jr.
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Memory Of Monrad G. Paulsen, Walter J. Wadlington
In Memory Of Monrad G. Paulsen, Walter J. Wadlington
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process As A Management Tool In Schools And Prisons, Elisabeth T. Dreyfuss, Jane C. Knapp
Due Process As A Management Tool In Schools And Prisons, Elisabeth T. Dreyfuss, Jane C. Knapp
Cleveland State Law Review
This article will explore due process as an effective tool for the management of schools and prisons through a close scrutiny of the fourteenth amendment. The authors will attempt to identify emerging trends in case law and give special attention to Bell v. Wolfish, which may point to a new direction in due process analysis under the Burger Court. The purpose of this article is to propose radical reform of schools and prisons through the involvement of their populations and staffs in the rule-making process. Spawned by a firm belief that only through such democratic processes can the violence and …
Is The Exclusionary Rule An 'Illogical' Or 'Unnatural' Interpretation Of The Fourth Amendment?, Yale Kamisar
Is The Exclusionary Rule An 'Illogical' Or 'Unnatural' Interpretation Of The Fourth Amendment?, Yale Kamisar
Articles
More than 50 years have passed since the Supreme Court decided the Weeks case, barring the use in federal prosecutions of evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and the Silverthorne case, invoking what has come to be known as the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine. The justices who decided those cases would, I think, be quite surprised to learn that some day the value of the exclusionary rule would be measured by-and the very life of the rule might depend on-an empirical evaluation of its efficacy in deterring police misconduct. These justices were engaged in a less …
Procedural Due Process And The Convicted Prisoner, 10 J. Marshall J. Of Prac. & Proc. 313 (1977), James A. Pitts
Procedural Due Process And The Convicted Prisoner, 10 J. Marshall J. Of Prac. & Proc. 313 (1977), James A. Pitts
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court And The Constitutional Rights Of Prisoners: A Reappraisal, Emily Calhoun
The Supreme Court And The Constitutional Rights Of Prisoners: A Reappraisal, Emily Calhoun
Publications
No abstract provided.
Prisoner Property Deprivations: Section 1983 And The Fourteenth Amendment, Steven H. Hazelrigg
Prisoner Property Deprivations: Section 1983 And The Fourteenth Amendment, Steven H. Hazelrigg
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Judicial Review Of Parole Release Decisionmaking, Thomas B. Grier
Judicial Review Of Parole Release Decisionmaking, Thomas B. Grier
IUSTITIA
An inmate at a federal penal institution "is entitled only to be released after full service of his sentence less good time earned during incarceration." He or she is not entitled to parole, for parole is not a right but a privilege, a matter of "legislative grace". The United States Board of Parole has "absolute discretion" in deciding whether and when to grant parole. The judiciary will not interfere with the Board, as "courts are without power to grant a parole or to determine judicially eligibility for parole." And since the Board is statutorily authorized to exercise broad discretion, and …
Due Process In Parole Granting: A Current Assessment, 10 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 93 (1976), Frank S. Merritt
Due Process In Parole Granting: A Current Assessment, 10 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 93 (1976), Frank S. Merritt
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Equal Protection Against Unnecessary Police Violence And The Original Understanding Of The Fourteenth Amendment: A Comment, Alfred Avins
Equal Protection Against Unnecessary Police Violence And The Original Understanding Of The Fourteenth Amendment: A Comment, Alfred Avins
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.