Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (191)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (36)
- University of Michigan Law School (18)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (17)
- UIC School of Law (17)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (11)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (10)
- University of Colorado Law School (6)
- Fordham Law School (5)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (5)
- University of Georgia School of Law (5)
- Barry University School of Law (4)
- Pepperdine University (4)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (4)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (4)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- The University of Akron (3)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Claremont Colleges (2)
- Mississippi Christian University School of Law (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2)
- American University in Cairo (1)
- Bridgewater College (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (40)
- Supreme Court (25)
- Constitution (24)
- Equal protection (18)
- Discrimination (17)
-
- Due process (17)
- Law (17)
- Jurisprudence (16)
- Constitutional law (15)
- Equal Protection Clause (14)
- Fifth Amendment (12)
- Due Process Clause (11)
- Federal (11)
- State (11)
- Defendant (10)
- Fourteenth amendment (10)
- New York (10)
- United States Supreme Court (10)
- 1990) (9)
- Affirmative Action (9)
- Congress (9)
- Due Process (9)
- § 1 (9)
- Court of Appeals (8)
- Dickerson v. United States (8)
- Evidence (8)
- First Amendment (8)
- Miranda v. Arizona (8)
- N.Y. Cont. Art. I (8)
- Race (8)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (190)
- Touro Law Review (22)
- UIC Law Review (17)
- Northwestern University Law Review (14)
- Michigan Law Review (13)
-
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (10)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (10)
- Faculty Scholarship (7)
- Cardozo Law Review (6)
- Publications (6)
- Scholarly Works (5)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (5)
- Articles (4)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (4)
- Akron Law Review (3)
- Arkansas Law Review (3)
- Barry Law Review (3)
- Cleveland State Law Review (3)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (3)
- Pepperdine Law Review (3)
- American University Law Review (2)
- CMC Senior Theses (2)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (2)
- Fordham Law Review (2)
- Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality (2)
- MC Law Review (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2)
- American Indian Law Review (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 361 - 386 of 386
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Gender Based Peremptory Challenges And The New York State Constitution, Frederick T. Kelsey
Gender Based Peremptory Challenges And The New York State Constitution, Frederick T. Kelsey
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Affirmative Action, Douglas Scherer, John Dunne
Affirmative Action, Douglas Scherer, John Dunne
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right-To-Die, Bruce Morton
Review Of Affirmative Action After Metro Broadcasting V. Fcc: The Solution Almost Nobody Wanted, Douglas O. Linder
Review Of Affirmative Action After Metro Broadcasting V. Fcc: The Solution Almost Nobody Wanted, Douglas O. Linder
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Progressive And Conservative Constitutionalism, Robin West
Progressive And Conservative Constitutionalism, Robin West
Michigan Law Review
The article's central thesis is that the understandings of the constitutional tradition most central to both paradigms are determined by sometimes implicit, but more often explicit, political dispositions toward various forms of social and private power, and the normative authority to which social and private power gives rise. Very broadly, conservative constitutionalists view private or social normative authority as the legitimate and best source of guidance for state action; accordingly, they view both the Constitution and constitutional adjudication as means of preserving and protecting that authority and the power that undergirds it against either legislative or judicial encroachment. Progressive constitutionalists, …
Reconstructing Section Five Of The Fourteenth Amendment To Assist Impoverished Children, James Wilson
Reconstructing Section Five Of The Fourteenth Amendment To Assist Impoverished Children, James Wilson
Cleveland State Law Review
This article maintains that the Supreme Court's most recent affirmative action decisions, City of Richmond v. JA. Croson, Co. and Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. F.C.C. provide a surprising opportunity for the Court to offer constitutional protection to many Americans who are currently under protected, particularly to poor children. This Article will argue that the Richmond/Metro double standard is acceptable in such difficult areas as affirmative action, particularly if the Court also adopts this Article's primary proposal that the Court should sometimes permit Congress to "dilute" Supreme Court decisions. This Article shall explore this proposed doctrine of limited dilution by applying …
Arizona V. Youngblood: Does The Criminal Defendant Lose His Right To Due Process When The State Loses Exculpatory Evidence?, Willis C. Moore
Arizona V. Youngblood: Does The Criminal Defendant Lose His Right To Due Process When The State Loses Exculpatory Evidence?, Willis C. Moore
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Affirmative Action: A Divided Supreme Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 99 (1988), Arthur J. Marinelli
Affirmative Action: A Divided Supreme Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 99 (1988), Arthur J. Marinelli
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mccleskey V. Kemp: The Supreme Court Pulls The Switch On Future Judicial Challenges To The Death Penalty, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1988), William H. Jones
Mccleskey V. Kemp: The Supreme Court Pulls The Switch On Future Judicial Challenges To The Death Penalty, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1988), William H. Jones
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Taking The Framers Seriously, William Michael Treanor
Taking The Framers Seriously, William Michael Treanor
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This article reviews Taking the Constitution Seriously by Walter Berns (1987).
This review focuses on three of the key historical points that Walter Berns makes: his arguments that the Declaration of Independence is a Lockean document; that the Constitution encapsulates the political philosophy of the Declaration; and that the framers viewed the commercialization of society as a salutary development and were unambivalent champions of the right to property. Examination of these issues suggests that the ideological universe of the framers was far more complex than Berns indicates. While the revolutionary era witnessed a new concern with individual rights and a …
Colorado V. Connelly: The Gratuitous Union Of Voluntariness And State Coercion, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 199 (1987), James P. Byrne Jr.
Colorado V. Connelly: The Gratuitous Union Of Voluntariness And State Coercion, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 199 (1987), James P. Byrne Jr.
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Constitution And Informational Privacy, Or How So-Called Conservatives Countenance Governmental Intrustion Into A Person's Private Affairs, 18 J. Marshall L. Rev. 871 (1985), Michael P. Seng
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Equal Protection Clause In The Supreme Court 1873-1903, Richard S. Kay
The Equal Protection Clause In The Supreme Court 1873-1903, Richard S. Kay
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Their Own Image: The Reframing Of The Due Process Clause By The United States Supreme Court, J. Ralph Beaird
In Their Own Image: The Reframing Of The Due Process Clause By The United States Supreme Court, J. Ralph Beaird
Scholarly Works
A distinguished constitutional scholar recently pointed out that "many of the important decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States are not based on law in the popular sense of that term." It is true, he noted, that "the court endeavors to identify Constitutional clauses upon which to hang its pronouncements." "[S]ome key words and phrases in the Constitution," however, "are so highly indeterminate that they cannot really qualify as law in any usual sense." Rather, he said, "they are semantic blanks--verbal vacuums that may be filled readily with any one of many possible meanings." Thus, it is not …
The Implications Of "Resegregation" For Judicially Imposed School Segregation Remedies, Charles T. Clotfelter
The Implications Of "Resegregation" For Judicially Imposed School Segregation Remedies, Charles T. Clotfelter
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Article examines the implications of changing racial patterns--particularly those tending to resegregate schools--as they bear on the formulation of judicial remedies for school segregation. The Article considers both the effect of changing residential racial patterns upon racial patterns in schools and the effect of school desegregation upon the level of white enrollment. A third question that also may be relevant in this connection concerns the extent to which the possible existence of such resegregation constitutes a legitimate consideration in school desegregation cases. For example,fourteenth amendment requirements may render white flight a wholly irrelevant factor in some desegregation cases. This …
Constitutional Law - Citizenship - Power Of Congress To Effect Involuntary Expatriation, Robert J. Hoerner S.Ed.
Constitutional Law - Citizenship - Power Of Congress To Effect Involuntary Expatriation, Robert J. Hoerner S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
In four recent cases the United States Supreme Court has dealt with the power of Congress to effect the denationalization of native-born citizens without their consent. Three cases, Perez v. Brownell, Trop v. Dulles, and Mendoza-Martinez v. Mackey dealt with the constitutionality of sections 401(e), 401(g) and 401(j), respectively, of the Nationality Act of 1940. The fourth case, Nishikawa v. Dulles dealt only with the burden of proof when duress is alleged under section 401(c), but contained one opinion of constitutional significance. The purpose of this comment is to analyze and evaluate these decisions.
Social And Economic Interpretation Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Robert Eugene Cushman
Social And Economic Interpretation Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Robert Eugene Cushman
Michigan Law Review
For those who love precision and definiteness the question of the application of the Fourteenth Amendment to social and economic problems remains an irritating enigma. The judicial construction of due process of law and the equal protection of the law has from the first discouraged systematic analysis and defied synthesis. More than one writer has emerged from the study of the problem with a neat and compact set of fundamental principles, only to have the Supreme Court discourteously ignore them in its next case. But paradoxical as it may seem, those who long for a wise and forward-looking solution of …