Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (187)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (31)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (9)
- UIC School of Law (9)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (8)
-
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (8)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (8)
- University of Michigan Law School (7)
- Fordham Law School (5)
- Pepperdine University (5)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- Barry University School of Law (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (2)
- University of Maine School of Law (2)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (2)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Claremont Colleges (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Mississippi Christian University School of Law (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- Texas A&M International University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (24)
- Supreme Court (24)
- Due process (22)
- Constitution (19)
- Fourteenth amendment (18)
-
- Law (17)
- Due Process (11)
- Equal protection (11)
- Federal (11)
- Discrimination (10)
- Affirmative Action (9)
- Judges (9)
- New York (9)
- State (9)
- Congress (8)
- Constitutional law (8)
- Diversity (8)
- Race (8)
- § 1 (8)
- 1990) (7)
- Federalism (7)
- Fifth Amendment (7)
- First Amendment (7)
- Roe v. Wade (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Constitutional Law (6)
- Court of Appeals (6)
- Defendant (6)
- ESG (6)
- Justice (6)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (187)
- Touro Law Review (28)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (9)
- UIC Law Review (9)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (8)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Articles (5)
- Northwestern University Law Review (5)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (3)
- Pepperdine Law Review (3)
- Cardozo Law Review (2)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (2)
- Faculty Works (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Journal of Law and Policy (2)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (2)
- Maine Law Review (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (2)
- University of the District of Columbia Law Review (2)
- Appellate Briefs (1)
- Arkansas Law Review (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- CMC Senior Theses (1)
- Calvert Undergraduate Research Awards (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (1)
- Cardozo Law Review de•novo (1)
- Child and Family Law Journal (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 271 - 300 of 323
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Lessons From Small Cases: Reflections On Dodson V. Arkansas Activities Association, Polly J. Price
Lessons From Small Cases: Reflections On Dodson V. Arkansas Activities Association, Polly J. Price
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Richard Sheppard Arnold: A Distinguished Jurist, A Loyal Colleague And A Good Friend, Gerald W. Heaney
Richard Sheppard Arnold: A Distinguished Jurist, A Loyal Colleague And A Good Friend, Gerald W. Heaney
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Congress's Power To Enforce Fourteenth Amendment Rights: Lessons From Federal Remedies The Framers Enacted , Robert J. Kaczorowski
Congress's Power To Enforce Fourteenth Amendment Rights: Lessons From Federal Remedies The Framers Enacted , Robert J. Kaczorowski
Faculty Scholarship
Professor Robert Kaczorowski argues for an expansive originalist interpretation of Congressional power under the Fourteenth Amendment. Before the Civil War Congress actually exercised, and the Supreme Court repeatedly upheld plenary Congressional power to enforce the constitutional rights of slaveholders. After the Civil War, the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment copied the antebellum statutes and exercised plenary power to enforce the constitutional rights of all American citizens when they enacted the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and then incorporated the Act into the Fourteenth Amendment. The framers of the Fourteenth Amendment thereby exercised the plenary power the Rehnquist Court claims the …
Unexplainable On Grounds Other Than Race: The Inversion Of Privilege And Subordination In Equal Protection Jurisprudence, Darren L. Hutchinson
Unexplainable On Grounds Other Than Race: The Inversion Of Privilege And Subordination In Equal Protection Jurisprudence, Darren L. Hutchinson
Faculty Articles
In this article, Professor Darren Hutchinson contributes to the debate over the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause by arguing that the Supreme Court has inverted its purpose and effect. Professor Hutchinson contends that the Court, in its judicial capacity, provides protection and judicial solicitude for privileged and powerful groups in our country, while at the same time requires traditionally subordinated and oppressed groups to utilize the political process to seek redress for acts of oppression. According to Professor Hutchinson, this process allows social structures of oppression and subordination to remain intact.
First, Professor Hutchinson examines the various …
Caseload Burdens And Jurisdictional Limitations: Some Observations From The History Of The Federal Courts, Edward A. Purcell Jr.
Caseload Burdens And Jurisdictional Limitations: Some Observations From The History Of The Federal Courts, Edward A. Purcell Jr.
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trying To Make Peace With Bush V. Gore (Symposium: Bush V. Gore Issue 2001), Richard D. Friedman
Trying To Make Peace With Bush V. Gore (Symposium: Bush V. Gore Issue 2001), Richard D. Friedman
Articles
The Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore, shutting down the recounts of Florida's vote in the 2000 presidential election and effectively awarding the election to George W. Bush, has struck many observers, including myself, as outrageous.' Decisions of the Supreme Court should be more than mere reflections of ideological or partisan preference thinly camouflaged behind legalistic language. It would therefore be pleasant to be able to believe that they are more than that. Accordingly, Judge Richard Posner's analysis,2 in which he defends the result reached by the Court-though not the path by which it got there-is particularly welcome. Though …
Making Biomedical Policy Through Constitutional Adjudication:The Example Of Physician-Assisted Suicide, Carl E. Scheider
Making Biomedical Policy Through Constitutional Adjudication:The Example Of Physician-Assisted Suicide, Carl E. Scheider
Book Chapters
Throughout most of American history no one would have supposed biomedical policy could or should be made through constitutional adjudication. No one would have thought that the Constitution spoke to biomedical issues, that those issues were questions of federal policy, or that judges were competent to handle them. Today, however, the resurgence of substantive due process has swollen the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment, the distinction between federal and state spheres is tattered, and few statutes escape judicial vetting. Furthermore, Abraham Lincoln's wish that the Constitution should "become the political religion of the nation" has been granted. "We now reverently …
What Spending Clause? - (Or The President's Paramour): An Examination Of The Views Of Hamilton, Madison, And Story On Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Of The United States Constitution, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 81 (1999), Jeffrey T. Renz
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Bribery Statute And The Ethics Of Purchasing Testimony, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 209 (1999), Camille Knight
Federal Bribery Statute And The Ethics Of Purchasing Testimony, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 209 (1999), Camille Knight
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Oregon V. Elstad Revisited: Urging State Court Judges To Depart From The U.S. Supreme Court's Narrowing Of Miranda, Claudia R. Barbieri
Oregon V. Elstad Revisited: Urging State Court Judges To Depart From The U.S. Supreme Court's Narrowing Of Miranda, Claudia R. Barbieri
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
Imagine an average young man on the threshold of adulthood, living in a medium-sized town in a middle-class family. Still in his early years, he gets into a little local trouble and one day finds the police at his door. They ask him questions about a burglary. He panics, and as he racks his brain for some scrap of legal knowledge that might get him out of this frightening situation, he admits that he knows about the crime, stating he was there. The police become more persistent, telling him they know about his involvement, asking him if he wants to …
Hopwood, Equal Protection, And Affirmative Action: Can Anyone's Ox Be Gored?, David J. Jannuzzi
Hopwood, Equal Protection, And Affirmative Action: Can Anyone's Ox Be Gored?, David J. Jannuzzi
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process, Court Of Appeals: People V. Thompson
Due Process, Court Of Appeals: People V. Thompson
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Extending The Constitution, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 197 (1998), Amy Walsh
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Extending The Constitution, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 197 (1998), Amy Walsh
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Brown V. State Of New York: Judge Simons Says New York State Can Be Held Liable For Money Damages, Eric J. Stockel
Brown V. State Of New York: Judge Simons Says New York State Can Be Held Liable For Money Damages, Eric J. Stockel
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
To Accomplish Fairness And Justice: Substantive Due Process, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 95 (1996), James W. Hilliard
To Accomplish Fairness And Justice: Substantive Due Process, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 95 (1996), James W. Hilliard
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rights And Freedoms Under The State Constitution: A New Deal For Welfare Rights, Sandra M. Stevenson, Eve Cary, Mary Falk, Helen Hershkoff, Robert A. Heverly
Rights And Freedoms Under The State Constitution: A New Deal For Welfare Rights, Sandra M. Stevenson, Eve Cary, Mary Falk, Helen Hershkoff, Robert A. Heverly
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Section 1983 Litigation, Martin A. Schwartz
Chase Court And Fundamental Rights: A Watershed In American Constitutionalism, The , Robert J. Kaczorowski
Chase Court And Fundamental Rights: A Watershed In American Constitutionalism, The , Robert J. Kaczorowski
Faculty Scholarship
Three weeks before he died in May 1873, the frail and ailing Salmon P. Chase joined three of his brethren in dissent in one of the most important cases ever decided by the United States Supreme Court, the Slaughter-House Cases.1 This decision was a watershed in United States constitutional history for several reasons. Doctrinally, it represented a rejection of the virtually unanimous decisions of the lower federal courts upholding the constitutionality of revolutionary federal civil rights laws enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War. Institutionally, it was an example of extraordinary judicial activism in overriding the legislative will of …
My Pizza With Ninó, Alex Kozinski
Abortion Rights, Eileen Kaufman
Affirmative Action, Douglas Scherer, John Dunne
Affirmative Action, Douglas Scherer, John Dunne
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right-To-Die, Bruce Morton
A Comparison Of A Mentally Ill Individual's Right To Refuse Medication Under The United States And The New York State Constitutions, William M. Brooks
A Comparison Of A Mentally Ill Individual's Right To Refuse Medication Under The United States And The New York State Constitutions, William M. Brooks
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.