Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (223)
- University of Michigan Law School (61)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (55)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (42)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (24)
-
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (17)
- UIC School of Law (14)
- Cornell University Law School (10)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (9)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (6)
- Pepperdine University (6)
- William & Mary Law School (6)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (5)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (5)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (5)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (4)
- University of Washington School of Law (4)
- Columbia Law School (3)
- Georgia State University College of Law (3)
- Mississippi Christian University School of Law (3)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (3)
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- University of Maine School of Law (3)
- University of Miami Law School (3)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (3)
- Barry University School of Law (2)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Emory University School of Law (2)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Due process (51)
- Fourteenth Amendment (35)
- Fifth Amendment (28)
- Due Process (25)
- Constitution (24)
-
- Capital punishment sentencing (21)
- Supreme Court (21)
- Due Process Clause (18)
- Sixth Amendment (18)
- United States Supreme Court (18)
- Capital punishment (17)
- Federal (17)
- Law (16)
- Miranda v. Arizona (16)
- Equal protection (15)
- Evidence (15)
- New York (15)
- Police (15)
- Eighth Amendment (12)
- Fourteenth amendment (12)
- State (12)
- Death penalty (11)
- Defendant (11)
- Exclusionary rule (11)
- § 1 (11)
- 1990) (10)
- Criminal law (10)
- Criminal procedure (10)
- Dickerson v. United States (10)
- Self-incrimination (10)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (189)
- Michigan Law Review (51)
- Capital Defense Journal (33)
- Touro Law Review (32)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (25)
-
- Nebraska Journal on Advancing Justice (17)
- UIC Law Review (13)
- Articles (10)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (10)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (10)
- American Indian Law Journal (9)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (9)
- Cardozo Law Review (8)
- Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (7)
- Supreme Court Case Files (7)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (7)
- Pepperdine Law Review (6)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (5)
- Faculty Works (5)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (5)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (5)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice (4)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (4)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (3)
- MC Law Review (3)
- Maine Law Review (3)
- Other Faculty Publications (3)
- Publications (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 481 - 510 of 565
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Review Of Affirmative Action After Metro Broadcasting V. Fcc: The Solution Almost Nobody Wanted, Douglas O. Linder
Review Of Affirmative Action After Metro Broadcasting V. Fcc: The Solution Almost Nobody Wanted, Douglas O. Linder
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
The Constitutionality Of High-Speed Pursuits Under The Fourth And Fourteenth Amendments, Kathryn R. Urbonya
The Constitutionality Of High-Speed Pursuits Under The Fourth And Fourteenth Amendments, Kathryn R. Urbonya
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Addressing The Needs Of Attorneys For The Damned, Sean O'Brien
Addressing The Needs Of Attorneys For The Damned, Sean O'Brien
Faculty Works
This article is an introduction to the UMKC Law Review symposium issue dedicated to exploring the topic of capital punishment. UMKC Professor of Law Sean O’Brien shares how the growing importance of capital litigation makes this a timely and appropriate subject for consideration and shares how the university and the Law Review's attention to the death penalty debate contributes to more than just academic discussion.
A Step Towards Fairness In Capital Litigation: Missouri Resource Center, Sean O'Brien
A Step Towards Fairness In Capital Litigation: Missouri Resource Center, Sean O'Brien
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Arizona V. Youngblood: Does The Criminal Defendant Lose His Right To Due Process When The State Loses Exculpatory Evidence?, Willis C. Moore
Arizona V. Youngblood: Does The Criminal Defendant Lose His Right To Due Process When The State Loses Exculpatory Evidence?, Willis C. Moore
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sandra Day O’Connor, Abortion, And Compromise For The Court, Susan M. Halatyn
Sandra Day O’Connor, Abortion, And Compromise For The Court, Susan M. Halatyn
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Illinois Courts Struggle To Evaluate Race-Neutral Explanations For Peremptory Challenges Under Batson V. Kentucky, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 235 (1988), Kevin E. Bry
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mccleskey V. Kemp: The Supreme Court Pulls The Switch On Future Judicial Challenges To The Death Penalty, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1988), William H. Jones
Mccleskey V. Kemp: The Supreme Court Pulls The Switch On Future Judicial Challenges To The Death Penalty, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1988), William H. Jones
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Rights In Transition: Sections 1981 And 1982 Cover Discrimination On The Basis Of Ancestry And Ethnicity, Eileen Kaufman, Martin A. Schwartz
Civil Rights In Transition: Sections 1981 And 1982 Cover Discrimination On The Basis Of Ancestry And Ethnicity, Eileen Kaufman, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Colorado V. Connelly: The Gratuitous Union Of Voluntariness And State Coercion, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 199 (1987), James P. Byrne Jr.
Colorado V. Connelly: The Gratuitous Union Of Voluntariness And State Coercion, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 199 (1987), James P. Byrne Jr.
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Citizen's Arrests And The Fourth Amendment--A Fresh Perspective, Howard E. Wallin
Citizen's Arrests And The Fourth Amendment--A Fresh Perspective, Howard E. Wallin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Salerno Challenge To The Bail Reform Act Of 1984, Aba Heiman
The Salerno Challenge To The Bail Reform Act Of 1984, Aba Heiman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Batson V. Kentucky: Curing The Disease But Killing The Patient, William T. Pizzi
Batson V. Kentucky: Curing The Disease But Killing The Patient, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure—Exclusionary Rule—No Good Faith Exception To The Arkansas Rules Of Criminal Procedure, Dale Scroggins
Criminal Procedure—Exclusionary Rule—No Good Faith Exception To The Arkansas Rules Of Criminal Procedure, Dale Scroggins
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Black Innocence And The White Jury, Sheri Johnson
Black Innocence And The White Jury, Sheri Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Racial prejudice has come under increasingly close scrutiny during the past thirty years, yet its influence on the decisionmaking of criminal juries remains largely hidden from judicial and critical examination. In this Article, Professor Johnson takes a close look at this neglected area. She first sets forth a large body of social science research that reveals a widespread tendency among whites to convict black defendants in instances in which white defendants would be acquitted. Next, she argues that none of the existing techniques for eliminating the influence of racial bias on criminal trials adequately protects minority-race defendants. She contends that …
Ake V. Oklaboma, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Black V. Romano, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Illinois V. Gates: Probable Cause Redefined, 17 J. Marshall L. Rev. 335 (1984), James W. Reilley, Barry E. Witlin, Christine P. Curran
Illinois V. Gates: Probable Cause Redefined, 17 J. Marshall L. Rev. 335 (1984), James W. Reilley, Barry E. Witlin, Christine P. Curran
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
New Hearsay Exceptions For A Child's Statement Of Sexual Abuse, 18 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (1984), Glen Skoler
New Hearsay Exceptions For A Child's Statement Of Sexual Abuse, 18 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (1984), Glen Skoler
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Race And The Decision To Detain A Suspect, Sheri Johnson
Race And The Decision To Detain A Suspect, Sheri Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Schall V. Martin, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
The Illinois Grand Jury Indictment: A Denial Of Due Process, 12 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 319 (1979), David F. Platek, Howard D. Lieberman
The Illinois Grand Jury Indictment: A Denial Of Due Process, 12 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 319 (1979), David F. Platek, Howard D. Lieberman
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Defense Of The Exclusionary Rule, Yale Kamisar
A Defense Of The Exclusionary Rule, Yale Kamisar
Articles
The exclusionary rule is being flayed with increasing vigor by a number of unrelated sources and with a variety of arguments. Some critics find it unworkable and resort to empirically based arguments. Others see it as the product of a belated and unwarranted judicial interpretation. Still others, uncertain whether the rule works, are confident that in some fashion law enforcement's hands are tied. Professor Yale Kamisar, long a defender of the exclusionary rule, reviews the current attacks on the rule and offers a vigorous rebuttal. He finds it difficult to accept that there is a line for acceptable police conduct …
Ordered Liberty: Cardozo And The Constitution, John T. Noonan Jr.
Ordered Liberty: Cardozo And The Constitution, John T. Noonan Jr.
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Procedural Due Process And The Rules Of Evidence—Federal Impeachment Of The Voucher Rules—Welcome V. Vincent, 549 F.2d 853 (2d Cir.), Cert. Denied, 97 S. Ct. 2960 (1977), Bruce D. Garrison
Procedural Due Process And The Rules Of Evidence—Federal Impeachment Of The Voucher Rules—Welcome V. Vincent, 549 F.2d 853 (2d Cir.), Cert. Denied, 97 S. Ct. 2960 (1977), Bruce D. Garrison
Washington Law Review
Appellant, Ernest Welcome, was convicted in a New York state supreme court on charges of murdering two real estate brokers in their Bronx office. Before indicting Welcome, the State tried another party, Albert Cunningham, for the same offenses. Cunningham had admitted his participation in the crimes to police, giving an accurate account of the date, time, and location of the shootings. After a separate evidentiary hearing, the state court held that his confession to police had been voluntary and thus was admissible against him. Nevertheless, the charges against Cunningham were dropped in mid-trial. At his trial, Welcome called Cunningham as …