Fourteenth Amendment Commons^™

Impermissible Reverse Discrimination V. Allowable Affirmative Action: The Supreme Court Upholds Racial Classifications, 14 J. Marshall L. Rev. 491 (1981), Margery Sabian

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

In Memory Of Monrad G. Paulsen, Walter J. Wadlington

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Finberg V. Sullivan: Protecting Exempt Funds From Postjudgment Seizure, Eric M. Schmidt

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Inequitable Burden Of School Desegregation Remedies: The Effects Of Shift In Supreme Court Decisions On The Buffalo School Desegregation Case, Denise E. O'Donnell

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Equal Protection Clause In The Supreme Court 1873-1903, Richard S. Kay

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Petrie V. Illinois High School Association: Gender Classification And High School Athletics, 14 J. Marshall L. Rev. 227 (1980), Diane I. Jennings

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Mackey V. Montrym - Due Process Limits On The Use Of Interest Balancing, 13 J. Marshall L. Rev. 441 (1980), Joyce E. Heinzerling

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Equal Protection Clause In The Supreme Court, 1873-1903, Richard Kay

Faculty Articles and Papers

No abstract provided.

Due Process And Pro Hac Vice Appearances By Attorneys: Does Any Protection Remain?, Timothy C. Cashmore

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Rights Of Gay Prisoners: A Challenge To Protective Custody, Joan W. Howarth

Scholarly Works

This Note focuses on the specific issues raised by the traditional method of dealing with homosexuals in prison: isolation from the general prison population. This traditional segregation often results in almost twenty-four hour-a-day confinement to a cell, which severely limits access to programs and opportunities normally enjoyed by prisoners.

This Note first discusses the history and current practice of segregation of gay prisoners' as well as the broader subject of protective custody, and then outlines the judicial response to the problems of protective custody prisoners generally and gay prisoners specifically. It then critiques the judicial confusion and resulting reluctance to …

Log-Rolling And Judicial Review, Michael J. Waggoner

Publications

No abstract provided.

Alimony For Men -- The Changing Law, Pamela Joy Smith

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Agins V. City Of Tiburon, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Mccall V. State, 354 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 1978), Arthur C. Beal, Jr.

Florida State University Law Review

Constitutional Law-THE FINE LINE BETWEEN PROTECTED AND NON-PROTECTED SPEECH

Police Use Of Trickery As An Interrogation Technique, James G. Thomas

Vanderbilt Law Review

This Note maintains that trickery can be effectively curtailed despite the failure of Miranda to do so. This Note argues that trickery in the interrogation room is a violation of fourteenth amendment substantive due process. The Supreme Court has recently stated, in very unambiguous terms, that due process requirements exist independently of the fifth amendment Miranda requirements in the interrogation context." This Note therefore proposes an objective due process standard that would prohibit trickery. The violation of this due process standard would require the exclusion at trial of confessions induced by trickery. Because the exclusionary rule is not a sufficient …

State V. West, No. 53, 123, 23 Fla. L. W. 265 (Sup. Ct. June 7, 1979), Marjorie E. Smith

Florida State University Law Review

Constitutional Law-EQUAL PROTECTION-STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR PATERNITY SUITS DOES NOT DENY ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS

The Unwed Father: Conflict Of Rights In Adoption Proceedings, Winston R. Davis

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Rites Of Passage: Race, The Supreme Court, And The Constitution, William W. Van Alstyne

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

In Re Estate Of Reed, 354 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 1978), L. D. Landry

Florida State University Law Review

Constitutional Law- EQUAL PROTECTION-A FLORIDA STANDARD OF EQUAL PROTECTION

Rollins V. State, 354 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 1978), William Tarr

Florida State University Law Review

Constitutional Law-EQUAL PROTECTION-STATUTE DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN TYPES OF ESTABLISHMENTS IN WHICH BILLIARD TABLES ARE LOCATED HELD UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Illegitimacy And The Rights Of Unwed Fathers In Adoption Proceedings After Quilloin V. Walcott, 12 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 383 (1979), Steven E. Davis

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Eberts V. Westinghouse Electric Corp. Gender-Based Discrimination After Gilbert And Satty, 12 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 459 (1979), Carol M. Cervantes

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Flagg Brothers, Inc. V. Brooks : The Public Function Doctrine In Retreat, 12 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 637 (1979), William R. Black

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

In Their Own Image: The Reframing Of The Due Process Clause By The United States Supreme Court, J. Ralph Beaird

Scholarly Works

A distinguished constitutional scholar recently pointed out that "many of the important decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States are not based on law in the popular sense of that term." It is true, he noted, that "the court endeavors to identify Constitutional clauses upon which to hang its pronouncements." "[S]ome key words and phrases in the Constitution," however, "are so highly indeterminate that they cannot really qualify as law in any usual sense." Rather, he said, "they are semantic blanks--verbal vacuums that may be filled readily with any one of many possible meanings." Thus, it is not …

Kentucky V. Whorton And The Presumption-Of-Innocence Instruction: An Imprecise Formula For Appellate Review, Anne Abbott Trumpf

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Ordered Liberty: Cardozo And The Constitution, John T. Noonan Jr.

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Ambach V. Norwick, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Child Support: The Double Standard, Karen Colby Weiner

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Recent Cases, James S. Hutchinson, James R. Newson, Iii, Andrew W. Byrd, Judith Mi. Janssen, John E. Tavss

Vanderbilt Law Review

Civil Procedure--Attorney-Client Privilege-- Privilege Protects Communications Made by Corporate Employee To Secure Legal Advice and a Matter Committed to a Professional Legal Advisor Is Prima Facie Committed To Secure Legal Advice

James S. Hutchinson

attorney-client privilege, the "predominance" test, legal activities

In summary, courts have not yet resolved how to determine who may qualify as the corporate client for purposes of the attorney-client privilege...

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Constitutional Law-- Confrontation Clause-Admission at Trial of Slain Informant's

Prior Grand Jury Testimony Against Defendants Does …

Equal Protection: A Closer Look At Closer Scrutiny, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

This Note proposes to restore means-end analysis to legal respectability through a comprehensive integrated approach to purpose, misfit, and balancing. The search for a rational basis is meaningless if there are no constraints on the kind of purpose which may justify a classification. Therefore, this Note initially explores ways in which a court can more rigorously scrutinize statutory purpose. The next significant question is how a court should evaluate the degree of coincidence between the class picked out by the law and the class which would be picked out if the law were to achieve its goals. Such "misfit" analysis …