Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (254)
- Seattle University School of Law (235)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (172)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (114)
- William & Mary Law School (108)
-
- UIC School of Law (57)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (42)
- The University of Akron (40)
- University of Georgia School of Law (35)
- Pepperdine University (33)
- Florida State University College of Law (32)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (32)
- University of Colorado Law School (28)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (27)
- St. John's University School of Law (26)
- Fordham Law School (25)
- Cleveland State University (24)
- Brooklyn Law School (22)
- Notre Dame Law School (21)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (20)
- Cornell University Law School (19)
- University of Kentucky (19)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (19)
- Brigham Young University Law School (17)
- Columbia Law School (17)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (17)
- University of Washington School of Law (17)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (16)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (16)
- University of Maine School of Law (16)
- Keyword
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (257)
- Due process (191)
- Equal protection (152)
- Fourteenth amendment (127)
- Supreme Court (125)
-
- Equal Protection Clause (107)
- Constitution (105)
- Constitutional law (98)
- United States Constitution 14th Amendment (79)
- Due Process (74)
- Constitutional Law (69)
- Due Process Clause (66)
- Discrimination (63)
- Equal Protection (59)
- Fifth Amendment (57)
- New York (50)
- Federal (48)
- Federalism (42)
- Abortion (40)
- First Amendment (40)
- Race (39)
- Affirmative action (38)
- Civil rights (33)
- Law (32)
- Due Process of Law (31)
- Segregation (31)
- United States Supreme Court (31)
- Brown v. Board of Education (30)
- Bill of Rights (29)
- Equal protection clause (29)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (231)
- Seattle University Law Review (199)
- Touro Law Review (147)
- Faculty Scholarship (74)
- UIC Law Review (54)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (45)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (44)
- Akron Law Review (36)
- Articles (35)
- William & Mary Law Review (32)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (30)
- Scholarly Works (29)
- Publications (28)
- Florida State University Law Review (27)
- Pepperdine Law Review (26)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (26)
- Faculty Publications (25)
- Northwestern University Law Review (22)
- The Catholic Lawyer (20)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (19)
- BYU Law Review (17)
- Cleveland State Law Review (17)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (17)
- Nebraska Journal on Advancing Justice (17)
- Kentucky Law Journal (16)
- Maine Law Review (16)
- Scholarly Articles (16)
- Law Faculty Publications (15)
- Maryland Law Review (15)
- Notre Dame Law Review (15)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1231 - 1260 of 1911
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Donating "Blood Money": Fundraising For International Terrorism By United States Charities And The Government's Efforts To Constrict The Flow, Montgomery E. Engel
Donating "Blood Money": Fundraising For International Terrorism By United States Charities And The Government's Efforts To Constrict The Flow, Montgomery E. Engel
Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
The note examines the U.S. government's use of blocking orders against charitable organizations suspected of supporting terrorism, arguing that while such orders are effective in disrupting terrorist financing, they raise significant concerns about due process, transparency, and the equitable treatment of Muslim-American donors. The author advocates for a shift toward criminal prosecution as a more effective and equitable strategy, balancing national security with civil liberties.
Did The Government Finally Get It Right? An Analysis Of The Former Ins, The Office Of Refugee Resettlement And Unaccompanied Minor Aliens' Due Process Rights, Jessica G. Taverna
Did The Government Finally Get It Right? An Analysis Of The Former Ins, The Office Of Refugee Resettlement And Unaccompanied Minor Aliens' Due Process Rights, Jessica G. Taverna
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Brown Et Al. V. Board Of Education Of Topeka Et Al., 347 U.S. 483 (1954), Supreme Court Of The United States
Brown Et Al. V. Board Of Education Of Topeka Et Al., 347 U.S. 483 (1954), Supreme Court Of The United States
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
The Murky Depths Of The Entry Fiction Doctrine: The Plight Of Inadmissible Aliens Post-Zadvydas, Allison Wexler
The Murky Depths Of The Entry Fiction Doctrine: The Plight Of Inadmissible Aliens Post-Zadvydas, Allison Wexler
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Family Leave Policies Trump States Rights: Nevada Department Of Human Resources V. Hibbs And Its Impact Of Sovereign Immunity Jurisprudence, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 599 (2004), Jana L. Tibben
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Permitted But Not Intended: Boub V. Township Of Wayne, Municipal Tort Immunity In Illinois, And The Right To Local Travel, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 545 (2004), Bruce Epperson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Experimentalist Equal Protection, Brandon L. Garrett, James S. Liebman
Experimentalist Equal Protection, Brandon L. Garrett, James S. Liebman
Faculty Scholarship
Elsewhere Garrett and Liebman have recounted that though James Madison is considered "the Father of the Constitution," his progeny disappointed him because it was defenseless against self-government's "mortal disease " – the oppression of minorities by local majorities – because the Framers rejected the radical structural approach to equal protection that Madison proposed. Nor did the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause and federal courts enforcing it adopt a solution Madison would have considered "effectual." This Article explores recent subconstitutional innovations in governance and public administration that may finally bring the nation within reach of the constitutional polity …
The Tri-Ethnic Dilemma: Race, Equality, And The Fourteenth Amendment In The American West, Tom I. Romero Ii
The Tri-Ethnic Dilemma: Race, Equality, And The Fourteenth Amendment In The American West, Tom I. Romero Ii
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Choosing Liberty Over Equality And Sacrificing Both: Equal Protection And Due Process In Lawrence V. Texas, Andrew J. Seligsohn
Choosing Liberty Over Equality And Sacrificing Both: Equal Protection And Due Process In Lawrence V. Texas, Andrew J. Seligsohn
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article critiques the Supreme Court's decision in Lawrence v. Texas, arguing that the Court's reliance on substantive due process under the Due Process Clause, rather than the Equal Protection Clause, undermines the broader equality concerns faced by the LGBTQ+ community. By prioritizing liberty over equality, the Court missed an opportunity to establish a more robust legal foundation for future LGBTQ+ rights, leaving the decision vulnerable to challenge and failing to address the systemic discrimination against gays and lesbians.
Two Wrongs Make A Right: Hybrid Claims Of Discrimination, Ming Hsu Chen
Two Wrongs Make A Right: Hybrid Claims Of Discrimination, Ming Hsu Chen
Publications
This Note reinterprets and recontextualizes the pronouncement in Employment Division v. Smith (Smith II) that exemptions from generally applicable laws will not be granted unless claims of free exercise are accompanied by the assertion of another constitutional right. It argues that when Arab American Muslims, and others who are of minority race and religion, bring claims for exemption from generally applicable laws on the basis of free exercise and equal protection principles, they ought to be able to invoke Smith II's hybridity exception, thus meriting heightened judicial scrutiny and increased solicitude from courts.
Student Suspension For Possession Of Contraband In Student Vehicles: Correct Guidance From The Tenth Circuit, Larry Lewis
Student Suspension For Possession Of Contraband In Student Vehicles: Correct Guidance From The Tenth Circuit, Larry Lewis
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Are Single-Sex Schools Inherently Unequal?, Michael Heise
Are Single-Sex Schools Inherently Unequal?, Michael Heise
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Davey And The Limits Of Equality, Laura S. Underkuffler
Davey And The Limits Of Equality, Laura S. Underkuffler
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Federalism Re-Constructed: The Eleventh Amendment's Illogical Impact On Congress' Power, Marcia L. Mccormick
Federalism Re-Constructed: The Eleventh Amendment's Illogical Impact On Congress' Power, Marcia L. Mccormick
All Faculty Scholarship
The Constitution is designed to protect individual liberty and equality by diffusing power among the three branches of the federal government and between the federal and state governments, and by providing a minimum level of protection for individual rights. Yet, the Supreme Court seems to think that federalism is about protecting states as states rather than balancing governmental power to protect individuals. In the name of federalism, the Supreme Court has been paring away at Congress' power to enact civil rights legislation. In doing so, it has transformed the Fourteenth Amendment into a vehicle for protecting states rights rather than …
A Glimpse Behind And Beyond Grutter, Evan H. Caminker
A Glimpse Behind And Beyond Grutter, Evan H. Caminker
Articles
Many people have suggested that the recent battle over affirmative action was a defining moment for the contemporary relevance of Brown v. Board of Education and that it would determine the promise and potential for widespread societal integration. In my remarks, I want to comment upon a couple of comparisons and links between the Brown, Bakke, Grutter, and Gratz cases.
Bolling Alone, Richard A. Primus
Bolling Alone, Richard A. Primus
Articles
Under the doctrine of reverse incorporation, generally identified with the Supreme Court's decision in Bolling v. Sharpe, equal protection binds the federal government even though the Equal Protection Clause by its terms is addressed only to states. Since Bolling, however, the courts have almost never granted relief to litigants claiming unconstitutional racial discrimination by the federal government. Courts have periodically found unconstitutional federal discrimination on nonracial grounds such as sex and alienage, and reverse incorporation has also limited the scope of affirmative action. But in the presumed core area of preventing federal discrimination against racial minorities, Boiling has virtually no …
Lawrence And Garner: The Love (Or At Least Sexual Attraction) That Finally Dared Speak Its Name, Paris R. Baldacci
Lawrence And Garner: The Love (Or At Least Sexual Attraction) That Finally Dared Speak Its Name, Paris R. Baldacci
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article examines the legal evolution from *Bowers v. Hardwick* to Lawrence v. Texas, highlighting how the latter marked a pivotal shift in recognizing LGBTQ+ rights by emphasizing personal autonomy and dignity. It underscores the significance of narrative strategies in shaping judicial decisions, particularly in *Lawrence*, where the plaintiffs' personal stories influenced the Court's ruling.
Grutter V. Bollinger: This Generation's Brown V. Board Of Education, Michelle Adams
Grutter V. Bollinger: This Generation's Brown V. Board Of Education, Michelle Adams
Articles
At first blush, Grutter appears to be a deviation from the body of the Court's recent affirmative action jurisprudence: it says "yes" where the other cases said "no." But it is not so clear that Grutter is a deviation from current law. Instead, it might be seen as consistent with it, in that the justification for the racial preference recognized in Grutter transcended the justifications offered in the previous cases, and the method used to achieve that end, "race as a factor," diffused rather than highlighted race. From this perspective, Grutter addressed several concerns that had troubled the Court for …
The "Horizontal Effect" Of Constitutional Rights, Stephen Gardbaum
The "Horizontal Effect" Of Constitutional Rights, Stephen Gardbaum
Michigan Law Review
Among the most fundamental issues in constitutional law is the scope of application of individual rights provisions and, in particular, their reach into the private sphere. This issue is also currently one of the most important and hotly debated in comparative constitutional law, where it is known under the rubric of "vertical" and "horizontal effect." These alternatives refer to whether constitutional rights regulate only the conduct of governmental actors in their dealings with private individuals (vertical) or also relations between private individuals (horizontal). In recent years, the horizontal position has been adopted to varying degrees, and after systematic scholarly and …
Lochner'S Feminist Legacy, David E. Bernstein
Lochner'S Feminist Legacy, David E. Bernstein
Michigan Law Review
Professor Julie Novkov's Constituting Workers, Protecting Women examines the so-called Lochner era of American constitutional jurisprudence through the lens of the struggle over the constitutionality of "protective" labor legislation, such as maximum hours and minimum wage laws. Many of these laws applied only to women, and Novkov argues that the debate over the constitutionality of protective laws for women - laws that some women's rights advocates saw as discriminatory legislation against women - ultimately had more important implications for the constitutionality of protective labor legislation more generally. Liberally defined, the Lochner era lasted from the Slaughter-House Cases in 1873 - …
Section Five Overbreadth: The Facial Approach To Adjudicating Challenges Under Section Five Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Catherine Carroll
Section Five Overbreadth: The Facial Approach To Adjudicating Challenges Under Section Five Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Catherine Carroll
Michigan Law Review
In February 1996, the New York State Department of Transportation fired Joseph Kilcullen from his position as a snowplow driver in the Department's Highway Maintenance training program. Alleging that the state discharged him because of his epilepsy and learning disability, Kilcullen sued his former employer under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), which abrogated states' sovereign immunity and permitted private suits for damages against states in a federal court. Kilcullen asserted only that he was not treated the same as similarly situated non-disabled employees; his claim did not implicate the ADA's requirement that employers provide "reasonable accommodation" to disabled employees. …
Location And Life: How Stenberg V. Carhart Undercut Roe V. Wade, Richard Stith
Location And Life: How Stenberg V. Carhart Undercut Roe V. Wade, Richard Stith
Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Discrimination?:The Conflict Between Public Accommodations' Freedom Association And State Anti-Discrimination Laws, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 125 (2003), Gregory J. Wartman
Freedom Of Discrimination?:The Conflict Between Public Accommodations' Freedom Association And State Anti-Discrimination Laws, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 125 (2003), Gregory J. Wartman
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Righting The Canoe: Title Ix And The Decline Of Men's Intercollegiate Athletics, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 257 (2003), Andrew J. Boyd
Righting The Canoe: Title Ix And The Decline Of Men's Intercollegiate Athletics, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 257 (2003), Andrew J. Boyd
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Racial Identity, Electoral Structures, And The First Amendment Right Of Association, Guy-Uriel Charles
Racial Identity, Electoral Structures, And The First Amendment Right Of Association, Guy-Uriel Charles
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Race Conscious Affirmative Action By Tax Exempt 501(C)(3) Corporations After Grutter And Gratz, David A. Brennen
Race Conscious Affirmative Action By Tax Exempt 501(C)(3) Corporations After Grutter And Gratz, David A. Brennen
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment generally acts as a legal limit on the permissible bounds of government action. Accordingly, public universities and other government entities are constitutionally prohibited from engaging in acts that violate equal protection of the laws. The Supreme Court recently reinforced this point when it ruled, in two related cases, that public universities may consider the race of applicants when making admissions decisions, so long as an applicant's race does not amount to a deciding factor when granting admission. By its very terms, the constitutional limitation imposed by the Equal Protection Clause only directly …
Caseload Burdens And Jurisdictional Limitations: Some Observations From The History Of The Federal Courts, Edward A. Purcell Jr.
Caseload Burdens And Jurisdictional Limitations: Some Observations From The History Of The Federal Courts, Edward A. Purcell Jr.
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Jon O. Newman And The Abortion Decisions: A Remarkable First Year, Andrew D. Hurwitz
Jon O. Newman And The Abortion Decisions: A Remarkable First Year, Andrew D. Hurwitz
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Decoupling 'Terrorist' From 'Immigrant': An Enhanced Role For The Federal Courts Post 9/11, Victor C. Romero
Decoupling 'Terrorist' From 'Immigrant': An Enhanced Role For The Federal Courts Post 9/11, Victor C. Romero
Faculty Scholarship
Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Attorney General John Ashcroft has utilized the broad immigration power ceded to him by Congress to ferret out terrorists among noncitizens detained for minor immigration violations. Such a strategy provides the government two options: deport those who are not terrorists, and then prosecute others who are. While certainly efficient, using immigration courts and their less formal due process protections afforded noncitizens should trigger greater oversight and vigilance by the federal courts for at least four reasons: First, while the legitimate goal of immigration law enforcement is deportation, Ashcroft's true objective in targeting …
The Principle And Practice Of Women's "Full Citizenship": A Case Study Of Sex-Segregated Public Education, Jill Elaine Hasday
The Principle And Practice Of Women's "Full Citizenship": A Case Study Of Sex-Segregated Public Education, Jill Elaine Hasday
Michigan Law Review
For more than a quarter century, the Supreme Court has repeatedly declared that sex-based state action is subject to heightened scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause. But the Court has always been much less clear about what that standard allows and what it prohibits. For this reason, it is especially noteworthy that one of the Court's most recent sex discrimination opinions, United States v. Virginia, purports to provide more coherent guidance. Virginia suggests that the constitutionality of sex-based state action turns on whether the practice at issue denies women "full citizenship stature" or "create[s) or perpetuate[s) the legal, social, …