Food and Drug Law Commons^™

The Case For Green Food Labels, Emily Alves, Mark Edwards

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.

Commentary Genetically Modified Organisms And Global Hunger: A Real Solution?, Simon Nicholson

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.

An Overview Of This Issue: Closely-Linked Nature Of Global Food And Finance, Siwa Msangi

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.

Rising Global Food Prices: The Need For Re-Regulating Commodity Futures, Megan S. Chapman

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.

Preparing For The Unknown: The Threat Of Agroterrorism, Matthew Padilla

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.

There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch: A Look At State Gift Disclosure Laws And The Effect On Pharmaceutical Company Marketing, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 563 (2008), Scott Velasquez

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Unjust Exclusion Of Gay Sperm Donors: Litigation Strategies To End Discrimination In The Gene Pool, Luke A. Boso

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Environmental Effects Of Cruelty To Agricultural Animals, Kyle H. Landis-Marinello

Michigan Law Review First Impressions

Laws criminalizing animal abuse should apply to the agricultural industry. When we exempt the agricultural industry from these laws, factory farms increase production to unnaturally high levels. This increased production causes devastating environmental effects, such as climate change, water shortages, and the loss of topsoil. In light of these effects, the law needs to do much more to regulate the agricultural industry, and the first step should be to criminalize cruelty to agricultural animals. This would force the industry to slow down production to more natural levels that are much less harmful to the environment.

"It's The Right Thing To Do": Why The Animal Agriculture Industry Should Not Oppose Science-Based Regulations Protecting The Welfare Of Animals Raised For Food, Angela J. Geiman

Michigan Law Review First Impressions

Since the beginning of history, people have used farm animals to assist with their work and to provide a source of food. These agricultural pursuits were not questioned; rather, they were a widely-accepted way of life. In fact, many people still say that the very purpose of livestock on this Earth is to provide these resources for mankind. As for the proper way to treat our livestock, we commonly hear farmers and livestock producers make comments like, “If we take care of the animals, they will take care of us,” and, “We treat our animals well because that’s just good …

One Bad Day: Thoughts On The Difference Between Animal Rights And Animal Welfare, Neil D. Hamilton

Michigan Law Review First Impressions

The lawsuit pitting the New Jersey Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals against the New Jersey Department of Agriculture brings into sharp focus the issue of animal rights versus animal welfare that has been dividing animal activists, farmers, and society for decades. On one side are proponents of animal rights—a set of rights articulated by humans but granted to animals to govern how we treat them. For many believers this includes the right not to be owned and certainly not to be eaten. On the other side are proponents of animal welfare—also a set of human derived standards …

A Case Study On Cruelty To Farm Animals: Lessons Learned From The Hallmark Meat Packing Case, Nancy Perry, Peter Brandt

Michigan Law Review First Impressions

“I need the public to understand that my office takes all cases involving animal cruelty very seriously . . . [and i]t doesn’t matter whether the mistreated animal is a beloved family pet or a cow at a slaughterhouse. Unnecessary cruelty will not be tolerated and will be prosecuted to the fullest extent allowed by law.” San Bernardino County District Attorney Michael A. Ramos (February 15, 2008) One morning in January 2008, images of horrific animal cruelty were blasted by Internet, television, and print media throughout the country. The story was all the more shocking in that the animals at …

Is Preemption Right For You - The Third Circuit Applies Preemption To A Misleading Drug Advertisement Claim In Pennsylvania Employee Benefit Trust Fund V. Zeneca, Inc., Diana Rabeh

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Two Global Crises Bring Opportunity To International Tobacco Control, Chris A. Bostic

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.

Usda Organic: Ecopornography Or A Label Worth Searching For?, Blake M. Mensing

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.

The Food Crisis: A New-Found Momentum To Redefine African Agricultural Policies, Meti Zegeye

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.

Three Keys For Rehabilitating And Stabilizing Haiti, Chris Logan

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.

Promoting Ethical Standards In Globalized Drug Trials Through Market Exclusion, Fazal Khan

Popular Media

With the increasing accessibility of cheap internet communication, human research subjects and concerned citizens in developing nations can be empowered to effectuate much of the surveillance and monitoring activities of clinical drug trials. For instance, WHO could maintain a multilingual website for the reporting of alleged ethical violations. A credible report could then prompt WHO officials to obtain a sworn statement from the reporter, which would then trigger an investigation into the alleged ethical abuses. Verified reports of ethical abuses can then be taken into account by drug regulatory agencies when determining whether a drug should obtain market approval.

The Effect Of The Food Allergen Labeling And Consumer Protection Act (Falcpa) On The Accidental Food Allergen Ingestion Rate In Adults With Self-Reported Food Allergies, Susan Liebert

Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations

Background: The Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA) recently required bolded allergens or “contains” statements on food product labels. Very few U.S. studies have looked at the accidental food allergen ingestion rate in adults. Since the emotional and medical costs of allergic reactions can be high, it is important to determine if the FALCPA is helping to reduce the accidental food allergen ingestion rate in adults with self-reported food allergies.

Background: The Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA) recently required bolded allergens or “contains” statements on food product labels. Very few U.S. studies have looked at …

2007 Cardozo International Advocate For Peace Award: Acceptance Speech, Jeffrey Sachs

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The Eighth International Peace Award Recipient

Expedited Partner Therapies For Sexually Transmitted Diseases: Legal And Policy Approaches, James G. Hodge, Erin C. Fuse Brown

Faculty Publications By Year

No abstract provided.

Pharma's Nonobvious Problem, Rebecca S. Eisenberg

Articles

This Article considers the effect of the recent decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in KSR International Co. v. Teleflex, Inc. on the nonobviousness standard for patentability as applied to pharmaceutical patents. By calling for an expansive and flexible analysis and disapproving of the use of rigid formulas in evaluating an invention for obviousness, KSR may appear to make it easier for generic competitors to challenge the validity of drug patents. But an examination of the Federal Circuit's nonobviousness jurisprudence in the context of such challenges reveals that the Federal Circuit has been employing all along the sort of flexible …

Lawsuits Over Tainted Heparin Manufactured In China: Is The Fda Becoming The Global Healthcare Authority? , Christina Laga

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

United States Regulation Of Stem Cell Research: Recasting Government's Role And Questions To Be Resolved, Owen C. B. Hughes, Alan L. Jakimo, Michael J. Malinowski

Journal Articles

This article directly addresses the stem cell controversy, but also the broader history and norms regarding the roles of federal and state government in U.S. science research funding.

Common Ground: The Case For Collaboration Between Anti-Poverty Advocates And Public Interest Intellectual Property Advocates, Deborah J. Cantrell

Publications

This article examines the previously unappreciated common ground between scholars and advocates who work to eliminate poverty, and scholars and advocates who work on intellectual property issues in the public interest. The article first illustrates how scholars and advocates working on poverty and on public interest intellectual property have relied on rights talk to frame their social movements. Under the conventional narrative, the framing has accentuated differences between the movements. As the Article explains, the two movements share core principles and should recognize shared interests and goals. By developing a new model of how to view public interest movements, the …

Let Us Eat Lettuce (And Spinach): Is The Bioterrorism Preparedness Act Enough Or Is An Independent Food Safety Agency Required?, Robert M. Yoke

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Dirty Dancing: The Fda Stumbles On The Chevron Two-Step, Gary S. Lawson

Faculty Scholarship

Professor Lars Noah deserves much credit for exposing some of the myriad ways in which the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has consistently sought to expand its authority through questionable, and perhaps in some cases abusive, legal practices.' As Professor Noah observes, there are signs that the federal courts' century-long honeymoon with the FDA may be ending 2 -and perhaps the FDA never deserved the solicitude that it has traditionally received from both the judiciary and Congress. 3 If Professor Noah can hasten the onset of a more realistic legal and public attitude toward the FDA, he will have performed …

A Healthy Solution For Patients And Patents: How India's Legal Victory Against A Pharmaceutical Giant Reconciles Human Rights With Intellectual Property Rights, Sara B. Myers

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

The Swiss drug company Novartis challenged India's status as the "Pharmacy of the Developing World" when it initiated a lawsuit against the Indian government on February 15, 2007. In 2005, India updated its Patents Act to comply with the World Trade Organization's (WTO) intellectual property requirements. Before 2005, India only granted patents to processes, not products, which facilitated the development of the country's booming generic drug industry. On January 25, 2006, India's Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks denied Novartis's patent application for its cancer-fighting drug Glivec on the grounds that it was not substantially different …

An Intellectual Property Food Fight: Why Copyright Law Should Embrace Culinary Innovation, J. Austin Broussard

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

In the United States, dining has become an increasingly popular form of leisure and entertainment, generating an estimated $537 billion in 2007. However, dining represents only one aspect of the modern food economy; cooking and dining are regularly featured in newspapers and magazines, while celebrity chefs tout their own brands on television. Eating has been transformed from a mere perfunctory activity into big business. Increasing competition for the attention and money of restaurant patrons has prompted chefs of grande cuisine to differentiate their menus by creating unique dishes. The time and labor that chefs sink into this form of innovation …

The Vioxx Litigation: Two Case Studies, Michael E. Tigar

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Putting The Brakes On Drugs: The Impact Of Ksr V. Teleflex On Pharmaceutical Patenting Strategies, Diane C. Renbarger

Georgia Law Review

In its 2007 KSR v. Teleflex decision, the Supreme Court permitted KSR International Co. to manufacture an adjustable gas pedal in spite of a competitor's patent. The ruling struck down the Federal Circuit's test to determine whether a patent is obvious and thereby invalid. Since the decision, there has been speculation about how much, if at all, the Supreme Court's decision changed patent validity standards,and particularly about how the decision will influence pharmaceutical patenting. This Note examines the impact KSRv. Teleflex may have on the pharmaceutical industry. Pharmaceutical patenting laws and early court decisions applying the reasoning of KSR v. …