Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Health Law and Policy (17)
- Administrative Law (13)
- Intellectual Property Law (13)
- Science and Technology Law (7)
- Supreme Court of the United States (7)
-
- Tax Law (6)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (4)
- Law and Economics (4)
- Legislation (4)
- Banking and Finance Law (3)
- Criminal Law (3)
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- Artificial Intelligence and Robotics (2)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Commercial Law (2)
- Computer Sciences (2)
- Courts (2)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- Evidence (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Immigration Law (2)
- International Trade Law (2)
- Law and Race (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (2)
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Drugs (17)
- Pharmaceuticals (15)
- Food and Drug Administration (10)
- Patent law (8)
- United States Supreme Court (8)
-
- Regulation (7)
- Constitution (5)
- Marijuana (5)
- Alcohol (4)
- Biomedicine (4)
- Competition (4)
- Drug approval (4)
- Federal agencies (4)
- Incentives (4)
- Innovation (4)
- Patients (4)
- Research and development (4)
- Cigarettes (3)
- Command-and-control (3)
- Controlled Substances Act (3)
- Doctors (3)
- Drug approvals (3)
- Ex ante (3)
- Ex post (3)
- Food (3)
- Generic drugs (3)
- Markets (3)
- Medical marijuana (3)
- Narcotics (3)
- Patentability (3)
Articles 61 - 64 of 64
Full-Text Articles in Food and Drug Law
International Aspects Of Prohibition Enforcement, Edwin D. Dickinson
International Aspects Of Prohibition Enforcement, Edwin D. Dickinson
Articles
The Eighteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution prohibits "the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors within, the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from the United States and all territory subject to the jurisdiction thereof for beverage purposes." 40 Stat. io5O, 1941. In the National Prohibition Cases. 253 U. S. 350, 386, the amendment was said to be operative "throughout the entire territorial limits of the United States." As originally enacted, the National Prohibition Act did not in terms define its territorial field, but a supplemental provision afterwards enacted declares that the act "shall apply not only to …
Real Significance Of The Proposed Michigan Beer And Wine Amendment, Edwin C. Goddard
Real Significance Of The Proposed Michigan Beer And Wine Amendment, Edwin C. Goddard
Articles
DISCUSSION of proposed prohibitory amendments to Constitutions, State or Federal, are usually regarded as part of the wet and dry fight in which lawyers are interested only as citizens. Before the recent Cleveland Meeting of the American Bar Association the bar of the country was circularized by a protest, signed by a number of very well known lawyers, urging the bar to take action against putting into the fundamental law, the Constitution, such matters as the regulation of what the people shall drink. These lawyers presented their case at the Cleveland meeting and vigorously attempted to induce the American Bar …
Sales: Liability For The Presence Of Mice And Other Uncommon Things In Food, John B. Waite
Sales: Liability For The Presence Of Mice And Other Uncommon Things In Food, John B. Waite
Articles
A group of recent decisions presents a somewhat farcical conformity with Montesquieu's thesis that "law" may vary with time and geography. It strikingly illustrates, also, the importance of the particular theory of liability upon which a suit is predicated. The unusual similarity in detail of the operative facts of these cases lends peculiar emphasis to the difference in the judgments rendered.
The Kansas 'Manhattan Cocktail Case' And Some Others Concerning Judicial Notice, James H. Brewster
The Kansas 'Manhattan Cocktail Case' And Some Others Concerning Judicial Notice, James H. Brewster
Articles
Some anti-prohibitionists may think they have an "eye-opener" in the recent Kansas decision that judicial notice will be taken of the intoxicating properties of a Manhattan cocktail: State v. Pigg, 97 Pac. 859.