Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (815)
- Supreme Court of the United States (221)
- Religion Law (181)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (171)
- Internet Law (129)
-
- Education Law (121)
- Communications Law (117)
- Courts (111)
- Law and Society (111)
- Jurisprudence (99)
- Intellectual Property Law (91)
- Law and Politics (82)
- Legislation (82)
- Privacy Law (78)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (70)
- Fourteenth Amendment (67)
- Criminal Law (66)
- Legal History (64)
- State and Local Government Law (58)
- Labor and Employment Law (53)
- Law and Gender (53)
- Science and Technology Law (52)
- Administrative Law (51)
- Torts (51)
- Election Law (49)
- Judges (46)
- Sexuality and the Law (43)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (42)
- Institution
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (121)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (103)
- University of Colorado Law School (93)
- Pepperdine University (91)
- Notre Dame Law School (85)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (85)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (62)
- University of Georgia School of Law (56)
- Washington University in St. Louis (45)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (45)
- The University of Akron (44)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (42)
- St. John's University School of Law (39)
- New York Law School (38)
- Columbia Law School (36)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (36)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (35)
- Cleveland State University (30)
- University of Richmond (30)
- University of Miami Law School (28)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (27)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (26)
- University of Baltimore Law (26)
- Boston University School of Law (24)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (23)
- American University Washington College of Law (22)
- Seattle University School of Law (20)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (18)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (16)
- University of Washington School of Law (16)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (90)
- Publications (85)
- Faculty Scholarship (84)
- Pepperdine Law Review (73)
- Journal Articles (55)
-
- Scholarly Works (53)
- Faculty Publications (46)
- Cardozo Law Review (45)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (44)
- Akron Law Review (42)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (42)
- Indiana Law Journal (42)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (42)
- Articles (37)
- Court Briefs (36)
- Law Faculty Publications (35)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (33)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (31)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (30)
- All Faculty Scholarship (28)
- Supreme Court Case Files (28)
- Faculty Articles (26)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (24)
- NYLS Law Review (21)
- Northwestern University Law Review (20)
- Cleveland State Law Review (18)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (18)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (18)
- Catholic University Law Review (17)
- Seattle University Law Review (17)
- Publication Type
Articles 1591 - 1620 of 1727
Full-Text Articles in First Amendment
The Right To Speak, The Right To Hear, And The Right Not To Hear: The Technological Resolution To The Cable/Pornography Debate, Michael I. Meyerson
The Right To Speak, The Right To Hear, And The Right Not To Hear: The Technological Resolution To The Cable/Pornography Debate, Michael I. Meyerson
All Faculty Scholarship
The advent of cable television presented a new opportunity to consider the competing interests on each side of the free speech/pornography debate. This Article attempts to construct an analysis that will be consistent with Supreme Court teaching on how government, under the first amendment, may constitutionally regulate legal obscenity, particularly in the name of protecting those who wish to avoid exposure to such material.
The Article shows how, unlike earlier battles over technology and pornography, cable television presented the novel opportunity to have a technological rather than a censorial solution to this difficult problem.
The Probable Significance Of The Bork Appointment For Issues Of Particular Concern To Women, Mary Ann Glendon
The Probable Significance Of The Bork Appointment For Issues Of Particular Concern To Women, Mary Ann Glendon
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Judicial Performance Of Robert H. Bork In Administrative And Regulatory Law, Richard B. Stewart
The Judicial Performance Of Robert H. Bork In Administrative And Regulatory Law, Richard B. Stewart
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The First Amendment Jurisprudence Of Judge Robert H. Bork, Michael W. Mcconnell
The First Amendment Jurisprudence Of Judge Robert H. Bork, Michael W. Mcconnell
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The White House Report: Information On Judge Bork's Qualifications, Judicial Record & Related Subjects
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judge Robert H. Bork's Decisions In Which He Wrote No Opinion: An Analysis Of The Regulatory And Benefit Cases, Robert A. Anthony
Judge Robert H. Bork's Decisions In Which He Wrote No Opinion: An Analysis Of The Regulatory And Benefit Cases, Robert A. Anthony
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Analysis Of Judge Robert H. Bork’S Opinions On Standing, Daniel D. Polsby
Analysis Of Judge Robert H. Bork’S Opinions On Standing, Daniel D. Polsby
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Speech And Holocaust Denial, Gerald Tishler
Freedom Of Speech And Holocaust Denial, Gerald Tishler
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Speech And Racism, David Kretzmer
Taking Libel Reform Seriously, Rodney A. Smolla
Book Review. Church-State Relationships In America By Gerald V. Bradley, Richard M. Fraher
Book Review. Church-State Relationships In America By Gerald V. Bradley, Richard M. Fraher
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Teaching Tolerance, Robert F. Nagel
An Excess Of Access: The Cable Communications Policy Act Of 1984 And First Amendment Protection Of Editorial Discretion, Adam R. Spilka
An Excess Of Access: The Cable Communications Policy Act Of 1984 And First Amendment Protection Of Editorial Discretion, Adam R. Spilka
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Corporation Of The Presiding Bishop Of The Church Of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints V. Amos, Lewis F. Powell Jr
Corporation Of The Presiding Bishop Of The Church Of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints V. Amos, Lewis F. Powell Jr
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Board Of The Airport Commissioners Of The City Of Los Angeles V. Jews For Jesus, Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Board Of The Airport Commissioners Of The City Of Los Angeles V. Jews For Jesus, Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Celebrities And The First Amendment: Broader Protection Against The Unauthorized Publication Of Photographs, D. Scott Gurney
Celebrities And The First Amendment: Broader Protection Against The Unauthorized Publication Of Photographs, D. Scott Gurney
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Moment Of Silence: A Permissible Accommodation Protecting The Capacity To Form Religious Belief, Andrew Woodbridge Hall
A Moment Of Silence: A Permissible Accommodation Protecting The Capacity To Form Religious Belief, Andrew Woodbridge Hall
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Unifying Theory For The Religion Clauses Of The First Amendment, Thomas R. Mccoy, Gary A. Kurtz
A Unifying Theory For The Religion Clauses Of The First Amendment, Thomas R. Mccoy, Gary A. Kurtz
Vanderbilt Law Review
According to Justice Powell, the first amendment religion clauses are the source of "some of the most perplexing questions"that the Supreme Court confronts. In a long and rapidly expanding line of religion clause cases the Court has struggled, with a conspicuous lack of success, to articulate principles of broad applicability. The Court's efforts to date have resulted in a jumble of tests, standards, and theoretical approaches from which predicting the outcome in future cases is very difficult.
The conceptual problems that have frustrated the Court's attempts at doctrinal development center in two broad areas: first,the meaning and effect of the …
Developments In Civil Liberties: 1984-85 Term, Ivan E. Bodensteiner, Rosalie Levinson
Developments In Civil Liberties: 1984-85 Term, Ivan E. Bodensteiner, Rosalie Levinson
Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Secular Meaning Behind The Lemon Test: Lynch V. Donnelly
The Secular Meaning Behind The Lemon Test: Lynch V. Donnelly
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A "Conservative" Judge And The First Amendment: Judicial Restraint And Freedom Of Expression, Daniel O. Conkle
A "Conservative" Judge And The First Amendment: Judicial Restraint And Freedom Of Expression, Daniel O. Conkle
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
First Amendment Restrictions On Title I Programs In Private Schools, Laura Gaston Dooley
First Amendment Restrictions On Title I Programs In Private Schools, Laura Gaston Dooley
Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Speech As Therapy, Pierre Schlag
The Supreme Court’S Public Forum Doctrine And The Return Of Formalism, Keith Werhan
The Supreme Court’S Public Forum Doctrine And The Return Of Formalism, Keith Werhan
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 68: "Settling" The Differences In The Proposed Amendments To The Offer Of Settlement Rule, Nelson Perel
Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 68: "Settling" The Differences In The Proposed Amendments To The Offer Of Settlement Rule, Nelson Perel
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bowen V. Roy, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Witters V. Washington Department Of Services For Blind, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Witters V. Washington Department Of Services For Blind, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Goldman V. Weinberger, Lewis F. Powell Jr
Goldman V. Weinberger, Lewis F. Powell Jr
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Racial Defamation As Free Speech: Abusing The First Amendment, Kenneth Lasson
Racial Defamation As Free Speech: Abusing The First Amendment, Kenneth Lasson
All Faculty Scholarship
The traditional view of the first amendment's free speech guarantee as absolute, allowing few and narrow exceptions, reflects the Constitution's dedication to an open and unfettered exchange of ideas. Those thoughts that are abhorrent to a free society, the argument goes, will wither when aired but fester if suppressed. Moreover, who is to decide which ideas are offensive? The interests of the state may well be inferior to those of the people, the wisdom of public servants often suspect in quality and motivation. But freedom of speech is so precious and delicate a liberty it must be preserved at great …
In Defense Of Group-Libel Laws, Or Why The First Amendment Should Not Protect Nazis, Kenneth Lasson
In Defense Of Group-Libel Laws, Or Why The First Amendment Should Not Protect Nazis, Kenneth Lasson
All Faculty Scholarship
The author discusses group libel laws, and the underlying problems when free speech is used as a defense by those who would defame specific racial or ethnic groups and/or minorities. The topic is further explained in reference to various state laws, and the subsequent court cases extant at the time of the article's writing which defined the issue in terms of law. References are also made to such laws in countries other than the United States for the sake of comparison.