Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

First Amendment Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Censorship

Discipline
Institution
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 121 - 141 of 141

Full-Text Articles in First Amendment

Library Book Selection And The Public Schools: The Quest For The Archimedean Point, Mark G. Yudof Oct 1984

Library Book Selection And The Public Schools: The Quest For The Archimedean Point, Mark G. Yudof

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.


How Useful Is Judicial Review In Free Speech Cases?, Robert F. Nagel Jan 1984

How Useful Is Judicial Review In Free Speech Cases?, Robert F. Nagel

Publications

No abstract provided.


Prior Restraint Of Expression Through The Private Search Doctrine, Edward J. Eberle Jan 1983

Prior Restraint Of Expression Through The Private Search Doctrine, Edward J. Eberle

Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Libraries, Librarians And First Amendment Freedoms, Robert M. O'Neil Jan 1975

Libraries, Librarians And First Amendment Freedoms, Robert M. O'Neil

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.


A Critique Of The Recent Supreme Court Obscenity Decisions, Herald Price Fahringer, Michael J. Brown Jan 1974

A Critique Of The Recent Supreme Court Obscenity Decisions, Herald Price Fahringer, Michael J. Brown

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Carmen: Movies, Censorship And The Law, Abner J. Mikva Feb 1968

Carmen: Movies, Censorship And The Law, Abner J. Mikva

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Movies, Censorship and the Law by Ira H. Carmen


The New York Times Rule: Judicial Overkill, Lewis C. Green Jan 1967

The New York Times Rule: Judicial Overkill, Lewis C. Green

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.


Newsmen And The Times Doctrine, Harold L. Nelson Jan 1967

Newsmen And The Times Doctrine, Harold L. Nelson

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.


The Right To Know: Fair Comment - Twentieth Century, Arthur B. Hanson Jan 1967

The Right To Know: Fair Comment - Twentieth Century, Arthur B. Hanson

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.


Customs Censorship, Jay A. Sigler Jan 1966

Customs Censorship, Jay A. Sigler

Cleveland State Law Review

The American national government is engaged in a vast program of censorship which includes a wider range of materials than that usually controlled by local government authority. The attention of the courts and the press has been concentrated primarily upon state and local censorship, but federal activity is usually more significant. The federal government has used the postal and customs powers, derived from Article I, Sec. 8 of the Constitution, to regulate both the internal movement of undesirable material and its entry from abroad. The postal power has been treated elsewhere, but the customs power is at least as important …


Ftc May Determine Whether Advertisements Containing Therapeutic Claims In Promotion Of Health Books Are Deceptive- Rodale Press, Inc., Michigan Law Review Jun 1965

Ftc May Determine Whether Advertisements Containing Therapeutic Claims In Promotion Of Health Books Are Deceptive- Rodale Press, Inc., Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Rodale Press advertised that the ideas and suggestions in its publication, The Health Finder, would increase life span, prevent various diseases, and permit savings on medical and dental expenses. The Federal Trade Commission challenged the advertising claims, which were substantially restatements of claims made in the book, on the ground that adherence to the book's suggestions would not effect the promised results. The hearing examiner denied Rodale's motion to dismiss the complaint. On request for permission to file an interlocutory appeal from the dismissal, held, request denied, one commissioner dissenting. The Commission may challenge the collateral claims in …


A Blueprint For Censorship Of Obscene Material: Standards For Procedural Due Process, John A. Luchsinger Jan 1965

A Blueprint For Censorship Of Obscene Material: Standards For Procedural Due Process, John A. Luchsinger

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.


Constitutional Law - Motion Picture Censorship - Artistic Merit Of Film As Whole Not Sufficient To Redeem Obscene Parts, Christopher J. Clark Jan 1964

Constitutional Law - Motion Picture Censorship - Artistic Merit Of Film As Whole Not Sufficient To Redeem Obscene Parts, Christopher J. Clark

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.


Freedom From Obscenity, Norman A. Erbe, Arlo F. Craig Jr. Jan 1961

Freedom From Obscenity, Norman A. Erbe, Arlo F. Craig Jr.

Cleveland State Law Review

Interest in obscenity laws, in the reason and purpose for their being, their efficacy in achieving the ends for which they are intended, the threat their existence and enforcement pose to the freedoms of speech and press, and the attitude of the courts toward them, seems to be at a new high. Obscenity is universally condemned throughout the United States. Yet law enforcement officers who attempt to enforce obscenity laws invariably are accused of "censoring" and "book burning."' A good many of such charges come from persons whose ox is being gored-persons who have a pecuniary interest in having obscenity …


Abstracts Of Recent Cases, M. J. F. Jun 1960

Abstracts Of Recent Cases, M. J. F.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


St. John-Stevas: Obscenity And The Law, William B. Lockhart Dec 1957

St. John-Stevas: Obscenity And The Law, William B. Lockhart

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Obscenity and the Law . By Norman St. John-Stevas


Constitutional Law - Censorship Of Obscence Literature, Donald M. Wilkinson, Jr. S.Ed. Feb 1954

Constitutional Law - Censorship Of Obscence Literature, Donald M. Wilkinson, Jr. S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The right to a free expression of ideas, without interference from governmental authorities, is inherent in the very nature of a democracy. On the other hand, it is also clear that the greater interests of the state at large will conflict with certain forms of expression, and in such circumstances obviously the former must prevail. It is the purpose of this comment to discuss the constitutional limitations on the governmental suppression of literature on grounds of obscenity.


Censorship And Free Speech, Byron Price Oct 1942

Censorship And Free Speech, Byron Price

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Contempt - Suppression Order - Publication Of Contents Of Suppressed File, Milton M. Howard Jan 1937

Contempt - Suppression Order - Publication Of Contents Of Suppressed File, Milton M. Howard

Michigan Law Review

On a bill of complaint being filed in chancery court an injunction was issued against the defendant therein, and the papers in the cause were ordered suppressed by the chancellor, and to that end, sealed in an envelope. The bill alleged misrepresentation on the part of a leading banker in getting stockholders to contribute toward making up the defalcations of other officers in the bank and malfeasance of other officers. Defendant newspaper reporter obtained information relative to the allegations in the bill from sources other than the suppressed file and published the same nine months later. Upon citation for contempt, …


Censorship Of Radio Programs And Freedom Of Speech, Byron Pumphrey Jan 1934

Censorship Of Radio Programs And Freedom Of Speech, Byron Pumphrey

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Freedom Of Speech And Of The Press In War Time The Espionage Act, Thomas F. Carroll Jun 1919

Freedom Of Speech And Of The Press In War Time The Espionage Act, Thomas F. Carroll

Michigan Law Review

The Imperial German Government had never made a secret of its willingness to encourage disloyalty among the citizens and subjects of Germany's enemies. It had officially announced: "Bribery of enemies' subjects, acceptance of offers of treachery, utilization of discontented elements in the population, support of pretenders and the like are permissible; indeed, international law is in no way opposed to the exploitation of the crimes of third parties."'