Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (36)
- Supreme Court of the United States (19)
- Communications Law (11)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (8)
- Internet Law (8)
-
- Religion Law (8)
- Administrative Law (5)
- Courts (5)
- Education Law (5)
- Election Law (5)
- Legal History (5)
- Legislation (5)
- Science and Technology Law (5)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (4)
- Intellectual Property Law (4)
- Judges (4)
- Legal Writing and Research (4)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (3)
- Computer Law (3)
- Criminal Law (3)
- Fourteenth Amendment (3)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- National Security Law (3)
- Privacy Law (3)
- Sexuality and the Law (3)
- Conflict of Laws (2)
- Food and Drug Law (2)
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (17)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (17)
- University of Colorado Law School (7)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (5)
- UIC School of Law (5)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (5)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (4)
- William & Mary Law School (4)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (3)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- University of Kentucky (2)
- Association of American Law Schools (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Chapman University (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (1)
- UC Law SF (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Denver (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (21)
- Freedom of speech (15)
- United States Supreme Court (6)
- Constitution (3)
- Constitutional law (3)
-
- Education (3)
- Equal Protection Clause (3)
- FCC (3)
- Federal Communications Commission (3)
- Federalism (3)
- Internet (3)
- Law (3)
- Obscenity (3)
- Religion (3)
- Supreme Court (3)
- Websites (3)
- Yahoo (3)
- 9/11 (2)
- Barry Elton Black (2)
- Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act of 2002 (2)
- Brandenburg v. Ohio (2)
- Broadcasters (2)
- Campaign Finance Reform (2)
- Civil rights (2)
- Constitution. 1st Amendment (2)
- Copyright Law (2)
- Cyberlaw (2)
- Elections (2)
- Establishment Clause (2)
- Establishment clause (2)
- Publication
-
- First Amendment Law Review (17)
- Michigan Law Review (12)
- Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (5)
- Publications (4)
-
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (4)
- UIC Law Review (3)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (3)
- University of Colorado Law Review (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Articles (2)
- Cardozo Law Review (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (2)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (2)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (2)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (2)
- Supreme Court Preview (2)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (2)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (1)
- Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal (1)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - ) (1)
- Journal of Legal Education (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 100
Full-Text Articles in First Amendment
Cyberdemons: Regulating A Truly World-Wide Web, Andrew P. Lycans
Cyberdemons: Regulating A Truly World-Wide Web, Andrew P. Lycans
Michigan Law Review
In the decade leading up to the twenty-first century, the number of Internet-related legal disputes grew exponentially. This growth continues into the new millennium, introducing old problems in a new context. For instance, in the field of copyright, Eric Eldred, the operator of a website dedicated to posting literary works already in the public domain, challenged the Copyright Term Extension Act ("CTEA"). The CTEA blocked his plans to post works copyrighted in 1923, works which under the previous statute would have entered the public domain in 1999. Looking to trademark law, the field has become obsessed of late with providing …
Disease And Cure?, L. A. Powe Jr.
Disease And Cure?, L. A. Powe Jr.
Michigan Law Review
Sunstein uses Franklin's remark to make two related points. First, citizens bear the burden of maintaining the American republic as a healthy, vibrant place; being a citizen is decidedly different from being a consumer. The former has duties, the latter wants (pp. 113-23). Second, and this is the gist of the slender book, the republic is jeopardized by the possibilities of the Internet. Sunstein assumes the correctness of MIT technology specialist Nicholas Negroponte's conclusion that in the not-too-distant future we will be able to create a "Daily Me" on the Internet that will provide the personalized information (including news) that …
The Heroes Of The First Amendment, Frederick Schauer
The Heroes Of The First Amendment, Frederick Schauer
Michigan Law Review
In 1950, Felix Frankfurter famously observed that "[i)t is a fair summary of history to say that the safeguards of liberty have frequently been forged in controversies involving not very nice people." The circumstances of Justice Frankfurter's observation were hardly atypical, for his opinion arose in a Fourth Amendment case involving a man plainly guilty of the crime with which he had been charged - fraudulently altering postage stamps in order to make relatively ordinary ones especially valuable for collectors. Indeed, Fourth Amendment cases typically present the phenomenon that Frankfurter pithily identified, for most of the people injured by an …
Regulating Speech Across Borders: Technology Vs. Values, Matthew Fagin
Regulating Speech Across Borders: Technology Vs. Values, Matthew Fagin
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
The disfavored status within international law of unilateral state-based regulations that target extraterritorial actors arises from the inherent challenges such actions represent to state sovereignty. In the context of the Internet, the complexity of choice-of-law analysis is heightened: regulations imposed by one state have the potential to effectively block communications to citizens of all states and undermine the conflicting regulatory aims of neighboring states. Early legal commentators built upon this cascading chilling effect of state-based regulation to proclaim both the futility and illegitimacy of state-based action in the online environment. Subsequent scholars have demonstrated the commensurability of state-based online regulation …
Constitutional Law—First Amendment And Freedom Of Speech—"It's Ok—She's A Pixel, Not A Pixie": The First Amendment Protects Virtual Child Pornography. Ashcroft V. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234 (2002)., Gary D. Marts Jr.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Regulating Political Parties Under A "Public Rights" First Amendment, Gregory P. Magarian
Regulating Political Parties Under A "Public Rights" First Amendment, Gregory P. Magarian
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Academics And Bioterrorists: New Thinking About The New Terror, Richard Danzig
Academics And Bioterrorists: New Thinking About The New Terror, Richard Danzig
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hate Speech In Constitutional Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis, Michel Rosenfeld
Hate Speech In Constitutional Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis, Michel Rosenfeld
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreword, Jason Bradley Kay
Judicial Campaign Speech And Fundraising: Will Republican Party Of Minnesota V. White Be A Catalyst For Reform, Kara A. Mccraw
Judicial Campaign Speech And Fundraising: Will Republican Party Of Minnesota V. White Be A Catalyst For Reform, Kara A. Mccraw
First Amendment Law Review
No abstract provided.
Separation Of Church And State: The Supreme Court's Misleading Metaphor, John C. Fischer
Separation Of Church And State: The Supreme Court's Misleading Metaphor, John C. Fischer
First Amendment Law Review
No abstract provided.
Resisting Efforts To Provide Public Funding For Parochial Education In The Wake Of Zelman V. Simmons-Harris: A Primer For North Carolina Advocates, Mary Elizabeth Hill Hanchey
Resisting Efforts To Provide Public Funding For Parochial Education In The Wake Of Zelman V. Simmons-Harris: A Primer For North Carolina Advocates, Mary Elizabeth Hill Hanchey
First Amendment Law Review
No abstract provided.
Contents, First Amendment Law Review
Taking Free Speech Seriously: The United States Supreme Court And Virtual Child Pornography, Arnold H. Loewy
Taking Free Speech Seriously: The United States Supreme Court And Virtual Child Pornography, Arnold H. Loewy
First Amendment Law Review
No abstract provided.
Minority Report: The Endorsement Test And Native American Religions On Federal Lands, Michelle B. Langford
Minority Report: The Endorsement Test And Native American Religions On Federal Lands, Michelle B. Langford
First Amendment Law Review
No abstract provided.
One Nation Under God: Newdow V. United States Congress - A Poorly Chosen Battle In The War Over Separation Of Church And State, Russell W. Johnson
One Nation Under God: Newdow V. United States Congress - A Poorly Chosen Battle In The War Over Separation Of Church And State, Russell W. Johnson
First Amendment Law Review
No abstract provided.
You Can't Touch This: A Lession To Legislators On Political Speech, B. Chad Bungard
You Can't Touch This: A Lession To Legislators On Political Speech, B. Chad Bungard
First Amendment Law Review
No abstract provided.
Avoiding Slim Reasoning And Shady Results: A Proposal For Indecency And Obscenity Regulation In Radio And Broadcast Television, Jacob T. Rigney
Avoiding Slim Reasoning And Shady Results: A Proposal For Indecency And Obscenity Regulation In Radio And Broadcast Television, Jacob T. Rigney
Federal Communications Law Journal
This Note explores the relevant law regarding the issue of indecency and obscenity in broadcast, with particular focus on a 2001 Policy Statement released by the FCC. The Author examines the major problems with the regulatory scheme as it now exists, and offers an alternative. The Author concludes by arguing that leaving the subjective decisions regarding indecency to market forces, leaving parents to determine what should or should not be indecent, and leaving the FCC free to pursue obscenity with greater zeal is the most appropriate course of action for the future.
Attacking Brandenburg With History: Does The Long-Term Harm Of Biased Speech Justify A Criminal Statute Suppressing It?, Anuj C. Desai
Attacking Brandenburg With History: Does The Long-Term Harm Of Biased Speech Justify A Criminal Statute Suppressing It?, Anuj C. Desai
Federal Communications Law Journal
Book Review: Destructive Messages: How Hate Speech Paves the Way for Harmful Social Movements, Alexander Tsesis, New York: New York University Press, 2002, 246 pages.
A review of Alexander Tsesis's Destructive Messages: How Hate Speech Paves the Way for Harmful Social Movements, New York University Press, 2002. At one level, Alexander Tsesis's thesis is simply one in a long line of arguments about the need to regulate racist speech. Yet on another level, it is fundamentally different from much American literature on "hate speech" because Tsesis draws on a broad historical swath, and because he contends that the United States …
Reporting On Terrorism: Choosing Our Words Carefully, Jeffrey A. Dvorkin
Reporting On Terrorism: Choosing Our Words Carefully, Jeffrey A. Dvorkin
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ideological Conflict And The First Amendment, Steven J. Heyman
Ideological Conflict And The First Amendment, Steven J. Heyman
All Faculty Scholarship
According to the prevailing view, constitutional interpretation ideally should consist in the development and application of a single, unified set of principles. This Essay challenges this position in the context of free speech jurisprudence. As the constitutional debates of 1787-91 show, the First Amendment and the Bill of Rights did not reflect a single view, but instead were intended to reconcile conflicting views on the proper relationship between liberty and government. In order to obtain the broad support necessary for adoption, the Bill of Rights was deliberately drafted on the level of general principles that could command a consensus. When …
Section Five Overbreadth: The Facial Approach To Adjudicating Challenges Under Section Five Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Catherine Carroll
Section Five Overbreadth: The Facial Approach To Adjudicating Challenges Under Section Five Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Catherine Carroll
Michigan Law Review
In February 1996, the New York State Department of Transportation fired Joseph Kilcullen from his position as a snowplow driver in the Department's Highway Maintenance training program. Alleging that the state discharged him because of his epilepsy and learning disability, Kilcullen sued his former employer under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), which abrogated states' sovereign immunity and permitted private suits for damages against states in a federal court. Kilcullen asserted only that he was not treated the same as similarly situated non-disabled employees; his claim did not implicate the ADA's requirement that employers provide "reasonable accommodation" to disabled employees. …
An Emotion-Based Approach To Freedom Of Speech, R. George Wright
An Emotion-Based Approach To Freedom Of Speech, R. George Wright
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Congress And The Courts Battle Over The First Amendment: Can The Law Really Protect Children From Pornography On The Internet?, 21 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 141 (2003), Mitchell P. Goldstein
Congress And The Courts Battle Over The First Amendment: Can The Law Really Protect Children From Pornography On The Internet?, 21 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 141 (2003), Mitchell P. Goldstein
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
Litigation and court action have provided little in the way of providing solutions to anyone dealing with inappropriate content on the Internet. In Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973). The court refused to establish a national standard and instead relied on community standards. Because the Internet has no geographic limitations, one cannot determine community standards because the Internet is so far reaching. Goldstein discusses in detail these Congressional enactments: Communications Decency Act of 1996, the Child Online Protection Act, and the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996, finding that none of them give children protection from pornography. The challenge …
Caging The Bird Does Not Cage The Song: How The International Covenant On Civil And Political Rights Fails To Protect Free Expression Over The Internet, 21 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 371 (2003), Antoine L. Collins
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
This comment addresses the right to free speech on the Internet. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, an instrument designed to protect the rights of individuals to free speech and expression, is analyzed for effectiveness. The author argues that the “ICCPR”, the most recent international human rights agreement, does not adequately protect Internet users, particularly from governments that may choose to violate citizens’ rights by interfering with computerized communications. The analysis of the “ICCPR” illustrates the purpose, capabilities and weaknesses of the agreement, and offers proposed changes to the act, to protect the rights of both the individual …
Cookies And The Commone Law: Are Internet Advertisers Trespassing On Our Computers?, Michael R. Siebecker
Cookies And The Commone Law: Are Internet Advertisers Trespassing On Our Computers?, Michael R. Siebecker
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
Are Internet advertisers trespassing on our computers? The question arises due to the increasing reliance upon cookie technology by Internet advertising firms as the primary means to match online ads with the specific interests and characteristics of individual Internet users.
It seems that whenever we visit a Web site, we are barraged with an increasing number of blinking banner advertisements hocking products and services of every imaginable sort. More than sixty billion advertisements per month are carefully selected for us and sent to our computers by a single Internet advertising firm, DoubleClick, Inc. In order to increase the effectiveness of …
Justice Isn't Deaf--A Behind The Scenes Look At How Bijoux Records' Executives Discuss The Potential Liability For Violence, Renee M. Moore
Justice Isn't Deaf--A Behind The Scenes Look At How Bijoux Records' Executives Discuss The Potential Liability For Violence, Renee M. Moore
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
The music industry is an interesting phenomenon. It is a world that exists on image--and everyone has a say. For that very reason, the music industry is no stranger to critics. At its heart, they are what the industry is all about. Critics are the driving force in the business--their written and verbal exchange of ideas predicts the rise and fall of stars. Critics come in all shapes and sizes--they are the everyday consumer, the media at large, the hopeful artist, the record company executive, the legal scholar, and even our nation's government. This article will take you on a …
Behind The Words: Interpreting The Hobbs Act Requirement Of "Obtaining Of Property From Another", 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 295 (2003), Kristal S. Stippich
Behind The Words: Interpreting The Hobbs Act Requirement Of "Obtaining Of Property From Another", 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 295 (2003), Kristal S. Stippich
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The First Amendment In The Seventh Circuit: 2002, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 807 (2003), Donald L. Beschle
The First Amendment In The Seventh Circuit: 2002, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 807 (2003), Donald L. Beschle
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sticks And Stones: The First Amendment And Campus Speech Codes, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 205 (2003), Lee Ann Rabe
Sticks And Stones: The First Amendment And Campus Speech Codes, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 205 (2003), Lee Ann Rabe
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.