Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

First Amendment Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law

Discipline
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 31 - 60 of 389

Full-Text Articles in First Amendment

The End Of Government Speech, G. Alex Sinha Jun 2023

The End Of Government Speech, G. Alex Sinha

Cardozo Law Review

Thirty years ago, the Supreme Court created the government-speech doctrine to protect certain forms of government action against First Amendment challenges. The government must speak to govern, the thinking goes, and the First Amendment regulates private rather than governmental speech. Therefore, government action that is classified as “government speech” should not be vulnerable to free-speech claims. The doctrine has since been used accordingly, vaccinating certain government programs against the First Amendment. For example, the doctrine has insulated regulations banning federally funded medical providers from counseling patients about abortion; advertising campaigns spearheaded by the federal government; state-level choices about which specialty …

Go to article

Montana Is Trying To Ban Tiktok. What Does The First Amendment Have To Say?, Deborah Pearlstein, John Dellamore May 2023

Montana Is Trying To Ban Tiktok. What Does The First Amendment Have To Say?, Deborah Pearlstein, John Dellamore

Online Publications

Last month, Montana became the first U.S. state to pass a bill banning TikTok from operating within its borders. If Governor Greg Gianforte signs some version of the bill, it will become the first statewide ban in the country to take direct aim at the popular social media app, which various U.S. government officials have warned poses a serious national security threat. But while Montana may be the first to act, significant gaps remain in the public debate surrounding both the nature of the threat that TikTok presents, and the constitutional questions that trying to regulate it might create.

Go to article

Confidentiality Over Privacy, Stacey A. Tovino Apr 2023

Confidentiality Over Privacy, Stacey A. Tovino

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Arbitrating Social Media Content: A Framework For Banning High-Profile Users Through Third-Party Arbitration, Rachel Gershengoren Jan 2023

Arbitrating Social Media Content: A Framework For Banning High-Profile Users Through Third-Party Arbitration, Rachel Gershengoren

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Combating False Election Information In A Section 230 Protected World: To Moderate Or Not To Moderate, Caitlin Muraca Jan 2023

Combating False Election Information In A Section 230 Protected World: To Moderate Or Not To Moderate, Caitlin Muraca

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note examines the challenges of combating false election information on social media platforms, focusing on the role of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. It argues that while Section 230 is crucial for protecting online speech, its current form is inadequate in addressing the spread of misinformation in the modern digital landscape. The note evaluates various proposals for reform, including the repeal or modification of Section 230, and suggests a balanced approach that maintains its protections while incentivizing improved content moderation to combat false election information.

Go to article

The Advent Of Facial Recognition And The Erosion Of The Rule Of Law In "Moscow Smart City", Antonina Semivolos Jan 2023

The Advent Of Facial Recognition And The Erosion Of The Rule Of Law In "Moscow Smart City", Antonina Semivolos

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The Russian government's deployment of facial recognition technology in Moscow, exemplified by the Popova case, highlights the erosion of civil liberties due to insufficient legal regulation and the absence of safeguards against surveillance overreach. This deployment underscores the broader decline in democratic principles and civil society's diminished capacity to challenge authoritarian measures.

Go to article

Democracy Harms And The First Amendment, Deborah Pearlstein Oct 2022

Democracy Harms And The First Amendment, Deborah Pearlstein

Articles

The First Amendment tolerates—has long tolerated—the regulation of certain kinds of false speech. Indeed, regulable lies are not limited to traditionally less-protected categories of speech like defamation and commercial deception. They include an array of other established speech regulations, administered by government institutions every day, from criminal laws barring perjury and other lies to government officials, to disciplinary measures by elected bodies sanctioning members for false or otherwise objectionable speech. Yet while it is easy to identify the kinds of lies that existing doctrinal categories make regulable for the personal, physical, or reputational harms they inflict on individuals¸ it has …

Go to article

Sex Work Is Real Work: The Implications Of U.S. Strippers Winning The Right To Unionize, An International Comparative Study, Katherine Fustich Apr 2022

Sex Work Is Real Work: The Implications Of U.S. Strippers Winning The Right To Unionize, An International Comparative Study, Katherine Fustich

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note examines the landmark NLRB decision in *Nolan Enterprises*, which granted U.S. strippers the right to unionize by classifying them as employees rather than independent contractors. This ruling has significant implications for labor rights in the sex work industry, both domestically and internationally. The analysis compares this development with international perspectives from the UK, Germany, and the Netherlands, highlighting the challenges and opportunities for sex worker unionization and the broader implications for labor movements globally.

Go to article

The Roberts Court's Transformative Religious Freedom Cases: The Doctrine And The Politics Of Grievance, Stephen M. Feldman Apr 2022

The Roberts Court's Transformative Religious Freedom Cases: The Doctrine And The Politics Of Grievance, Stephen M. Feldman

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The article argues that the Roberts Court has adopted a conservative approach in religious freedom cases, shifting toward a jurisprudence that favors Christianity and undermines the separation of church and state. This approach, rooted in tradition and a de facto Christian America, has led to significant changes in both Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause doctrines. The Court's decisions increasingly protect Christian practices and institutions while marginalizing non-Christian religions, reflecting a broader ideological shift toward judicial engagement and away from principles of federalism and judicial restraint.

Go to article

Disinformation On Trial: Fighting Foreign Disinformation By Empowering The Victims, Ari B. Rubin Feb 2022

Disinformation On Trial: Fighting Foreign Disinformation By Empowering The Victims, Ari B. Rubin

Cardozo Law Review

Foreign disinformation catapulted into the national spotlight with the 2016 presidential election, but its impact is not confined to the electoral map or season. This Article addresses the threat of foreign disinformation by proposing a new statute: a private right of action, enabling harmed persons to directly sue state or private actors, foreign or domestic, who knowingly or recklessly spread disinformation from abroad. Scholars and policymakers have proposed other, far-flung solutions ranging from greater online security to outright censorship. Each of those ideas stumbles on common challenges and lacks a valuable ingredient: an interested party, directly harmed by the foreign …

Go to article

Panel 2: Modern Trends And Internet Speech, Enrique Armijo, Paul M. Barrett, Michael A. Cheah, Zahra Takhshid, Felix Wu Jan 2022

Panel 2: Modern Trends And Internet Speech, Enrique Armijo, Paul M. Barrett, Michael A. Cheah, Zahra Takhshid, Felix Wu

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article explores the complexities and future of Section 230, focusing on its role in protecting online platforms from liability for user-generated content. Panelists argue that Section 230 is an immunity, not a subsidy, and discuss its implications for content moderation, new technologies, and regulatory oversight. They propose various reforms, including FTC regulation and clarifying Section 230's scope for emerging harms.

Go to article

The "End" Of Neutrality: Tumultuous Times Require A Deeper Value, Carol Pauli Jan 2022

The "End" Of Neutrality: Tumultuous Times Require A Deeper Value, Carol Pauli

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

American political talk has grown so fragmented and polarized that some observers say that "[w]e are no longer in any 'public conversation." Accusations of "fake news" are followed by disheartening discoveries that providing people with accurate information may only serve to further entrench their erroneous beliefs. One longtime journalism professor worries aloud that "what's at risk is the idea of a public that is even 'inform-able."' Putting the problem in terms familiar to mediation, can we get the parties back to the table? This essay will focus on journalists, whose ideal has been to maintain a neutral position from which …

Go to article

Section 230 And The Right To Remove Vaccine Misinformation, Michael A. Cheah Jan 2022

Section 230 And The Right To Remove Vaccine Misinformation, Michael A. Cheah

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Recognizing its clear propensity to cause serious public harm, many online platforms have restricted vaccine misinformation. This essay argues that these platforms are protected from liability when they remove such content under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The essay conducts a textual and policy-based analysis of the "publisher" immunity conferred by Section 230(c) (1) and the immunity for restricting objectionable materials under Section 230(c)(2) and concludes that both protect the removal of vaccine misinformation. The essay further argues that repealing Section 230 will not encourage platforms to combat vaccine misinformation as some policymakers have suggested. That is because …

Go to article

Five Reflections From Five Years Of Fosta/Sesta, Kendra Albert Jan 2022

Five Reflections From Five Years Of Fosta/Sesta, Kendra Albert

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article critically examines the impact of the Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA) and the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act (SESTA), arguing that these laws have disproportionately harmed sex workers by leading to widespread deplatforming and increased criminalization. While FOSTA/SESTA aimed to combat sex trafficking, the author contends that the legislation conflated sex work with trafficking, resulting in the shutdown of harm reduction platforms and exacerbating risks for sex workers. The article emphasizes the need to center the voices of marginalized communities in policy-making and advocates for decriminalization as a more effective approach to preventing exploitation.

Go to article

Smoke Without Fire: Employing Mediation To Create Workplace Accommodations For Medical Cannabis Use By Disabled Armed Forces Veterans, Brendan William Potocki Jan 2022

Smoke Without Fire: Employing Mediation To Create Workplace Accommodations For Medical Cannabis Use By Disabled Armed Forces Veterans, Brendan William Potocki

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Over the course of a nearly twelve-year career in the Air Force, which included multiple tours of duty in Afghanistan and Iraq, Stephen Otero experienced unspeakable trauma. He has the scars-both visible and invisible-to prove it. Despite being diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder ("PTSD") in 2008, Otero once again placed country before self and reaffirmed his commitment to serving the United States by agreeing to complete another tour of duty. During this final deployment, Otero sustained extensive abdominal injuries as a result of a suicide bombing attack.

Go to article

#Freebritney: The Importance Of Public Access To The Guardianship System, Cecily D'Amore Jan 2022

#Freebritney: The Importance Of Public Access To The Guardianship System, Cecily D'Amore

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note examines the systemic issues in the U.S. guardianship system, highlighted by Britney Spears' highly publicized conservatorship case, and advocates for increased transparency and accountability. It argues that while guardianship laws are designed to protect vulnerable individuals, cases like Spears' reveal gaps in oversight, inconsistent public access to records, and the need for less restrictive alternatives. The note proposes reforms, including enhanced public access to guardianship case information and the creation of a centralized database, to address these shortcomings and prevent abuse.

Go to article

Examining The Fourth Amendment And Biometric Data Privacy Law Implications Of Ncaa Athletes' Mandated Use Of Athlete Biometric Data Tracking Devices, Alicia Jessop Jan 2022

Examining The Fourth Amendment And Biometric Data Privacy Law Implications Of Ncaa Athletes' Mandated Use Of Athlete Biometric Data Tracking Devices, Alicia Jessop

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

This Article presents the first in-depth analysis of the privacy law implications, under both the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and individual states' biometric data privacy laws, resulting from National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) member institutions mandating that athletes wear athlete biometric data (ABD) tracking devices. The Article provides the NCAA' and its member institutions, athletes, and Congress with recommendations of how to respond to the privacy law concerns that exist in a period of expanded ABD collection, use, and storage. Part I discusses the growing practice of athletics departments requiring intercollegiate athletes to wear ABD tracking devices. …

Go to article

Section 230: The Internet's Most Important And Most Misunderstood Law Is Unfairly Under Attack, Málfríður A. Helgadóttir Jan 2022

Section 230: The Internet's Most Important And Most Misunderstood Law Is Unfairly Under Attack, Málfríður A. Helgadóttir

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a foundational law enabling the modern internet, is under threat despite its critical role in protecting online platforms from liability for user-generated content. The article argues that Section 230 is essential for promoting free speech and innovation, as its repeal would force platforms to censor content to avoid liability, fundamentally altering the internet. Critics often misunderstand the law, and bipartisan attacks jeopardize its future, risking the unravelling of the internet as we know it.

Go to article

Enhancing The Ftc's Consumer Protection Authority To Regulate Social Media Companies, Paul M. Barrett, Lily Warnke Jan 2022

Enhancing The Ftc's Consumer Protection Authority To Regulate Social Media Companies, Paul M. Barrett, Lily Warnke

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article argues that Congress should enhance the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) consumer protection authority to regulate social media companies, focusing on procedural oversight rather than substantive content moderation. It proposes that the FTC ensure social media platforms maintain adequate content moderation systems, disclose algorithmic practices, and comply with transparency requirements, all while respecting First Amendment protections. The authors advocate for legislative reforms to clarify the FTC's role in addressing harmful content and to amend Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to limit liability protections for certain harmful activities.

Go to article

Something For Nothing: Untangling A Knot Of Section 230 Solutions, Nicholas Bradley Jan 2022

Something For Nothing: Untangling A Knot Of Section 230 Solutions, Nicholas Bradley

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

Social media platforms have become the dominant public forum of the modern age but there is a big problem: they are privately owned and can moderate content however they like. This right is protected both by the First Amendment and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the latter of which creates immunity from suit for platforms that exercise their right to moderate content by removing—or not removing—objectionable content. Politicians on both sides of the aisle have complained that platforms are abusing this immunity and, while they have put forward a wide variety of legislative solutions, none of them have …

Go to article

Intragovernmental Speech And Sanction, Katherine A. Shaw Jan 2022

Intragovernmental Speech And Sanction, Katherine A. Shaw

Articles

This Essay, prepared as part of a symposium on Professor Helen Norton’s The Government’s Speech and the Constitution, asks what role, if any, we should understand the Constitution to play in mediating disputes over speech between and among government entities. Focusing on the examples of impeachment and censure, the piece considers scenarios in which one arm of government takes action in response to the speech of another arm or entity of government, exploring what role the Constitution should play in shaping or constraining those responses.

Go to article

“A Force Created”: The U.S. Chamber Of Commerce And The Politics Of Corporate Immunity, Myriam E. Gilles Jan 2022

“A Force Created”: The U.S. Chamber Of Commerce And The Politics Of Corporate Immunity, Myriam E. Gilles

Articles

Upon its founding in 1912, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce was conceived as a “force created” to exert “a beneficent influence upon our national life” by integrating the views of the business community into governmental policies and regulations. That a force was created is beyond question. Beneficence is a separate issue.

Go to article

The Powerful Problem Of Prayer At Public School Board Meetings, Amanda Harmon Cooley Dec 2021

The Powerful Problem Of Prayer At Public School Board Meetings, Amanda Harmon Cooley

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Go to article

When Free Speech And Privacy Collide: Why Strict Scrutiny Is A Poor Fit For Nonconsensual Pornography Laws, Leah S. Murphy Oct 2021

When Free Speech And Privacy Collide: Why Strict Scrutiny Is A Poor Fit For Nonconsensual Pornography Laws, Leah S. Murphy

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Deceive, Profit, Repeat: Public Deception Schemes To Conceal Product Dangers, Wes Henricksen Oct 2021

Deceive, Profit, Repeat: Public Deception Schemes To Conceal Product Dangers, Wes Henricksen

Cardozo Law Review

Companies in numerous industries have misled the public by hiding the dangers posed by their products. Sugar manufacturers hid the dangers of high fructose corn syrup and misdirected the public’s attention to fat, causing an epidemic of diabetes, obesity, and heart disease. Opioid manufacturers hid the dangers and addictiveness of opioid painkillers, leading to the opioid crisis. Fossil fuel companies misled the public about the causes, certainty, and effects of global warming, resulting in massive unregulated CO2 emissions and causing one of the greatest threats to humankind. This Article identifies all such schemes as belonging to a category of wrongs …

Go to article

Rluipa’S Hidden Third-Party Harms On Landowners And Local Governments, Menachem Polishuk Oct 2021

Rluipa’S Hidden Third-Party Harms On Landowners And Local Governments, Menachem Polishuk

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Deeply Fake, Deeply Disturbing, Deeply Constitutional: Why The First Amendment Likely Protects The Creation Of Pornographic Deepfakes, Bradley Waldstreicher May 2021

Deeply Fake, Deeply Disturbing, Deeply Constitutional: Why The First Amendment Likely Protects The Creation Of Pornographic Deepfakes, Bradley Waldstreicher

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Here Stood My Dreaming Tree: A Proposal To Reform Non-Lpr Cancellation Of Removal To Bring Undocumented Immigrants Out Of The Shadows, Andrea Barrientos Apr 2021

Here Stood My Dreaming Tree: A Proposal To Reform Non-Lpr Cancellation Of Removal To Bring Undocumented Immigrants Out Of The Shadows, Andrea Barrientos

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note advocates for expanding nonLPR (non-Lawful Permanent Resident) cancellation of removal as a pathway to lawful status for undocumented immigrants. It critiques the current system’s restrictive eligibility criteria, annual caps, and high hardship standards, arguing that these limitations exclude many deserving applicants. The proposed reforms aim to eliminate the 4,000-person cap, convert the relief into an affirmative process, and lower the hardship standard to align immigration policy with U.S. values of fairness and inclusion. By doing so, the reforms would stabilize families, reduce marginalization, and bring undocumented immigrants out of the shadows.

Go to article

Keynote Address, Jessica Litman Jan 2021

Keynote Address, Jessica Litman

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article explores the significant yet underappreciated role of Edward S. Rogers in shaping U.S. trademark law, particularly through his drafting of the Lanham Act. It argues that Rogers' deep involvement in the law's creation embedded a use-based, common law foundation that has proven durable but increasingly problematic in modern commerce. Despite Rogers' later evolution in thinking, his early drafting choices, influenced by historical legal frameworks, continue to shape the statute's quirks and limitations.

Go to article

Constitutive Choices: Section 230 And First Amendment Values Versus Fosta And President Trump's Executive Order, Scott Memmel, Christopher Terry Jan 2021

Constitutive Choices: Section 230 And First Amendment Values Versus Fosta And President Trump's Executive Order, Scott Memmel, Christopher Terry

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

In 2018, the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA) produced the first category of speech not provided immunity by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. This first cut against Section 230 was followed by President Donald Trump's May 2020 executive order aimed at limiting the legal protections for social media companies. Both of these actions represent a new battle over old ideas about protecting expression. This Article uses Paul Starr's "Constitutive Choices" model to suggest that Section 230 represents a legacy of laws and regulations designed to foster free speech and access to information. …

Go to article

First Prev Next Last