Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (194)
- University of Michigan Law School (30)
- DePaul University (26)
- University of Colorado Law School (24)
- Fordham Law School (23)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (19)
- UIC School of Law (18)
- Brooklyn Law School (16)
- Roger Williams University (16)
- Columbia Law School (11)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (11)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (10)
- University of Richmond (8)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (7)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (7)
- University of Georgia School of Law (7)
- University of Miami Law School (7)
- Washington University in St. Louis (7)
- Brigham Young University Law School (5)
- Liberty University (5)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (5)
- University of Rhode Island (5)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (5)
- Boston University School of Law (4)
- Florida International University College of Law (4)
- Georgetown University Law Center (4)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (4)
- St. Mary's University (4)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (4)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (4)
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (82)
- Freedom of speech (41)
- Free speech (27)
- First amendment (24)
- Law (24)
-
- Constitutional law (23)
- Supreme Court (22)
- Politics (20)
- Constitution (18)
- Democracy (18)
- Discrimination (14)
- Religion (14)
- Speech (14)
- United States Supreme Court (14)
- Privacy (10)
- Campaign finance (9)
- Elections (9)
- Free Speech (9)
- Government (9)
- Social media (9)
- Corporations (8)
- Election (8)
- Equality (8)
- Partisan (8)
- Regulation (8)
- State (8)
- 1st Amendment (7)
- Censorship (7)
- Constitutional Law (7)
- Diversity (7)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (192)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (26)
- Publications (24)
- Faculty Scholarship (23)
- Michigan Law Review (17)
-
- UIC Law Review (17)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (11)
- Journal of Law and Policy (10)
- Fordham Law Review (9)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (9)
- University of Richmond Law Review (8)
- Northwestern University Law Review (7)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (7)
- Touro Law Review (7)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (7)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (6)
- Georgia Law Review (6)
- University of Miami Law Review (6)
- Articles (5)
- BYU Law Review (5)
- Helm's School of Government Conference - 2021-2024 (5)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (4)
- Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence (4)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (4)
- Indiana Law Journal (4)
- Law School Blogs (4)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (4)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (4)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 481 - 510 of 557
Full-Text Articles in First Amendment
Politics At The Pulpit: Tax Benefits, Substantial Burdens, And Institutional Free Exercise, Lloyd Hitoshi Mayer
Politics At The Pulpit: Tax Benefits, Substantial Burdens, And Institutional Free Exercise, Lloyd Hitoshi Mayer
Journal Articles
More than fifty years ago, Congress enacted a prohibition against political campaign intervention for all charities, including churches and other houses of worship, as a condition for receiving tax deductible contributions. Yet the IRS has never taken a house of worship to court for alleged violation of the prohibition through political comments from the pulpit, presumably at least in part because of concerns about the constitutionality of doing so. This decision is surprising, because a careful review of Free Exercise Clause case law - both before and after the landmark Employment Division v. Smith decision - reveals that the prohibition …
The Forgotten Freedom Of Assembly, John D. Inazu
The Forgotten Freedom Of Assembly, John D. Inazu
Scholarship@WashULaw
The freedom of assembly has been at the heart of some of the most important social movements in American history: antebellum abolitionism, women's suffrage in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the labor movement in the Progressive Era and after the New Deal, and the civil rights movement. Claims of assembly stood against the ideological tyranny that exploded during the first Red Scare in the years surrounding the First World War and the second Red Scare of 1950s McCarthyism. Abraham Lincoln once called 'the right of the people peaceably to assemble' part of 'the Constitutional substitute for revolution'. In 1939, the …
The Clear And Present Internet: Terrorism, Cyberspace, And The First Amendment, Peter Margulies
The Clear And Present Internet: Terrorism, Cyberspace, And The First Amendment, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Money As Property: The Effects Of Doctrinal Misallocation On Campaign Finance Reform, Maneesh Sharma
Money As Property: The Effects Of Doctrinal Misallocation On Campaign Finance Reform, Maneesh Sharma
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
By applying First Amendment jurisprudence to campaign finance measures, this Note argues that the Supreme Court has misallocated campaign finance within its doctrinal scheme. This doctrinal misallocation has stymied the ability of legislatures to enact effective reforms to reduce the role of money in politics. This Note argues that money in the political process more closely resembles property than speech and should therefore be analyzed under a less stringent property review. This Note concludes by proposing a standard of review developed from the Court's property jurisprudence.
Magic Words And Millionaires: The Supreme Court's Assault On Campaign Funding, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2008), Michael J. Kasper
Magic Words And Millionaires: The Supreme Court's Assault On Campaign Funding, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2008), Michael J. Kasper
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Public Employee Speech, Categorical Balancing And § 1983: A Critique Of Garcetti V. Ceballos, Sheldon H. Nahmod
Public Employee Speech, Categorical Balancing And § 1983: A Critique Of Garcetti V. Ceballos, Sheldon H. Nahmod
University of Richmond Law Review
I propose to discuss Garcetti's First Amendment reasoning as well as the implications of the § 1983' setting in which Garcetti and other public employee free speech cases typically arise. After briefly setting out the Court's opinion and the three dissenting opinions, I begin by addressing the pros and cons of Garcetti, and in the course of so doing, I discuss the prior Pickering-Connick landscape that Garcetti so significantly altered. I consider the deeper First Amendment implications of Garcetti, including itsuse of categorical balancing to create an absolute immunity fromFirst Amendment liability for employer discipline based on job-required public employee …
Federal Campaign Finance Reform Based On Virginia Election Law, Rhodes B. Ritenour
Federal Campaign Finance Reform Based On Virginia Election Law, Rhodes B. Ritenour
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Second Class For The Second Time: How The Commercial Speech Doctrine Stigmatizes Commercial Use Of Aggregated Public Records, Brian N. Larson, Genelle I. Belmas
Second Class For The Second Time: How The Commercial Speech Doctrine Stigmatizes Commercial Use Of Aggregated Public Records, Brian N. Larson, Genelle I. Belmas
Faculty Scholarship
This Article argues that access to aggregated electronic public records for commercial use should receive protection under the First Amendment in the same measure as the speech acts the access supports. In other words, we view commercial access to aggregated public records as an essential means to valuable speech. For many, however, the taint of the commercial speech doctrine is turning all “information flows” into commercial ones. This, in turn, is threatening the access to government records.
Hemlock In The Marketplace: How Freedom Of The Press For College Newspapers Poisons The First Amendment, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1365 (2007), Michael Hopkins
Hemlock In The Marketplace: How Freedom Of The Press For College Newspapers Poisons The First Amendment, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1365 (2007), Michael Hopkins
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Legalized Gaming And Political Contributions: When The Diceman Cometh, Will Corruption Goeth?, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1089 (2007), Bonny Bumiller
Legalized Gaming And Political Contributions: When The Diceman Cometh, Will Corruption Goeth?, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1089 (2007), Bonny Bumiller
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Religious Origins Of Disestablishment Principles, Marci A. Hamilton, Rachel Steamer
The Religious Origins Of Disestablishment Principles, Marci A. Hamilton, Rachel Steamer
Articles
No abstract provided.
Establishment Clause Jurisprudence And The Free Exercise Dilemma: A Structural Unitary-Accommodationist Argument For The Constitutionality Of God In The Public Square, Carolyn A. Deverich
Establishment Clause Jurisprudence And The Free Exercise Dilemma: A Structural Unitary-Accommodationist Argument For The Constitutionality Of God In The Public Square, Carolyn A. Deverich
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Reply To Professor Beck, Jason Carter
A Reply To Professor Beck, Jason Carter
Georgia Law Review
The 2004 election reinvigorated the debate about Christianity's role in our nation's lawmaking. The election saw increased polarization between the secular left, and the politicized Christian right.' Evangelical Protestants voted overwhelmingly for the Republican candidate, George W. Bush, while the most secular voters voted overwhelmingly for John Kerry.2 The 2004 election emboldened the Christian right. In addition to what they believed was their crucial role in President Bush's victory, the Christian right celebrated the passage of constitutional amendments banning gay marriage in all eleven states where such amendments were on the ballot.? One leader of the Christian right stated that …
Toward A Genuine Debate About Morals, Religion, Politics, And Law: Why America Needs A Christian Response To The "Christian" Right, Jason Carter
Georgia Law Review
America's current debate about religion's role in politics offers a false choice. On one side is the politicized Christian right.' This group, loosely defined, consists of those political groups and leaders who associate themselves with traditional conservative ideas on culture and claim to represent fundamentalist or evangelical Christians. This group has been by far the most vocal advocate of the position that religion deserves an increased role in our nation's policy making. Indeed, it has come to dominate that position. The response to the Christian right has come almost exclusively from the secular left. It argues not with the Christian …
The City Of God And The Cities Of Men: A Response To Jason Carter, Randy Beck
The City Of God And The Cities Of Men: A Response To Jason Carter, Randy Beck
Georgia Law Review
Jason initially considers and rejects philosophical positions that call for citizens to put aside their religious beliefs when they participate in the political sphere.' He advocates, instead, the freedom to live a "religiously integrated existence" in all areas of life, including political life. Here, Jason reminds me of another Carter-Professor Stephen L. Carter of the Yale Law School. In The Culture of Disbelief, Professor Carter contends that "[in our sensible zeal to keep religion from dominating our politics, we have created a political and legal culture that presses the religiously faithful to be other than themselves, to act publicly, and …
Foreword, Richard B. Collins
Originalism, Ceremonial Deism And The Pledge Of Allegiance, Z. Ryan Pahnke
Originalism, Ceremonial Deism And The Pledge Of Allegiance, Z. Ryan Pahnke
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Cheers, Profanity, And Free Speech, Howard M. Wasserman
Cheers, Profanity, And Free Speech, Howard M. Wasserman
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Campaign Finance Reform, Electioneering Communications, And The First Amendment: Resuscitating The Third Exception, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1315 (2005), Daniel B. Roth
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Buttletproof Speech: Are Political Books Beyond Litigation's Reach, Emily Kirstine Wacker
Buttletproof Speech: Are Political Books Beyond Litigation's Reach, Emily Kirstine Wacker
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )
No abstract provided.
Rethinking Campaign-Finance Reform: The Pressing Need For Deregulation And Disclosure, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 633 (2004), Cecil C. Kuhne Iii
Rethinking Campaign-Finance Reform: The Pressing Need For Deregulation And Disclosure, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 633 (2004), Cecil C. Kuhne Iii
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Not For Attribution: Government's Interest In Protecting The Integrity Of Its Own Expression, Helen Norton
Not For Attribution: Government's Interest In Protecting The Integrity Of Its Own Expression, Helen Norton
Publications
Public entities increasingly maintain that the First Amendment permits them to ensure that private speakers' views are not mistakenly attributed to the government. Consider, for example, Virginia's efforts to ban the Sons of Confederate Veterans' display of the Confederate flag logo on state-sponsored specialty license plates. Seeking to remain neutral in the ongoing debate over whether the Confederate flag is a symbol of "hate" or "heritage," Virginia argued that the state would be wrongly perceived as endorsing the flag if the logo appeared on a state-issued plate adorned by the identifier "VIRGINIA." The Fourth Circuit was unpersuaded, holding that the …
Say Cheese: The Constitutionality Of State-Mandated Airtime On Public Broadcasting Stations In Wisconsin, Andrew D. Cotlar
Say Cheese: The Constitutionality Of State-Mandated Airtime On Public Broadcasting Stations In Wisconsin, Andrew D. Cotlar
Federal Communications Law Journal
Last year, the State of Wisconsin passed legislation which would require statechartered public broadcasting television networks to carry political advertising for candidates free of charge. In this article, Andrew Cotlar raises many concerns about the wisdom of such legislation and the impact this trend may have on public broadcasters throughout the nation. The author begins by analyzing the current position of the law on political access requirements, at both federal and state levels, and then argues that the public television stations should continue to be free to exercise substantial editorial discretion. The Article proceeds to critique the Wisconsin statute as …
Reporting On Terrorism: Choosing Our Words Carefully, Jeffrey A. Dvorkin
Reporting On Terrorism: Choosing Our Words Carefully, Jeffrey A. Dvorkin
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Business Of Expression: Economic Liberty, Political Factions And The Forgotten First Amendment Legacy Of Justice George Sutherland, 10 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 249 (2002), Samuel R. Olken
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
In The Business of Expression: Economic Liberty, Political Factions And The Forgotten First Amendment Legacy of Justice George Sutherland, Samuel Olken traces the dichotomy that emerged in constitutional law in the aftermath of the Lochner era between economic liberty and freedom of expression. During the 1930s, while a deeply divided United States Supreme Court adopted a laissez faire approach to economic regulation, it viewed with great suspicion laws that restricted the manner and content of expression. During this period, Justice George Sutherland often clashed with the majority consistently insisting that state regulation of private economic rights bear a close and …
Regulating Political Parties Under A Public Rights First Amendment, Gregory P. Magarian
Regulating Political Parties Under A Public Rights First Amendment, Gregory P. Magarian
Scholarship@WashULaw
The recently-enacted McCain-Feingold campaign finance law pushes to the fore the questions of whether and to what extent the First Amendment allows government to regulate the electoral activities of political parties. One of the new law's primary components is its attempt to eliminate so-called "soft money"- unlimited donations to national political parties that the Democrats and Republicans have used to circumvent legal limits on campaign contributions? One congressional opponent of the new law called it "the death knell" for political parties' role in elections." Not surprisingly, both major parties have attacked McCain-Feingold. Most Republicans in Congress opposed the legislation, and …
Rendering Unto Caesar Or Electioneering For Caesar--Loss Of Church Tax Exemption For Participation In Electoral Politics, Alan L. Feld
Rendering Unto Caesar Or Electioneering For Caesar--Loss Of Church Tax Exemption For Participation In Electoral Politics, Alan L. Feld
Faculty Scholarship
The restriction on church participation in political campaigns contained in the Internal Revenue Code operates uneasily. It appears to serve the useful purpose of separating the spheres of religion and electoral politics. But the separation often is only apparent, as churches in practice signal support for a particular candidate in a variety of rays that historically have not cost them their exemptions. Although the limited enforcement by the Internal Revenue Service has reflected the sensitive nature of the First Amendment values present, the federal government should provide more formal elaboration by statute or regulation. Focus on the use of funds …
Jones V. Clinton: A Study In Politically Motivated Suits, Rule 1 1, And The First Amendment, Carol Rice Andrews
Jones V. Clinton: A Study In Politically Motivated Suits, Rule 1 1, And The First Amendment, Carol Rice Andrews
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Ideology Of Judging And The First Amendment In Judicial Election Campaigns, W. Bradley Wendel
The Ideology Of Judging And The First Amendment In Judicial Election Campaigns, W. Bradley Wendel
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Editorial Rights Of Public Broadcasting Stations Vs. Access For Minor Political Candidates To Television Debates, Kyu Ho Youm
Editorial Rights Of Public Broadcasting Stations Vs. Access For Minor Political Candidates To Television Debates, Kyu Ho Youm
Federal Communications Law Journal
In Arkansas Education Television Commission v. Forbes, the Supreme Court of the United States held that a state-owned public station did not violate the First Amendment in excluding a third-party candidate from a political debate organized and broadcast by the television station because the debate was a nonpublic forum. In this Article, Professor Youm examines the constitutional and statutory framework on the access for political candidates to TV debates, the judicial interpretations of the political candidates' claim for access to public television debates, and the Supreme Court's balancing in Forbes of the conflicts between the candidates' access rights and the …