Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Juvenile Law (1209)
- Constitutional Law (1007)
- Law and Gender (932)
- Law and Society (883)
- Criminal Law (768)
-
- State and Local Government Law (705)
- Courts (673)
- Health Law and Policy (668)
- Sexuality and the Law (659)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (613)
- Legislation (589)
- Human Rights Law (560)
- Contracts (549)
- Social Welfare Law (546)
- International Law (543)
- Torts (542)
- Civil Law (504)
- Legal History (471)
- Other Law (460)
- Estates and Trusts (458)
- Religion Law (454)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (450)
- Criminal Procedure (448)
- Property Law and Real Estate (447)
- Administrative Law (438)
- Jurisprudence (431)
- Civil Procedure (430)
- Tax Law (423)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (614)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (295)
- Seattle University School of Law (278)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (260)
- William & Mary Law School (260)
-
- Brigham Young University Law School (238)
- American University Washington College of Law (227)
- University of Richmond (217)
- West Virginia University (212)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (211)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (206)
- Universitas Indonesia (185)
- University of Washington School of Law (180)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (178)
- University of Kentucky (164)
- Columbia Law School (154)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (148)
- University of Baltimore Law (146)
- The Peter A. Allard School of Law (133)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (114)
- Pepperdine University (100)
- Fordham Law School (98)
- Brooklyn Law School (95)
- Notre Dame Law School (92)
- UIC School of Law (84)
- Cleveland State University (83)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (79)
- Barry University School of Law (78)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (78)
- Roger Williams University (77)
- Keyword
-
- Divorce (574)
- Family law (497)
- Marriage (402)
- Children (399)
- Adoption (254)
-
- Child custody (185)
- Child welfare (182)
- Domestic violence (180)
- Same-sex marriage (166)
- Parents (165)
- Domestic relations (163)
- Family (163)
- Family Law (158)
- Child support (145)
- Custody (137)
- Parental rights (136)
- Alimony (127)
- Families (126)
- Domestic Relations (124)
- Women (119)
- Law (117)
- Child abuse (102)
- Foster care (98)
- Abortion (80)
- Child (78)
- Gender (76)
- Law reform (66)
- Paternity (66)
- Surrogacy (64)
- Child protection (60)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (527)
- Michigan Law Review (320)
- Seattle University Law Review (235)
- West Virginia Law Review (211)
- Children's Legal Rights Journal (207)
-
- Articles (200)
- Faculty Publications (175)
- Indiana Law Journal (154)
- All Faculty Scholarship (135)
- Washington Law Review (134)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (132)
- Kentucky Law Journal (130)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- University of Richmond Law Review (118)
- Canadian Journal of Family Law (116)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (110)
- Journal Articles (109)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (107)
- BYU Law Review (104)
- Buffalo Law Review (103)
- Scholarly Articles (90)
- Maryland Law Review (89)
- Law Faculty Publications (84)
- Scholarly Works (83)
- William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice (77)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (73)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (73)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (71)
- Child and Family Law Journal (68)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (68)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2941 - 2970 of 7932
Full-Text Articles in Family Law
A Relational Model Of Family Lawyering: Exploring The Potential For Education, Practice, And Research, Jill Howieson, Lynn Priddis
A Relational Model Of Family Lawyering: Exploring The Potential For Education, Practice, And Research, Jill Howieson, Lynn Priddis
Canadian Journal of Family Law
This article responds to what seems to be a "hot" millennium topic in the family law environment—namely the nature of the relationship between the family lawyer and the client. It proposes a model of family lawyering that puts the relationship with the client explicitly in the foreground of the process and suggests a research regime that could investigate the merits of the model. The authors refer to the model as a "relational model of family lawyering." The model involves family lawyers working within a partnering framework that incorporates attention to the relational aspects of the process, and in particular, to …
Protecting Survivors Of Domestic Violence Within The Insurance Regime: Opportunities To Seek Termination Or Variation Of Insurance Contracts, Elizabeth Adjin-Tettey
Protecting Survivors Of Domestic Violence Within The Insurance Regime: Opportunities To Seek Termination Or Variation Of Insurance Contracts, Elizabeth Adjin-Tettey
Canadian Journal of Family Law
A person whose life is insured under a life insurance contract for the benefit of another person does not have a contractual or common law right to terminate or otherwise affect the terms of the contract. As well, such contracts remain valid even after termination of the relationship that provided an insurable interest at the commencement of the contract. The existence of a life insurance contract might provide an incentive for the policy owner/beneficiary to cause harm to the insured person in order to collect the insurance money. Recovery of the insurance money is precluded on grounds of public policy …
Canon 1095 And The Dignitas Connubii: The Role Of Consent, Incapacity, And Psychic Anomalies In Cases Of Matrimonial Nullity, Roberto Rosas
Canon 1095 And The Dignitas Connubii: The Role Of Consent, Incapacity, And Psychic Anomalies In Cases Of Matrimonial Nullity, Roberto Rosas
Faculty Articles
This Article will focus on the following points: (1) the essential elements of marriage; (2) the basic principle of matrimonial consent; (3) the nature of consent; (4) acts through which consent is formed; (5) matrimonial nullity in Canon Law; (6) Canon Law and the Dignitas Connubil (Dignitas); and (7) recent jurisprudence concerning matrimonial nullity. It aims to shed light and clarify paragraphs 2 and 3 of Canon 1095 of the Code by making clear how the causes of defect of discretion of judgment and the inability to assume the essential obligations due to some sort of psychic disorder or anomaly …
Conferring Dignity: The Metamorphosis Of The Legal Homosexual, Noa Ben-Asher
Conferring Dignity: The Metamorphosis Of The Legal Homosexual, Noa Ben-Asher
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
The legal homosexual has undergone a dramatic transformation over the past three decades, culminating in United States v. Windsor, which struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). In 1986, the homosexual was a sexual outlaw beyond the protection of the Constitution. By 2013, the homosexual had become part of a married couple that is “deemed by the State worthy of dignity.” This Article tells the story of this metamorphosis in four phases. In the first, the “Homosexual Sodomite Phase,” the United States Supreme Court famously declared in Bowers v. Hardwick that there was no right to …
Introduction: Invited Essays On The Implications Of Windsor And Perry
Introduction: Invited Essays On The Implications Of Windsor And Perry
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Adoption And The Limits Of Contract In Victorian Adoption Case Law And George Eliot's Silas Marner, Sarah Abramowicz
Adoption And The Limits Of Contract In Victorian Adoption Case Law And George Eliot's Silas Marner, Sarah Abramowicz
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Marriage Equality, United States V. Windsor, And The Crisis In Equal Protection Jurisprudence, Susannah W. Pollvogt
Marriage Equality, United States V. Windsor, And The Crisis In Equal Protection Jurisprudence, Susannah W. Pollvogt
Hofstra Law Review
The article discusses equal protection jurisprudence in America in relation to the U.S. Supreme Court's (USSC's) ruling in the 2013 marriage equality case United States v. Windsor. The views of USSC Justice Anthony Kennedy are mentioned, along with an unconstitutional animus legal doctrine and a heightened rational basis standard of review. The U.S. Constitution's Equal Protection Clause is addressed in relation to the nation's discrimination laws.
Do Tell! The Rights Of Donor-Conceived Offspring, Naomi Cahn
Do Tell! The Rights Of Donor-Conceived Offspring, Naomi Cahn
Hofstra Law Review
The article discusses the legal rights of donor-conceived children in America, and it mentions U.S. constitutional rights, the laws associated with donor conception in the country, and the concept of double disclosure. Parental rights and children's interests are mentioned, along with respect for familial autonomy and various aspects of U.S. family and health laws. Sperm and egg (ovum) donations are examined, along with the nation's fertility industry and assisted reproductive technology.
Two Direct Rights Of Action In Child Support Enforcement, Margaret Ryznar
Two Direct Rights Of Action In Child Support Enforcement, Margaret Ryznar
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Further Standing Lessons, Heather Elliott
Further Standing Lessons, Heather Elliott
Indiana Law Journal
Professor Elliott wrote a piece for the Indiana Law Journal in 2012 (available here). In this article, she updates her analysis and explores the implications of both the health-care and marriage equality cases on the Court’s standing doctrine.
Windsor, Shelby County, And The Demise Of Originalism: A Personal Account, Dawn E. Johnsen
Windsor, Shelby County, And The Demise Of Originalism: A Personal Account, Dawn E. Johnsen
Indiana Law Journal
Essays on the Implication of Windsor and Perry
Evolving Values, Animus, And Same-Sex Marriage, Daniel O. Conkle
Evolving Values, Animus, And Same-Sex Marriage, Daniel O. Conkle
Indiana Law Journal
In this Essay, I contend that a Fourteenth Amendment right to same-sex marriage will emerge, and properly so, when the Supreme Court determines that justice so requires and when, in the words of Professor Alexander Bickel, the Court’s recognition of this right will “in a rather immediate foreseeable future . . . gain general assent.” I suggest that we are fast approaching that juncture, and I go on to analyze three possible justifications for such a ruling: first, substantive due process; second, heightened scrutiny equal protection; and third, rational basis equal protection coupled with a finding of illicit “animus.” I …
Standing To Appeal And Executive Non-Defense Of Federal Law After The Marriage Cases, Ryan W. Scott
Standing To Appeal And Executive Non-Defense Of Federal Law After The Marriage Cases, Ryan W. Scott
Indiana Law Journal
Essays on the Implications of Windsor and Perry
Is The Full Faith And Credit Clause Still "Irrelevant" To Same-Sex Marriage?: Toward A Reconsideration Of The Conventional Wisdom, Steve Sanders
Is The Full Faith And Credit Clause Still "Irrelevant" To Same-Sex Marriage?: Toward A Reconsideration Of The Conventional Wisdom, Steve Sanders
Indiana Law Journal
Essays on the Implications of Windsor and Perry
Contractualizing Custody, Sarah Abramowicz
Contractualizing Custody, Sarah Abramowicz
Law Faculty Research Publications
Many scholars otherwise in favor of the enforcement of family contracts agree that parent-child relationships should continue to prove the exception to any contractualized family law regime. This Article instead questions the continued refusal to enforce contracts concerning parental rights to children’s custody. It argues that the refusal to enforce such contracts contributes to a differential treatment of two types of families: those deemed “intact”—typically consisting of two married parents and their offspring—and those deemed non-intact. Intact families are granted a degree of freedom from government intervention, provided that there is no evidence that children are in any danger of …
Leveling Up After Doma, Deborah A. Widiss
Leveling Up After Doma, Deborah A. Widiss
Indiana Law Journal
Essays on the Implication of Windsor and Perry
The Case For Mandatory Training On Screening For Domestic Violence In The Wake Of The Affordable Care Act, Nat Stern, Karen Oehme
The Case For Mandatory Training On Screening For Domestic Violence In The Wake Of The Affordable Care Act, Nat Stern, Karen Oehme
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
The Origin Of Parental Rights: Labor, Intent, And Fathers, Dara Purvis
The Origin Of Parental Rights: Labor, Intent, And Fathers, Dara Purvis
Faculty Scholarship
Most theories of parentage fail to explain the genesis of the right to parent - for example, why does a biological relationship generate parental rights? This Article shows that the law of parental rights mirrors theories of acquiring property, and that the law has shifted over time, from favoring a property right based in genetics to a Lockean theory of property rights earned through labor. The growth of Lockean labor-based theories is epitomized in reforms to parentage laws that incorporate functional theories of parenting, meaning that adults who perform caretaking work that creates a significant relationship with children are recognized …
Effects Of Clergy Reporting Laws On Child Maltreatment Report Rates, Frank E. Vandervort, Vincent J. Palusci
Effects Of Clergy Reporting Laws On Child Maltreatment Report Rates, Frank E. Vandervort, Vincent J. Palusci
Articles
Child maltreatment (CM) reporting laws and policies have an important role in the identification, treatment, and prevention of CM in the United States (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [US DHHS], 2012). Abuse by a member of the clergy “is not only a personal and emotional betrayal, but [also] a spiritual betrayal, with secrecy amplified by the unprecedented and systemic cover-up committed by the Church hierarchy” (Coyne, 2011, p. 15). Recent controversies have resulted in the consideration of changes in mandated U.S. reporting laws that include increasing requirements for clergy and extension to additional professions (Freeh, Sporkin, & Sullivan, …
Abolish Anonymous Reporting To Child Abuse Hotlines, Dale Margolin Cecka
Abolish Anonymous Reporting To Child Abuse Hotlines, Dale Margolin Cecka
Law Faculty Publications
Part I of this Article traces the history of child abuse reporting hotlines. Part II describes the current law and practice behind child abuse reporting hotlines. Part III examines why anonymous reporting by the public is unnecessary and highly susceptible to abuse. Part IV analyzes the constitutional rights at stake in anonymous reporting, citing federal case law that contradicts current practice. Part V concludes with a proposal to abolish anonymous reporting and require all public reporting hotlines to adhere to published, written policies.
Comments: What's Yours Is Ours? Gamete Donation In The Marital Context: Why Courts And Legislatures Should Not Interfere With An Individual's Fundamental Right To Privacy, Emily K. Alt
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
From Third Parties To Parents: The Case Of Lesbian Couples And Their Children, Nancy Polikoff
From Third Parties To Parents: The Case Of Lesbian Couples And Their Children, Nancy Polikoff
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
The Contractualization Of Family Law In The United States, Fernanda Nicola, Adrienne Hunter Jules
The Contractualization Of Family Law In The United States, Fernanda Nicola, Adrienne Hunter Jules
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
The Child-Welfare System And The Limits Of Determinacy, Clare Huntington
The Child-Welfare System And The Limits Of Determinacy, Clare Huntington
Faculty Scholarship
To read Robert Mnookin’s seminal 1975 article, Child-Custody Adjudication: Judicial Functions in the Face of Indeterminacy, is to see a blueprint for legislative action. To a remarkable degree, the reforms Mnookin proposed to the child-welfare system are what Congress and the states adopted in the following two decades. And yet reading Mnookin’s article is also a Groundhog Day experience. The problems he described with the child-welfare system nearly forty years ago sound all too familiar today.
Mnookin famously argued that the best-interests standard was indeterminate in the context of the child-welfare system. According to Mnookin, this open-ended standard created …
In Re Sanders And The Resurrection Of Stanley V. Illinois, Joshua Gupta-Kagan
In Re Sanders And The Resurrection Of Stanley V. Illinois, Joshua Gupta-Kagan
Faculty Scholarship
This Essay begins by reviewing Stanley v. Illinois, and outlines how that foundational case originally recognized parental rights in foster care cases yet became understood primarily as a private adoption case. Second, it explains how, simultaneously, family courts developed the One-Parent Doctrine and a related doctrine making it difficult to transfer custody of a child from an abusive or neglectful parent in one state to a non-offending parent in another. Both doctrines violate Stanley by allowing the State to take custody of children without ever proving parental unfitness. Cases adopting these doctrines literally ignore Stanley. Third, this Essay …
Testing The Boundaries Of Family Privacy: The Special Case Of Pediatric Sibling Transplants, Doriane Lambelet Coleman
Testing The Boundaries Of Family Privacy: The Special Case Of Pediatric Sibling Transplants, Doriane Lambelet Coleman
Faculty Scholarship
A six-year-old girl suffers third-degree burns over eighty percent of her body. Her chance of survival with minimal scarring is said to depend on her identical twin sister’s availability as an organ source. There are other transplant options—including the parents—but because the twins’ skin is “equivalent,” a “sibling transplant” is likely to result in a better medical and aesthetic outcome for the burned twin. Her doctor thus proposes to harvest her healthy sister’s skin on “her backside from her bra line down to the bottom of her buttocks or possibly her thighs.” This procedure would be repeated up to three …
You've Got [International] Mail! A Comment On Bakala V. Bakala, Renee Ballew
You've Got [International] Mail! A Comment On Bakala V. Bakala, Renee Ballew
South Carolina Journal of International Law and Business
No abstract provided.
A Colorado Child's Best Interests: Examining The Gabriesheski Decision And Future Policy Implications, David Meschke
A Colorado Child's Best Interests: Examining The Gabriesheski Decision And Future Policy Implications, David Meschke
University of Colorado Law Review
Children in dependency and neglect proceedings are one of the most vulnerable groups in our legal system. Nationally, their legal representation comes in many forms. In Colorado, juvenile courts assign guardians ad litem (GALs) to children in these proceedings. GALs are lawyers who represent the children's best interests. For many years, GALs faced an ethical dilemma: should confidentiality, as proscribed by the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct, apply to the GAL-child relationship. In People v. Gabriesheski, the Colorado Supreme Court held that GALs are not their children's lawyers and, thus, confidentiality does not exist between GALs and children. While this …
Dreams Of My Father, Prison For My Mother: The H-4 Nonimmigrant Visa Dilemma And The Need For An "Immigration-Status Spousal Support", Stewart Chang
Dreams Of My Father, Prison For My Mother: The H-4 Nonimmigrant Visa Dilemma And The Need For An "Immigration-Status Spousal Support", Stewart Chang
Scholarly Works
In this article, Professor Stewart Chang uses the situation of H-4 visa derivatives in the Asian Indian immigrant community as a case study to expose and critique larger incongruities within current American immigration policy, which on the one hand has historically extolled individuality, equality, and workforce participation as avenues to the American Dream, while enforcing gender hierarchy and dependency through requirements that prioritize family unity on the other. These incongruities remain largely unnoticed because the culture of dependency is often attributed to traditional ethnic culture, which then becomes the site of scrutiny and blame. The H-4 visa dilemma in the …
Family Courts Are Here To Stay, So Let's Improve Them, Barbara A. Babb
Family Courts Are Here To Stay, So Let's Improve Them, Barbara A. Babb
Articles
The article presents a commentary in response to the White Paper of the Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System's Honoring Families Initiative on the court and separating and divorcing families. Topics include the mission, function and structure of family courts, therapeutic jurisprudence, and the design of a unified family court. It also discusses the ecology of human development.