Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law and Gender (14)
- Contracts (13)
- Constitutional Law (11)
- Health Law and Policy (9)
- International Law (9)
-
- Law and Society (9)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (7)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (7)
- Sexuality and the Law (7)
- Human Rights Law (4)
- Medical Jurisprudence (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Juvenile Law (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Civil Law (2)
- Family, Life Course, and Society (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- Gender and Sexuality (2)
- Immigration Law (2)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Sociology (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
- Transnational Law (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Bioethics and Medical Ethics (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Institution
-
- Cleveland State University (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (4)
- Florida State University College of Law (3)
- Pace University (3)
-
- St. John's University School of Law (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Barry University School of Law (2)
- Southern Methodist University (2)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- The Peter A. Allard School of Law (2)
- University of Maine School of Law (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- BLR (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (1)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- Singapore Management University (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Touro Law Review (4)
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- Scholarly Publications (3)
- All Faculty Publications (2)
-
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (2)
- Articles (2)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (2)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (2)
- St. John's Law Review (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (1)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (1)
- Catholic University Law Review (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Department of Sociology: Faculty Publications (1)
- Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence (1)
- ExpressO (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Global Business Law Review (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development (1)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (1)
- Maine Law Review (1)
- Marquette Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 64 of 64
Full-Text Articles in Family Law
Surrogacy And Adoption: A Case Of Incompatibility, Barbara L. Atwell
Surrogacy And Adoption: A Case Of Incompatibility, Barbara L. Atwell
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
This Article explores the public policy doctrine relating to contracts generally and examines specific public policies set forth in state adoption statutes. The Article concludes that surrogate parenting agreements are 1) incompatible with consent provisions of state adoption statutes, 2) inconsistent with state laws prohibiting baby-selling, and 3) inconsistent with state adoption provisions that provide for a thorough investigation of the adoptive parents in order to ensure that the adoption serves the child's best interests. Accordingly, this Article suggests that as state legislatures debate the best means of addressing the issue of surrogate parenting, they should recognize that surrogate parenting …
Enforcement Of Surrogate Mother Contracts: Case Law, The Uniform Acts, And State And Federal Legislation, James T. Flaherty
Enforcement Of Surrogate Mother Contracts: Case Law, The Uniform Acts, And State And Federal Legislation, James T. Flaherty
Cleveland State Law Review
Surrogate motherhood is possibly the most viable family issue in today's society, and especially in the law. Surrogacy will be treated here solely as a fact of life, and examined solely from the point of view of its legal status under the appropriate Uniform Acts, existing and proposed legislation outside Ohio, and existing Ohio law. It may sound strange that Ohio was chosen as an example, in that a search of Ohio law will not show any law directly dealing with surrogacy. But then, that is the point. Ohio is one of only three states that have adopted both relevant …
Baby M Reconsidered, Judith C. Areen
Baby M Reconsidered, Judith C. Areen
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Surrogate mothering depends on treating procreation, an activity traditionally viewed as an integral aspect of family life (and family law), as a service to be purchased in the marketplace and governed by the rules of contract law. Thus surrogacy forces us to confront the differences between two of our most fundamental institutions-the family and the market.
Comparative Responses To Surrogate Motherhood, Thomas A. Eaton
Comparative Responses To Surrogate Motherhood, Thomas A. Eaton
Scholarly Works
This Article analyzes the Warnock Report [UK] and the Surrogacy Arrangements Act [UK] in light of existing practices and laws in the United States and Great Britain. Section II provides a description of surrogacy practices and the uncertain legal environment in which they operate. Section III compares the Surrogacy Arrangements Act with Canadian, American, and Australian legislative proposals. Section IV then examines in more detail the commonly voiced ethical objections to surrogacy agreements an concludes that these objections do not warrant criminalization of surrogacy agreements. Finally, Section V offers suggestions on the enforcement of surrogacy agreements.