Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Juvenile Law (51)
- Law and Society (43)
- Law and Gender (27)
- Sexuality and the Law (24)
- Constitutional Law (22)
-
- Criminal Law (16)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (14)
- State and Local Government Law (14)
- Health Law and Policy (12)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (12)
- Civil Law (11)
- Courts (11)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (11)
- Administrative Law (9)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (9)
- Legislation (8)
- Social Welfare Law (8)
- Immigration Law (7)
- Law and Psychology (7)
- Legal Education (7)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (6)
- Fourteenth Amendment (6)
- Human Rights Law (6)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (6)
- International Law (6)
- Legal Profession (6)
- Other Law (6)
- Legal History (5)
- Institution
-
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (18)
- St. John's University School of Law (14)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (13)
- University of Maine School of Law (11)
- Fordham Law School (10)
-
- Brooklyn Law School (9)
- The Peter A. Allard School of Law (9)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (8)
- Notre Dame Law School (8)
- American University Washington College of Law (7)
- Roger Williams University (7)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (7)
- Barry University School of Law (6)
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
- University of Richmond (6)
- Columbia Law School (5)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (5)
- Southern Methodist University (5)
- University of Baltimore Law (5)
- University of Washington School of Law (5)
- William & Mary Law School (5)
- Georgia State University College of Law (4)
- New York Law School (4)
- Pepperdine University (4)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- Duquesne University (3)
- Pace University (3)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (3)
- Singapore Management University (3)
- Keyword
-
- Family law (36)
- Divorce (15)
- Marriage (15)
- Child welfare (13)
- Children (11)
-
- Domestic relations (11)
- Same-sex marriage (11)
- Adoption (10)
- Child custody (9)
- Family (9)
- Parental rights (7)
- Symposium; family law; public policy (7)
- Child support (6)
- Domestic violence (6)
- Foster care (6)
- Legal (6)
- Parents (6)
- Custody (5)
- Family Law (5)
- Law (5)
- Obergefell v. Hodges (5)
- Parenthood (5)
- Abortion (4)
- Child (4)
- Domestic (4)
- Gender (4)
- Indian Child Welfare Act (4)
- Parental Rights (4)
- Paternity (4)
- Surrogacy (4)
- Publication
-
- Children's Legal Rights Journal (17)
- Faculty Scholarship (17)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (12)
- The Catholic Lawyer (12)
- Maine Law Review (11)
-
- Fordham Law Review (10)
- Canadian Journal of Family Law (9)
- Articles (7)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (7)
- Child and Family Law Journal (6)
- Faculty Publications (6)
- Law Faculty Publications (6)
- All Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Journal Articles (5)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (4)
- Journal of Law and Policy (4)
- Lisa PytlikZillig Publications (4)
- Other Publications (4)
- William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice (4)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (3)
- Cleveland State Law Review (3)
- Faculty Articles (3)
- Pro Bono Collaborative Staff Publications (3)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (3)
- Touro Law Review (3)
- University of Richmond Law Review (3)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (2)
- Arkansas Law Review (2)
- Catholic University Law Review (2)
- Center for Children, Families and the Law Conferences & Symposia (2)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 91 - 120 of 268
Full-Text Articles in Family Law
In Re Parental Rights As To M.M.L., 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 21 (May 11, 2017), Hayley Cummings
In Re Parental Rights As To M.M.L., 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 21 (May 11, 2017), Hayley Cummings
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court determined that (1) when a parent is deemed incompetent to stand a criminal trial, there is no statutory authority requiring the district court to continue a parallel parental rights termination trial so that the parent can regain competence; and (2) when a litigant fails to object to the State’s method of service in initial pleadings or during trial, the litigant waives all challenges to the service of a parental rights termination by publication.
Custody Of Frozen Embryos Upon Dissolution Of Marriage In Georgia Research Guide, Lauren Zaki
Custody Of Frozen Embryos Upon Dissolution Of Marriage In Georgia Research Guide, Lauren Zaki
Law Library Student-Authored Works
No abstract provided.
Complex Kinship Networks In Fragile Families, Tonya L. Brito
Complex Kinship Networks In Fragile Families, Tonya L. Brito
Fordham Law Review
This Article examines the complex kinship networks in families that experience multiple-partner fertility. Part I begins with a broad examination of the dramatic changes to the American family that have occurred over the past half century. Part I then highlights the broad diversity of forms present in today’s families, the evolving nature of American families, and how a two-tiered family system has emerged as patterns have diverged along class-based lines. Next, Part II turns to multiple-partner fertility, assessing what we know and do not know about this social phenomenon, including its prevalence, characteristics, and trends. Part III then addresses the …
Reflections On The Challenge Of Inez Moore: Family Integrity In The Wake Of Mass Incarceration, Ann Cammett
Reflections On The Challenge Of Inez Moore: Family Integrity In The Wake Of Mass Incarceration, Ann Cammett
Fordham Law Review
The U.S. Supreme Court case Moore v. City of East Cleveland has long been celebrated as affirming constitutional rights related to family integrity. The Moore holding specifically confirmed the Court’s obligation to scrutinize housing ordinances that regulate a traditional family’s household composition. By comparison and extension, one might assume that alternative family formations would trigger similar scrutiny, but the Court has been loath to extend these protections. Apart from the Court’s failure to increase protections beyond traditional extended families, an interesting phenomenon has gone largely unexplored in this jurisprudential framework. In the wake of late twentieth-century mass incarceration, lawmakers and …
John Moore Jr.: Moore V. City Of East Cleveland And Children’S Constitutional Arguments, Nancy E. Dowd
John Moore Jr.: Moore V. City Of East Cleveland And Children’S Constitutional Arguments, Nancy E. Dowd
Fordham Law Review
This Article is divided into three parts. First, I retell the story of Moore from John Jr.’s perspective and frame his potential claims. Second, I explore constitutional arguments under existing doctrine, using contemporary equal protection and substantive due process analyses. Finally, I suggest how a children’s rights perspective might be even more persuasive as a strategy for John Jr. as well as for achieving opportunity and equality on behalf of contemporary children living amid and affected by structural inequalities that impact their developmental capacity.
Extending The Normativity Of The Extended Family: Reflections On Moore V. City Of East Cleveland, Angela Onwuachi-Willig
Extending The Normativity Of The Extended Family: Reflections On Moore V. City Of East Cleveland, Angela Onwuachi-Willig
Fordham Law Review
Part I of this Article briefly recounts the plurality decision in Moore before analyzing Justice Brennan’s concurring opinion and detailing how the concurrence affirms, rather than deconstructs, the notion of African American deviance in families. Next, Part II specifies the ways in which Justice Brennan could have truly uplifted African American families and other families of color by identifying and explicating the strengths of extended or multigenerational family forms among people of color and by showing how such family forms can be a model, or even the model (if one must be chosen), for all families. Then, Part III concludes …
Grasping Fatherhood In Abortion And Adoption, Malinda L. Seymore
Grasping Fatherhood In Abortion And Adoption, Malinda L. Seymore
Faculty Scholarship
Biology makes a mother, but it does not make a father. While a mother is a legal parent by reason of her biological relationship with her child, a father is not a legal parent unless he takes affirmative steps to grasp fatherhood. Being married to the mother at the time of conception or at the time of birth is one of those affirmative steps. But if he is not married to the mother, he must do far more before he will be legally recognized as a father. Biology is often presented as a sufficient reason for this dichotomy--it is easy …
Introduction: Moore V. City Of East Cleveland: How One Grandmother Helped A Nation Redefine Family, Anne Williams-Isom
Introduction: Moore V. City Of East Cleveland: How One Grandmother Helped A Nation Redefine Family, Anne Williams-Isom
Fordham Law Review
When reviewing the Moore v. City of East Cleveland decision, it is impossible not to see one of the grandmothers that Harlem Children’s Zone (HCZ) routinely encounters in Inez Moore. While educating children is the primary focus of HCZ, working with the adults who bring those children through the doors is important to HCZ’s success. Miss Inez, as she would have been referred to by HCZ, illustrates the important role played by extended families in communities of color.
Moore’S Potential, June Carbone, Naomi Cahn
Moore’S Potential, June Carbone, Naomi Cahn
Fordham Law Review
Part I of this Article briefly explores the culture wars that have consumed American politics since Moore. Part II discusses Moore’s uneasy position within the conception of family as a matter of choice versus tradition. Then, to the extent that the Moore Court addressed the changing family, Part III shows how it did so by treating the extended family as a manifestation of traditional family values, not the newly emerging substantive family values that valorize delay in childbearing and financial independence. Finally, Part IV considers Moore's missed opportunities to examine the relationship between family form, race, and …
Other Mothers, Kevin Maillard
Other Mothers, Kevin Maillard
Fordham Law Review
There is a robust body of scholarship and jurisprudence addressing psychological parents, assisted reproductive technology, surrogacy, and same-sex parents, which reinforces the primacy of heterosexual marriage and procreation. This tradition suggests a vulnerability of parental status involving the other parent. Now that legal parenthood can be approached in a number of ways, it is time to take a critical look at the preeminence of motherhood and gestation in the determination of parental status and fitness.
Sharing A House But Not A Household: Extended Families And Exclusionary Zoning Forty Years After Moore, Solangel Maldonado
Sharing A House But Not A Household: Extended Families And Exclusionary Zoning Forty Years After Moore, Solangel Maldonado
Fordham Law Review
This Article proceeds in three parts. Part I briefly recounts the evolution of zoning laws and their effect on racial minorities. Next, Part II demonstrates how single-family zoning laws disproportionately exclude racial minorities from the most desirable blocks. Part II also examines how these laws economically and socially disadvantage minorities and hinder efforts to integrate neighborhoods and schools. Then, Part III uses Moore to explore potential solutions and concludes that, at minimum, zoning laws cannot exclude two-family homes that are occupied by extended family members. It also shows how Moore may support a more inclusionary approach to zoning.
The Empirics Of Child Custody, Margaret Ryznar
The Empirics Of Child Custody, Margaret Ryznar
Cleveland State Law Review
Child custody issues are as American as apple pie, with only a quarter of children seeing their parents married until the end. The legal standard for custody is the best interests of the child, but the greyness of this inquiry allows courts to make difficult judgments. In family law, such discretionary standards govern factually diverse cases and make it difficult to draw conclusions from individual cases. This Article offers an objective measurement in family law by empirically examining a sample of Indiana divorce cases filed during three months in 2008 that involved children. The resulting analysis of child custody and …
Extending The Normativity Of The Extended Family: Reflections On Moore V. City Of East Cleveland, Angela Onwuachi-Willig
Extending The Normativity Of The Extended Family: Reflections On Moore V. City Of East Cleveland, Angela Onwuachi-Willig
Faculty Scholarship
Part I of this Article briefly recounts the plurality decision in Moore before analyzing Justice Brennan’s concurring opinion and detailing how the concurrence affirms, rather than deconstructs, the notion of African American deviance in families. Next, Part II specifies the ways in which Justice Brennan could have truly uplifted African American families and other families of color by identifying and explicating the strengths of extended or multigenerational family forms among people of color and by showing how such family forms can be a model, or even the model (if one must be chosen), for all families. Then, Part III concludes …
Exploring The Boundaries Of Obergefell, Andrew J. Pecoraro
Exploring The Boundaries Of Obergefell, Andrew J. Pecoraro
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marriage Equality And Family Diversity: Comparative Perspectives From The United States And South Africa, Holning Lau
Marriage Equality And Family Diversity: Comparative Perspectives From The United States And South Africa, Holning Lau
Fordham Law Review
This Article proceeds in two parts. Part I examines the United States’s and South Africa’s competing approaches to same-sex marriage. Both countries’ highest courts ruled that excluding same-sex couples from marriage is unconstitutional, but they took divergent paths to reach that conclusion. This Article contends that the Constitutional Court of South Africa paved a better road for other countries to follow because it developed a superior conceptualization of the right to marry. Part II looks beyond same-sex marriage to explore new frontiers for reforming laws to address family diversity both in the United States and in South Africa. Specifically, Part …
Have Prenup, Will Travel: Why England’S Law On Marital Agreements Has Attracted Forum Shoppers And How The Courts Can Fight Back, Karina Vanhouten
Have Prenup, Will Travel: Why England’S Law On Marital Agreements Has Attracted Forum Shoppers And How The Courts Can Fight Back, Karina Vanhouten
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
This Note examines the English judiciary’s reluctance to fully accept marital agreements, and the disruptive effect this has in the global legal arena. In our increasingly international world, the fundamental events of family life—marriage, divorce, and death—often no longer occur in the same jurisdiction. In recent years, prospective divorcées from around the globe have flocked to England to take advantage of the country’s matrimonial law, which generally favors the party seeking to invalidate or minimize a marital agreement. This forum-shopping phenomenon is problematic because English courts regularly disregard foreign marital agreements that would be valid and binding in other jurisdictions, …
The New Phoenix: Maine's Innovative Standards For Guardians Ad Litem, Dana E. Prescott
The New Phoenix: Maine's Innovative Standards For Guardians Ad Litem, Dana E. Prescott
Maine Law Review
In a 2014 article in the Maine Law Review, the author reviewed the historical and legal foundations for guardian ad litem (GAL) appointments by judges on behalf of children in Maine. GALs are appointed to provide the court with investigative facts and recommendations concerning the best interest of a child. The implications and frustrations expressed during political and policy discussions reflect a broader national debate deeply rooted in the power of family law courts when child custody or abuse and neglect are alleged. Whether in the form of child protection or child custody litigation, the sheer volume and complexity of …
Agree To Disagree: Moving Tennessee Toward Pure No-Fault Divorce, Evan Wright
Agree To Disagree: Moving Tennessee Toward Pure No-Fault Divorce, Evan Wright
Lincoln Memorial University Law Review Archive
This Note addresses Tennessee's no-fault divorce statute. Currently, married couples are forced to either agree on all issues or prove at least one fault ground. This author contends that the current law imposes an unnecessary burden on litigants, which wastes precious resources that Tennessee families could use for more productive purposes. Moreover, pure no-fault states have not seen a disproportionate rise in divorce rates. Last, pure no-fault divorce better reflects current societal trends and the evolving effect of religious affiliation on how a younger generation defines morality.
Zoning For The Elderly And Family Rights, Ralph J. Libsohn
Zoning For The Elderly And Family Rights, Ralph J. Libsohn
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
Marriage, Millennials, And Massive Student Loan Debt, Victoria J. Haneman
Marriage, Millennials, And Massive Student Loan Debt, Victoria J. Haneman
Concordia Law Review
The purpose of this Essay is to explore the idea that the student loan indebtedness bearing down upon the majority of today’s college graduates creates economic insecurity that forces borrowers to reject or significantly delay marriage, and that burden, taken together with an already lukewarm Millennial attitude, may not bode well for the future of the institution. Record numbers of Millennials have rejected the traditional path of marriage-homeownership-children, and the percentage of Millennials who will marry by age 40 is projected to fall lower than the figure for any previous generation of Americans. To the extent that marriage is an …
A Longitudinal And Experimental Study Of The Impact Of Knowledge On The Bases Of Institutional Trust, Lisa M. Pytlikzillig, Christopher D. Kimbrough, Ellie Shockley, Tess M.S. Neal, Mitchel Herian, Joseph A. Hamm, Brian H. Bornstein, Alan Tomkins
A Longitudinal And Experimental Study Of The Impact Of Knowledge On The Bases Of Institutional Trust, Lisa M. Pytlikzillig, Christopher D. Kimbrough, Ellie Shockley, Tess M.S. Neal, Mitchel Herian, Joseph A. Hamm, Brian H. Bornstein, Alan Tomkins
Lisa PytlikZillig Publications
This study examined a knowledge-centered theory of institutional trust development. In the context of trust in water regulatory institutions, the moderating impact of knowledge was tested to determine if there were longitudinal changes in the bases of institutional trust as a function of increases in knowledge about a target institution. We hypothesized that as people learn about an institution with which they were previously unfamiliar, they begin to form more nuanced perceptions, distinguishing the new institution from other institutions and relying less upon their generalized trust to estimate their trust in that institution. Prior to having specific, differential information about …
Domestic Violence And Enforcement Of Protection From Abuse Orders: Simple Fixes To Help Prevent Intra-Family Homicide, Nicole R. Bissonnette
Domestic Violence And Enforcement Of Protection From Abuse Orders: Simple Fixes To Help Prevent Intra-Family Homicide, Nicole R. Bissonnette
Maine Law Review
Domestic violence has long been recognized as a pressing law enforcement and societal concern, and both federal and state governments have continued to pursue strategies to address the issue. Beyond the criminal threatening, assaults, batteries, and other physical atrocities that victims face, domestic violence provides an added horror—“obliterating personhood, suspending identity and nullifying any notion of personal autonomy.” To address these concerns, legislatures created Protection from Abuse Orders (hereinafter PFAs), to protect those that have been subject to abuse from trusted family members or dating partners. Unfortunately, victims then place their trust in the system, which often fails to deter …
Petit V. Adrianzen, 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 15 (Apr. 13, 2017), Skyler Sullivan
Petit V. Adrianzen, 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 15 (Apr. 13, 2017), Skyler Sullivan
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court considers, as a matter of first impression, the standard of proof to be applied by district courts in resolving initial naming disputes of a child of married parents. The focus should be on the best interest of the child and neither parent should have the burden of proof. The Court held the district court determined the child’s name should be hyphenated to include both parent’s surnames and, in doing so, considered the best interests of the child and, thus, the order is affirmed.
Recognizing Gestational Surrogacy Contracts: "Baby-Steps" Toward Modern Parentage Law In Maine After Nolan V. Labree, Adam Quinlan
Recognizing Gestational Surrogacy Contracts: "Baby-Steps" Toward Modern Parentage Law In Maine After Nolan V. Labree, Adam Quinlan
Maine Law Review
In Nolan v. LaBree, a husband and wife filed a complaint seeking a judgment declaring their legal parentage of a newborn child born via gestational surrogacy. All parties surrounding the birth of this child entered into a surrogacy contract and are in agreement that the genetic mother and father bringing this suit should be declared as the legal parents. When the child was born, however, the birth certificate did not reflect the intentions of the contract, listing the parents as the surrogate mother and the surrogate mother’s spouse. The trial court, following an uncontested hearing, declared the requested paternity determination …
"In Sickness And In Health, Until Death Do Us Part": An Examination Of Fmla Rights For Same-Sex Spouses And A Case Note On Obergefell V. Hodges, Jasmine Foo
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
This note discusses the history of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) struggle for equal rights alongside the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges and uses this to examine the potential effect on the rights granted to same-sex spouses by the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Part II records the jurisprudence that has slowly evolved over the past forty to fifty years to make the present a more hospitable era for same-sex marriage to take root today. Part III gives a general overview of the FMLA's history and current form. Part IV reviews the facts prompting the …
Will Focusing On Men's Moral Calculus Make Abortion Less "About" Gender?, Linda C. Mcclain
Will Focusing On Men's Moral Calculus Make Abortion Less "About" Gender?, Linda C. Mcclain
Faculty Scholarship
Decades ago, feminist leader Gloria Steinem quipped that, “if men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament.” As President Trump reinstates restrictions on women’s reproductive rights that the Obama Administration lifted (such as the “global gag rule”), the visual imagery of Trump signing executive orders while surrounded by an audience of white men raises – once again – the question of how gender shapes the abortion issue. In the recent unsuccessful Republican effort to repeal “Obamacare,” when Kansas Senator Pat Roberts was asked whether he supported removing the mandate that insurance companies cover “essential health benefits” such as maternity …
Sealed Records In Adoptions: The Need For Legislative Reform, Patricia Gallagher Lupack
Sealed Records In Adoptions: The Need For Legislative Reform, Patricia Gallagher Lupack
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
Marriage Contracts For The Mentally Retarded, John B. Murray
Marriage Contracts For The Mentally Retarded, John B. Murray
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
Commitment To And In Marriage, Leon Salzman
Homosexuality And Validity Of Matrimony - A Study In Homo-Psychosexual Inversion, John Rogg Schmidt
Homosexuality And Validity Of Matrimony - A Study In Homo-Psychosexual Inversion, John Rogg Schmidt
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.