Family Law Commons^™

An Idigent's Right To An In Forma Pauperis Proceeding In Pennsylvania Divorce Litigation - Analysis And A Proposal, Richard W. Hoolstein, Michael R. Stiles

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Recent Decisions

University of Richmond Law Review

This is a summary of the case law that was decided in 1970.

Divisible Divorce In Maryland - Does It Exist? - Dackman V. Dackman

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Book Notes, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

The Child Savers: The Invention of Delinquency By Anthony M. Platt Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969. Pp. ix, 202.$8.50.

=============================

Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas (rev. ed.) By Clifford R.Shaw & Henry D. McKay Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1969. Pp. 394.

=============================

The Positive School of Criminology Edited by Stanley E. Grupp Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1968. Pp. vi, 114. $5.95.

=============================

State and Local Tax Problems Edited by Harry L. Johnson Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1969. Pp. xiii, 190. $7.50.

=============================

Tension in the Cities By James A. Bayton Philadelphia: Chilton Book Co., 1969. Pp. x, …

Requiring Indigent Seeking Divorce To Pay Cost Of Service By Publication Held Denial Of Equal Access To Courts - Jeffreys V. Jeffreys

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law--Torts--Equal Protection Of Illegitimate Children, David L. Core

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Difficult Quest For A Truly Humane Abortion Law, Donald A. Giannella

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Equal Protection For The Illegitimate, Harry D. Krause

Michigan Law Review

In our time the general constitutional phrase promising equal protection has become specific law. It has been used to invalidate many state statutes which discriminated on the basis of race or other arbitrary criteria. Definite rules have been developed for this process of invalidation. These rules will be applied below to state and federal legislation that favors the legitimate child and discriminates against the illegitimate in matters of inheritance rights, rights of support, rights of name and custody, and social welfare. The question that will be asked is whether state and federal legislation may constitutionally discriminate between children on the …

Foster Parents Versus Agencies: A Case Study In The Judicial Application Of "The Best Interests Of The Child" Doctrine, Sanford N. Katz

Michigan Law Review

A recurring problem which courts face is the need to resolve the conflict which arises when foster parents challenge the decision of agencies that have disqualified these persons from continuing their relationship with or adopting their foster child. This article will explore the role of courts in resolving these disputes and will suggest some criteria by which the courts may be guided in deciding such questions.

Legislation Requiring Child To Support Mother In State Asylum Is A Denial Of Equal Protection-Department Of Mental Hygiene V. Kirchner, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

The California Department of Mental Hygiene brought suit under section 6650 of the state's Welfare and Institutions Code, a provision commonly known as a relative support statute, against the administratrix to recover 7,500 dollars from the intestate's estate. This amount represented the cost of food, housing, and treatment received by intestate's mother in a state mental hospital during the four years she had been confined there following a civil sanity hearing. Plaintiff was granted judgment on the pleadings. On appeal to the California Supreme Court, held, reversed. Since mental hospitals serve a proper public function, it is a denial …

Child Custody In A Federal System, Leonard G. Ratner

Michigan Law Review

Among the most difficult of judicial functions is the determination of a child's custody after its parents have separated. The difficulties are acute enough when all the parties remain in the same place; when the parties are in different states, an additional perplexing problem arises as to which state should have authority to make the custody decision. This broad question can be resolved into three distinct though interrelated issues: (1) what state may initially determine custody; (2) what state may later modify that determination; (3) to what extent is such a determination binding on other states.

Recent Case Comments, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Recent Case Comments --

Accounting--Return To Be Allowed Utilities on Deferred Tax Reserves Instituted in Connection with Accelerated Depreciation Methods

============================

Conflict of Laws--Torts--Repudiation of Place of Injury Rule

============================

Constitutional Law--Due Process--Juvenile Court Proceeding a Bar to Subsequent Criminal Trial for the Same Act

============================

Family Law--Divorce--Insanity as a Defense to Action--for Divorce on the Ground of Cruelty

============================

Labor Law--Unemployment Compensation-Status of Laid-Off Worker Under No--Strike Clause

============================

Real Property--Future Interests--Valuation of Possibility of Reverter

============================

Taxation--Federal Income Tax--Deductibility of Contingent Witness Fees

============================

Torts--Warranty--Relation of Foreseeability of Risk to the Implied Warranty of a Cigarette Manufacturer

============================ …

Priority Paradoxes In Patent Law, Richard H. Stern

Vanderbilt Law Review

The constitutional provision governing patents gives Congress the power to promote the progress of useful arts "by securing for limited Times to... Inventors the exclusive Right to their... Discoveries. "'Because an "exclusive right" suggests an exclusive grant, the Patent Office interference proceeding has been created for the purpose of determining administratively the question of priority of rights between two or more parties claiming substantially the same invention. This article attempts to state in terms of an informal axiomatic system the rules of law for determining priority of invention, and then examine that system to explore its possible paradoxes Finally, an …

Abstracts Of Recent Cases, Charles Henry Rudolph Jr.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law - Due Process- Residence Substituted For Domicile As Basis For Divorce Jurisdiction, Paul Gerding S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff husband brought a divorce action under an Arkansas statute, which granted state courts divorce jurisdiction on the basis of residence of one of the parties within Arkansas for three months, to terminate a marriage performed in another jurisdiction. Defendant wife, domiciled in California, filed a cross complaint for separate maintenance and attacked the court's jurisdiction to grant the divorce. The lower court held the act unconstitutional in eliminating domicile of one of the parties as a jurisdictional requirement in a divorce action, and, finding that the plaintiff was not domiciled in Arkansas, dismissed the suit. On appeal, held, …

Conflict Of Laws - Custody Decrees - Jurisdiction To Modify And Effect In Sister States, Donald R. Jolliffe S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Husband and wife were divorced in Wisconsin in 1956 by a judgment which awarded alimony, custody of the children, and support money to W. The custody decree provided that W be permitted to remove the children to California but that they be allowed to visit H each summer. While H was visiting California in October 1957, he was served in an action commenced by W seeking absolute custody. H returned to Wisconsin and on November 5 asked the Wisconsin court to modify its divorce judgment by awarding custody of the children to him. That court set a hearing and …

Book Reviews, Dale F. Stansbury, Malcolm P. Sharp, Arthur T. Von Mehren, John S. Bradway, James D. Ghiardi, Thomas H. Eliot, Julius Paul, W. Howard Mann

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

In a hearing before the Commissioner of Investigation of the City of New York, appellant refused to state whether he was then a member of the Communist Party and based his refusal to answer on the fifth amendment to the United States Constitution. He was thereafter discharged as an employee of the New York Transit Authority pursuant to provisions of the New York Security Risk Law' which allows dismissal of employees of security agencies who are found to be of "doubtful trust and reliability." Without seeking administrative remedies, appellant brought a proceeding in the state court for reinstatement contending that …

Abstracts Of Recent Cases, T. E. P.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Domestic Relations—Survival Of Right To Alimony, Vincent P. Furlong

Buffalo Law Review

Vanderbilt v. Vanderbilt, 1 N. Y. 2d 342, 135 N. E. 2d 553 (1956), cert. granted, 352 U. S. 820 (1956).

Domestic Relations—Reciprocal Support Statutes—Constitutionality, Vincent P. Furlong

Buffalo Law Review

Landes v. Landes, 1 N. Y. 2d 358, 135 N. E. 2d 562 (1956), appeal docketed, 25 U. S. L. WEEK 3155, (U. S. Oct. 12, 1956) (No. 507).

Wills - Religious Conditions In Restraint Of Marriage - Validity At Common Law And Effect Of Shelley V. Kraemer, Jack G. Armstrong S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Testator devised and bequeathed his property to his children, but with a proviso that the gift to any child who should marry a person not born in the Hebrew faith should lapse. Subsequent to the testator's death, the defendant married a woman who had been born a Roman Catholic. The other beneficiaries brought a proceeding to declare that the defendant had lost his rights under the will by reason of his marriage. The probate court granted a decree substantially as sought by the plaintiffs. On appeal, held, affirmed. This partial restraint on marriage is not so unreasonable as to …

Equity-Power Of Court To Order Operation On Child Over Parental Objection For Purpose Of Preventing Harmful Psychological Reaction In Child [In Re Seiferth, N. Y. 1954]

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Barriya V. Kadi Of The Sharia Moslem Court, Yitzhak Olshan, David Goitein, Zvi Berinson

Translated Opinions

An application was made to a Moslem Religious Court by the aunt of three minor children to be appointed their guardian. The applicant's deceased brother, the father of the children, had directed before his death that the mother of the children should be their guardian. After his death the mother had remarried and the aunt, relying upon Moslem law, had taken the children into her care and had prevented them from remaining with their mother.

In the course of the proceedings before the Moslem Religious Court the mother submitted (inter alia) that she was entitled to the guardianship by virtue …

Constitutional Law - Full Faith And Credit-Res Judicata Applied To Determination Of Sister State Concerning Ex Parte Divorce, Frank M. Mccann

William and Mary Review of Virginia Law

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law - Church And State - Statute Requiring Religion To Be Taken Into Consideration In Adoption, David W. Swanson

Michigan Law Review

ln 1951, a Jewish couple obtained custody of illegitimate twins who were then two weeks old. In 1954, the couple formally sought to adopt the children. Although petitioners were otherwise qualified to act as parents, a Massachusetts statute provides that "in making orders for adoption, the judge when practicable must give custody only to persons of the same religious faith as that of the child." The twins' natural mother was Catholic but had consented in writing to adoption by the petitioners and to rearing of the children in the Jewish faith. The lower court found that several Catholic couples had …

Children’S Court Act—Medical Treatment Of Child Against Parent’S Wishes, Dawn Girard

Buffalo Law Review

In re Seiferth, 285 App. Div. 221, 137 N. Y. S. 2d 35 (4th Dep't 1955).

Conflict Of Laws - Full Faith And Credit - Foreign Custody Decrees, Theodore J. St. Antoine S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Husband and wife were domiciled in Wisconsin. When marital troubles developed, the parties agreed that the wife should. take their children to Ohio and. there decide on her future action. Shortly afterward the wife informed the husband. she was not returning. The husband secured. a divorce in Wisconsin, with the decree purporting to award. him custody of the children subject to visitation rights in the wife. Service on the wife was · obtained by publication, but she made no appearance in the Wisconsin proceedings. After one of the visits of the children, the wife refused. to return them and. the …

Yosifof V. Attorney General, Moshe Landau, Moshe Silberg, Moshe Smoira

Translated Opinions

The appellant, an Israel Jew belonging to the Caucasian community, married in the year 1936. He married a second time in the year 1950 while the first marriage still subsisted. He was convicted of bigamy under s. 181 of the Criminal Code Ordinance, 1936 1) and sentenced to imprisonment for one year. On appeal it was argued that s. 181 was ultra vires the powers of the High Commissioner by reason of Article 17(1)(a) 2)2) of the Palestine Order in Council 1922 (as amended) in that the section introduced discrimination between the inhabitants of Palestine, namely, between Moslems and Jews, …

Shibli V. Shibli, Shneor Zalman Cheshin, Moshe Smoira, Simha Assaf

Translated Opinions

Under the Palestine Order in Council, 1922, a number of Christian "communities", including the Greek Catholic community but not including the Protestant community, were recognised and given the right to hold courts of their own with jurisdiction (which in some cases required the consent of the parties) in matters of personal status over members of their own community.

The petitioner was a Protestant and had married the first respondent, a member of the recognised Greek Catholic community, in a Greek Catholic church. There was one child of the marriage. The parties quarreled soon after the marriage and their disagreements led …