Family Law Commons^™

Indian Reservations And The Preservation Of Tribal Culture: Beyond Wardship To Stewardship, John W. Ragsdale Jr

Faculty Works

No abstract provided.

Confrontation Clause

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Confrontation Clause

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Confrontation Clause

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Confrontation Clause

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Ideal Of Liberty: A Comment On Michael H. V. Gerald D., Robin West

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

What is the meaning and content of the "liberty" protected by the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment? In Michael H. v. Gerald D. Justices Brennan and Scalia spelled out what at first blush appear to be sharply contrasting understandings of the meaning of liberty and of the substantive limits liberty imposes on state action. Justice Scalia argued that the "liberty" protected by a substantive interpretation of due process is only the liberty to engage in activities historically protected against state intervention by firmly entrenched societal traditions. I will sometimes call this the "traditionalist" interpretation of liberty. Justice Brennan, …

Administrative Failure And Local Democracy: The Politics Of Deshaney, Jack M. Beermann

Faculty Scholarship

This Essay is an effort to construct a normative basis for a constitutional theory to resist the Supreme Court's recent decision in DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services.¹ In DeShaney, the Court decided that a local social service worker's failure to prevent child abuse did not violate the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment even though the social worker "had reason to believe" the abuse was occurring. ² Chief Justice Rehnquist's opinion for the Court held that government inaction cannot violate due process unless the state has custody of the victim, ³ thus settling a controversial …

Constitutional Law—Prisoners' Rights—Prison Regulation Denying Inmate The Right To Artificially Inseminate Wife Held Constitutional. Goodwin V. Turner, 908 F.2d 1395 (8th Cir. 1990)., Todd M. Turner

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law—Freedom Of Religion—Requiring Reports Of Religious Counseling Sessions Under Child Abuse Reporting Statutes Does Not Violate The First Amendment. State V. Motherwell, 114 Wash. 2d 353, 788 P.2d 1066 (1990)., Mona J. Mcnutt

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Equality Theory, Marital Rape, And The Promise Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Robin West

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

During the 1980s a handful of state judges either held or opined in dicta what must be incontrovertible to the feminist community, as well as to most progressive legal advocates and academics: the so-called marital rape exemption, whether statutory or common law in origin, constitutes a denial of a married woman's constitutional right to equal protection under the law. Indeed, a more obvious denial of equal protection is difficult to imagine: the marital rape exemption denies married women protection against violent crime solely on the basis of gender and marital status. What possibly could be less rational than a statute …

The Right To Abortion: Anomalous, Absolute, And Ripe For Reversal, James Bopp Jr., Richard E. Coleson

Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law

No abstract provided.

Terminating The Rights Of Mentally Retarded Parents: Severing The Ties That Bind, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 133 (1988), Patricia Werner

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Intentional Creation Of Fetal Tissue For Transplants: The Womb As A Fetus Farm, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 853 (1988), James David Roberts

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Rights Discourse And Neonatal Euthanasia, Carl E. Schneider

Articles

Hard cases, they say, make bad law. Hard cases, we know, can also make revealing law. Hard cases identify the problems we have not found a way of solving. They reveal ways the law's goals conflict. They force us to articulate our assumptions and to examine our modes of discourse and reasoning. If there was ever a hard case for the law, it is the question of whether, how, and by whom it should be decided to allow newborn children who are severely retarded mentally or severely damaged physically to die. For many years, the law has not had to …

A Civil Liberties Analysis Of Surrogacy Arrangements, Lawrence O. Gostin

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

In this essay the author comes to the following conclusions based upon a civil liberties analysis. First, surrogacy arrangements cannot be prohibited or criminalized. Second, the state cannot ban the exchange of money for surrogacy services, provided the money is paid for conception, gestation, and birth. Money, however, cannot be paid on condition that the gestational mother waive her parental rights over the child. Third, contractual provisions that require the gestational mother to waive her parental rights or her rights to privacy and autonomy are void and unenforceable. Fourth, when the child is born, both the gestational mother and the …

The Lawyer's Role In The Independent Adoption Process: Parental Consent And Best Interests Of The Child, Diana Lafemina

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Putative Father's Due Process Rights To Notice And A Hearing: In Re Baby Boy Doe, Carl Belliston

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Bowen V. Gilliard, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Zbaraz V. Hartigan: Mandatory Twenty-Four Hour Waiting Period After Parental Notification Unconstitutionally Burdens A Minor's Abortion Decision, 19 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1071 (1986), Debra A. Harvey

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Three Generations, No Imbeciles: New Light On Buck V. Bell, Paul A. Lombardo

Faculty Publications By Year

No abstract provided.

Book Review Of Passion: An Essay On Personality , Richard F. Devlin Frsc

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

Passion is a cogently structured, compel Jingly argued and seductively enthralling masterpiece which, in years to come, will undoubtedly stand out as an inspirational source for many who seek social transformation. Unger's style, in this essay at least, is lucid and inviting. Substantively, Passion demonstrates not only the depth of his penetrating intellect but also his command of an array of' disciplines. Unger's polymathy is all the more impressive when we remember that ours is an era in which idiosyncratic specialization is the norm.

The Right To Life Of The Unborn-An Assessment Of The Eighth Amendment To The Irish Constitution, John A. Quinlan

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Domestic Relations—Arkansas Supreme Court Defines Marital Property To Include Future Pension Benefits, Roger L. Morgan

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Confronting Child Victims Of Sex Abuse: The Unconstitutionality Of The Sexual Abuse Hearsay Exception, Katrin E. Frank

Seattle University Law Review

This Comment first analyzes Washington’s hearsay exception Act in the light of the principles that form the basis for the hearsay rule and its exceptions. It then examines the effect of the Act on the preexisting hearsay rules. Next, it compares the concept of unavailability as used in the hearsay exceptions with the concept of incompetence; both concepts are then analyzed according to the requirements of the hearsay rules and the confrontation clause. The Comment concludes that the Act is unconstitutional because it permits admission of hearsay of testimonially incompetent children.

Family Law - Support - The Natural Father Of A Child Born Out Of Wedlock May Not Assert As A Defense Against His Support Obligation The Mother's Deliberate Misrepresentation That She Was Using Contraception, Suzanne E. Miller

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Incest Statutes And The Fundamental Right Of Marriage: Is Oedipus Free To Marry?, Carolyn S. Bratt

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

The U.S. Supreme Court has found that the right to marry is a constitutionally protected right. That right is restricted, however, by state incest statutes which impede marriage between adults by making some choices of a marriage partner illegal. The constitutional validity of modern state incest statutes is difficult to analyze because of shifting definitions, reflexive fears, ambivalent attitudes, and underlying facile generalizations.

The mere word "incest" triggers strong feelings of revulsion in most people. Therefore, any a priori labeling of a marriage as incestuous tends to preclude objective thought about the permissibility of the particular form of the marriage …

Palmore V. Sidoti, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Kirkpatrick V. Christian Home Of Abilene, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Inequality In Marital Liabilities: The Need For Equal Protection When Modifying The Necessaries Doctrine, Debra S. Betteridge

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

This Note contends that the "primary/secondary" modification is unconstitutional because it ignores the husband's equal protection rights while unlawfully stigmatizing women as dependent. Part I discusses how the growing independence of women has led courts to modify the common law doctrine. Part II develops the test that the Supreme Court would apply in judging the constitutionality of any modification of the doctrine. Part III applies this test to the "primary/secondary" modification and concludes that the modification is unconstitutional and, therefore, not a legitimate reformation of the common law necessaries doctrine.

Lehr V. Robertson, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.