Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Procedure (3)
- Fourth Amendment (3)
- Supreme Court of the United States (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Agriculture Law (2)
-
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (2)
- Earth Sciences (2)
- Energy and Utilities Law (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- Environmental Sciences (2)
- Hydrology (2)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Natural Resource Economics (2)
- Natural Resources Law (2)
- Natural Resources Management and Policy (2)
- Oil, Gas, and Energy (2)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (2)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (2)
- Political Science (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- State and Local Government Law (2)
- Taxation-State and Local (2)
- Water Law (2)
- Water Resource Management (2)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Problems Of Interstate Allocation Of Groundwater, Charles E. Corker
Problems Of Interstate Allocation Of Groundwater, Charles E. Corker
Groundwater: Allocation, Development and Pollution (Summer Conference, June 6-9)
41 pages.
Agenda: Groundwater: Allocation, Development And Pollution, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Agenda: Groundwater: Allocation, Development And Pollution, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Groundwater: Allocation, Development and Pollution (Summer Conference, June 6-9)
Even before the [Natural Resources Law] Center was established [in the fall of 1981], the [University of Colorado] School of Law was organizing annual natural resources law summer short courses. To date four programs have been presented:
- July 1980: "Federal Lands, Laws and Policies-and the Development of Natural Resources"
- June 1981: "Water Resources Allocation: Laws and Emerging Issues"
- June 1982: "New Sources of Water for Energy Development and Growth: lnterbasin Transfers"
- June 1983: "Groundwater: Allocation; Development and Pollution"
(Reprinted from Resource Law Notes, no. 1, Jan. 1984, at 1.)
University of Colorado School of Law professors …
The Fourth Amendment As A Device For Protecting The Innocent, Arnold H. Loewy
The Fourth Amendment As A Device For Protecting The Innocent, Arnold H. Loewy
Michigan Law Review
Part I of this Article establishes that the government has a right to search for and seize evidence of crime. Part II develops the corollary proposition that the fourth amendment does not protect the right to secrete evidence of crime. Part III explores the impact of the reasonable expectation of privacy concept on the innocent. Part IV evaluates consent searches and their effect on the innocent. Finally, Part V considers the exclusionary rule as a device for protecting the innocent.
Forgotten Points In The "Exclusionary Rule" Debate, James Boyd White
Forgotten Points In The "Exclusionary Rule" Debate, James Boyd White
Michigan Law Review
Most contemporary discussions of the "exclusionary rule" assume or assert that this "rule" is not part of the fourth amendment, nor required by its terms, but is rather a judicial "remedy" that was fashioned to protect those rights (against unreasonable search and seizure) that actually are granted by the fourth amendment. The protection is said to work by "deterring" official violations; this is, however, an odd use of the word, for the rule does not punish violations but merely deprives the government of some of the benefits that might ensue from them, namely the use in the criminal case of …
Does (Did) (Should) The Exclusionary Rule Rest On A 'Principled Basis' Rather Than An 'Empirical Proposition'?, Yale Kamisar
Does (Did) (Should) The Exclusionary Rule Rest On A 'Principled Basis' Rather Than An 'Empirical Proposition'?, Yale Kamisar
Articles
[U]ntil the [exclusionary rule] rests on a principled basis rather than an empirical proposition, [the rule] will remain in a state of unstable equilibrium. Mapp v. Ohio, which overruled the then twelve-year-old Wolf case and imposed the fourth amendment exclusionary rule (the Weeks doctrine) on the states as a matter of fourteenth amendment due process, seemed to mark the end of an era. Concurring in Mapp, Justice Douglas recalled that Wolf had evoked "a storm of constitutional controversy which only today finds its end."' But in the two decades since Justice Douglas made this observation, the storm of controversy has …