Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Administrative Law (2)
- Agriculture Law (2)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (2)
- Earth Sciences (2)
- Energy and Utilities Law (2)
-
- Environmental Law (2)
- Environmental Sciences (2)
- Hydrology (2)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Natural Resource Economics (2)
- Natural Resources Law (2)
- Natural Resources Management and Policy (2)
- Oil, Gas, and Energy (2)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (2)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (2)
- Political Science (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- State and Local Government Law (2)
- Taxation-State and Local (2)
- Water Law (2)
- Water Resource Management (2)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Problems Of Interstate Allocation Of Groundwater, Charles E. Corker
Problems Of Interstate Allocation Of Groundwater, Charles E. Corker
Groundwater: Allocation, Development and Pollution (Summer Conference, June 6-9)
41 pages.
Agenda: Groundwater: Allocation, Development And Pollution, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Agenda: Groundwater: Allocation, Development And Pollution, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Groundwater: Allocation, Development and Pollution (Summer Conference, June 6-9)
Even before the [Natural Resources Law] Center was established [in the fall of 1981], the [University of Colorado] School of Law was organizing annual natural resources law summer short courses. To date four programs have been presented:
- July 1980: "Federal Lands, Laws and Policies-and the Development of Natural Resources"
- June 1981: "Water Resources Allocation: Laws and Emerging Issues"
- June 1982: "New Sources of Water for Energy Development and Growth: lnterbasin Transfers"
- June 1983: "Groundwater: Allocation; Development and Pollution"
(Reprinted from Resource Law Notes, no. 1, Jan. 1984, at 1.)
University of Colorado School of Law professors …
Does (Did) (Should) The Exclusionary Rule Rest On A 'Principled Basis' Rather Than An 'Empirical Proposition'?, Yale Kamisar
Does (Did) (Should) The Exclusionary Rule Rest On A 'Principled Basis' Rather Than An 'Empirical Proposition'?, Yale Kamisar
Articles
[U]ntil the [exclusionary rule] rests on a principled basis rather than an empirical proposition, [the rule] will remain in a state of unstable equilibrium. Mapp v. Ohio, which overruled the then twelve-year-old Wolf case and imposed the fourth amendment exclusionary rule (the Weeks doctrine) on the states as a matter of fourteenth amendment due process, seemed to mark the end of an era. Concurring in Mapp, Justice Douglas recalled that Wolf had evoked "a storm of constitutional controversy which only today finds its end."' But in the two decades since Justice Douglas made this observation, the storm of controversy has …