Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Admissibility (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- Coercion (1)
- Confessions (1)
- Confrontation Clause (1)
-
- Crimes (1)
- Custodial interrogations (1)
- Domestic violence (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Hearsay (1)
- History (1)
- Juries (1)
- Jurors (1)
- Lilly v. Virginia (1)
- Michigan (1)
- Miranda v. Arizona (1)
- Moran v. Burbine (1)
- Narrative relevance (1)
- Old Chief v. United States (1)
- Police (1)
- Prosecutors (1)
- Recordings (1)
- Rehnquist (William) (1)
- Reliability (1)
- Searches (1)
- Seizures (1)
- Sixth Amendment (1)
- State v. Lee (1)
- Telephone calls (1)
- Testimony (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Narrative Relevance, Imagined Juries, And A Supreme Court Inspired Agenda For Jury Research, Richard O. Lempert
Narrative Relevance, Imagined Juries, And A Supreme Court Inspired Agenda For Jury Research, Richard O. Lempert
Articles
This paper has its roots in Old Chief v. United States, a case the Supreme Court of the United States decided in 1997. I will begin by describing this case; then comment on its implications for the Supreme Court’s conception of the jury, and conclude by examining the agenda one may draw from it for empirical jury research. Old Chief arose when Johnny Lynn Old Chief was charged not only with assault with a dangerous weapon and using a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence, but also with violating a law that forbids convicted felons from possessing …
Confessions, Search And Seizure, And The Rehnquist Court, Yale Kamisar
Confessions, Search And Seizure, And The Rehnquist Court, Yale Kamisar
Book Chapters
About the time William Rehnquist ascended to the Chief Justiceship of the United States, two events occurred that increased the likelihood that Miranda would enjoy a long life.
In Moran v. Burbine, a six to three majority held that a confession preceded by an otherwise valid waiver of a suspect's Miranda rights should not be excluded either (1) because the police misled an inquiring attorney when they told her they were not going to question the suspect she called about or (2) because the police failed to inform the suspect of the attorney's efforts to reach him.
Although Burbine has …
Dial-In Testimony, Richard D. Friedman, Bridget Mary Mccormack
Dial-In Testimony, Richard D. Friedman, Bridget Mary Mccormack
Articles
For several hundred years, one of the great glories of the common law system of criminal justice has been the requirement that prosecution witnesses give their testimony in the presence of the accused" face to face," in the time-honored phrase-under oath, subject to cross-examination, and, unless unfeasible, in open court. In the United States, this principle is enshrined in the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, which provides that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be confronted with the witnesses against him." But now a new way is developing for witnesses for the prosecution …