Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Federal Rules of Evidence (4)
- Admissibility (2)
- Law reform (2)
- Michigan (2)
- Presumptions (2)
-
- Burden of persuasion (1)
- Burden of proof (1)
- Civil cases (1)
- Criminal Procedure Advisory Committee (1)
- Evidence law (1)
- Expert evidence (1)
- FRE Rule 301 (1)
- Federal model (1)
- Findings of fact (1)
- Hearsay (1)
- Instructions to juries (1)
- Jury instructions (1)
- Lawyers (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Legislative drafting (1)
- Michigan Rules of Evidence (1)
- Motions in limine (1)
- Objections (1)
- Permanent Rules Advisory Committee (1)
- Presumed fact (1)
- Privileges (1)
- Proof (1)
- Relevance (1)
- Scientific evidence (1)
- Symposium (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
The Chiropractor In North Carolina: Statutory Expert Witness, Benjamin G. Alford
The Chiropractor In North Carolina: Statutory Expert Witness, Benjamin G. Alford
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1976
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1976
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Instructing The Jury Upon Presumptions In Civil Cases: Comparing Federal Rule 301 With Uniform Rule 301, Christopher B. Mueller
Instructing The Jury Upon Presumptions In Civil Cases: Comparing Federal Rule 301 With Uniform Rule 301, Christopher B. Mueller
Publications
No abstract provided.
Foreword: Should Wyoming Adopt These Rules?, Christopher B. Mueller
Foreword: Should Wyoming Adopt These Rules?, Christopher B. Mueller
Publications
No abstract provided.
Evidence Problems In Criminal Cases, John W. Reed
Evidence Problems In Criminal Cases, John W. Reed
Book Chapters
The Federal Rules of Evidence, enacted by Congress, became effective on July 1, 1975. Ten states have adopted state versions of the Federal Rules to govern trials in their courts, and about half the remaining states are considering whether to follow suit. Michigan is one of these latter states. Early in 1977 a committee appointed by the Supreme Court of Michigan proposed rules of evidence for Michigan closely patterned on the Federal Rules, and, if all goes well, the Court will promulgate rules for the Michigan courts to become effective in 1977 or soon thereafter. Michigan lawyers should be aware …
A Review Of The Proposed Michigan Rules Of Evidence, James K. Robinson, John W. Reed
A Review Of The Proposed Michigan Rules Of Evidence, James K. Robinson, John W. Reed
Articles
On January 6, 1977, the Supreme Court of Michigan entered an order stating that it is considering adoption of the proposed Michigan Rules of Evidence which were submitted to the Court by the committee which it appointed in March 1975. The Court has solicited comments from interested persons regarding the proposed rules. A copy of the Supreme Court's order is published in this issue of the Bar Journal. The proposed rules are published in the January 26, 1977, issue of North Western Reporter, Second Series (Michigan Edition). The purpose of this article is to review in general the background and …