Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- AID (1)
- Agreement (1)
- Artificial insemination (1)
- Child (1)
- Children (1)
-
- Contract law (1)
- Domestic Relations (1)
- Egg donor (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Family Law, Contract Law, Modern Contract Law, Surrogacy Contract/Agreement, Change of Heart, Unequal Power of the Contracting Parties, Changed Circumstances, Renegotiation, Unconscionability, Surrogate Mother, Motherhood, Parent-Child, Surrogacy, Intended Parent, Intentional Parenthood. (1)
- Family law (1)
- Father (1)
- Fatherhood (1)
- Forensic Science (1)
- Forensic science (1)
- Gestation (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- IVF (1)
- Individualization evidence (1)
- Innocence Project (1)
- Intended parent (1)
- Intentional parenthood (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Law and Technology (1)
- Mother (1)
- Motherhood (1)
- NAS (1)
- National Academy of Sciences (1)
- Ovum donation (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
The Rise, Fall And Rise Again Of The Genetic Foundation For Legal Parentage Determination, Yehezkel Margalit
The Rise, Fall And Rise Again Of The Genetic Foundation For Legal Parentage Determination, Yehezkel Margalit
Hezi Margalit
Recently, we have witnessed dramatic changes in the formation of the family and parenthood. One of the results of those shifts is a growing number of children growing up outside of the traditional marriage framework. Therefore, the dilemma of determining a child's parentage, which was usually resolved by a legal fiction as to the child's legal parents, is becoming increasingly problematic. It is appropriate that any discussion of the establishment of legal parentage should start with a study of the rise of the most popular modern model, the genetic model.
It is relevant to point out that from the beginning …
Will History Be Servitude?: The Nas Report On Forensic Science And The Rule Of The Judiciary, Jane Moriarty
Will History Be Servitude?: The Nas Report On Forensic Science And The Rule Of The Judiciary, Jane Moriarty
Jane Campbell Moriarty
For several decades, the prosecution and its witnesses have maintained that despite little research and virtually no standards, they can match a fingerprint, handwriting, bullet and bullet cartridge, hair, dental imprint, footprint, tire track, or even a lip print to its unique source (collectively, “individualization evidence”). Not only can they match it, they claim, they can do so often without any error rate. In the last few decades, with the help of lawyers and academics, litigants have challenged the underlying reliability of individualization evidence. Scholars in various disciplines have written about the startling state of individualization evidence, including its lack …