Environmental Law Commons^™

The Ends And Means Of Pollution Control: Toward A Positive Theory Of Environmental Law, David M. Driesen

Utah Law Review

An understanding of environmental law’s means and ends makes it possible to understand the field as a whole, both in terms of the overall structure of statutes and relationships between means and ends. This analysis of means and ends yields a host of valuable insights and significant research questions. It also provides an important foundation for evaluating proposed regulatory reforms. A reasonably complete theory, at a minimum, should also explain key features of the enforcement regime and the allocation of authority among governments. The theory of means and ends articulated here constitutes a very substantial step forward in constructing a …

Behavioral Public Choice And The Carbon Tax, Gary M. Lucas Jr.

Utah Law Review

In response to the historic Paris Agreement on climate change and to the Environmental Protection Agency’s recently finalized Clean Power Plan, economists and other climate policy experts have renewed the call for the United States to adopt a carbon tax. Opposition among the public presents a major obstacle. While a majority of the public supports government action on climate change, most people favor the use of “green” subsidies and command-and-control regulations — a fact that frustrates economists of all political stripes who contend that a carbon tax would be much cheaper and more effective. This Article argues that a cognitive …

Eliminating Passive Disposal: Equalizing Liability Among Current And Prior Owners And Operators In The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, And Liability Act Of 1980, Joe Amadon

Utah Law Review

It seems clear, through the 1986 SARA, that Congress did not want innocent parties who conducted due diligence in inspecting the land to be liable under CERCLA. Thus, expanding CERCLA’s definition of disposal to attach liability to passive conduct is inconsistent with Congress’s intent. Therefore, in order to align enforcement of CERCLA with its dual purposes and Congress’s intent in enacting the Act, disposal should be interpreted to exclude passive migration of hazardous substances when the owner or operator knows nothing of the presence of the hazardous substance that is spreading.

Debate Over Environmental Rights And State Constitutional Convention, Michael B. Gerrard, Edward Mctiernan

Faculty Scholarship

During the election on November 7, the voters in New York state will be presented with the allot question (as they are every 20 years), “Shall there be a convention to revise the constitutionand amend the same?” If the referendum passes, the delegates to the Constitutional Convention will be elected in November 2018, and the Convention’s proposed changes will appear on the ballot, most likely in November 2019.

Many issues are under debate: ethics reform, reorganizing the judiciary, voting rights, and several more. This column focuses on environmental rights.

Survey Of 2016 Cases Under New York State Environmental Quality Review Act, Michael B. Gerrard, Edward Mctiernan

Faculty Scholarship

The courts decided 46 cases in 2016 under the New York State Environ­mental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), which requires the preparation of an environmen­tal impact statement (EIS) for state or local governmental actions that could have a significant impact.

For only the second time since this annual survey began in 1991, no court overturned any agency decision where an EIS had been prepared. Eight challenges involved an EIS – all failed. In circumstances where there was no EIS, challeng­ers won four and lost 20. In sum, 2016 was a bad year for plaintiffs in SEQRA cases.

Regulating Cumulative Risk, Sanne H. Knudsen

Articles

This Article proceeds in four parts. Part I describes how cumulative risk assessments tackle the real-world exposure problems that lie at the heart of public health. It shows how risk science has evolved and why policy, not science, lags behind. Part II then examines why key public health concerns cannot be answered through information disclosure or consumer choice models alone.

Having established that regulatory drivers are needed, Part III begins to examine how to move forward. It does so by looking backward and examining how TSCA and FIFRA have failed historically to provide this critical public health focus despite room …