Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- St. Mary's University (828)
- Seattle University School of Law (186)
- Barry University School of Law (46)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (15)
- University of Colorado Law School (14)
-
- BLR (11)
- Georgetown University Law Center (9)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (7)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (6)
- New York Law School (4)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (4)
- The University of Akron (4)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (4)
- UIC School of Law (4)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (3)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- Pace University (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (3)
- Duquesne University (2)
- Georgia State University College of Law (2)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- University of Montana (2)
- Aga Khan University (1)
- American University in Cairo (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (395)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (385)
- Inc. (73)
- Student comment (46)
- Texas (39)
-
- Texas Supreme Court (34)
- Jurisprudence (27)
- Fourteenth Amendment (24)
- Law (23)
- Environmental Law (20)
- Negligence (20)
- Environmental law (19)
- First Amendment (19)
- Jr. (19)
- Texas Constitution (19)
- Due Process Clause (18)
- United States Supreme Court (18)
- Equal Protection Clause (17)
- Climate change (16)
- Due process (16)
- Legal malpractice (16)
- Sixth Amendment (16)
- Supreme Court (16)
- Constitution (15)
- Environment (15)
- Criminal law (14)
- Regulation (14)
- Constitutional Law (13)
- Constitutional law (13)
- U.S. Const. amend. XIV (13)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- St. Mary's Law Journal (828)
- Seattle University Law Review (186)
- Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ) (43)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (15)
- ExpressO (11)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (9)
- Publications (7)
- Journal of Food Law & Policy (6)
- Akron Law Review (4)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (4)
- Drafting Model Laws on Indoor Pollution for Developing and Developed Nations (July 12-13) (4)
- NYLS Law Review (4)
- Touro Law Review (4)
- UIC Law Review (4)
- Barry Law Review (3)
- Buffalo Environmental Law Journal (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Faculty Works (3)
- Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (3)
- Northwestern University Law Review (3)
- Articles (2)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (2)
- Cardozo Law Review (2)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Publications By Year (2)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (2)
- Student Works (2)
- American University International Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 931 - 960 of 1200
Full-Text Articles in Environmental Law
1989 Texas Dtpa Reform: Closing The Dtpa Loophole In The 1987 Tort Reform Laws And The Ongoing Quest For Fairer Dtpa Laws., John T. Montford, Will G. Barber, Robert L. Duncan
1989 Texas Dtpa Reform: Closing The Dtpa Loophole In The 1987 Tort Reform Laws And The Ongoing Quest For Fairer Dtpa Laws., John T. Montford, Will G. Barber, Robert L. Duncan
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Dedication., James P. White
Dedication., Sam S. Crutchfield
Commanding Respect: Criminal Sanctions For Environmental Crimes., Eva M. Fromm
Commanding Respect: Criminal Sanctions For Environmental Crimes., Eva M. Fromm
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Standards Of Appellate Review In Civil Appeals., W. Wendell Hall
Standards Of Appellate Review In Civil Appeals., W. Wendell Hall
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Punitive Damages For Breach Of Contract - A Principled Approach., Frank J. Cavico Jr.
Punitive Damages For Breach Of Contract - A Principled Approach., Frank J. Cavico Jr.
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Reasonable Belief That A Third Party Had Authority To Consent To A Search Is An Exception To The Warrant Requirement., S. Jeffrey Gately
A Reasonable Belief That A Third Party Had Authority To Consent To A Search Is An Exception To The Warrant Requirement., S. Jeffrey Gately
St. Mary's Law Journal
In Illinois v. Rodriguez, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether a warrantless search is valid when police rely on consent of a third party whom they reasonably believe had common authority over an area but does not. A reasonable belief that a third party had authority to consent to a search is an exception to the warrant requirement. The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects people and their possessions by prohibiting unreasonable searches by government authorities. Although this protection extends to any place where a person may claim a reasonable expectation of privacy, it especially protects …
Under The Boren Amendment, Health Care Providers Have An Enforceable Right, Actionable Under 42 U.S.C. 1983, To Challenge A State's Reimbursement Plan Under The Medicaid Act., C. Lee Cusenbary
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Allowing A Child Abuse Victim To Testify Via One-Way Closed-Circuit Television Does Not Violate A Criminal Defendant's Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause Right If The Trial Court Specifically Finds Such A Procedure Necessary To Protect The Child's Welfare., Lisa R. Miller
St. Mary's Law Journal
In Maryland v. Craig, the Supreme Court held allowing child abuse victims to testify via one-way closed-circuit television does not violate a criminal defendant’s Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause right if the trial court finds the procedure necessary to protect the child’s welfare. Although “confront” has generally been interpreted to mean “face-to-face,” on occasion, it may yield to public policy considerations and the compelling necessities of particular cases. The original purpose of the confrontation right was to prevent the accusers in a criminal proceeding from using ex parte affidavits or depositions against a defendant, in lieu of personal testimony. The Craig …
Organizational Standing In Environmental Litigation, Jeanne A. Compitello
Organizational Standing In Environmental Litigation, Jeanne A. Compitello
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Benign Classification Based On Race Must Be Narrowly Tailored To Achieve A Compelling Governmental Interest., Martha J. Hess
Benign Classification Based On Race Must Be Narrowly Tailored To Achieve A Compelling Governmental Interest., Martha J. Hess
St. Mary's Law Journal
In City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., the Supreme Court held a minority business utilization plan (Richmond Plan) was violative of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. The Richmond Plan required all builders awarded city construction contracts to subcontract, at minimum, 30% of the contract value to Minority Business Enterprises. A state government enacting legislation that burdens one class of persons and benefits a similarly-situated class must provide sufficient justification for its action to survive equal protection analysis. When distinction is based on race or national origin—classes considered inherently suspect—a reviewing court subjects the governmental legislation to strict scrutiny, …
The Original Intent Of The Education Article Of The Texas Constitution., Mikal Watts, Brad Rockwell
The Original Intent Of The Education Article Of The Texas Constitution., Mikal Watts, Brad Rockwell
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Current Procedures For Performing Meaningful Discussions In Federal Negotiated Procurements Are Uneconomical, Inefficient, And Ineffective - A Proposal For Improvement., Howard L. Speight
Current Procedures For Performing Meaningful Discussions In Federal Negotiated Procurements Are Uneconomical, Inefficient, And Ineffective - A Proposal For Improvement., Howard L. Speight
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Nonparties To Employment Discrimination Consent Decrees May Attack, In A Collateral Lawsuit, Decisions Made Pursuant To The Decrees., Michael T. Larkin
Nonparties To Employment Discrimination Consent Decrees May Attack, In A Collateral Lawsuit, Decisions Made Pursuant To The Decrees., Michael T. Larkin
St. Mary's Law Journal
In Martin v. Wilks, the United States Supreme Court held nonparties to employment discrimination consent decrees may attack, in a collateral lawsuit, decisions made pursuant to the decrees. A consent decree is a voluntary judgment between parties which facilitates settlement of litigation by providing one party with equitable relief. Courts retain jurisdiction over parties to a consent decree, and they can issue contempt orders to parties violating the terms of the decree. Unlike judgments, the parties cannot challenge the consent decrees, except in limited circumstances. Recently, federal courts have widened the scope of preclusion law by defining the term “claim” …
Pitfalls Of Public Policy: The Case Of Arbitration Agreements., Jeffrey W. Stempel
Pitfalls Of Public Policy: The Case Of Arbitration Agreements., Jeffrey W. Stempel
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Preface, Charles F. Wilkinson
Limitation Of Liability Of Limited Partners While Affording Control Of Partnership Affairs To Limited Partners., Kenneth L. Bennight Jr., Troy (Trey) S. Martin Iii
Limitation Of Liability Of Limited Partners While Affording Control Of Partnership Affairs To Limited Partners., Kenneth L. Bennight Jr., Troy (Trey) S. Martin Iii
St. Mary's Law Journal
This article examines the liability provisions of the Texas Revised Act Section 3.03 and compares it with other uniform limited partnership acts. It attempts to ascertain the amount of control a limited partner can exercise over the partnership without risking unlimited liability as a general partner. Limited partners invest capital and share in the profits of the business, but their liability is limited to the amount of capital they invest. If the limited partners exercise control over the business, however, the limited partners may forfeit their limited liability and become liable as general partners. In the last century, the law …
Protecting The Fetus From Maternal Drug And Alcohol Abuse: A Proposal For Texas., Tom Rickhoff, Curtis L. Cukjati
Protecting The Fetus From Maternal Drug And Alcohol Abuse: A Proposal For Texas., Tom Rickhoff, Curtis L. Cukjati
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
You Should See Your Irs File: Access To Irs Information - What Are A Taxpayer's Rights., Richard J. Wood
You Should See Your Irs File: Access To Irs Information - What Are A Taxpayer's Rights., Richard J. Wood
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Estate Planning For The Non-Taxable Estate., Mcken V. Carrington
Estate Planning For The Non-Taxable Estate., Mcken V. Carrington
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Government Regulations Authorizing M.Andatory Alcohol And Drug Testing Of Private Railroad Employees On Less Than Individualized Suspicion To Enhance Safety Are Constitutional, Keith Dorsett
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
42 U.S.C. 1981 Does Not Provide A Remedy For Racial Harassment During Employment., Jeffrey A. Lacy
42 U.S.C. 1981 Does Not Provide A Remedy For Racial Harassment During Employment., Jeffrey A. Lacy
St. Mary's Law Journal
In Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, the United States Supreme Court held 42 U.S.C. § 1981 does not provide a remedy for racial harassment during employment. In 1976, in Runyon v. McCrary, the Court expanded the scope of § 1981 to cover private discrimination in contractual settings, including racial discrimination in private schools, when previously unavailable. More than a decade after the Runyon decision, the Supreme Court in Patterson, established that there were limits to § 1981’s applicability in private racial discrimination claims. Specifically, the Court held while § 1981 prohibits discriminatory conduct while entering into or enforcing a contract, …
Dtpa In The Courts: Two Empirical Studies And A Proposal For Change., Nancy Friedman Atlas, Scott J. Atlas, Raymond T. Nimmer
Dtpa In The Courts: Two Empirical Studies And A Proposal For Change., Nancy Friedman Atlas, Scott J. Atlas, Raymond T. Nimmer
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Recognizing An Implied Warranty That Professional Services Will Be Performed In A Good And Workmanlike Manner., Mark L. Kincaid
Recognizing An Implied Warranty That Professional Services Will Be Performed In A Good And Workmanlike Manner., Mark L. Kincaid
St. Mary's Law Journal
Although the Court received a deluge of amicus curiae briefs after its initial ruling in Melody Home ushering the Court to reevaluate the consequences of its decision, there is no sound basis for excluding professional services from the implied warranty recognized by the Texas Supreme Court that services will be performed in a good and workmanlike manner. The issue of what is properly considered a “professional” service or what definition is to be applied to distinguish “non-professional” and “professional” services if the latter were to be excluded from the implied warranty. Instead of differentiating between “non-professional” and “professional” services in …
Personal Injury Actions Under The Dtpa., Paul N. Gold, George (Tex) Quesada
Personal Injury Actions Under The Dtpa., Paul N. Gold, George (Tex) Quesada
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Texas Disciplinary Rules Of Professional Conduct: Additional Liability For Texas Lawyers., Xavier G. Medina, Virginia Coyle
Texas Disciplinary Rules Of Professional Conduct: Additional Liability For Texas Lawyers., Xavier G. Medina, Virginia Coyle
St. Mary's Law Journal
As a result of the enactment of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct (“Rules”), Texas lawyer no longer practice under guidelines which include aspirational goals and discretionary moral choices. The Rules are mandatory in nature and depict a minimum standard of professional conduct which, if violated, could subject the offending lawyer to disciplinary action. Although the Rules provide a disclaimer stating that they “do not undertake to define standards of civil liability of lawyers for professional conduct,” Texas lawyers fear the Rules will be utilized as an independent basis for liability, or a standard of care for malpractice. The …
Dedication., Ernest A. Raba
Dedication., Orville C. Walker
Dedication., Jack Pope