Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (211)
- American University Washington College of Law (181)
- University of Colorado Law School (112)
- University of Montana (86)
- Pace University (41)
-
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (36)
- Fordham Law School (30)
- BLR (25)
- Florida State University College of Law (22)
- William & Mary Law School (18)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (18)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (15)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (13)
- Brooklyn Law School (12)
- Georgetown University Law Center (12)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (12)
- University of Michigan Law School (12)
- Roger Williams University (11)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (11)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (10)
- Columbia Law School (9)
- Suffolk University (9)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (8)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (8)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (8)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (7)
- University of Maine School of Law (6)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (5)
- University of Georgia School of Law (5)
- Duke Law (4)
- Keyword
-
- Environmental law (68)
- Environmental Law (59)
- Constitutional Law (54)
- Climate change (50)
- United States (40)
-
- Public lands (37)
- Natural resources (35)
- Constitutional law (30)
- Colorado (27)
- Federalism (27)
- BLM (26)
- Congress (26)
- Constitution (25)
- EPA (25)
- Environment (25)
- Clean Water Act (24)
- Public land law (24)
- FLPMA (23)
- Fifth Amendment (23)
- Law (23)
- U.S. Bureau of Land Management (23)
- California (22)
- Natural resources law (22)
- Administrative Law (21)
- Land use (21)
- Standing (21)
- Supreme Court (21)
- Legislation (20)
- Takings (20)
- Commerce Clause (19)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (196)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (176)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (83)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (34)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (30)
-
- The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (28)
- ExpressO (23)
- Faculty Scholarship (22)
- Water as a Public Resource: Emerging Rights and Obligations (Summer Conference, June 1-3) (21)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (19)
- Florida State University Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law (18)
- Western Water Law in Transition (Summer Conference, June 3-5) (18)
- American Indian Law Journal (14)
- Faculty Publications (14)
- Pace Environmental Law Review (13)
- The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (13)
- Federal Lands, Laws and Policies and the Development of Natural Resources: A Short Course (Summer Conference, July 28-August 1) (12)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (11)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (11)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (10)
- William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review (10)
- Journal Publications (9)
- Suffolk University Law School Faculty Works (9)
- Publications (8)
- Touro Law Review (8)
- Northwestern University Law Review (7)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (7)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (5)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (5)
- Buffalo Environmental Law Journal (5)
- Publication Type
Articles 841 - 870 of 1049
Full-Text Articles in Environmental Law
The "Benefits" Of Non-Delegation: Using The Non-Delegation Doctrine To Bring More Rigor To Benefit-Cost Analysis, Victor B. Flatt
The "Benefits" Of Non-Delegation: Using The Non-Delegation Doctrine To Bring More Rigor To Benefit-Cost Analysis, Victor B. Flatt
ExpressO
This article examines the problems of benefit-cost (or cost-benefit) analysis in our regulatory system and posits that a more nuanced version of the “non-delegation” doctrine (made famous in Schechter Poultry) could improve many of the problems associated with the use of benefit-cost analysis. In particular this article notes that many of the problems with benefit-cost analysis are its use by agencies to make large policy decisions, which could be characterized as legislative. The article also notes that though the “non-delegation” doctrine may appear to be dead or dormant, that a form of it, in separation of powers doctrine, exists in …
Bond Repudiation, Tax Codes, The Appropriations Process And Restitution Post-Eminent Domain Reform, John H. Ryskamp
Bond Repudiation, Tax Codes, The Appropriations Process And Restitution Post-Eminent Domain Reform, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
This brief comment suggests where the anti-eminent domain movement might be heading next.
Statutes Of Repose And The Equal Protection Clause Of The 14th Amendment Of The U.S. Constitution, Garris G. Ference
Statutes Of Repose And The Equal Protection Clause Of The 14th Amendment Of The U.S. Constitution, Garris G. Ference
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
A Modern Disaster: Agricultural Land, Urban Growth, And The Need For A Federally Organized Comprehensive Land Use Planning Model, Jess M. Krannich
A Modern Disaster: Agricultural Land, Urban Growth, And The Need For A Federally Organized Comprehensive Land Use Planning Model, Jess M. Krannich
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Finding New Constitutional Rights Through The Supreme Court’S Evolving “Government Purpose” Test Under Minimum Scrutiny, John H. Ryskamp
Finding New Constitutional Rights Through The Supreme Court’S Evolving “Government Purpose” Test Under Minimum Scrutiny, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
By now we all are familiar with the litany of cases which refused to find elevated scrutiny for so-called “affirmative” or “social” rights such as education, welfare or housing: Lindsey v. Normet, San Antonio School District v. Rodriguez, Dandridge v. Williams, DeShaney v. Winnebago County. There didn’t seem to be anything in minimum scrutiny which could protect such facts as education or housing, from government action. However, unobtrusively and over the years, the Supreme Court has clarified and articulated one aspect of minimum scrutiny which holds promise for vindicating facts. You will recall that under minimum scrutiny government’s action is …
Using Capture Theory And Chronology In Eminent Domain Proceedings, John H. Ryskamp
Using Capture Theory And Chronology In Eminent Domain Proceedings, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
Capture theory--in which private purpose is substituted for government purpose--sheds light on a technique which is coming into greater use post-Kelo v. New London. That case affirmed that eminent domain use need only be rationally related to a legitimate government purpose. Capture theory focuses litigators' attention on "government purpose." That is a question of fact for the trier of fact. This article shows how to use civil discovery in order to show the Court that private purpose has been substituted for government purpose. If it has, the eminent domain use fails, because the use does not meet minimum scrutiny. This …
Congress' Pet: Why The Clean Air Act’S Favoritism Of California Is Unconstitutional Under The Equal Footing Doctrine , Valerie Jm Brader
Congress' Pet: Why The Clean Air Act’S Favoritism Of California Is Unconstitutional Under The Equal Footing Doctrine , Valerie Jm Brader
ExpressO
The Clean Air Act gives two regulatory powers to one state – California – that it forbids to all others: the power to regulate fuels, and the power to regulate motor vehicle construction. This paper makes the novel argument that by creating a differential in power between the states, these provisions violate the equal footing doctrine, and are therefore unconstitutional. In doing so, it is the first law review article to provide a complete history of the doctrine, a foundational principle that pre-dates the Constitution and remains the law of the land today. Though the doctrine has been relegated to …
Regulatory Reform: The New Lochnerism?, David M. Driesen
Regulatory Reform: The New Lochnerism?, David M. Driesen
ExpressO
This article explores the question of whether contemporary regulatory reformers’ attitudes toward government regulation have anything in common with those of the Lochner-era Court. It finds that both groups tend to favor value neutral law guided by cost-benefit analysis over legislative value choices. Their skepticism toward redistributive legislation reflects shared beliefs that regulation often proves counterproductive in terms of its own objectives, fails demanding tests for rationality, and violates the natural order. This parallelism raises fresh questions about claims of neutrality and heightened rationality that serve as important justifications modern regulatory reform.
The Green Costs Of Kelo: Economic Development Takings And Environmental Protection, Jonathan H. Adler
The Green Costs Of Kelo: Economic Development Takings And Environmental Protection, Jonathan H. Adler
Faculty Publications
This Article is the first academic paper to systematically consider the environmental impact of the Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. City of New London and of economic development condemnations more generally. Kelo upheld economic development takings - condemnations that transfer property from one private owner to another solely on the ground that doing so might improve the local economy or increase tax revenue. The decision stands in sharp contrast to the Michigan Supreme Court's ruling in County of Wayne v. Hathcock, which forbade the use of eminent domain for economic development.
Part I briefly explains the rationales of the …
Prudential Standing And The Dormant Commerce Clause: Why The 'Zone Of Interests' Test Should Not Apply To Constitutional Cases, Bradford Mank
Prudential Standing And The Dormant Commerce Clause: Why The 'Zone Of Interests' Test Should Not Apply To Constitutional Cases, Bradford Mank
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
In a unique decision, the Fifth Circuit in National Solid Waste Management Ass'n v. Pine Belt Regional Solid Waste Management Authority (NSWMA) used the prudential zone of interests standing test to bar the plaintiffs, who met constitutional standing requirements, from filing a facial, per se challenge under the dormant Commerce Clause. Six Mississippi counties and cities that are members of the Pine Belt Regional Solid Waste Management Authority (the Authority) had enacted flow control ordinances that required all solid waste collected in their six jurisdictions be sent to the Authority's facilities, and, thus, prohibited the export of waste to alternative, …
When Is Two A Crowd: The Impact Of Federal Action On State Environmental Regulation, Jonathan H. Adler
When Is Two A Crowd: The Impact Of Federal Action On State Environmental Regulation, Jonathan H. Adler
Faculty Publications
This article seeks to identify the ways in which federal actions can influence state regulatory choices in the context of environmental policy. The federal government may directly influence state policy choices by preempting state policies or by inducing state cooperation through the use of various incentives and penalties for state action. The federal government may indirectly, and perhaps unintentionally, influence state policy choices as well. Federal policies may encourage greater state regulation by reducing the costs of initiating regulatory action or by placing issues on state policy agendas. Federal regulation may also discourage or even "crowd-out" state-level regulatory action by …
An Unfair Advantage: Comparing The International Court Of Justice To A Form Of Adr And Why It Was Inappropriate For The Court To Issue An Advisory Opinion In The Case Of Israel's Separation Fence, Mimi Trenk
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Note will begin with a concise background of the ArabIsraeli conflict. It will then explain the three arguments presented to the Court as to why it should have declined to exercise jurisdiction and the Court's response. It will explore the similarities of non-binding arbitration, as a form of alternative dispute resolution, and the Advisory Opinion. It will then examine whether, in the interests of justice, it was appropriate for the Court to issue the opinion, even though it is considered to be non-binding. This Note will examine the Israeli Supreme Court as the proper forum to enforce the rights …
Endangered Statute - The Current Assault On The Endangered Species Act, Philip Weinberg
Endangered Statute - The Current Assault On The Endangered Species Act, Philip Weinberg
Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )
No abstract provided.
Aboriginal Title And Oceans Policy In Canada, Diana Ginn
Aboriginal Title And Oceans Policy In Canada, Diana Ginn
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
The Oceans Act of Canada sets out a broad framework for the unified management of Canada’s oceans based on an ecosystem approach. In particular, the Oceans Act calls on the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans to lead and facilitate the development of a national strategy to guide the management of Canada’s estuarine, coastal and marine ecosystems. The Oceans Act also reflects awareness that aboriginal rights may affect the development or implementation of policy surrounding oceans management. For example, s. 2(1) of the Act states that “. . . nothing in this Act shall be construed so as to abrogate or …
The Dual Model Of Balancing: A Model For The Proper Scope Of Balancing In Constitutional Law, Iddo Porat
The Dual Model Of Balancing: A Model For The Proper Scope Of Balancing In Constitutional Law, Iddo Porat
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments In The Law Of The "Taking Issue", John C. Keene
Recent Developments In The Law Of The "Taking Issue", John C. Keene
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Are Property Owners Constitutionally Entitled To Compensation For Environmental Remediation Funds?, Andrew Hysell
Are Property Owners Constitutionally Entitled To Compensation For Environmental Remediation Funds?, Andrew Hysell
Buffalo Environmental Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Rhode Island Court Resolves Palazzolo, Jonathan Lew
Rhode Island Court Resolves Palazzolo, Jonathan Lew
Sea Grant Law Fellow Publications
No abstract provided.
Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor
Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Facing A Hobson's Choice? The Constitutionality Of The Epa's Administrative Compliance Order Enforcement Scheme Under The Clean Air Act, Christopher M. Wynn
Facing A Hobson's Choice? The Constitutionality Of The Epa's Administrative Compliance Order Enforcement Scheme Under The Clean Air Act, Christopher M. Wynn
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Interstate Commerce And Interstate Endangered Species: The Controversy And The Need For Compromise, Paul Ziel
Interstate Commerce And Interstate Endangered Species: The Controversy And The Need For Compromise, Paul Ziel
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
Water Justice In South Africa: Natural Resources Policy At The Intersection Of Human Rights, Economics, & Political Power, Rose Francis
Water Justice In South Africa: Natural Resources Policy At The Intersection Of Human Rights, Economics, & Political Power, Rose Francis
ExpressO
This paper analyzes water as a social justice issue in South Africa, a nation that has undergone tremendous political and legal transformations over the last fifteen years, but whose population nonetheless continues to suffer from severe inequities in access to freshwater resources. In light of growing water scarcity worldwide, this paper highlights that legal treatment of water resources has significant socioeconomic and distributive justice impacts, even in progressive constitutional democracies that have embraced principles of human rights and international legal norms. The paper explores historical changes in South African water law and evaluates the current political and legal status of …
Obligations Of State And Non-State Actors Regarding The Human Right To Water Under The South African Constitution, Anna R. Welch
Obligations Of State And Non-State Actors Regarding The Human Right To Water Under The South African Constitution, Anna R. Welch
Sustainable Development Law & Policy
No abstract provided.
The Constitutional Right To Water In Uruguay, Rachael Moshman
The Constitutional Right To Water In Uruguay, Rachael Moshman
Sustainable Development Law & Policy
No abstract provided.
Judicial Federalism And The Future Of Federal Environmental Regulation, Jonathan H. Adler
Judicial Federalism And The Future Of Federal Environmental Regulation, Jonathan H. Adler
Faculty Publications
This article assesses the current and likely impact of the Supreme Court's federalism cases on federal environmental regulation. As a result of this assessment, the article seeks to make four points: (1) Thus far, the Supreme Court's federalism cases have had a limited impact on federal regulation, as federal courts have not used these cases as a basis for limiting the reach of federal regulatory authority. (2) Notwithstanding this limited impact, the underlying logic of the Supreme Court's cases does pose a challenge for federal regulation, particularly in the Commerce Clause context. (3) The thrust of the federalism cases makes …
Jurisdictional Mismatch In Environmental Federalism, Jonathan H. Adler
Jurisdictional Mismatch In Environmental Federalism, Jonathan H. Adler
Faculty Publications
Jurisdictional mismatch plagues contemporary environmental law and policy. The division of authority and responsibility for environmental protection between the federal and state governments lacks any cohesive rationale or justification. The federal government regulates in many areas where there is no clear analytical basis for federal involvement. At the same time, the federal government is relatively absent where a stronger federal presence could be justified. Conversely, states are precluded, discouraged or otherwise inhibited from adopting environmental protections where state efforts would be worthwhile. At the same time, state intervention seeps into areas where a dominant federal role would be more defensible. …
Human Nature, The Laws Of Nature, And The Nature Of Environmental Law, Richard J. Lazarus
Human Nature, The Laws Of Nature, And The Nature Of Environmental Law, Richard J. Lazarus
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The essay is divided into three parts. Part I considers the ways in which the need for environmental law derives from the tendency of human nature to cause adverse environmental consequences and the ways in which the laws of nature make it more difficult to prevent those consequences absent the imposition of external legal rules. Part II describes how our nation's lawmaking institutions are similarly challenged by the laws of nature. This includes a discussion of how the kinds of laws necessary to bridge the gap between human nature and the laws of nature are systematically difficult for our lawmaking …
The Manacled Octopus: The Unitary Executive And Epa Enforcement Involving Federal Agencies, William C. Tucker
The Manacled Octopus: The Unitary Executive And Epa Enforcement Involving Federal Agencies, William C. Tucker
Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )
No abstract provided.
Congress, Cave Bugs, Courts And The Commerce Clause: Did The Fifth Circuit Figure Out How To Regulate Intrastate Activity Under The Endangered Species Act, John Gregory Koch
Congress, Cave Bugs, Courts And The Commerce Clause: Did The Fifth Circuit Figure Out How To Regulate Intrastate Activity Under The Endangered Species Act, John Gregory Koch
Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )
No abstract provided.
Law, Geography And Cyberspace: The Case Of On-Line Territorial Privacy, Daniel Benoliel
Law, Geography And Cyberspace: The Case Of On-Line Territorial Privacy, Daniel Benoliel
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
Territorial privacy, one of the central categories of privacy protection, involves setting limit boundaries on intrusion into an explicit space or locale. Initially, the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which defined the privacy tort of intrusion as applied by courts, most notably designated two classes of excluded areas: "private" places in which the individual can expect to be free from intrusion, and "non-private" places, in which the individual does not have a recognized expectation of privacy. In the physical world, courts ultimately held, almost uniformly, that the tort of intrusion could not occur in a public place or in a place …