Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons^™

"Disillusioned Words Like Bullets Bark": Incitement To Genocide, Music, And The Trial Of Simon Bikindi, Robert H. Snyder

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

Simply A Dress Rehearsal? U.S. Olympic Sports Arbitration And De Novo Review At The Court Of Arbitration For Sport, Maureen A. Weston

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

Making The Game Beautiful Again: Lessons From Brazil Provide A Roadmap For Rebuilding Soccer In Nigeria, John Cates

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

Bcs Europa: An Analysis Of The Bowl Championship Series Under The European Commission White Paper On Sport, Deanna Brock

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

Moving All-In With The World Trade Organization: Ignoring Adverse Rulings And Gambling With The Future Of The Wto, Paul Rothstein

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

Who Let The Dogs Out: Should A Stadium Owner Be Held Liable For Injuries Sustained From A Mascot's Errant Hot Dog Toss?, Joshua D. Winneker, David Gargone, Sam C. Ehrlich

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

An Inside Look At The World Of Agents: Past Present, And Future: Panels 1 & 3, Andrew Brandt, David Cornwell, David Feher, Tom Condon

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

The Narrowest And Most Obvious Limits: Applying Fair Use To Appropriation Art Economically Using A Royalty System, Brittani Everson

Catholic University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Into The Wild: Can Regulation Of Wilderness Recreational Activities Improve Safety And Reduce Search And Rescue Incidents?, Anne Villella, T.K. Keen

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Score A Touchdown, Kiss Your Tattoo, And Get Sued For Copyright Infringement?, Darren A. Heitner, Alan Wilmot

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Fumble! How The North Carolina Courts Dropped The Ball In Mcadoo V. University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill, Katherine D. Tohanczyn

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Where Is The Awareness In Concussion Awareness: Can Concussed Players Really Assume The Risk In A Concussed State?, Heather Macgillivray

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Stepping Up To The Plate: Can The City Of San Jose Overcome Baseball's Antitrust Exemption?, John Becker

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Bargaining For The Next Gay Player: How Can Jason Collins Help To Develop The National Basketball Association Into A More Inclusive Workplace?, Timothy Galaz

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Official Timeout On The Field: Critics Have Thrown A Red Flag And Are Challenging The Nfl's Tax-Exempt Status, Calling For It To Be Revoked, Christian Schmed

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Throwing The Red Flag: Why The Nfl Should Challenge The Ruling On The Field That Player Decertification Lowers The Antitrust Shield, Alexandra Hayes

University of Miami Business Law Review

No abstract provided.

Breaking Bad: An Examination Of The Ncaa's Investigation Practices Over The Last Forty Years, Ryan Appel

University of Miami Business Law Review

No abstract provided.

Padres Players Arbitration Results, Edmund P. Edmonds

Team - Player Results

No abstract provided.

Mlb Team Arbitration Results, Edmund P. Edmonds

Team Hearing Charts

No abstract provided.

Goldberg, Matt Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

San Diego Padres Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Team Hearing Charts

No abstract provided.

Gold, Marlene Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Sands, John Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

The Anti-Competitive Music Industry And The Case For Compulsory Licensing In The Digital Distribution Of Music, Ankur Srivastava

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Is Cricket Taxing? The Taxation Of Cricket Players In India, Rishi Shroff

Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum

This Essay examines the taxation of crickets in the context of Indian law. It examines the concept of non-resident “star” companies created by Indian cricketers as a mechanism to avoid the taxation of their global income in India.

Protecting A Celebrity’S Child From Harassment: Is California’S Amendment Penal Code § 11414 Too Vague To Be Constitutional?, Michelle N. Robinson

Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum

This Note will describe a brief history of the legal attempts to restrict the paparazzi and the legislative history behind A.B. 3592 and its amendment, S.B. 606. The bills are controversial and have received a significant amount of criticism, due to the fact that they restrict speech by essentially prohibiting paparazzi, known for their harassing behavior, from taking pictures of the children of celebrities. The Note will conclude with an analysis utilizing the void-for-vagueness doctrine of whether the bill is in violation of the First Amendment.

The Copyright Infringement Test: A New Approach To Literary Misappropriation In Film, Rikki Bahar

Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum

This Note argues that courts’ emphasis on the ordinary observer test to prove illicit copying in film is misguided. The ordinary observer test relies on whether the accused work captures the total feel of the copyrighted work, but overlooks an essential aspect of unlawful appropriation and copyright law – the idea that only particular elements of a work are copyrightable. If a jury is exposed to expert testimony regarding probative similarity before making their evaluation, it is unlikely they will forget such evidence when evaluating the illicit copying.

A better test for infringement would be one that allows the ordinary …

Let’S Talk About Sex: How Societal Value Evolution Has Redefined Obscenity, Kamilah Mitchell

Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum

This Note seeks to examine the evolution of sex and sexuality in the media, by critically examining how the prevalence of sex and more recently the prevalence of topics and issues related to sexuality in television, literature, electronic media, and art have and continue to impact societal views and notions on obscenity. This Note will also examine the Miller test for obscenity, and the long term effects of societal value evolution on the application of the Miller test. This Note concludes by positing that at some point, the line between what is deemed sexually offensive and what is socially acceptable …

Cash From Chaos: Sound Recording Authorship, Section 203 Recapture Rights And A New Wave Of Termination, Hector Martinez

Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum

The thesis of this Article is that under an exclusive recording agreement entered into in the United States between a record label and recording artist on or after January 1, 1978, any key member of recording artist that signed the recording contract is a bona fide author of a sound recording for purposes of claiming standing in order to effectuate a termination of transfer of grant under Section 203 of the 1976 Copyright Act.

Part I will summarize the history of sound recordings as copyrightable subject matter. Part II will examine record industry custom and practice as it relates to …

Banksy Got Back? Problems With Chains Of Unauthorized Derivative Works And Arrangements In Cover Songs Under A Compulsory License, Matthew A. Eller

Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum

This Article will analyze the scope of copyright ownership in relation to chains of unauthorized derivative works and chains of arrangement rights in cover versions of musical recordings. In particular, the analysis will focus on the gray area in the law where an unauthorized derivative work (“D1”) is created by an author and another author creates a second derivative work (“D2”) based off of D1. In situations such as these, does the creator of the original derivative work have any rights in their creation if their derivative work was unauthorized?

Further, depending on what rights do exist for D1, can …